Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (202)
- Courts (53)
- Law and Society (51)
- Legal History (43)
- Judges (40)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (37)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (37)
- Criminal Law (27)
- Criminal Procedure (27)
- Legislation (27)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (22)
- Administrative Law (21)
- Law and Politics (21)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (18)
- Human Rights Law (17)
- International Law (17)
- Supreme Court of the United States (17)
- Litigation (16)
- Jurisdiction (14)
- Legal Profession (14)
- Environmental Law (13)
- First Amendment (12)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (12)
- Religion Law (12)
- Economics (11)
- Law and Economics (11)
- State and Local Government Law (11)
- Institution
-
- BLR (71)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (46)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (15)
- University of San Diego (11)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (6)
- Barry University School of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (69)
- Cardozo Law Review (33)
- Working Paper Series (14)
- Articles (13)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (11)
-
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Barry Law Review (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- South Carolina Law Review (3)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (2)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- All Papers (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 212
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
“Now The Machine Runs Itself”: Carl Schmitt On Hobbes And Kelsen, David Dyzenhaus
“Now The Machine Runs Itself”: Carl Schmitt On Hobbes And Kelsen, David Dyzenhaus
Cardozo Law Review
Carl Schmitt claimed that the fundamental distinction of politics is the distinction between friend and enemy. That distinction, he said, has to be put on a substantive basis, which, in the era of the nation state, he supposed must amount to an idea of the homogeneity of the people. Since liberal democracy is opposed to this kind of substance, Schmitt argued that liberalism cannot make the distinction between friend and enemy. It thus cannot defend itself against its enemies. It is no wonder that he remains the leading theorist of fascism.
Rethinking Rawls' Theory Of Liberty And Rights, James W. Nickel
Rethinking Rawls' Theory Of Liberty And Rights, James W. Nickel
Articles
No abstract provided.
James Madison And Public Choice At Gucci Gulch: A Procedural Defense Of Tax Expenditures And Tax Institutions, Edward A. Zelinsky
James Madison And Public Choice At Gucci Gulch: A Procedural Defense Of Tax Expenditures And Tax Institutions, Edward A. Zelinsky
Articles
Few academic doctrines can claim the intellectual and political success of tax expenditure analysis. In roughly a generation's time, Professor Surrey's procedural and substantive critique of tax subsidies has become entrenched in the law school curriculum and in legal scholarship. More impressively, the tax expenditure concept has been enshrined in federal law and become part of the daily discourse of the national budget process.
The Relevance Of Time To The Relationship Between The Philosophy Of The Limit And Systems Theory, Drucilla Cornell
The Relevance Of Time To The Relationship Between The Philosophy Of The Limit And Systems Theory, Drucilla Cornell
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sociological Theory In The Absence Of People: The Limits Of Luhmann’S Systems Theory, Alan Wolfe
Sociological Theory In The Absence Of People: The Limits Of Luhmann’S Systems Theory, Alan Wolfe
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Open Justice In A Closed Legal System?, Bernhard Schlink
Open Justice In A Closed Legal System?, Bernhard Schlink
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson
Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Pizza With Ninó, Alex Kozinski
The Use Of Legislative History In Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Treaty Approach, Malvina Halberstam
The Use Of Legislative History In Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Treaty Approach, Malvina Halberstam
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judging In The Good Society: A Comment On The Jurisprudence Of Justice Scalia, Stephen Wizner
Judging In The Good Society: A Comment On The Jurisprudence Of Justice Scalia, Stephen Wizner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Trial Court's Refusal To Question Prospective Jurors About The Specific Contents Of Pretrial Publicity Which They Had Read Or Heard Did Not Violate A Defendant's Sixth Amendment Right To An Impartial Jury, Or Fourteenth Amendment Right To Due Process., Karen A. Cusenbary
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Mu'Min v. Virginia, the United States Supreme Court held a defendant has no right to ask jurors about the potential influence of prejudicial pretrial publicity. A defendant may ask only if the jurors can remain impartial. The Court mandates that overturning a trial court’s jury selection is allowable only if manifest error renders the trial fundamentally unfair. The Court did not find that the case involved sufficient public passion to necessitate a more extensive jury examination by the trial court to include inquiries involving the effect of pretrial publicity. The ruling in Mu'Min leaves too much discretion to the …
