Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (49)
- International Law (46)
- International Trade Law (33)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (29)
- State and Local Government Law (29)
-
- Environmental Law (28)
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Immigration Law (26)
- Military, War, and Peace (26)
- Courts (25)
- Health Law and Policy (25)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (25)
- Legal History (24)
- Judges (17)
- Criminal Law (16)
- Legislation (14)
- Supreme Court of the United States (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (11)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Law and Gender (9)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Legal Education (8)
- Law and Philosophy (7)
- Legal Writing and Research (7)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (39)
- University of New Mexico (33)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (30)
- St. Mary's University (26)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- BLR (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- Association of American Law Schools (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- New York Law School (4)
- Liberty University (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of the Pacific (2)
- Duke Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (26)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (15)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (15)
- Judicial review (7)
- Legal theory (5)
-
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Comparative law (3)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (3)
- Empiricism (3)
- Equal Protection Clause (3)
- Equity (3)
- Feminist jurisprudence (3)
- Formalism (3)
- Justice (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal ethics (3)
- Legal formalism (3)
- Legislature (3)
- Morality (3)
- Politics (3)
- Positivism (3)
- Pragmatism (3)
- Remedies (3)
- Articles (2)
- Publication
-
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (33)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (30)
- Cardozo Law Review (27)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (25)
- Articles (9)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (9)
- ExpressO (7)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Journal of Legal Education (6)
- Publications (6)
- Articles & Chapters (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- San Diego International Law Journal (3)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (3)
- William Mitchell Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (2)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (2)
- Pragmatism, Law and Governmentality (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 243
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Reply: The Institutional Dimension Of Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, Richard A. Posner
Reply: The Institutional Dimension Of Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, Richard A. Posner
Michigan Law Review
Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule argue in Interpretation and lnstitutions that judicial interpretation of statutes and constitutions should take account both of the institutional framework within which interpretation takes place and of the consequences of different styles of interpretation; they further argue that this point has been neglected by previous scholars. The first half of the thesis is correct but obvious; the second half, which the authors state in terms emphatic to the point of being immodest, is incorrect. Moreover, the authors offer no feasible suggestions for how the relation between interpretation and the institutional framework might be studied better …
Interpretive Theory In Its Infancy: A Reply To Posner, Cass R. Sunstein, Adrien Vermeule
Interpretive Theory In Its Infancy: A Reply To Posner, Cass R. Sunstein, Adrien Vermeule
Michigan Law Review
In law, problems of interpretation can be explored at different levels of generality. At the most specific level, people might urge that the Equal Protection Clause forbids affirmative action, or that the Food and Drug Act applies to tobacco products. At a higher level of generality, people might argue that the Equal Protection Clause should be interpreted in accordance with the original understanding of its ratifiers, or that the meaning of the Food and Drug Act should be settled with careful attention to its legislative history. At a still higher level of generality, people might identify the considerations that bear …
The Innocence Revolution And Our "Evolving Standards Of Decency" In Death Penalty Jurisprudence, Mark A. Godsey, Thomas Pulley
The Innocence Revolution And Our "Evolving Standards Of Decency" In Death Penalty Jurisprudence, Mark A. Godsey, Thomas Pulley
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
One cannot adequately consider whether the current administration of the death penalty in America measures up to modern notions of decency without doing so in light of the revolution that has occurred over the past decade in the American criminal-justice system - the Innocence Revolution. Up through the 1990s, as a society, we believed our criminal-justice system was highly accurate, but the recent advent of DNA testing and other advanced technologies has demonstrated the naiveté of such beliefs. This article will discuss the history of the Innocence Revolution, examine the impact of that revolution on our society, and ask: "What …
México: ¿Nuevamente Una Colonia Europea?, Richard Stith
México: ¿Nuevamente Una Colonia Europea?, Richard Stith
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Tracking The Circulatory Of Confession Jurisprudence After Massiah & (And) Miranda: Can A Superficial Application Of Property Law Make Sense Out Of Nonsense?, Rory Bahadur
St. Thomas Law Review
After Miranda v. Arizona and Massiah v. United States, there were arguably three doctrinally separate methodologies for determining the admissibility of confessions in criminal proceedings. The interaction of these three doctrines has generated a complex, contradictory, somewhat inexplicable, and chaotic jurisprudence. This paper re-examines the post- Miranda interaction of the three doctrines, and argues that basic property law provides a conceptual framework for reconciling what appears to be an otherwise arbitrary and unpalatable collection of Supreme Court decisions. Section one briefly examines the totality of the circumstances test and the Miranda and Massiah decisions themselves, not from the standpoint of …
