Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (54)
- Law and Society (46)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (44)
- Health Law and Policy (39)
- Environmental Law (38)
-
- Immigration Law (38)
- Military, War, and Peace (38)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (38)
- Constitutional Law (30)
- Courts (23)
- International Law (23)
- International Trade Law (20)
- Judges (18)
- Supreme Court of the United States (14)
- Legal History (10)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Legislation (9)
- First Amendment (8)
- Law and Gender (8)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Common Law (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- Legal Writing and Research (5)
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Education Law (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (38)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (30)
- University of New Mexico (20)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (14)
- University of Colorado Law School (12)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Valparaiso University (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- California State University, San Bernardino (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (27)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (26)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Federal (13)
- 1992) (11)
-
- Supreme Court (9)
- Constitutional law (8)
- State (8)
- Appellate Division (7)
- Constitution (7)
- First Amendment (7)
- N.Y. Constitutional Article I (7)
- Texas (7)
- Constitutions (6)
- Defendant (6)
- Mexico (6)
- North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (6)
- Court of Appeals (5)
- New York State (5)
- § 6 (5)
- Constitutional interpretation (4)
- Equal protection (4)
- Hermeneutics (4)
- Jr. (4)
- Judges (4)
- Jury (4)
- Rule of law (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- § 1 (4)
- Abortion (3)
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (38)
- Cardozo Law Review (22)
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (20)
- Touro Law Review (14)
- Publications (12)
-
- Articles (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Articles & Book Chapters (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Theses Digitization Project (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 161
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Special Proceedings In Ohio: What Is The Ohio Supreme Court Doing With The Final Judgment Rule, Donald I. Gitlin
Special Proceedings In Ohio: What Is The Ohio Supreme Court Doing With The Final Judgment Rule, Donald I. Gitlin
Cleveland State Law Review
This note will analyze special proceedings in Ohio insofar as they relate to the appealability of interlocutory orders. Because of the complex and evolving nature of the Ohio Supreme Court's interpretation of special proceedings, this note's analysis must necessarily be largely descriptive of Ohio case law. In addition, this note will highlight differences between Ohio appellate practice and federal practice in order to acquaint the reader with the dramatically different results reached by the two systems. In addition, Part II of this note will examine what is meant by the phrase "substantial right," which appears in the second prong of …
Disagreement And Interpretation, Robert F. Nagel
A Contemporary Definition Of The International Norm Of Self-Determination, S. James Anaya
A Contemporary Definition Of The International Norm Of Self-Determination, S. James Anaya
Publications
No abstract provided.
Expert Witness Fees In Federal Diversity Cases., Wade P. Webster
Expert Witness Fees In Federal Diversity Cases., Wade P. Webster
St. Mary's Law Journal
Even with the increasing complexity of litigation and the increased utilization of expert witnesses to provide expensive evidence on narrow scientific and technical issues, Congress still limits compensation of expert witnesses to only forty dollars per day, the same rate as ordinary fact witnesses. The justification for the low rate is that the witness fee statute was not intended by Congress to compensate witnesses fully for their lost time and income. Presumably this same reasoning also applies to expert witnesses. The problem with this reasoning, unlike law witnesses who may be compelled by subpoena, individual litigants must pay the fees …
Comments On The Law On Property In The Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic., Larisa Krasavchikova
Comments On The Law On Property In The Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic., Larisa Krasavchikova
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Summary Of The Convention Between The Government Of The United States Of America And The Government Of The United Mexican States For The Avoidance Of Double Taxation And The Prevention Of Fiscal Evasion With Respect To Taxes On Income., Raul S. Moreyra
St. Mary's Law Journal
To prevent double taxation and income tax evasion, the Mexico and United States governments signed a convention in September 1992. The convention establishes when businesses may be subject to either United States or Mexico tax liabilities. Key to the application of the convention is the concept of permanent establishment. Permanent establishment is the designation given to a business situated in Mexico that transacts operations for a United States enterprise. This designation determines which nation, the United States or Mexico, will collect taxes from the business. If the business is a permanent establishment, the Mexican government will collect taxes. The types …
Revisiting Standards Of Review In Civil Appeals - Foreword Foreword., Nathan L. Hecht
Revisiting Standards Of Review In Civil Appeals - Foreword Foreword., Nathan L. Hecht
