Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (36)
- Constitutional Law (31)
- State and Local Government Law (29)
- Health Law and Policy (25)
- Immigration Law (25)
-
- Legal History (25)
- International Law (24)
- Environmental Law (23)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (22)
- Military, War, and Peace (22)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (22)
- Judges (18)
- Courts (17)
- International Trade Law (16)
- Law and Gender (10)
- Law and Philosophy (10)
- Legislation (10)
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (8)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Common Law (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Education Law (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (47)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- University of New Mexico (16)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- UIC School of Law (8)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Cleveland State University (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (35)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (19)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (19)
- Democracy (11)
- Judges (9)
-
- Political Systems and Governments (9)
- Politics (General) (8)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Due Process Clause (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Student comment (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Legal History (5)
- Constitutional interpretation (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- NAFTA (4)
- North American Free Trade Agreement (4)
- Statutory interpretation (4)
- Textualism (4)
- U.S. Const. amend. V (4)
- Adjudication (3)
- Book review (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Courts (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- EPA (3)
- Economics Law (3)
- Environmental Side Agreement (3)
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (35)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (22)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (16)
- Articles (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
-
- UIC Law Review (8)
- Publications (7)
- American University Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (5)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Hofstra Law & Policy Symposium (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 165
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
An Epilogue To The Age Of Pound, Thomas A. Green
An Epilogue To The Age Of Pound, Thomas A. Green
Articles
Doubts about the reality of criminal offenders' autonomy have sometimes played a role in the movement to abolish, or greatly reduce the reach of, the sanction of capital punishment.
Legislative History And Statutory Interpretation: The Supreme Court And The Tenth Circuit, Fritz Snyder
Legislative History And Statutory Interpretation: The Supreme Court And The Tenth Circuit, Fritz Snyder
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reconsidering Strict Scrutiny Of Affirmative Action, Brent E. Simmons
Reconsidering Strict Scrutiny Of Affirmative Action, Brent E. Simmons
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Under the artificial constraints of strict scrutiny, however, the courts are free to veto the government's choice of more effective, race-conscious means. The Supreme Court's unfortunate and ill-conceived adoption of strict scrutiny as the constitutional standard for reviewing race-conscious affirmative action should be reconsidered for several reasons. This Article examines those reasons.
Natural Law And The Limits To Judicial Review, David F. Forte
Natural Law And The Limits To Judicial Review, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The very premise of judicial review in America is rooted in the structure of natural law. Judges have no authority to make any kind of law. They can only enforce and apply authoritatively passed positive law. But if the positive law has not been enacted, either in form or substance, without proper authority, then if the judge should enforce such a law, he would in fact be making new positive law, and would be acting outside of his authority.
Challenges In Judging: Some Insights From The Writings Of Moses, Gordon J. Beggs
Challenges In Judging: Some Insights From The Writings Of Moses, Gordon J. Beggs
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
I would like to use the writings of Moses as a lens to examine some challenges in judging. Moses authored the first five books of the Old Testament known as the Pentateuch or books of the law--Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. He is probably best known for leading the Hebrew people out of bondage in Egypt and for receiving the Ten Commandments. As our discussion today will reveal, he may also be credited with authoring some significant principles with respect to the judicial function.
What's In A Name - Nothing Good If It's Friday: The Seventh Circuit Invalidates Good Friday Public School Holiday, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1031 (1996), Joanne Yasus
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Death With Dignity: Aids And A Call For Legislation Securing The Right To Assisted Suicide, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 677 (1996), Jeremy A. Sitcoff
Death With Dignity: Aids And A Call For Legislation Securing The Right To Assisted Suicide, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 677 (1996), Jeremy A. Sitcoff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commentary: Noam Chomsky And Judicial Review, James G. Wilson
Commentary: Noam Chomsky And Judicial Review, James G. Wilson
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Although Chomsky has never discussed judicial review in any detail, he recently made several interesting observations. He believes America's governmental structure remains acceptable, even desirable, even though all three federal branches have not just failed to protect us from private power's excesses but instead have devoted far too much of their energy and power to enhancing private power. The constitutional text creates a unique relationship between the Supreme Court and private power. Because the Court is staffed by unelected Justices who need not pander for money to be reelected, it is more independent of the rich and powerful than either …
The Antinomy Of Coherence And Determinacy, William A. Edmundson
The Antinomy Of Coherence And Determinacy, William A. Edmundson
Faculty Publications By Year
Coherence and determinacy are both apparent desiderata for bodies of law and legal systems. Unfortunately, in legal systems of any complexity, increasing the degree of one invariably brings about a lessening of the other. For theories of law - such as Ronald Dworkin's - that emphasize the importance of coherence in judicial reasoning, while requiring as a condition of legitimacy that legal rights pre-exist judicial decisions, this must be an unwelcome fact.
