Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (68)
- Law and Society (60)
- Judges (58)
- Courts (57)
- Supreme Court of the United States (51)
-
- Legal History (40)
- Legislation (37)
- Law and Politics (34)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (32)
- Criminal Law (31)
- State and Local Government Law (30)
- Law and Race (29)
- International Law (28)
- Human Rights Law (26)
- Law and Economics (26)
- Rule of Law (26)
- Litigation (23)
- Administrative Law (22)
- Law and Philosophy (22)
- Legal Education (22)
- Legal Writing and Research (21)
- Other Law (21)
- Criminal Procedure (20)
- First Amendment (20)
- Jurisdiction (20)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (20)
- Legal Profession (20)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (19)
- Institution
-
- United Arab Emirates University (50)
- Seattle University School of Law (24)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (16)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (12)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (12)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (12)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (12)
- Barry University School of Law (10)
- Brooklyn Law School (10)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (8)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- American University in Cairo (6)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (6)
- Washington University in St. Louis (6)
- Florida International University College of Law (5)
- St. Mary's University (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Liberty University (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (43)
- Supreme Court (14)
- First Amendment (10)
- Islamic Jurisprudence (9)
- Constitution (7)
-
- Symposium (7)
- Abortion (6)
- Evidence (6)
- International Law (6)
- Law (6)
- Legal Theory (6)
- Originalism (6)
- Black Law Student Association (5)
- Black Law Students (5)
- Black Laywers (5)
- COVID-19 (5)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Critical legal studies (5)
- Democracy (5)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Judges (5)
- Racism (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Textualism (5)
- Civil rights (4)
- Contracts (4)
- Development (4)
- Equality (4)
- Equity (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Publication
-
- UAEU Law Journal (50)
- Seattle University Law Review (23)
- Faculty Scholarship (21)
- Arkansas Law Review (12)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (12)
-
- Publications (11)
- Articles (9)
- Journal Articles (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (6)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (6)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (5)
- FIU Law Review (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (4)
- Barry Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Theses and Dissertations (3)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Court Briefs (2)
- Faculty Datasets (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 306 of 306
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
On The Domestication Of Critical Legal History, Justin Deystone, Samuel Moyn
On The Domestication Of Critical Legal History, Justin Deystone, Samuel Moyn
Publications
Among many of today’s legal historians, there is a relatively new and generally unreflective understanding of the relationship between history and method. The landscape is everywhere marked by a tendency to eschew big thinking, grand theory, and programmatic approaches to historical explanation and social transformation. In the place of the grand theory approach to law and history, there is a preference for the minimalist, the pragmatic, the particularistic, and the quotidian. What this normal science of today’s legal historiography makes obvious is a kind of attachment to particular kinds of problems with particular sorts of built-in solutions. The result for …
Wage Theft Criminalization, Benjamin Levin
Wage Theft Criminalization, Benjamin Levin
Publications
Over the past decade, workers’ rights activists and legal scholars have embraced the language of “wage theft” in describing the abuses of the contemporary workplace. The phrase invokes a certain moral clarity: theft is wrong. The phrase is not merely a rhetorical flourish. Increasingly, it has a specific content for activists, politicians, advocates, and academics: wage theft speaks the language of criminal law, and wage theft is a crime that should be punished. Harshly. Self-proclaimed “progressive prosecutors” have made wage theft cases a priority, and left-leaning politicians in the United States and abroad have begun to propose more criminal statutes …
A Prolegomenon To The Study Of Racial Ideology In The Era Of International Human Rights, Justin Deystone
A Prolegomenon To The Study Of Racial Ideology In The Era Of International Human Rights, Justin Deystone
Publications
There is no critical race approach to international law. There are Third World approaches, feminist approaches, economic approaches, and constitutional approaches, but notably absent in the catalogue is a distinct view of international law that takes its point of departure from the vantage of Critical Race Theory (CRT), or anything like it. Through a study of racial ideology in the history of international legal thought, this Article offers the beginnings of an explanation for how this lack of attention to race and racism came to be, and why it matters today.
Women’S Votes, Women’S Voices, And The Limits Of Criminal Justice Reform, 1911–1950, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Women’S Votes, Women’S Voices, And The Limits Of Criminal Justice Reform, 1911–1950, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Publications
Deriving its vigor from the work of grassroots organizations at the state and local levels, the League of Women Voters (LWV) sought, in the first half of the twentieth century, to provide newly enfranchised women with a political education to strengthen their voice in public affairs. Local branches like the San Francisco Center learned from experience—through practical involvement in a variety of social welfare and criminal justice initiatives. This Article, written for a symposium commemorating the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, assesses the role of LWV leaders in California and especially San Francisco in reforming three aspects of the criminal …
Design Justice In Municipal Criminal Regulation, Amber Baylor
Design Justice In Municipal Criminal Regulation, Amber Baylor
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a model for addressing current inequities in U.S. municipal criminal regulation through design justice theory. Historically, municipal courts in the United States have been the arbiter of minor crimes, processing traffic tickets and other low-level criminal charges. They have also served to uphold Black Codes, segregation, anti-protest laws, and “broken windows” criminal regulation. Enhancing equality in municipal courts requires meaningful participation from across the city’s populace. Participatory design- a framework within urban planning, architecture and design fields- is a practice with honed protocols for implementing meaningful participation from “users” of a place or product. The goal of …
Appellate Courts And Civil Juries, Adam N. Steinman
Appellate Courts And Civil Juries, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
In federal civil litigation, decision-making power is shared by juries, trial courts, and appellate courts. This Article examines an unresolved tension in the different doctrines that allocate authority among these institutions, one that has led to confusion surrounding the relationship between appellate courts and civil juries. At base, the current uncertainty stems from a longstanding lack of clarity regarding the distinction between matters of law and matters of fact. The high-stakes Oracle-Google litigation—which is now before the Supreme Court—exemplifies this. In that case, the Federal Circuit reasoned that an appellate court may assert de novo review over a jury’s verdict …