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Use Of Excessive Physical Force Against An Inmate May Constitute Cruel And Unusual Punishment Even Though The Prisoner Does Not Suffer Significant Injury., Anthony A. Avey
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Hudson v. McMillian, the Supreme Court held that use of excessive physical force against an inmate may constitute cruel and unusual punishment even though the prisoner does not suffer any significant injury. The Eighth Amendment has evolved significantly since its adoption in 1791, becoming a complex line of authority which over time expanded the rights of criminals and convicts. Recent cases have attempted to mold the varying Eight Amendment standards into a more cohesive legal doctrine. These efforts were meant to clarify the doctrine of cruel and unusual punishments; however, the divergent interpretations of these decisions rendered Eighth Amendment …
La Cour Constitutionnelle Roumaine. Premiers Pas. (The Romanian Constitutional Court. First Steps), Dana Neacsu
La Cour Constitutionnelle Roumaine. Premiers Pas. (The Romanian Constitutional Court. First Steps), Dana Neacsu
Law Faculty Publications
As a panel member, Constitutional Law Study and Research Group, University of Aix-Marseille III, France this Paper covered the early jurisprudence of the Romanian Constitutional Court (September 1993) (in French)
Rethinking The Rule Of Law: A Demonstration That The Obvious Is Plausible, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Rethinking The Rule Of Law: A Demonstration That The Obvious Is Plausible, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Scholarly Works
In this Article, I defend the Rule of Law from its detractors in the academy by uncovering and criticizing the unsound presuppositions driving their critiques. I acknowledge that these critiques raise two different problems for those who defend the plausibility of the Rule of Law: The problem of ensuring legal innovation and the problem of supplying effective constraint. In response to these problems, I locate our faith in the Rule of Law in the hermeneutical practice in which we are engaged as lawyers. Jurisprudential characterizations of the problems of constraint and innovation are misguided reactions to the narrow Enlightenment conception …
Is The Rule Of Law Possible In A Postmodern World?, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Is The Rule Of Law Possible In A Postmodern World?, Francis J. Mootz Iii
Scholarly Works
The Rule of Law is the core of our political and legal ideology, but the Rule of Law increasingly is attacked as an unattainable goal. Postmodern theorists challenge whether it makes sense to believe that rules can be formulated for general application and then later neutrally applied by decision makers. Postmodern theorists reject the Enlightenment world view and its political corollary, classical liberalism. The author agrees with the spirit of the postmodern critique, but argues that we can understand the Rule of Law in a manner consonant with postmodern thought. Drawing on the Continental tradition of hermeneutics, or the philosophy …
Transcending Community: Some Thoughts On Havel And Bergson, Brian Slattery
Transcending Community: Some Thoughts On Havel And Bergson, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability Or Judicial Activism?, Introduction To A Review Of Recent Decisions Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, The Honorable Pauline Newman
The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability Or Judicial Activism?, Introduction To A Review Of Recent Decisions Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, The Honorable Pauline Newman
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Mspb Cases In 1991-1992: Theoretical Critique And Practical Applications, G. Jerry Shaw, Jr., William S. Bransford, Richard A. Moore, Christopher M. Okay
Survey Of Mspb Cases In 1991-1992: Theoretical Critique And Practical Applications, G. Jerry Shaw, Jr., William S. Bransford, Richard A. Moore, Christopher M. Okay
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Voice And Text In Constitutionalism, Ferenc Feher
Voice And Text In Constitutionalism, Ferenc Feher
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hermeneutics And Constitutional Interpretation, Aharon Barak
Hermeneutics And Constitutional Interpretation, Aharon Barak
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Philosophical Reconstruction Of Judicial Review, Carlos Santiago Nino
A Philosophical Reconstruction Of Judicial Review, Carlos Santiago Nino
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Court’S Role In Interbranch Disputes Over Oversight Of Agency Rulemaking, John J. Gibbons
The Court’S Role In Interbranch Disputes Over Oversight Of Agency Rulemaking, John J. Gibbons
Cardozo Law Review
This paper is adapted from the Uri and Caroline Bauer Memorial Lecture delivered at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, on March 10, 1992.
New York Adverse Possession Law As A Conspiracy Of Forgetting: Van Valkenburgh V. Lutz And The Examination Of Intent, Lila Perelson
New York Adverse Possession Law As A Conspiracy Of Forgetting: Van Valkenburgh V. Lutz And The Examination Of Intent, Lila Perelson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Habeas Hagioscope, Larry Yackle
The Habeas Hagioscope, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
If you would understand American law, American politics, and the elusive difference between the two, look no further. Federal habeas corpus for state prisoners opens a window on the workings of our national government, overt and covert. I mean in this Article to describe the scene that is revealed. A rich account of experience in recent years can contribute to a deeper understanding of our government by arranging the players and the set in context and sequence. The record will show a number of things to be true.
