Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (71)
- Law and Society (63)
- Administrative Law (46)
- Courts (44)
- Legal History (35)
-
- Legislation (33)
- State and Local Government Law (29)
- Environmental Law (27)
- International Law (24)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (24)
- Health Law and Policy (22)
- Criminal Law (21)
- Judges (21)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (20)
- Immigration Law (19)
- Military, War, and Peace (19)
- Jurisdiction (17)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (17)
- Litigation (16)
- Criminal Procedure (15)
- Intellectual Property Law (15)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (14)
- First Amendment (14)
- Human Rights Law (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
- Law and Politics (13)
- Civil Procedure (12)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (12)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (86)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (27)
- St. Mary's University (16)
- Barry University School of Law (12)
- Georgetown University Law Center (12)
-
- New York Law School (11)
- Duke Law (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (22)
- Cases (21)
- Summaries (20)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Constitutional law (15)
-
- Supreme Court (9)
- United States Supreme Court (9)
- United States (8)
- First Amendment (7)
- Law (7)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (7)
- Constitution (6)
- Interpretation (6)
- Judicial process (6)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (6)
- Stare decisis (6)
- Gonzales (5)
- Image (5)
- Originalism (5)
- Precedent (5)
- Sentencing (5)
- Separation of powers (5)
- California (4)
- Congress (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Decision making (4)
- Doe (4)
- FCC (4)
- First amendment (4)
- Judges (4)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (47)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (39)
- Faculty Scholarship (21)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (16)
- Articles (13)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (12)
- NYLS Law Review (9)
- Barry Law Review (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (6)
- IP Theory (6)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (5)
- Publications (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Journal Articles (4)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Working Paper Series (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (3)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Florida Law Review (2)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2)
- Marquette Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 279
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Rostker V. Goldberg: A Step Backward In Equal Protection, Or A Justifiable Affirmation Of Congressional Power?, Gilbert L. Purcell, Janet Rappaport
Rostker V. Goldberg: A Step Backward In Equal Protection, Or A Justifiable Affirmation Of Congressional Power?, Gilbert L. Purcell, Janet Rappaport
Pepperdine Law Review
The Supreme Court in Rostker v. Goldberg upheld a Congressional decision which excluded women from registration for service in the Armed Forces of the United States. Although the case was brought based upon equal protection grounds, the majority took a separation of powers stance and based its decision upon the fact that the Court has traditionally granted deference to the decisions of Congress in the area of military affairs. The minority opinions disagreed with the majority's analysis and claimed that the central issue in Rostker was not military in nature, but was that Congress' plan to register males only, promoted …
Justice Stevens And The Emerging Law Of Sex Discrimination , John P. Wagner
Justice Stevens And The Emerging Law Of Sex Discrimination , John P. Wagner
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mr. Justice Black: Some Passing Observations, Ronald K. L. Collins
Mr. Justice Black: Some Passing Observations, Ronald K. L. Collins
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Pepperdine Law Review
Justice Hugo L. Black served on the United States Supreme Court over a period of thirty-four years, encompassing Supreme Court terms from 1937 to 1971. During this period, the subject of the constitutional limitations of the freedom of religion was increasingly subjected to intense social pressures. Justice Black figured prominently in the development of constitutional law as the Supreme Court attempted to give meaning to the establishment and free exercise clause of the first amendment. He wrote the majority opinions which dealt with the establishment clause in the Everson, McCulloin, Engel and Torcaso cases. Yet, on later occasions, Justice Black …
Social Justice And The Warren Court: A Preliminary Examination, Arthur S. Miller
Social Justice And The Warren Court: A Preliminary Examination, Arthur S. Miller
Pepperdine Law Review
Whether courts should attempt to advance social justice is a much debated topic in American jurisprudence. The conventional wisdom about the judicial process is to the contrary. In this article, Professor Arthur S. Miller suggests that the Supreme Court's innovative civil rights and civil liberties decisions during Chief Justice Earl Warren's tenure had the ultimate effect of helping to preserve the status quo of the social order. Its decisions, coming at a time of economic abundance, were a means of siphoning off discontent from disadvantaged groups at minimum social cost to the established order. The "activist" decisions under Warren were …
Lifeless Writings Or Living Script?: The Life Of Law In Plato, Middle Platonism, And Jewish Platonizers, Melissa S. Lane
Lifeless Writings Or Living Script?: The Life Of Law In Plato, Middle Platonism, And Jewish Platonizers, Melissa S. Lane
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutionalism Ancient And Early Modern: The Contributions Of Roman Law, Canon Law, And English Common Law, Janelle Greenberg, Michael J. Sechler
Constitutionalism Ancient And Early Modern: The Contributions Of Roman Law, Canon Law, And English Common Law, Janelle Greenberg, Michael J. Sechler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Early Modern Absolutism And Constitutionalism, Kinch Hoekstra
