Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (34)
- Constitutional Law (29)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (29)
- International Law (27)
- State and Local Government Law (26)
-
- Military, War, and Peace (24)
- Health Law and Policy (23)
- Immigration Law (23)
- Environmental Law (22)
- International Trade Law (22)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (22)
- Supreme Court of the United States (16)
- Criminal Procedure (14)
- Judges (11)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (11)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Courts (9)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- Legal Education (9)
- Legal History (9)
- Evidence (8)
- Fourth Amendment (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Common Law (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Institution
-
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (35)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (27)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- University of New Mexico (21)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
-
- UIC School of Law (6)
- Association of American Law Schools (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of San Diego (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (18)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (9)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (9)
- Dickerson v. United States (8)
- Miranda v. Arizona (8)
-
- Fifth Amendment (6)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Federalism (4)
- Formalism (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Legal profession (4)
- St. Mary’s Law School (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Book review (3)
- Confession (3)
- Custodial interrogation (3)
- Due Process Clause (3)
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Interpretation (3)
- Judicial decision making (3)
- Law and economics (3)
- Lawrence Joseph (3)
- Legal realism (3)
- Michigan v. Tucker (3)
- New York v. Quarles (3)
- Original meaning (3)
- Police interrogation (3)
- Religion (3)
- Rule of law (3)
- Self-Incrimination Clause (3)
- Publication
-
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (35)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (22)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (21)
- Cardozo Law Review (20)
- Michigan Law Review (9)
-
- Articles (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Journal of Legal Education (5)
- Publications (5)
- San Diego Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (3)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- Faculty Law Review Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Human Rights Brief (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 182
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Masthead, United States-Mexico Law Journal
Masthead, United States-Mexico Law Journal
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Nafta Standards Regulation: The U.S. Perspective, Geri C. Word
Nafta Standards Regulation: The U.S. Perspective, Geri C. Word
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Corporate Governance: An International And Mexican Perspective, Mike Lubrano
Corporate Governance: An International And Mexican Perspective, Mike Lubrano
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Some Brief Comments About The Pre-Merger Notification Processes In Mexico And The United States, Alfred Mathewson
Some Brief Comments About The Pre-Merger Notification Processes In Mexico And The United States, Alfred Mathewson
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Landmark Cases Related To Proceedings Commenced By The Cfc For Monopolistic Practices, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro
Landmark Cases Related To Proceedings Commenced By The Cfc For Monopolistic Practices, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Recent Decisions Of The Mexican Supreme Court Of Justice, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez
Recent Decisions Of The Mexican Supreme Court Of Justice, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Comparative Perspectives Of The Regulatory Process, Santiago Gonzalez Luna, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, Alfred Mathewson, Rafael Valdes-Abascal
Comparative Perspectives Of The Regulatory Process, Santiago Gonzalez Luna, Leon Ricardo Elizondo Castro, Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, Alfred Mathewson, Rafael Valdes-Abascal
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Corporate Governance Assessment: Mexico, Antje Zaldivar Mueller
Corporate Governance Assessment: Mexico, Antje Zaldivar Mueller
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Capital Markets Issues And Corporate Governance, John E. Rogers, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa, Terrence A. Everett, David Huntington, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Mike Lubrano, James E. Ritch
