Juvenile Law Commons^™

New Hearsay Exceptions For A Child's Statement Of Sexual Abuse, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1984), Glen Skoler

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Punishment And Juvenile Justice: A Conceptual Framework For Assessing Constitutional Rights Of Youthful Offenders, Martin R. Gardner

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Article attempts to provide an analytical framework for identifying the punitive aspects of the juvenile justice system. The Article proposes a framework that is extrapolated from Supreme Court cases which define punishment in contexts outside the juvenile area. Several commentators have criticized the Court's definitional efforts, some because of perceived inadequacies in the developed definitions, others because of the belief that the very enterprise of defining constitutional rights in terms of the presence or absence of punishment is misguided . Although many of these criticisms of the Court's record are understandable, the alleged defects are less detrimental to an …

Social Commentary: Values And Legal Personhood, Jeffrey A. Parness

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The State's Interest In Adoption And Washington's Sealed Records Statute, Eileen M. Lawrence

Seattle University Law Review

After discussing the legal effect of the adoption decree and the purpose of Washington's adoption statute, this comment will analyze the competing interests of the adoptee, the biological parents, the adoptive parents, and the state. This article will also discuss the legislative proposal in Washington attempting to abolish the good cause requirement. Finally, this article concludes the sealed records requirement is constitutionally sound and despite the need for further legislative articulation, the good cause balancing approach is the most suitable method for protecting the conflicting rights and interests inherent in the adoption process.

Davis V. Page, 442 F. Supp. 258 (S.D. Fla. 1977), K. Dian Fedak

Florida State University Law Review

Constitutional Law-JUVENILE DEPENDENCE PROCEEDINGS-CRITICAL STAGES ANALYSIS USED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS GOVERNS TIMING OF RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN CHILD DEPENDENCY HEARINGS

Essay--Fighting For Their Lives: The Applicability Of The Fairness Doctrine To Violence In Children's Television Programming, Thomas Barton

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Parental Notification As A Prerequisite For Minors' Access To Contraceptives: A Behavioral And Legal Analysis, Michael N. Finger

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article examines whether the constitutional right of parents to determine what is best for their children prevents the state from permitting minors access to contraceptives without notifying their parents. Part I examines the effect of the presence or absence of a notice requirement upon the interests of parents, minors, and the state. Part II reviews the development of the constitutional right of privacy and the impact of parental rights and state interests on the extension of privacy rights to minors. Part III considers the manner in which the interests of minors, parents, and the state should be balanced. The …

Children And The Idea Of Liberty: A Comment On The Civil Commitment Cases, John H. Garvey

Scholarly Articles

Despite all the talk about the rights of children in the past few years, it has not often been necessary to parse conflicting claims by parents and children, and to give independent constitutional content to the latter. Before 1979, the Supreme Court had reached the merits in only one case presenting that issue. The problem will arise whenever the state lends its aid to the parents in a familial dispute, and in time will doubtless provoke litigation in which outnumbered children claim the benefit of most of the Bill of Rights. Until now, debate has focused on the procedural and …

Parent-Child Privilege: Constitutional Right Or Specious Analogy?, Donald Cofer

Seattle University Law Review

To avoid reaching incorrect verdicts as a result of insufficient evidence, courts generally require witnesses to testify to all relevant facts within their knowledge. Two important exceptions to this general rule, incompetency and privilege, rest on very different rationales. Developed at common law to exclude unreliable evidence, rules of competency disqualify certain untrustworthy witnesses from testifying. To promote extrinsic public policies, however, privileges excuse competent witnesses from providing what may be highly probative and reliable evidence. In the past decade there have been calls for legislative or judicial recognition of a parent-child privilege, similar to the marital privilege, that would …

Of Rights Lost And Gained, Patricia A. Dore

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Curfew Ordinances And The Constitution, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Recognizing that a legislature must decide whether to enact a juvenile curfew without the benefit of conclusive data on the effectiveness of such laws, the remainder of this Note will focus primarily upon the constitutional issues raised by such ordinances. The freedom of movement that is limited by a curfew is, it will be argued, an unenumerated right protected by the ninth and fourteenth amendments. The constitutional rights of juveniles, however, -are not necessarily coextensive with those of adults. Certain characteristics of juveniles-in particular, their lesser capacity for reason and self-control-imply that the strength of their right to freedom of …