Legitimating The Illegitimate: A Comment On 'Beyond Rape', Robin West
Legitimating The Illegitimate: A Comment On 'Beyond Rape', Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professor Dripps's provocative proposal, as I understand it, is that we think of sex as a commodity and rape as the theft of that commodity. Understood as such, the theft of sex accomplished through violence or the threat of violence is a twofold wrong: it violates our "negative" right to refuse to have sex with anyone for any or no reason, and violence or the threat of violence infringes our right to personal, physical security. Therefore, the violent expropriation of sex should be punished as a major felony, as is violent rape, at least in theory.
Furthermore, according to Dripps, …
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
I share with Fred Schauer the relatively unpopular belief that the positivist insistence that we keep separate the legal "is" from the legal "ought" is a logical prerequisite to meaningful legal criticism, and therefore, in the constitutional context, is a logical prerequisite to meaningful criticism of the Constitution. As Schauer argues, despite the modern inclination to associate positivism with conservatism, the positivist "separation thesis," properly understood, facilitates legal criticism and legal reform, not reactionary acquiescence. If we want to improve law, we must resist the urge to see it through the proverbial rose-colored glasses; we must be clear that a …
That Obscure Object Of Desire: Hermeneutics And The Autonomous Legal Text, Paul Campos
That Obscure Object Of Desire: Hermeneutics And The Autonomous Legal Text, Paul Campos
Publications
No abstract provided.
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Attorney's Fees In Texas., Scott A. Brister
Proof Of Attorney's Fees In Texas., Scott A. Brister
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Texas, the complex and confusing rules defining proof of attorney’s fees require simplification. Texas, like many other states, follows the American Rule, meaning the plaintiff and defendant each pay their own attorney’s fees. The United States is the only common-law jurisdiction and virtually the only industrialized democracy following the American Rule. Two primary justifications support following the American Rule. First, the American Rule supports individuals seeking a judicial remedy by removing the obstacle of paying an opponent’s legal fees. Second, it reduces potential litigation, attendant time and expense that would be necessary to dispute legal fees if they were …
The Brain Gets Sick, Too - The Case For Equal Insurance Coverage For Serious Mental Illness., Brian D. Shannon
The Brain Gets Sick, Too - The Case For Equal Insurance Coverage For Serious Mental Illness., Brian D. Shannon
St. Mary's Law Journal
Recent brain research has revealed that the major mental illnesses are organic diseases of the brain. Like other organs of the body, the brain can become ill. Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, a psychiatrist whose sister suffers from schizophrenia, has commented that "[t]he evidence that serious mental illnesses are diseases is now overwhelming..." Notwithstanding recent medical findings regarding the organic underpinnings of mental illnesses, private insurers generally do not provide health insurance coverage for the treatment of these brain diseases at the same coverage levels as for other physical illnesses. In fact, "[m]ost private insurers require larger co-payments and set lower …
Criminal Trespass And The Exclusionary Rule In Texas., Paul R. Stone, Henry De La Garza
Criminal Trespass And The Exclusionary Rule In Texas., Paul R. Stone, Henry De La Garza
St. Mary's Law Journal
In State v. Hobbs, the Texas Fourth Court of Appeals held a warrantless intrusion by police onto private property to obtain evidence constitutes criminal trespass under Section 30.05 of the Texas Penal Code. The resulting evidence falls within the exclusionary rule and this article considers whether this protection, which goes beyond constitutional guarantees, is necessary or desirable. The first part of this paper reviews existing federal and state constitutional protections against unreasonable searches. Next, the paper analyzes the history and purpose of criminal trespass and the exclusionary rule in Texas. Finally, the paper considers a question the court of appeals …
Private Property And Russia's Leap Of Faith., Douglas R. Haddock
Private Property And Russia's Leap Of Faith., Douglas R. Haddock
St. Mary's Law Journal
Popular notions of property are enshrined in constitutional protections which seem to make quite clear society’s emphasis on the individual’s preeminence in matters of property. Americans have never been able to accept the “socialist ownership” notions of the Soviet Union and other socialist countries as a viable scheme of property. It is probably irrefutable that the application of socialist ownership principles in the Soviet Union has been less efficient than the American model of private ownership. Yet, it is reactionary to entirely condemn the idea of socialist ownership and conclude the downfall of the Soviet Union proved the “rightness” of …