Nude Dancing Conveying A Message Or Eroticism And Sexuality Is Protected By The First Amendment But Can Be Limited Under State Police Powers Provided The Government Establishes A Substantial, Content-Neutral Purpose., Fred S. Wilson
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., the Supreme Court held the First Amendment protects nude dancing as conveying an expressive message, but state police powers may limit protection if the government establishes a substantial, content-neutral purpose. It is a principal of constitutional law where an actor intends to convey a message by expressive conduct, the First Amendment protection extends to that expression. Traditionally, time, place, and manner regulations restricting expressive conduct based on either the subject-matter of the message or the viewpoint of the actor receive content-based classification. However, content-based regulation of expressive conduct is constitutional only when narrowly drawn …
Resisting Theory, Jonathan Culler
On The Critical Tribunal, Stephen Watson
Tribe's "Jurisprudence Of The Religion Clauses", Gerard V. Bradley
Tribe's "Jurisprudence Of The Religion Clauses", Gerard V. Bradley
Journal Articles
Laurence Tribe has usefully been described as a constitutional apologist for liberal political causes. His conspicuous opposition to the nomination of Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court and his imaginative defenses of Roe v. Wade have fueled that image. Tribe's "jurisprudence of the religion clauses" both confounds and complicates the picture. He sees no constitutional difficulty with public education vouchers, and defends the Catholic Church against "pro-choicers" who would strip its tax-exempt status because of the Bishops' "pro-life" activities. Tribe thinks that a public school moment-of-silence can be consistent with the Constitution and carves out a considerable zone of …
Judge Richard Posner's Wealth Maximization Principle: Another Form Of Utilitarianism?, Robin F. Grant
Judge Richard Posner's Wealth Maximization Principle: Another Form Of Utilitarianism?, Robin F. Grant
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Monroe E. Price
Preface, Monroe E. Price
The First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Judge Robert H. Bork, Michael W. Mcconnell
The First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Judge Robert H. Bork, Michael W. Mcconnell
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Bork Nomination, Ronald M. Dworkin
Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony
Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Searching For The Status Quo, Jeremy Paul
Why Professor Redish Is Wrong About Abstention, Michael Wells
Why Professor Redish Is Wrong About Abstention, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
Most critics of the Supreme Court's abstention doctrines have attacked the substantive merits of rules that channel constitutional litigation away from federal courts and into state courts instead. In a recent article, Martin Redish raises an interesting objection to abstention from a different perspective. He addresses the institutional legitimacy of the rules and contends that whatever their merits, rules like these should be made only by Congress and not the Supreme Court, for they contravene Congress' intent to grant federal courts jurisdiction over constitutional claims against state actors. Part I of this article describes the context in which the choice …
Taking Hegel Seriously: Reflections On Beyond Objectivism And Relativism, Drucilla Cornell
Taking Hegel Seriously: Reflections On Beyond Objectivism And Relativism, Drucilla Cornell
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To A Jury Trial For Jurisdictional Issues, Steven Kessler
The Right To A Jury Trial For Jurisdictional Issues, Steven Kessler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Press Privacy And Malice: Reflections On New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, Irving R. Kaufman
Press Privacy And Malice: Reflections On New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, Irving R. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Iranian Litigation: Implications For American Business Interests, Charles G. Labella
The Iranian Litigation: Implications For American Business Interests, Charles G. Labella
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Their Own Image: The Reframing Of The Due Process Clause By The United States Supreme Court, J. Ralph Beaird
In Their Own Image: The Reframing Of The Due Process Clause By The United States Supreme Court, J. Ralph Beaird
Scholarly Works
A distinguished constitutional scholar recently pointed out that "many of the important decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are not based on law in the popular sense of that term." It is true, he noted, that "the court endeavors to identify Constitutional clauses upon which to hang its pronouncements." "[S]ome key words and phrases in the Constitution," however, "are so highly indeterminate that they cannot really qualify as law in any usual sense." Rather, he said, "they are semantic blanks--verbal vacuums that may be filled readily with any one of many possible meanings." Thus, it is not …
Beacon Theatres And The Constitutional Right To Jury Trial, Paul F. Rothstein
Beacon Theatres And The Constitutional Right To Jury Trial, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
No abstract provided.