In The Wake Of Kyllo V. United States: The Future Of Thermal Imaging Cameras, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 507 (2003), Paul Kleppetsch
In The Wake Of Kyllo V. United States: The Future Of Thermal Imaging Cameras, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 507 (2003), Paul Kleppetsch
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Holmes, Common Law Theory, And Judicial Restraint, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 457 (2003), Frederic R. Kellogg
Holmes, Common Law Theory, And Judicial Restraint, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 457 (2003), Frederic R. Kellogg
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Into The Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching Through The Exercise Of Unequal Bargaining Power, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 421 (2003), Pamela Edwards
Into The Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching Through The Exercise Of Unequal Bargaining Power, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 421 (2003), Pamela Edwards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Behind The Words: Interpreting The Hobbs Act Requirement Of "Obtaining Of Property From Another", 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (2003), Kristal S. Stippich
Behind The Words: Interpreting The Hobbs Act Requirement Of "Obtaining Of Property From Another", 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (2003), Kristal S. Stippich
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Why The Constitution Should Be Amended To Grant Congress The Power To Legislate In Furtherance Of The General Welfare, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2003), Casey L. Westover
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Americans With Disabilities Act (Ada), Seventh Circuit Review, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 953 (2003), Paul Cherner, Abel Leon
Americans With Disabilities Act (Ada), Seventh Circuit Review, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 953 (2003), Paul Cherner, Abel Leon
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Covering Women And Violence: Media Treatment Of Vawa's Civil Rights Remedy, Sarah F. Russell
Covering Women And Violence: Media Treatment Of Vawa's Civil Rights Remedy, Sarah F. Russell
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
This Article analyzes how newspapers described and characterized the civil rights provision over the past decade and shaped the public discourse about the law. The author examines how lower federal courts, and eventually the Supreme Court, categorized the VAWA remedy when deciding whether Congress had acted within its commerce powers. After considering why there may have been resistance in the press and in the courts to VAWA's categorization of violence against women as a civil rights issue, the author concludes by examining the remedies that have been introduced at the state and local level for victims of gender-motivated violence, and …
The Disappearance Of The Ultra Vires Doctrine In Greater China: Harmonized Legislative Action Or (Simply) An Accident Of History, Lutz-Christian Wolff
The Disappearance Of The Ultra Vires Doctrine In Greater China: Harmonized Legislative Action Or (Simply) An Accident Of History, Lutz-Christian Wolff
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
In the context of company law, the term "ultra vires" is normally used to describe acts that are beyond the scope of the powers of a corporation. Rules concerning ultra vires acts of companies have changed in recent years in mainland China, Taiwan and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ("Hong Kong"). It appears that in all of these parts of Greater China, the legal frameworks are now rather similar to each other and seem to resemble the rules that are applied in the Macau Special Administrative Region ("Macau"). This, of course, provokes questions: what are the reasons for these …
The Easy Case Against Tax Simplification, Samuel A. Donaldson
The Easy Case Against Tax Simplification, Samuel A. Donaldson
Faculty Publications By Year
There is growing political momentum to simplify the Internal Revenue Code. While the federal tax laws should be no more complex than necessary, this Article demonstrates that tax complexity is not as bad as political rhetoric leads us to believe. The Article makes four arguments in support of this thesis. First, the forces comprising tax complexity are either inevitable or net beneficial, so calls for simplification are ultimately pointless. Second, the alleged harms of tax complexity are either unproven or overstated, so the need for simplification is questionable. Third, significant proposals for simplification are flawed because they either overcorrect for …
Negotiating The Jurisprudential Terrain: A Model Theoretic Approach To Legal Theory, Christopher Roederer
Negotiating The Jurisprudential Terrain: A Model Theoretic Approach To Legal Theory, Christopher Roederer
Seattle University Law Review
This paper explores borrowing a meta-theoretical approach to theory from the natural and social sciences in order to provide a framework within which to situate and evaluate the various theories one encounters in the field of law and jurisprudence. Often it is the case that students of jurisprudence go from one school or theory to another with one of three responses: (1) this makes no sense to me; (2) this makes some sense, but what is the point or relevance; or (3) this makes sense and seems true, but so do many of the schools, theories, and theorists we have …
Judicial Independence In Family Courts, Barbara A. Babb, Judith D. Moran
Judicial Independence In Family Courts, Barbara A. Babb, Judith D. Moran
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Index
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Index
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
No abstract provided.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Day Sars Came To Town: The Court’S Role In Preventing Epidemics, Ian B. Cowan
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Day Sars Came To Town: The Court’S Role In Preventing Epidemics, Ian B. Cowan
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
PROTOCOL FOR HPPA APPLICATIONS IN THE DAVIS COURT BY THE MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - President’S Column, Francis X. Halligan Jr.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - President’S Column, Francis X. Halligan Jr.
