Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Family Law (17)
- Criminal Law (12)
- Criminal Procedure (12)
- Law and Gender (12)
- Law and Society (12)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Human Rights Law (10)
- Sexuality and the Law (9)
- International Law (8)
- Social Welfare Law (7)
- Economics (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Law and Psychology (5)
- Organizations Law (5)
- Religion Law (5)
- Courts (4)
- Education Law (4)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (4)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Internet Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Keyword
-
- Domestic Relations (17)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (12)
- Law and Society (12)
- Women (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
-
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Human Rights Law (10)
- Sexuality and the Law (9)
- General Law (8)
- International Law (8)
- Social Welfare (7)
- Economics (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Organizations (5)
- Psychology and Psychiatry (5)
- Religion (5)
- Courts (4)
- Education Law (4)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Law and Technology (4)
- Politics (4)
- Practice and Procedure (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Juvenile Law
Foster Care Placement: Reducing The Risk Of Sibling Incest, David J. Herring
Foster Care Placement: Reducing The Risk Of Sibling Incest, David J. Herring
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Immaturity, Normative Competence, And Juvenile Transfer: How (Not) To Punish Minors For Major Crimes, David O. Brink
Immaturity, Normative Competence, And Juvenile Transfer: How (Not) To Punish Minors For Major Crimes, David O. Brink
ExpressO
This essay critically examines the national trend to get tough on juvenile crime by making it easier to transfer juvenile offenders to adult criminal court. It assesses this trend in light of different rationales for punishment, arguing that immaturity provides retributive, deterrent, and corrective reasons to punish juvenile crime differently than otherwise similar adult crime. Insofar as retributive concepts determine whom to punish and how much to punish, it is especially important that immaturity involves diminished normative competence and, hence, diminished responsibility. In defending a traditional approach to juvenile criminal justice against the reforms embodied in the transfer trend, the …