Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (188)
- UIC School of Law (38)
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- University of Colorado Law School (21)
- Cornell University Law School (10)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- New York Law School (6)
- BLR (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Employment discrimination (28)
- Litigation (18)
- Discrimination (16)
- Employment law (13)
- Title VII (13)
-
- Law (12)
- Civil rights (10)
- Employment (10)
- United States Supreme Court (9)
- Arbitration (7)
- Civil procedure (7)
- Employee (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Summary judgment (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Courts (6)
- ESG (6)
- Employment Practice (6)
- Evidence (6)
- Labor Law (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Women (6)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (5)
- Class actions (5)
- Class certification (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Contracts (5)
- Dispute Resolution (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Economics (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (187)
- UIC Law Review (38)
- Publications (21)
- Michigan Law Review (19)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
-
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- ExpressO (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- Brooklyn Law Review (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Proxy (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- Texas A&M Law Review (2)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (2)
- 2021–2022 Flyers (1)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 391
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Reconciling The Age Discrimination In Employment Act And Federalism-Constitutional Balancing Or Judicial Sleight Of Hand: Eeoc V. Wyoming, Jeffrey B. Hays
Reconciling The Age Discrimination In Employment Act And Federalism-Constitutional Balancing Or Judicial Sleight Of Hand: Eeoc V. Wyoming, Jeffrey B. Hays
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notice To Class Members Under The Fair Labor Standards Act Representative Action Provision, Thomas Ashby
Notice To Class Members Under The Fair Labor Standards Act Representative Action Provision, Thomas Ashby
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Federal courts currently apply different standards concerning the permissibility of notice. Although the Ninth Circuit forbids notice and the Seventh Circuit grants plaintiffs a right to send notice, the Second Circuit permits notice only in appropriate cases. This Note advocates that plaintiffs in FLSA and ADEA actions should be allowed to notify potential class members in appropriate cases. Part I analyzes inherent court powers, statutes, legislative history, and federal policies relating to notice. It concludes that enactment of FLSA and ADEA remedies did not alter the inherent power of federal courts to permit or prohibit notice. On the contrary, only …
Right To Sue Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act - The Employee Deischarged For Regusal To Participate In The Anitcompetivie Practices Of His Employer: Bichan V. Chemetron Corp. Examined In Light Of Blue Shield V. Mcready, Ralph N. Bryson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statutory And Common Law Considerations In Defining The Tort Liability Of Public Employee Unions To Private Citizens For Damages Inflicted By Illegal Strikes, Michigan Law Review
Statutory And Common Law Considerations In Defining The Tort Liability Of Public Employee Unions To Private Citizens For Damages Inflicted By Illegal Strikes, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that in the absence of any clear indication that the legislature intended to bar such suits, courts should uphold private actions whenever plaintiffs can establish the elements of a common-law tort. Part I briefly outlines the various theories supporting the view that public sector collective bargaining statutes preempt private actions. The analysis is necessarily general, but Part I concludes that in most cases neither the language and structure of the applicable statute nor an analogy to federal labor law will resolve the preemption question. Part II, therefore, looks to the policies that animate no-strike provisions and argues …
Survey Of Developments In The Fourth Circuit: 1981
Survey Of Developments In The Fourth Circuit: 1981
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Norris V. Arizona Governing Committee: Titile Vii's Applicability To Arizona's Deferred Compensation Plan, Mary E. Berkheiser
Norris V. Arizona Governing Committee: Titile Vii's Applicability To Arizona's Deferred Compensation Plan, Mary E. Berkheiser
Scholarly Works
Analysis of Norris v. Arizona Governing Comm., 671 F.2d 330 (9th Cir. 1982).