Pins Jurisdiction, The Vagueness Doctrine, And The Rule Of Law, All Katz, Lee E. Teitelbaum

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Due Process - Prior To Voluntary Commitment By A Parent Or Guardian To A State Mental Institution, Children Under The Age Of 18 Are Entitled To Specific Procedural Due Process Rights Which Cannot Be Waived By The Committing Adult, Mark J. Levin

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

A Guide To Pennsylvania Delinquency Law, Leonard Packel

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Constiutional Law - Balancing Test Employed To Resolve Conflict Between State Statute And Resulting Burden On Free Exercise Of Religion - State Interest In Compelling Compulsory High School Attendance Outweighed By Resulting Burden On Free Exercise Of Amish Religion, Michael G. Trachtman

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Law In Educational Decision Making, John H. Vanderzell, Donald W. Dowd, Matthew W. Finkin, Mark R. Shedd

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The First Amendment And Education - A Plea For Peaceful Coexistence, Dan L. Johnston

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Student Discipline In Public Schools Under The Constitution, William D. Valente

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Courts--Juveniles In Delinquency Proceedings Are Not Constitutionally Entitled To The Right Of Trial By Jury--Mckeiver V. Pennsylvania, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

At a hearing in the juvenile court of Philadelphia in October 1968, Joseph McKeiver was declared a "delinquent child" and placed on probation by a juvenile court judge who determined that McKeiver had violated a Pennsylvania law. The juvenile court petition charged McKeiver, then sixteen years old, with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods as the result of an incident in which McKeiver and twenty or thirty other youths took twenty-five cents from three teenagers. Despite the fact that the evidence against McKeiver consisted primarily of the weak and inconsistent testimony of two of the victims, the juvenile court judge, …

Constitutional Law - Burden Of Proof In A Juvenile Delinquency Proceeding, M. Lawrence Shields Iii

Duquesne Law Review

The Supreme Court of the United States has held that where a juvenile is charged with the commission of a delinquent offense for which institutional confinement may be imposed, due process requires that the charges against him be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).

Constitutional Law - Right To Trial By Jury In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Dennis L. Veraldi

Duquesne Law Review

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that the right to trial by jury in a juvenile proceeding is not so "fundamental" as to be constitutionally required.

Terry Appeal, 438 Pa. 339, 265 A.2d 350 (1970).

Statutes--Vagueness Of Phrase "Contributing To Delinquency Of A Minor", Steven C. Hanley

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

To Insure Due Process And Equal Protection, Such Facts As Are Necessary To Adjudicate A Child Delinquent Must Be Proved Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Rather Than By A Preponderance Of The Evidence., G. P. Hardy Iii

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena

St. Mary's Law Journal

For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proceedings. The goal of the juvenile court movement was to establish systems of education and protection of errant children, rather than deterrence and retribution. To accomplish these results, the juvenile court was shorn of all resemblance to criminal courts. Public hearings were to be avoided and the intervention of counsel was not required, since the juvenile judge represented both the child and the state. However, it became clear that children were receiving the protection of the state because they engaged in criminal conduct and with little …

Constitutional Law--Due Process In Juvenile Court Proceeding, John Hampton Tinney

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Delinquency--Jurisdiction--Double Jeopardy, John Woodville Hatcher

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Equal Protection For The Illegitimate, Harry D. Krause

Michigan Law Review

In our time the general constitutional phrase promising equal protection has become specific law. It has been used to invalidate many state statutes which discriminated on the basis of race or other arbitrary criteria. Definite rules have been developed for this process of invalidation. These rules will be applied below to state and federal legislation that favors the legitimate child and discriminates against the illegitimate in matters of inheritance rights, rights of support, rights of name and custody, and social welfare. The question that will be asked is whether state and federal legislation may constitutionally discriminate between children on the …

Constitutional Rights In Juvenile Court, Joseph L. Rubin

Cleveland State Law Review

On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the case of In Re Gault. Ten months and three weeks later, the Supreme Court reached a landmark decision on judicial handling of juvenile delinquency matters. On May 15, 1967, the court handed down a ruling that many of the constitutional procedural protections previously observed only in adult trials are also applicable to children in juvenile court proceedings. This decision portends a major change in the manner in which most of the nation's three thousand juvenile courts have been functioning. The significance of this …