Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (42)
- Supreme Court of the United States (42)
- Law and Society (40)
- Courts (35)
- Judges (32)
-
- Legal History (31)
- Criminal Law (24)
- Law and Gender (22)
- Criminal Procedure (19)
- Legal Profession (17)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Legal Writing and Research (16)
- Human Rights Law (15)
- Law and Philosophy (14)
- Law and Politics (14)
- Legislation (14)
- Administrative Law (13)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (13)
- Law and Race (13)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (12)
- Immigration Law (12)
- International Law (12)
- Legal Remedies (12)
- Other Law (12)
- Civil Law (11)
- Civil Procedure (11)
- Commercial Law (11)
- Legal Education (11)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (21)
- Notre Dame Law School (20)
- University of Maine School of Law (15)
- Barry University School of Law (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
-
- Texas A&M University School of Law (12)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (8)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Duke Law (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (4)
- Pace University (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- The University of Notre Dame Australia (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (23)
- Statutory interpretation (9)
- United States Supreme Court (9)
- Sales (8)
- Uniform Commercial Code (8)
-
- Article 2 (7)
- CISG (7)
- Supreme Court (7)
- UCC (7)
- Textualism (6)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Law (5)
- Board of veterans appeals (4)
- Bva (4)
- Cavc (4)
- Commercial Practices (4)
- Contracts (4)
- Court of appeals for veterans claims (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Lecture (4)
- Military law (4)
- Originalism (4)
- Punishment (4)
- Sentencing (4)
- Stare decisis (4)
- Symposium (4)
- Twenty-First Century (4)
- Va (4)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Maine Law Review (15)
- Cardozo Law Review (13)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (11)
- Barry Law Review (9)
-
- Michigan Law Review (9)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (8)
- Articles (6)
- Notre Dame Law Review (5)
- Publications (5)
- Texas A&M Law Review (5)
- Brooklyn Law Review (4)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Georgia State University Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (3)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Cornell Law Review (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 211 of 211
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
When Should The First Amendment Protect Judges From Their Unethical Speech?, Lynne H. Rambo
When Should The First Amendment Protect Judges From Their Unethical Speech?, Lynne H. Rambo
Faculty Scholarship
Judges harm the judicial institution when they engage in inflammatory or overtly political extrajudicial speech. The judiciary can be effective only when it has the trust of the citizenry, and judicial statements of that sort render it impossible for citizens to see judges as neutral and contemplative arbiters. This lack of confidence would seem especially dangerous in times like these, when the citizenry is as polarized as it has ever been.
Ethical codes across the country (based on the Model Code of Judicial Conduct) prohibit judges from making these partisan, prejudicial or otherwise improper remarks. Any discipline can be undone, …