Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Family Law (25)
- Criminal Law (23)
- State and Local Government Law (15)
- Legislation (14)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
-
- Estates and Trusts (11)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (10)
- Business Organizations Law (10)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- Courts (10)
- Civil Law (9)
- Property Law and Real Estate (9)
- Education Law (8)
- Environmental Law (8)
- Labor and Employment Law (8)
- Health Law and Policy (7)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Commercial Law (5)
- Construction Law (5)
- Insurance Law (5)
- Tax Law (5)
- Evidence (4)
- Judges (4)
- Law and Psychology (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Medical Jurisprudence (4)
- Workers' Compensation Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (11)
- Virginia (7)
- In re Gault (6)
- Index (6)
- Adoption (4)
-
- Children (4)
- Custody (4)
- Divorce (4)
- Education (4)
- Juvenile (4)
- Sexting (4)
- Broadnax v. Commonwealth (3)
- Crawford v. Commonwealth (3)
- Fisher v. Commonwealth (3)
- Grogg v. Commonwealth (3)
- IDEA (3)
- Johnson v. Commonwealth (3)
- Justice (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Marriage (3)
- McKeiver v. Pennsylvania (3)
- Punishment (3)
- Social media (3)
- Teenagers (3)
- Anderson v. Commonwealth (2)
- Arrest records (2)
- Barrett v. Commonwealth (2)
- Bill of Rights (2)
- CHINS (2)
- California v. Superior Court of California (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 99 of 99
Full-Text Articles in Juvenile Law
Article V Returns Under The Interstate Compact On Juveniles, Adrienne Volenik
Article V Returns Under The Interstate Compact On Juveniles, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
The Interstate Compact on Juveniles provides the means by which a juvenile escapee or absconder can be returned to his state of origin with only a minimum of difficulty. Article V of the compact, which covers this situation, provides that the person or authority from whose probation or parole supervision a delinquent youth has absconded or from whose institutional custody he has escaped can make a written request for his return to the appropriate court or executive authority of the state where the youth is allegedly located.
Juvenile Court And Arrest Records, Adrienne Volenik
Juvenile Court And Arrest Records, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
Recognizing the near impossibility of changing societal views toward juvenile offenders, many legislators have at- tempted instead to combat the harmful effects of a delinquency adjudication by providing for concealment of juvenile records, on the grounds that such concealment will aid the child's reintegration into society.
Expungement Of Arrest Records, Adrienne Volenik
Expungement Of Arrest Records, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
Contrary to the philosophy of the juvenile court, it is undoubtedly a rare occasion when a child benefits from his exposure to the juvenile court system. Even when a child is actually rehabilitated by the process, the invidious effects that flow from being labeled a "juvenile delinquent" may serve to negate any benefit that he may have received. Perhaps the most unjustifiable of all side effects is the stigma that attaches to a child who has been arrested and subsequently either released without prosecution or acquitted. In a society that espouses the idea that an individual is innocent until proven …
Notice In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Adrienne Volenik
Notice In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
Despite these suggestions, the problem of what constitutes adequate notice continues to plague juvenile courts. Furthermore, by suggesting two criminal and two civil cases as examples, the Court added the issue of whether a civil or a criminal standard for notice should be applied. Courts that have addressed this issue have reached different conclusions.
Juvenile Law- Double Jeopardy
University of Richmond Law Review
Both the United States Constitution' and the Constitution of Virginia recognize the right of an individual to be protected against successive prosecutions for the same crime. While the concept of double jeopardy is rooted in the English common law and early case law of the United States, it has been predominant in the criminal law, and has gained little acceptance in the area of juvenile law, which has been regarded as a civil proceeding.
Right To Counsel In Virginia Juvenile Proceedings
Right To Counsel In Virginia Juvenile Proceedings
University of Richmond Law Review
The juvenile court, representing the parens patriae power of the state, was created in order to remove juveniles from the stigmatizing and punitive atmosphere of adult criminal courts. Divorced from this atmosphere, the juvenile court, by administering individualized justice' in an informal, civil-natured proceeding, could measure the juvenile's social maladjustment and subject him to state supervision in such a manner as to correct his delinquent attitude and lead him to a correct life. Many forums, however, have found that the functioning juvenile system inadequately promulgates the enlightened principles which led to its creation. Scholars have attacked the non-criminal label as …
Publicity In The Juvenile Court
Publicity In The Juvenile Court
University of Richmond Law Review
With few exceptions a public trial is granted, under the sixth amendment, to adults accused of crimes. Correspondingly, what takes place in the courtroom is generally held to be public property available for dissemination by the press. In juvenile proceedings, however, privacy has "typically been among the few unchallenged keynotes." Characteristic of the juvenile court system have been procedures aimed at maintaining the anonymity of juvenile offenders.
Recent Decisions
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law from 1969.
The Kent Case And Juvenile Courts In Virginia, Kermit V. Rooke
The Kent Case And Juvenile Courts In Virginia, Kermit V. Rooke
University of Richmond Law Review
In an article in the October, 1966, issue of the American Bar Association Journal, Honorable Robert Gardner, Judge of the Superior Court of Orange County, Cali- fornia, directs the attention of the legal profession to the juvenile courts of this country and suggests corrective action in respect to various phases of the operation of these courts. His concern and immediate anxiety were occasioned by the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Morris A. Kent v. United States,; wherein by a 5 to 4 opinion that court found irregularity in the handling of a case in …