The Proper Role Of Res Judicata And Collateral Estoppel In Title Vii Suits, Charles C. Jackson, John H. Matheson, Thomas J. Pikorski
The Proper Role Of Res Judicata And Collateral Estoppel In Title Vii Suits, Charles C. Jackson, John H. Matheson, Thomas J. Pikorski
Michigan Law Review
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclusion principles unless Congress clearly indicates otherwise. Part II considers a number of indicators of Congress's intent, and finds no evidence to rebut the presumption that federal courts must give preclusive weight to certain state decisions. Part III then proposes general guidelines for the application of preclusion doctrines in title VII litigation.
A Lawyer's Medical Guide To Black Lung Litigation, N. Leroy Lapp M.D.
A Lawyer's Medical Guide To Black Lung Litigation, N. Leroy Lapp M.D.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Basics Of Federal Black Lung Litigation, Samuel J. Smith, Ford F. Newman
The Basics Of Federal Black Lung Litigation, Samuel J. Smith, Ford F. Newman
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In The Fourth Circuit: 1980
Survey Of Developments In The Fourth Circuit: 1980
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Tentative Settlement Class And Class Action Suits Under Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act, Michigan Law Review
The Tentative Settlement Class And Class Action Suits Under Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note will examine the potential utility of a tentative settlement class (TSC) in suits initiated under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The advantages and disadvantages of the TSC will be discussed in the context of analyzing whether the use of a TSC is valid under rules 23(a) and 23(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The discussion of the merits of the TSC in the title VII context will illustrate the problems inherent in the use of a tentative class for encouraging settlements of any class action.
Litigation Versus Mediation Under Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Litigation Versus Mediation Under Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
Report of the 1969 Proceedings of the Section of Labor Relations Law, American Bar Association.
Labor Law--Res Judicata--The Applicability Of Res Judicata And Collateral Estoppel To Actions Brought Under Section 8(B) (4) Of The National Labor Relations Act, Michigan Law Review
Labor Law--Res Judicata--The Applicability Of Res Judicata And Collateral Estoppel To Actions Brought Under Section 8(B) (4) Of The National Labor Relations Act, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note is concerned primarily with the possibility of granting preclusive effect to the Board's determination of the issue of union liability under the section 8(b)(4) charge. Since traditional collateral estoppel principles must be adapted somewhat when applied to the Board's procedures, the preclusive effect given to the prior determination of liability will be referred to simply as "estoppel" in order to avoid confusion with the doctrine of collateral estoppel as it was developed in the courts.
Punitive Damages: Punishment Of An Insured Defendant?, Carroway V. Johnson, Kenneth Lasson
Punitive Damages: Punishment Of An Insured Defendant?, Carroway V. Johnson, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries sustained in an automobile collision and was awarded a judgment in the amount of $5,000 actual damages and $1,500 punitive damages. The defendant's insurance company had refused to defend her in that action or to pay the judgment obtained, relying upon an employee exclusion clause in the policy. The plaintiff thereupon sued the defendant on the judgment, this time joining the insurer as a co-defendant, and won a verdict to recover against the insurer the aforesaid amount. The insurance company appealed, questioning its liability for punitive damages.
Venue-The Need For A Change In The Venue Provisions Of The Federal Employers' Liability Act, S. I. Shuman S.Ed.
Venue-The Need For A Change In The Venue Provisions Of The Federal Employers' Liability Act, S. I. Shuman S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In response to the need created by a highly dangerous era of railroad employment, and subsequent to the passage of similar legislation in Europe, there was enacted in 1906 a Federal Employers' Liability Act. The attempted coverage of the first FELA was too broad to withstand the constitutional scrutiny of a five-to-four Supreme Court, and it consequently remained for the Congress of 1908 to enact valid legislation for the protection of the railroad employee. Whether or not: the FELA is the most efficacious solution to the problem of the injured railroad employee continues to be warmly debated, but for the …
Suits Against Labor Organizations Under Section 301 Of The Labor Management Relations Act, Charles F. Bagley, Jr.
Suits Against Labor Organizations Under Section 301 Of The Labor Management Relations Act, Charles F. Bagley, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Labor Law—Injunctions—Jurisdiction Of N. L. R. B. Held Exclusive, Francis W. Greune.
