Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (61)
- Legal History (61)
- Courts (56)
- Constitutional Law (53)
- Supreme Court of the United States (47)
-
- Judges (44)
- International Law (38)
- Legislation (38)
- Law and Politics (27)
- State and Local Government Law (27)
- Legal Profession (26)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (26)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (25)
- Other Law (24)
- Criminal Law (23)
- Jurisdiction (23)
- Environmental Law (20)
- Law and Economics (20)
- Law and Gender (19)
- Law and Philosophy (19)
- Administrative Law (17)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (17)
- Legal Writing and Research (17)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- European Law (16)
- Civil Procedure (15)
- Civil Law (14)
- Litigation (14)
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (24)
- Brooklyn Law School (23)
- Fordham Law School (23)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (20)
- Barry University School of Law (17)
-
- St. Mary's University (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (8)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (8)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of the Pacific (7)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- St. John's University School of Law (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Duke Law (4)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (4)
- Valparaiso University (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (3)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (28)
- Judge (9)
- Justice (9)
- Supreme Court (8)
- Civil procedure (7)
-
- Feminism (7)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (7)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- Chief Judge (6)
- Constitutional Convention (6)
- Dual Constitutionalism (6)
- Due process (6)
- Gender (6)
- Judith S. Kaye (6)
- Justice Brennan (6)
- Litigation (6)
- New York (6)
- New York City Bar Association (6)
- New York Court of Appeals (6)
- Opportunity (6)
- Skadden (6)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (6)
- Women lawyers (6)
- Authority (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Criminal law (5)
- Federal courts (5)
- Gun Control; Heller; SCOTUS; Second Amendment (5)
- International law (5)
- Publication
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (24)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (21)
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Barry Law Review (13)
- Journal of Law and Policy (10)
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (10)
- Brooklyn Law Review (9)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (8)
- Law Faculty Publications (8)
- Publications (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (6)
- Nevada Law Journal (6)
- University of the Pacific Law Review (6)
- Articles (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Northwestern University Law Review (5)
- Articles & Chapters (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (4)
- Buffalo Law Review (4)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (4)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 276 of 276
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Originalism’S Bite, William Baude, Stephen E. Sachs
Originalism’S Bite, William Baude, Stephen E. Sachs
Faculty Scholarship
Is originalism toothless? Richard Posner seems to think so. He writes that repeated theorizing by "intelligent originalists," one of us happily included, has rendered the theory "incoherent" and capable of supporting almost any result. We appreciate the attention, but we fear we've been misunderstood. Our view is that originalism permits arguments from precedent, changed circumstances, or whatever you like, but only to the extent that they lawfully derive from the law of the founding. This kind of originalism, surprisingly common in American legal practice, is catholic in theory but exacting in application. It might look tame, but it has bite.
Agenda-Setting In The Regulatory State: Theory And Evidence, Cary Coglianese, Daniel E. Walters
Agenda-Setting In The Regulatory State: Theory And Evidence, Cary Coglianese, Daniel E. Walters
Faculty Scholarship
Government officials who run administrative agencies must make countless decisions every day about what issues and work to prioritize. These agenda-setting decisions hold enormous implications for the shape of law and public policy, but they have received remarkably little attention by either administrative law scholars or social scientists who study the bureaucracy. Existing research offers few insights about the institutions, norms, and inputs that shape and constrain agency discretion over their agendas or about the strategies that officials employ in choosing to elevate certain issues while putting others on the back burner. In this article, we advance the study of …
The End Of An Era? Federal Civil Procedure After The 2015 Amendments, Adam N. Steinman
The End Of An Era? Federal Civil Procedure After The 2015 Amendments, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
The recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were the most controversial in decades. The biggest criticisms concerned pleading standards and access to discovery. Many feared that the amendments would undermine the simplified, merits-driven approach that the original drafters of the Federal Rules envisioned and would weaken access to justice and the enforcement of substantive rights and obligations.
This Article argues that the amendments that came into effect on December 1, 2015, do not mandate a more restrictive approach to pleading or discovery. Although there was legitimate cause for alarm given the advisory committee’s earlier proposals and supporting …
Justice Scalia, The 2016 Presidential Election, And The Future Of Church-State Relations, Marci A. Hamilton
Justice Scalia, The 2016 Presidential Election, And The Future Of Church-State Relations, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.
When Extrinsic Incentives Displace Intrinsic Motivation: Designing Legal Carrots And Sticks To Confront The Challenge Of Motivational Crowding-Out, Kristen Underhill
When Extrinsic Incentives Displace Intrinsic Motivation: Designing Legal Carrots And Sticks To Confront The Challenge Of Motivational Crowding-Out, Kristen Underhill
Faculty Scholarship
The rise of “nudges” has inspired countless efforts to encourage individual choices that maximize personal and collective welfare, with a preference for less restrictive tools such as setting default options or reordering choice sets. As part of this trend, there has been renewed interest in the behavioral impacts of incentives – namely, rewards or penalties for shaping individual choices, including but not limited to financial incentives. Explicit incentives are pervasive in the law, including carrots offered by governments (for example, tax deductions for charitable contributions, rebates for recycling, sentence reductions for prisoners who complete drug rehabilitation programs, and incentives for …
Overcoming The Great Forgetting: A Comment On Fishkin And Forbath, Jedediah S. Purdy
Overcoming The Great Forgetting: A Comment On Fishkin And Forbath, Jedediah S. Purdy
Faculty Scholarship
Fishkin and Forbath’s (F&F’s) manuscript is a project of recovery. It portrays the present as a time marked by a “Great Forgetting” of a tradition of constitutional political economy. F&F name what has been forgotten the “democracy of opportunity” tradition. Recovering it would mean again treating the following three principles as linked elements at the core of our Constitution: (1) an anti-oligarchy principle that works to prevent wealth from producing grossly unequal political power; (2) a commitment to a broad middle class with secure, respected work; and (3) a principle of inclusion that opens participation in both citizenship and the …