Increasing Recognition Of Enterprise Principles In Determining Parent And Subsidiary Corporation Liabilities, The, Phillip Blumberg
Increasing Recognition Of Enterprise Principles In Determining Parent And Subsidiary Corporation Liabilities, The, Phillip Blumberg
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Gatekeeping In Texas: The Practical Impact Of Full Implementation Of The Texas Rules Of Civil Evidence Regarding Experts., Suzanne B. Baker
Gatekeeping In Texas: The Practical Impact Of Full Implementation Of The Texas Rules Of Civil Evidence Regarding Experts., Suzanne B. Baker
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Free Trade Agreements And The Federal Courts: Emerging Issues., Robert P. Deyling
Free Trade Agreements And The Federal Courts: Emerging Issues., Robert P. Deyling
St. Mary's Law Journal
The United States and Canada, and more recently Mexico, have tried to resolve certain types of international trade disputes through a unique process. Under the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) and its successor, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), disputing parties may choose binational panels to review disputes over antidumping and countervailing duty determinations. Binational panel review entirely replaces national judicial review for each case in which the parties choose the panel process. Panels are convened on a case-by-case basis from a list of trade experts submitted by disputing countries. Panels must follow relevant national trade law in …
Adarand Constructors, Inc. V. Pena: The Lochnerization Of Affirmative Action Recent Development., Patricia A. Carlson
Adarand Constructors, Inc. V. Pena: The Lochnerization Of Affirmative Action Recent Development., Patricia A. Carlson
St. Mary's Law Journal
The Supreme Court’s decision in Adarand will lead to the invalidation of many federal programs because the decision requires strict scrutiny for all affirmative action programs, including federal programs. The Court ignores both constitutional strictures and American history by resorting to Lochner era rulings of striking down federal socio-economic regulations. Overturning the clear precedent of Fullilove undermines stare decisis by valuing the language of the Court’s decision over its meaning. The Court in Adarand presumes that the Constitution is color-blind. This presumption ignores the history leading up to the Reconstruction Amendments, the purpose of the Reconstruction Amendments, and the intentions …
Nafta And The Environment: A Proposal For Free Trade In Hazardous Waste Between The United States And Mexico Symposium - The Environment And The United States-Mexico Border., David W. Eaton
St. Mary's Law Journal
Over the past decade, the transboundary movement of hazardous waste has become an important issue. Because of its geographic proximity to the United States and its desire to attract foreign investment, Mexico has become one of the United States-owned maquiladoras’ favorite dumping grounds. The recent North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) may only exacerbate matters. Because the health and environmental risks associated with the inappropriate disposal of hazardous waste knows no boundaries, it is important NAFTA signatories jointly address waste issues. While NAFTA has had a positive impact on environmental protection in the United States and Mexico, the NAFTA debate …
Hopwood V. Texas: A Victory For Equality That Denies Reality - An Afterword Recent Development., Barbara Bader Aldave
Hopwood V. Texas: A Victory For Equality That Denies Reality - An Afterword Recent Development., Barbara Bader Aldave
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
A Nonoriginalist Perspective On The Lessons Of History, Michael C. Dorf
A Nonoriginalist Perspective On The Lessons Of History, Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Revolution, Robert C. Power
The Fourth Revolution, Robert C. Power
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Anatomy Of Emtala: A Litigator's Guide., Alicia K. Dowdy, Gail N. Friend, Jennifer L. Rangel
The Anatomy Of Emtala: A Litigator's Guide., Alicia K. Dowdy, Gail N. Friend, Jennifer L. Rangel
St. Mary's Law Journal
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) prohibits hospitals from inappropriately transferring or refusing medical care to persons with emergency medical conditions. EMTALA was passed in response to the practice of “dumping” seriously ill patients from private hospitals into public ones, to ensure all patients receive medical treatment in emergency situations. Plaintiffs have attempted to pursue EMTALA claims against non-hospital defendants, but courts have consistently disallowed such claims under the statute. By limiting the scope of its coverage to hospitals, EMTALA creates a situation unique from ordinary medical malpractice. Although hospitals may be held liable for negligent credentialing …