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Upon assuming the presidency of the American Judges Association at the 2002 Annual Conference in Maui, I indicated that it was one of my goals for the AJA to have a greater participation in the activities of the United Nations. We have an association with the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) affiliate.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Complete Issue
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Complete Issue
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
No abstract provided.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Federal Sentencing Guidelines: An Infectious Antidote, Rosalind Alexis Sargent
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Federal Sentencing Guidelines: An Infectious Antidote, Rosalind Alexis Sargent
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Why should a bank robber in California get a different sentence than a bank robber in Texas? This was the rallying cry behind the legislative implementation of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Senate Judiciary Committee found that a major source of the astounding variations in federal sentencing for identical crimes was the “judge factor.” Federal judges had the discretion to select a sentence from anywhere within a broad statutory range for each offense. The judge had the sole responsibility of assessing each individual offender and deciding where, within that broad range, the offender should receive a sentence. As a result, …
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Editor's Note
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Editor's Note
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Before describing each of the articles in this issue, let me take a moment to comment on the sorts of problems that arise in editing a journal intended for both a United States and Canadian audience. The American Judges Association was formed in the United States and has most of its members there. It also has a substantial—and growing—membership in Canada. As our Canadian readers are well aware, there are some differences in the way the English language is used in Canada and in the United States. (For an entertaining and enlightening discussion of some of the differences, prepared by …
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Ignition Interlock System: An Evidentiary Tool Becomes A Sentencing Element, Andrew Fulkerson
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Ignition Interlock System: An Evidentiary Tool Becomes A Sentencing Element, Andrew Fulkerson
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Technology is becoming an increasingly pervasive aspect of the criminal justice system. One of the earliest technological innovations in the investigation of crimes was the use of fingerprints for identification of suspects. Fingerprinting began as an investigatory tool and by the early 20th century was accepted as scientific evidence in court proceedings. Courts now increasingly rely upon expert witnesses to explain scientific evidence, which is often critical in the decision- making process for criminal and civil courts. While technology has routinely been utilized as both investigatory and evidentiary devices, only in the last decade has a technological device made the …
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Cover
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Cover
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
No abstract provided.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Table Of Contents
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - Table Of Contents
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
No abstract provided.
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Ignition Interlock System: An Evidentiary Tool Becomes A Sentencing Element, Andrew Fulkerson
Court Review: Volume 39, Issue 4 - The Ignition Interlock System: An Evidentiary Tool Becomes A Sentencing Element, Andrew Fulkerson
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Technology is becoming an increasingly pervasive aspect of the criminal justice system. One of the earliest technological innovations in the investigation of crimes was the use of fingerprints for identification of suspects. Fingerprinting began as an investigatory tool and by the early 20th century was accepted as scientific evidence in court proceedings. Courts now increasingly rely upon expert witnesses to explain scientific evidence, which is often critical in the decision- making process for criminal and civil courts. While technology has routinely been utilized as both investigatory and evidentiary devices, only in the last decade has a technological device made the …
The Stages Of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, And Realism, Wilson Huhn
The Stages Of Legal Reasoning: Formalism, Analogy, And Realism, Wilson Huhn
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Defining The Movement: Parallels Between Feminism And Environmentalism, Alice Kaswan
Defining The Movement: Parallels Between Feminism And Environmentalism, Alice Kaswan
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article explores the evolution of the feminist and environmental movements by incorporating diverse voices, highlighting the importance of anti-essentialism and intersectionality. It draws parallels between how both movements have expanded their definitions to address broader social justice issues, moving beyond initial narrow focuses.
Holmes On Natural Law, Robert P. George
Holmes On Natural Law, Robert P. George
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.