Early Modern Absolutism And Constitutionalism, Kinch Hoekstra
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Policy Against Religion: Doubting Thomas , Richard H. Seeburger
Public Policy Against Religion: Doubting Thomas , Richard H. Seeburger
Pepperdine Law Review
In free exercise cases, the Supreme Court has adopted a least restrictive alternative test in an attempt to maximize protection for religiously motivated practices. Because the least restrictive alternative test only considers the importance of the governmental interest and the availability of alternative means to accomplish those interests, thereby ignoring the importance of the burdened religious activity to the individual and the degree of burden on religious activity, all religious interests are treated equally when asserted against a governmental interest. Under such an inflexible and brittle test, the Supreme Court has recently denied religious claims which had previously been recognized. …
Reasonable Expectations: Seeking A Principled Application, William A. Mayhew
Reasonable Expectations: Seeking A Principled Application, William A. Mayhew
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality And A Proposal For Its Amelioration, W. Noel Keyes
The Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality And A Proposal For Its Amelioration, W. Noel Keyes
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Restatement (Second): A Tribute To Its Increasingly Advantageous Quality, And An Encouragement To Continue The Trend, John W. Wade
The Restatement (Second): A Tribute To Its Increasingly Advantageous Quality, And An Encouragement To Continue The Trend, John W. Wade
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nollan V. California Coastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You Want, But Sometimes You Get What You Need, Timothy A. Bittle
Nollan V. California Coastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You Want, But Sometimes You Get What You Need, Timothy A. Bittle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Arbitration Of Federal Domestic Antitrust Claims: How Safe Is The American Safety Doctrine?, Bruce R. Braun
The Arbitration Of Federal Domestic Antitrust Claims: How Safe Is The American Safety Doctrine?, Bruce R. Braun
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Note On Individual Recovery In Derivative Suits, Richard A. Booth
A Note On Individual Recovery In Derivative Suits, Richard A. Booth
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Shareholder Litigant: Basic, Inc. V. Levinson In Context, Jayne W. Barnard
The Supreme Court And The Shareholder Litigant: Basic, Inc. V. Levinson In Context, Jayne W. Barnard
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Overruling Of Royal Globe: A "Royal Bonanza" For Insurance Companies, But What Happens Now?, Michael J. Gainer
The Overruling Of Royal Globe: A "Royal Bonanza" For Insurance Companies, But What Happens Now?, Michael J. Gainer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thompson V. Oklahoma: Debating The Constitutionality Of Juvenile Executions, Susan M. Simmons
Thompson V. Oklahoma: Debating The Constitutionality Of Juvenile Executions, Susan M. Simmons
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Coy V. Iowa: A Constitutional Right Of Intimidation, John A. Mayers
Coy V. Iowa: A Constitutional Right Of Intimidation, John A. Mayers
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Kozminski: On The Threshold Of Involuntary Servitude , Kenneth T. Koonce Jr.
United States V. Kozminski: On The Threshold Of Involuntary Servitude , Kenneth T. Koonce Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Sentencing Error: Thomas V. Morris And The Double Jeopardy Clause , Paul G. Flynn
Judicial Sentencing Error: Thomas V. Morris And The Double Jeopardy Clause , Paul G. Flynn
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thompson V. Thompson: The Jurisdictional Dilemma Of Child Custody Cases Under The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act , Steven M. Schuetze
Thompson V. Thompson: The Jurisdictional Dilemma Of Child Custody Cases Under The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act , Steven M. Schuetze
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Saint Francis College V. Al-Khazraji: Cosmetic Surgery Or A Fresh Breadth For Section 1981? , Barbara A. Bayliss
Saint Francis College V. Al-Khazraji: Cosmetic Surgery Or A Fresh Breadth For Section 1981? , Barbara A. Bayliss
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hustler Magazine, Inc. V. Falwell: Laugh Or Cry, Public Figures Must Learn To Live With Satirical Criticism , James R. Laguzza
Hustler Magazine, Inc. V. Falwell: Laugh Or Cry, Public Figures Must Learn To Live With Satirical Criticism , James R. Laguzza
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
California Liquor Liability: A Decade After Coulter V. Superior Court , Darla R. Desteiguer
California Liquor Liability: A Decade After Coulter V. Superior Court , Darla R. Desteiguer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thornburgh V. Abbott: Slamming The Prison Gates On Constitutional Rights, Megan M. Mcdonald
Thornburgh V. Abbott: Slamming The Prison Gates On Constitutional Rights, Megan M. Mcdonald
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response To "One Year After Dondi: Time To Get Back To Litigating?", Thomas M. Reavley
Response To "One Year After Dondi: Time To Get Back To Litigating?", Thomas M. Reavley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
One Year After Dondi: Time To Get Back To Litigating?, William A. Brewer Iii, Francis B. Majorie
One Year After Dondi: Time To Get Back To Litigating?, William A. Brewer Iii, Francis B. Majorie
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
National Treasury Employees Union V. Von Raab—Will The War Against Drugs Abrogate Constitutional Guarantees?, Alyssa C. Westover
National Treasury Employees Union V. Von Raab—Will The War Against Drugs Abrogate Constitutional Guarantees?, Alyssa C. Westover
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.