A Fair Day's Pay For A Fair Day's Work: Time To Raise And Index The Minimum Wage., William P. Quigley
A Fair Day's Pay For A Fair Day's Work: Time To Raise And Index The Minimum Wage., William P. Quigley
St. Mary's Law Journal
Millions of people are working for a living but not receiving a living wage in return for their work. The value of the minimum wage continues to erode, with the Congressional Research Service estimating the minimum wage would have to rise to $6.75 per hour in 1996 to equal the purchasing power it represented in 1978. It is not in the common interest, nor in the interest of justice, for people to work full-time, yet remain mired in poverty. Reforming the minimum wage by raising it and indexing it for inflation is a critical step toward attaining Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s …
Intellectual Property Pirates: Congress Raises The Stakes In The Modern Battle To Protect Copyrights And Safeguard The United States Economy Comment., Timothy D. Howell
Intellectual Property Pirates: Congress Raises The Stakes In The Modern Battle To Protect Copyrights And Safeguard The United States Economy Comment., Timothy D. Howell
St. Mary's Law Journal
Intellectual property pirates menace the industry by hijacking audio recordings, movies, television broadcasts, and software—posing an economic threat and accounting for billions of dollars in losses annually. This Comment examines legislative attempts to combat information piracy through criminalization of copyright infringement—focusing on the proposed Criminal Copyright Improvement Act of 1995 (Improvement Act). The Improvement Act contemplates expansion of criminal copyright infringement law, attempting to close the legal “loophole” exposed by United States v. LaMacchia, and providing a more effective means for deterring copyright piracy. Part II of this Comment provides a historical overview of United States copyright laws and introduces …
Principles Of Governmental Immunity In Texas: The Texas Government Waives Sovereign Immunity When It Contracts - Or Does It Comment., Renna Rhodes
St. Mary's Law Journal
When the government causes injury through negligence or by breaching a contract, the injured party must face the obstacle of governmental immunity. The doctrine of governmental immunity can act as a total bar to recovery, especially in Texas. Over the years, governmental immunity increasingly has faced attack from courts and commentators. Some states, including Texas, have revised the common-law doctrine, allowing the government to be sued in certain situations. In Texas, principles of governmental immunity are often misconstrued. Which principles of governmental immunity apply to a particular situation in Texas depends on whether the defendant is a state entity or …
Scientific Evidence Under Daubert., John H. Mansfield
Scientific Evidence Under Daubert., John H. Mansfield
St. Mary's Law Journal
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument over the value of a jury trial compared with a bench trial or decisions by scientists. The argument has both a constitutional dimension in the provisions relating to a jury trial, compulsory process and due process, and a nonconstitutional dimension in the ordinary law of evidence. In the recent case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court took a different approach, basing its decision almost entirely on an interpretation of the particular words used in Rule 702 of the Federal …
Speaking The Language Of Exclusion: How Equal Protection And Fundamental Rights Analyses Permit Language Discrimination Comment., Donna F. Coltharp
Speaking The Language Of Exclusion: How Equal Protection And Fundamental Rights Analyses Permit Language Discrimination Comment., Donna F. Coltharp
St. Mary's Law Journal
In the summer of 1995, the en banc Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Flores v. State upheld a lower court’s ruling to give a drunk-driving (DWI) offender a year in prison as opposed to probation. The trial judge denied the defendant probation due to his inability to speak English. The county in which the defendant was arrested and convicted did not provide a DWI rehabilitation program in Spanish, leading the judge to determine the defendant would not benefit from probation. In his appeal, Mr. Flores claimed the lower court violated his equal protection and due process rights under the …
Changing The Nature Of Corporate Representation: Attorney Liability For Aiding And Abetting The Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Comment., Stanley Pietrusiak Jr.