Capital Markets Issues And Corporate Governance, John E. Rogers, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa, Terrence A. Everett, David Huntington, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Mike Lubrano, James E. Ritch
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Insider Trading And Other Hot Topics In The Mexican Markets, Miguel Jauregui Rojas
Insider Trading And Other Hot Topics In The Mexican Markets, Miguel Jauregui Rojas
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Mexican Lawyers Going North And U.S. Lawyers Going South: Interstate Legal Practice, Nafta And U.S. State Bar Regulations, Michael W. Gordon, George Bermann, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Carlos Loperena Ruiz, William Macpherson, Stephen C. Nelson
Mexican Lawyers Going North And U.S. Lawyers Going South: Interstate Legal Practice, Nafta And U.S. State Bar Regulations, Michael W. Gordon, George Bermann, Miguel Jauregui Rojas, Carlos Loperena Ruiz, William Macpherson, Stephen C. Nelson
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Front Matter, United States-Mexico Law Journal
Front Matter, United States-Mexico Law Journal
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Public Offerings Of Securities: Mexican Law Issues, James E. Ritch
Public Offerings Of Securities: Mexican Law Issues, James E. Ritch
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Mexican Standards Related Policy And Regulation, Jose Augustin Portal
Mexican Standards Related Policy And Regulation, Jose Augustin Portal
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Private Placements Under United States Federal Securities Law, Terrence A. Everett
Private Placements Under United States Federal Securities Law, Terrence A. Everett
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Panel Discussion: The Operational Realities Of Resolving Or Not Resolving Standards Disputes Under Nafta, Ralph Folsom, Jose Augustin Portal, Jimmie V. Reyna, Geri Word
Panel Discussion: The Operational Realities Of Resolving Or Not Resolving Standards Disputes Under Nafta, Ralph Folsom, Jose Augustin Portal, Jimmie V. Reyna, Geri Word
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Private Placement Of Mexican Securities: Mexican Law Issues, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa
Private Placement Of Mexican Securities: Mexican Law Issues, Francisco Carrillo Gamboa
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
Concentrations: An Analysis Of The Mexican Economic Competition Legal Framework, Rafael Valdes-Abascal
Concentrations: An Analysis Of The Mexican Economic Competition Legal Framework, Rafael Valdes-Abascal
United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005)
No abstract provided.
The Paths Not Taken: The Supreme Court's Failures In Dickerson, Paul G. Cassell
The Paths Not Taken: The Supreme Court's Failures In Dickerson, Paul G. Cassell
Michigan Law Review
Where's the rest of the opinion? That was my immediate reaction to reading the Supreme Court's terse decision in Dickerson, delivered to me via email from the clerk's office a few minutes after its release. Surely, I thought, some glitch in the transmission had eliminated the pages of discussion on the critical issues in the case. Yet, as it became clear that I had received all of the Court's opinion, my incredulity grew.
Miranda, Dickerson, And The Puzzling Persistence Of Fifth Amendment Exceptionalism, Stephen J. Schulhofer
Miranda, Dickerson, And The Puzzling Persistence Of Fifth Amendment Exceptionalism, Stephen J. Schulhofer
Michigan Law Review
Dickerson v. United States preserves the status quo regime for judicial oversight of police interrogation. That result could be seen, in the present climate, as a victory for due process values, but there remain many reasons for concern that existing safeguards are flawed - that they are either too restrictive or not restrictive enough. Such concerns are partly empirical, of course. They depend on factual assessments of how much the Miranda rules do restrict the police. But such concerns also reflect a crucial, though often unstated, normative premise; they presuppose a certain view of how much the police should be …
Identifying And (Re)Formulating Prophylactic Rules, Safe Harbors, And Incidental Rights In Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Susan R. Klein
Identifying And (Re)Formulating Prophylactic Rules, Safe Harbors, And Incidental Rights In Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Susan R. Klein
Michigan Law Review
The Miranda conundrum runs something like this. If the Miranda decision represents true constitutional interpretation, and all unwarned statements taken during custodial interrogation are "compelled" within the meaning of the Self-Incrimination Clause, the impeachment and "fruits" exceptions to Miranda should fall. If it is not true constitutional interpretation, than the Court has no business reversing state criminal convictions for its violation. I offer here what I hope is a satisfying answer to this conundrum, on both descriptive and normative levels, that justifies not only Miranda but a host of similar Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Court decisions as well. In Part …