Labor Law—Injunctions—Jurisdiction Of N. L. R. B. Held Exclusive, Francis W. Greune.
Buffalo Law Review
Ryan v. Simons, 277 App. Div. 1000, 100 N. Y. S. 2d 18 (2d Dept. 1950).
Labor Law-Breach Of No-Strike Covenant-Damage Suits Against Unions, Bernard L. Goodman S. Ed.
Labor Law-Breach Of No-Strike Covenant-Damage Suits Against Unions, Bernard L. Goodman S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provided that there should be no strikes by members of the union until the grievance procedure prescribed therein was exhausted. A walkout in violation of this agreement occurred and the plaintiff sought damages for the consequent loss of profits. A statute provided that ''Whenever any unincorporated . . . association . . . shall be formed in this state . . . actions . . . may be brought by or against such associations. . . " On de novo hearing, held, the defendant was amenable to …
Labor Law-Breach Of No-Strike Covenant-Damage Suits Against Unions, Bernard L. Goodman S. Ed.
Labor Law-Breach Of No-Strike Covenant-Damage Suits Against Unions, Bernard L. Goodman S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provided that there should be no strikes by members of the union until the grievance procedure prescribed therein was exhausted. A walkout in violation of this agreement occurred and the plaintiff sought damages for the consequent loss of profits. A statute provided that ''Whenever any unincorporated . . . association . . . shall be formed in this state . . . actions . . . may be brought by or against such associations. . . " On de novo hearing, held, the defendant was amenable to …
Constitutional Law–Due Process–Equal Protection Of The Laws–Anti-"Strike Suit'' Legislation Held Constitutional, Joseph Gricar S.Ed.
Constitutional Law–Due Process–Equal Protection Of The Laws–Anti-"Strike Suit'' Legislation Held Constitutional, Joseph Gricar S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought a derivative suit against the defendant, a Delaware corporation, in a United States district court in New Jersey. While the suit was in process, New Jersey passed a statute permitting a corporation in whose name a suit was brought to demand security for reasonable expenses including attorney fees. The plaintiff stockholder was to be liable for such expenses if the suit was unsuccessful. The statute was not to apply when the complainant's holding represented 5% of the par or stated value of the corporation's outstanding stock or had a value of $50,000. Since the act applied to suits …
Agency-Liability Of Employer For Employee's Intentional Torts, L. W. Larson, Jr.
Agency-Liability Of Employer For Employee's Intentional Torts, L. W. Larson, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a spectator occupying a front seat at a hockey game, was struck and injured by one of the players who was attempting to strike an opponent. Beyond the fact that a hockey game was in progress, there was nothing to indicate the player's motive. Plaintiff recovered judgment against appellant, the corporation that employed the player who had struck her. The lower court instructed the jury that the player who had struck the plaintiff was as a matter of law acting as a servant, agent, or employee and within the scope of his employment at the time the plaintiff was …
Labor Unions-Suability Of Unincorporated Labor Union In Its Common Name, Joseph R. Brookshire S.Ed.