Changing The Nature Of Corporate Representation: Attorney Liability For Aiding And Abetting The Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Comment., Stanley Pietrusiak Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
In 1983, the American Bar Association (ABA) comprehensively defined corporate counsel’s ethical duties in situations where a corporate officer engages in conduct which could substantially harm the organization. In such cases, the nature of the corporate attorney’s duties depends on whether the officer’s conduct is illegal or whether the officer made a policy decision which falls short of illegality. Rule 1.13 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct imposes the duty on corporate counsel to take steps to stop corporate officers from engaging in illegal conduct which is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization. Conversely, counsel is …
Same-Sex Harassment - The Next Step Up In The Evolution Of Sexual Harassment Law Under Title Vii Comment., Regina L. Stone-Harris
Same-Sex Harassment - The Next Step Up In The Evolution Of Sexual Harassment Law Under Title Vii Comment., Regina L. Stone-Harris
St. Mary's Law Journal
Women sexually harassed by male co-workers are protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Yet, men are not protected because the federal courts in the Fifth Circuit do not protect men who are sexually harassed by other men. Male victims of sexual harassment are protected if they live in another district which does offer Title VII protection to same-sex victims. But should geography dictate protection? The federal courts are currently split as to whether a claim of sexual harassment between members of the same gender is actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. In the absence …
Introduction, Belinda Cooper
Introduction, Belinda Cooper
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article explores the emergence and gradual integration of feminist jurisprudence in Germany, highlighting the challenges and opportunities faced by women in law as feminist ideas begin to influence legal academia and practice. It traces the development of feminist legal scholarship in Germany, starting from its early stages in the 1980s to the establishment of institutionalized feminist jurisprudence at Humboldt University. The article introduces a collection of writings that examine key legal issues affecting women in Germany, emphasizing the interplay between German and European Community law, as well as the cultural and historical contexts that shape legal discourse.
A Different Approach To Jurisprudence? Feminisms In German Legal Science, Legal Cultures, And The Ambivalence Of Law, Susanne Baer
A Different Approach To Jurisprudence? Feminisms In German Legal Science, Legal Cultures, And The Ambivalence Of Law, Susanne Baer
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The integration of feminist theories into legal science and education faces significant challenges, particularly in Germany, where institutional and cultural barriers have slowed progress compared to other countries like Norway, Denmark, and the U.S. While feminist approaches have made inroads elsewhere, Germany remains hesitant, with the question of whether feminism belongs in legal education still unanswered. The tension between feminist perspectives and traditional legal methodologies, coupled with structural academia challenges, underscores the difficulty of achieving meaningful integration.
On The History Of Fathers' Rights And Mothers' Duty Of Care, Sibylla Flügge
On The History Of Fathers' Rights And Mothers' Duty Of Care, Sibylla Flügge
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the historical evolution of custody rights in Germany, focusing on the shift from maternal preference to increasing recognition of fathers' rights. It argues that the legal system's move toward joint custody and equal parental rights reflects broader societal changes in gender roles, while also critiquing the potential backlash against women's emancipation. The analysis highlights how improvements in fathers' legal standing have often coincided with decreased obligations for men to actively care for children, raising concerns about the practical implications for mothers and children.
Using The American Courts To Prosecute International Crimes Against Women: Jane Doe V. Radovan Karadzic And S. Kadic V. Radovan Karadzic, Rachel Bart
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note examines the use of the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) to prosecute international crimes against women, focusing on the *Karadzic* cases. It argues that these cases represent a significant expansion of U.S. federal jurisdiction over human rights abuses, particularly gender-based violence, committed abroad. The Second Circuit's decision to reverse the district court's dismissal and the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari affirmed the applicability of ATCA and TVPA to non-state actors and clarified their role in enforcing international human rights standards.