Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Evidence (53)
- Criminal Law (31)
- Criminal Procedure (31)
- Constitutional Law (25)
- Courts (23)
-
- Law and Society (21)
- State and Local Government Law (19)
- Judges (18)
- Supreme Court of the United States (16)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (15)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (15)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- Environmental Law (10)
- Legal Profession (10)
- Litigation (10)
- Civil Law (9)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (9)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Fourteenth Amendment (8)
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Immigration Law (8)
- Legal History (8)
- Military, War, and Peace (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (7)
- Internet Law (7)
- Juvenile Law (7)
- Legal Writing and Research (7)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (16)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- BLR (9)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- United Arab Emirates University (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (13)
- ExpressO (9)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- Articles (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (3)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (3)
- South Carolina Law Review (3)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- St. Thomas Law Review (1)
- UAEU Law Journal (1)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 80 of 80
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Testing Right - Lying In View Of Justice, Peter Fenves
Testing Right - Lying In View Of Justice, Peter Fenves
Cardozo Law Review
Walter Benjamin: Justice, Right and the Critique of Violence
Decision And Inference, Peter Tillers
The Nature Of Juridicial Proof, Ronald J. Allen
The Nature Of Juridicial Proof, Ronald J. Allen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson
Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Weinrib's Coherence, Alan Brudner
The Noseworthy Doctrine: A Threepart Rule For Its Application, Steven D. Jannace
The Noseworthy Doctrine: A Threepart Rule For Its Application, Steven D. Jannace
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interference With Prospective Civil Litigation By Spollation Of Evidence: Should Texas Adopt A New Tort., Philip A. Lionberger
Interference With Prospective Civil Litigation By Spollation Of Evidence: Should Texas Adopt A New Tort., Philip A. Lionberger
St. Mary's Law Journal
Texas courts should adopt a tort for spoliation of evidence. Spoliation of evidence is the tampering with, interference with, loss of, or destruction of evidence. Spoliation of evidence is a serious legal problem because it increases a litigant’s difficulty in proving a cause of action or a defense. Evidence destruction may also increase litigation costs and cause the trial court to make factfinding errors. Texas courts should adopt the tort of spoliation of evidence because it compensates injured litigants and deters future acts of spoliation. Another reason for adopting the tort for spoliation of evidence is the inadequacy of alternative …
Burden Of Proof With Respect To The Defense Of Withdrawal From Conspiracy: United States V. Read, Alan S. Fox
Burden Of Proof With Respect To The Defense Of Withdrawal From Conspiracy: United States V. Read, Alan S. Fox
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parent-Child Privilege: Constitutional Right Or Specious Analogy?, Donald Cofer
Parent-Child Privilege: Constitutional Right Or Specious Analogy?, Donald Cofer
Seattle University Law Review
To avoid reaching incorrect verdicts as a result of insufficient evidence, courts generally require witnesses to testify to all relevant facts within their knowledge. Two important exceptions to this general rule, incompetency and privilege, rest on very different rationales. Developed at common law to exclude unreliable evidence, rules of competency disqualify certain untrustworthy witnesses from testifying. To promote extrinsic public policies, however, privileges excuse competent witnesses from providing what may be highly probative and reliable evidence. In the past decade there have been calls for legislative or judicial recognition of a parent-child privilege, similar to the marital privilege, that would …
Hardin And Medvid: A Change In Indiana's Entrapment Law, Michael Hyatte
Hardin And Medvid: A Change In Indiana's Entrapment Law, Michael Hyatte
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.