Labor Unions-Suability Of Unincorporated Labor Union In Its Common Name, Joseph R. Brookshire S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought suit in a district court of the United States against the defendant union in its common name, and officers of the union for an alleged libel. The union was not incorporated, no substantive right protected by federal law was involved, and the state wherein the suit was brought, Illinois, did not have a statute permitting actions at law against an unincorporated association in its own name. The district court dismissed the action against the union on the ground that it was not a legal entity; the plaintiff appealed. Held, under the common law of Illinois, an unincorporated …
Labor Law - Right Of Employee To Sue On Collective Bargaining Contract Between Employer And Union, David Davidoff
Labor Law - Right Of Employee To Sue On Collective Bargaining Contract Between Employer And Union, David Davidoff
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a local union by the terms of which he agreed to hire only union operators, to pay them a specified wage, and to give them two weeks' notice of their discharge, or two weeks' salary in lieu thereof, should he decide to go out of business. Plaintiff, a union member, was employed by the defendant from March, 1939, until he was discharged in December, 1939. It appeared that this discharge was occasioned by defendant's sale of his theatre and retirement from the business. Plaintiff sued for …
Judgments - Declaratory Judgments - Use In Statutory Interpretation, Reid J. Hatfield
Judgments - Declaratory Judgments - Use In Statutory Interpretation, Reid J. Hatfield
Michigan Law Review
A mining company, subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, brought an action against the United States District Attorney for Idaho for a declaratory judgment that it was not subject to threatened criminal prosecutions and penalties under the act. The company had not included the forty minutes allowed for lunch in estimating the number of hours worked by its employees. The employees and their labor union threatened to sue, claiming the lunch period was part of their working hours and that they were therefore to that extent required to work overtime without extra pay. The Department of Labor and the …
Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act - Right Of Prospective Bidder To Question Wage Determination Of Secretary Of Labor, David Loeb
Michigan Law Review
Complainants, small steel companies in eastern Pennsylvania, Maryland and Connecticut, brought this action to enjoin the secretary of labor and others from applying the provisions of the Public Contracts Act, as construed, to the iron and steel industry. It was contended that the secretary's wage determination was the result of an erroneous interpretation of the word "locality" as included in the act. The district court dismissed the complaint. Upon appeal the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia granted the injuction. On certiorari, held, reversed. The complainants have no standing in court to sue. Perkins v. Lukens Steel …
Administrative Law - Labor Law - Federal Courts - Equity - Propriety Of Interrogatories Directed To The Members Of The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review
Administrative Law - Labor Law - Federal Courts - Equity - Propriety Of Interrogatories Directed To The Members Of The National Labor Relations Board, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The National Labor Relations Board brought a proceeding under section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act for the enforcement of an order to cease certain unfair labor practices, its petition stating that the board had considered the case before it and upon all the testimony and evidence made its findings of fact and issued its order. The answer alleged that the board did not consider the evidence but referred it to others for suggested findings of fact, and that with no opportunity to respondent to know of or criticize the suggestions they were adopted by the board without further …
Conflict Of Laws - Federal Employers Liability Act - Jurisdiction Of State Courts Over Foreign Causes Of Action Between Nonresident Parties, H. F. B.
Michigan Law Review
The historical classification of actions for personal injuries as transitory imposes no limitation upon the prosecution of foreign suits, either by reference to the residence of the parties or the place in which the action arises. Whenever jurisdiction of the person of the defendant is obtained, the power to hear and determine this type of tort action inheres in every court having jurisdiction of the subject matter. An extreme application of the doctrine of the transitory character of personal actions is not infrequently permitted under the statutes as to venue, wherever suits between parties, all of whom are nonresidents of …
Injunction In Labor Disputes--Anti-Trust Laws--"Secondary Boycott".
Injunction In Labor Disputes--Anti-Trust Laws--"Secondary Boycott".
Michigan Law Review
Since the passing of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in 1890 there has been an enormous increase in litigation concerning the trade union and its activities. When the Supreme Court in the Danbury Hatters' case8 held that labor organizations were included in the provisions of the Sherman Act, and that the so-called "secondary boycott"' was a violation of the terms of this act, labor felt that it had lost a very effective weapon and at once began to fear that the very existence of the labor union was in danger. Not having much hope of relief from the courts, the forces …
Note And Comment, Sigmund W. David, Newton K. Fox, Harold R. Curtis, Aquilla C. Lewis, Albert R. Dilley
Note And Comment, Sigmund W. David, Newton K. Fox, Harold R. Curtis, Aquilla C. Lewis, Albert R. Dilley
Michigan Law Review
Civil Liability for False Testimony; Review by the Courts of the Decisions of the Land Department; Right of One Partner to Sue His Co-Partners in Conversion; Does a Tax Deed, Void on it Face, Give Color of Title; Interference With Employment by Trade Union;