Separated At Birth But Siblings Nonetheless: Miranda And The Due Process Notice Cases, George C. Thomas Iii
Separated At Birth But Siblings Nonetheless: Miranda And The Due Process Notice Cases, George C. Thomas Iii
Michigan Law Review
Paraphrasing Justice Holmes, law is less about logic than experience. Courts and scholars have now had thirty-four years of experience with Miranda v. Arizona, including the Court's recent endorsement in Dickerson v. United States last Term. Looking back over this experience, it is plain that the Court has created a Miranda doctrine quite different from what it has said it was creating. I think the analytic structure in Dickerson supports this rethinking of Miranda. To connect the dots, I offer a new explanation for Miranda that permits us to reconcile Dickerson and the rest of the post-Miranda doctrine with the …
In The Stationhouse After Dickerson, Charles D. Weisselberg
In The Stationhouse After Dickerson, Charles D. Weisselberg
Michigan Law Review
Miranda v. Arizona established the high water mark of the protections afforded an accused during a custodial interrogation. During the decades that followed, the United States Supreme Court allowed Miranda's foundation to erode, inviting a direct challenge to the landmark ruling. In Dickerson v. United States, the Court turned back such a challenge and placed Miranda upon a more secure, constitutional footing. This Article explores the impact of Dickerson in the place where Miranda was meant to matter most: the stationhouse. As I have described elsewhere, Supreme Court decisions have influenced a number of California law enforcement agencies to instruct …
The Undersell: An Essay On Duncan Kennedy's A Critique Of Adjudication, Jane B. Baron
The Undersell: An Essay On Duncan Kennedy's A Critique Of Adjudication, Jane B. Baron
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miranda, The Constitution, And Congress, David A. Strauss
Miranda, The Constitution, And Congress, David A. Strauss
Michigan Law Review
Are Miranda warnings required by the Constitution, or not? If they are, why has the Supreme Court repeatedly said that the rights created by Miranda are "not themselves rights protected by the Constitution"? If not, why can't an Act of Congress, such as 18 U.S.C. 3501, declare them to be unnecessary? These were the central questions posed by United States v. Dickerson. It is not clear that the majority opinion ever really answered them. The majority said that "Miranda is constitutionally based," that Miranda has "constitutional underpinnings," that Miranda is "a constitutional decision," and that Miranda "announced a constitutional rule." …
Miranda'S Mistake, William J. Stuntz
Miranda'S Mistake, William J. Stuntz
Michigan Law Review
The oddest thing about Miranda is its politics - a point reinforced by the decision in, and the reaction to, Dickerson v. United States. In Dickerson, the Supreme Court faced the question whether Miranda ought to be overturned, either directly or by permitting legislative overrides. The lawyers, the literature, and the Court split along right-left - or, in the Court's case, right-center - lines, with the right seeking to do away with Miranda's restrictions on police questioning, and the left (or center) seeking to maintain them. The split is familiar. Reactions to Miranda have always divided along ideological lines, with …
Questioning The Relevance Of Miranda In The Twenty-First Century, Richard A. Leo
Questioning The Relevance Of Miranda In The Twenty-First Century, Richard A. Leo
Michigan Law Review
Miranda v. Arizona is the most well-known criminal justice decision - arguably the most well-known legal decision - in American history. Since it was decided in 1966, the Miranda decision has spawned voluminous newspaper coverage, political and legal debate, and academic commentary. The Miranda warnings themselves have become so well-known through the media of television that most people recognize them immediately. As Patrick Malone has pointed out, the Miranda decision has added its own lexicon of words and phrases to the American language. Perhaps with this understanding in mind, George Thomas recently suggested that the Miranda warnings are more well-known …
A Critique Of Adjudication: Fin De Siècle: Confession Without Avoidance, Tamara R. Piety
A Critique Of Adjudication: Fin De Siècle: Confession Without Avoidance, Tamara R. Piety
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Duncan Kennedy, A Critique Of Adjudication: Fin De Siècle, David Kennedy
Duncan Kennedy, A Critique Of Adjudication: Fin De Siècle, David Kennedy
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lilies Of The Field: A Critique Of Adjudication, Anthony Paul Farley
Lilies Of The Field: A Critique Of Adjudication, Anthony Paul Farley
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.