Jurisprudence Commons^™

Book Review, Allison L. Scafuri

Vanderbilt Law Review

The intellectual force in this scientifically and technologically oriented century, as Gatland and Dempster indicate, resides with men who have renaissance minds that can ably embrace scientific as well as societal propositions, reason anew and reach unique and far-reaching conclusions beyond the realm of current thought. To date, the intellectual strength of the lawyer has been his pervading understanding of problems from every societal view. This test can remain valid; however, the province of the legal "skill-elite group"must range far beyond his traditional social science touchstones into decidedly esoteric scientific subjects. The horizon of jurisprudence now embraces the mechanical universe …

A Reply To Professors Cohen And Dworkin, Lon L. Fuller

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Introduction To The Morality Of Law, John E. Murray Jr.

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Elusive Morality Of Law, Ronald M. Dworkin

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Law, Morality And Purpose, Marshall Cohen

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Regarding The Symposium On Law And Morality, E. Russell Naughton

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Thoughts On The Symposium: The Moraliy Of Law, Donald A. Giannella

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Remarks On The Symposium: The Morality Of Law, Francis H. Parker

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Morality Of Law, By Lon L. Fuller, Edwin W. Tucker

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Observations On The Morality Of Law, John E. Murray Jr.

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews, Joseph Trachtman, Philip A. Trautman, Arthur Larson, A. Kenneth Pye, Walter F. Murphy, Norman Redlich, Leroy Kahn, Edwin W. Patterson, Frederick M. Hart, Curtis J. Berger, Wallace R. Bennett, W. W. Patterson

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

From Legal Theory To Integrative Jurisprudence, Jerome Hall

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Book Review, W. N. Ethridge, Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

The consummation of Llewellyn's particular interest in the craft of appellate judging was his classic The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals, which he completed in 1960. After reading it,no appellate judge could decide a case or write an opinion without being affected to some extent by Llewellyn's method and criteria. He conceived of law as the product of a rational process. The traditional dichotomy of reason and experience are reconcilable by development of legal methods in a rational framework. This technique clarifies and supports the sociological jurisprudence of Holmes, Cardozo, and Brandeis.

The Interaction Of Religion, Law, And Politics In Western Society: Its Historical Character And Influence, Simeon L. Guterman

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews, Richard G. Huber, James E. Sizemore, Gordon Brewster Baldwin, Ernest M. Jones, G. Stanley Joslin, Ilmar Tammelo, Melvin G. Dakin, Vernon X. Miller

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Some Reflections On The Teaching Of Jurisprudence, Walter Probert

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of Law And Psychiatry, James P. Whyte Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Llewellyn: Jurisprudence: Realism In Theory And Practice, Charles D. Kelso

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice By Karl N. Llewellyn.

Political Jurisprudence, Martin Shapiro

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Meaning And Structure Of Law In Islam, Salah-Eldin Abdel-Wahab

Vanderbilt Law Review

There are many other reasons to believe that consideration of Islamic jurisprudence should prove amply rewarding in the comparative study of law. A legal system which still underlies the legal life and social conduct of some 400 million people (one sixth of the world population) cannot be ignored. The original solutions which it provides for problems of high complexity and its very advanced normative structure which consists entirely of works by jurists, not of government codes and statutes, are worthy of consideration.

What's Wrong With Baker V. Carr?, Robert Lancaster

Vanderbilt Law Review

The decision of the majority of the Supreme Court in Baker v. Carr, the recently decided Tennessee Reapportionment Case, may well turn out to be one of the landmark decisions of American jurisprudence. If by reason of apathetic acquiescence such a judicial intrusion is permitted to go unchallenged and undebated, our federal system of limited and constitutional government may be further weakened. Although the balance of power as between the states and the national government has shifted and this shift has been reflected in and furthered by judicial interpretation of our Constitution, it seems questionable that such a far-reaching and …

Book Reviews, Edward S. Mason, Stanley D. Rose, Reber Boult, Robert N. Covington

Vanderbilt Law Review

This volume, which brings together, with one exception, all of Stocking's papers relating to workable competition, is more than a random collection of essays. As he indicates in the preface, the papers had been conceived from the beginning as segments of a book, and they proceed to cover systematically the relation of the concept of workable competition to the major areas of antitrust policy.

===============================

Sir Frederick Pollock was born in 1845 and died in 1937. Throughout this long life, his industry was apparently unflagging. His mark is clearly discernible in wide areas of English law. Every student of the …

Ethical Theory And Legal Philosophy, Stanley D. Rose

Vanderbilt Law Review

Jurisprudence and ethics, the author believes, represent distinct efforts to achieve values in society. However, because of their similar method, bases in fact, and testing by consequences, each has something to give the other. With this in mind, the article examines the work of contemporary writers in ethics, both to determine what exactly are their positions and to see what they might offer the student of jurisprudence.

Developments In Judicial Jurisprudence, John M. Finnis

Journal Articles

The purpose of this Comment is to explore briefly the fundamentals of what Prof. H. L. A. Hart has called "the contribution offered by the judges to the jurisprudence of our day", and to indicate in outline the disparity between this contribution and those of the most recent academic writings.

Legal Philosophy - Recent Contributions, Neil W. Schilke

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Law And History, C. J. Friedrich

Vanderbilt Law Review

Law is frozen history. In an elementary sense, everything we study when we study law is the report of an event in history, and all history consists of such records or reports. It therefore cannot be my task to develop a sermon on the importance of historical records for the understanding of the law; the tie is too intimate and too obvious to need laboring." The work of Professor Maine on 'Ancient Law,'" wrote Professor T. W. Dwight in his Introduction to that book in the sixties of the last century, "is almost the only one in the English language …

The Next Step: Uniform Rules For The Courts Of Appeals, Milton D. Green

Vanderbilt Law Review

The adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938 maybe regarded as one of the great landmarks of procedural reform in the United States. The many innovations and improvements over prior practice which were effected are well known. Not the least of these was the achievement of uniformity of procedure in all of the federal district courts of the United States, replacing the chaotic confusion which had existed under the Conformity Act.' Although the Federal Rules were addressed primarily to practice and procedure in the district courts, they also dealt with certain aspects of appellate practice. This was …

Hickman V. Jencks, Edward W. Cleary

Vanderbilt Law Review

In recent years the Supreme Court of the United States has decided two cases with fundamental impact upon the status of the legal profession in the litigatory process. Although the two cases are intimately related, the opinion in the second did not mention the first, and the two decisions have never really been laid side by side.' It is proposed here to explore their mutual implications.

Legal Sanctions, Jerome Hall

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Sociological Jurisprudence Of Roscoe Pound (Part I), James A. Gardner

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.