Jurisprudence Commons^™

From Utopia To Apology: The European Union And The Challenge Of Liberal Supranationalism, Daniel Francis

Cardozo Law Review

Amid the wealth of scholarship on European integration and its values, positive political liberty tends to languish in the background while democracy, efficiency, and other goals occupy the limelight. This short contribution aims to correct that neglect by setting out a normative approach to European integration that places positive political liberalism front and center. I offer this approach, which I call liberal supranationalism, as a complement to existing normative accounts of European integration.

I make three claims. First, I claim that liberal supranationalism offers a particularly appealing normative orientation for the European project. Second, I claim that, to the extent …

Democracy, Liberalism, And Brexit, James Allan

Cardozo Law Review

The article argues that the Brexit referendum highlighted a significant tension between democratic principles and liberal institutions. It contends that the majority vote to leave the European Union, despite opposition from political and judicial elites, demonstrates the importance of prioritizing democracy over liberalism. The author asserts that democratic decision-making, even with its flaws, is preferable to the influence of non-accountable liberal institutions, particularly in cases where there is a clear disconnect between the majority will and elite opinion.

Complicated-But Not Too Complicated: The Sunset Of E.U. Law In The U.K. After Brexit, Maimon Schwarzschild

Cardozo Law Review

The article examines the complexities of Brexit, focusing on the integration of EU law into UK law and the challenges of disentangling the two legal systems post-Brexit. It explores key areas such as free movement, environmental law, and the forms of EU law, highlighting the interconnectedness of EU and UK legal frameworks. The author suggests a "sunset clause" approach to manage the transition, allowing EU laws to expire unless explicitly retained, to align with the UK's newfound independence and regulatory autonomy.

Marbury V. Madison In The U.K.: Brexit And The Creation Of Judicial Supremacy, David Campbell

Cardozo Law Review

The article argues that the UK Supreme Court's decision in *Miller* (R (Miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union) marks a significant shift in the UK's constitutional framework, establishing judicial supremacy akin to the US Supreme Court's role following *Marbury v. Madison*. This shift occurred through the court's assertion of authority to instruct Parliament, challenging the traditional sovereignty of Parliament and creating a de facto constitutional court without explicit public or political debate.

Brexit And Ip: The Great Unraveling?, Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss

Cardozo Law Review

The article examines the impact of Brexit on intellectual property (IP) law in the United Kingdom, arguing that while Brexit may theoretically restore sovereignty, the practical benefits are limited. The U.K. remains deeply intertwined with international IP regimes, and the costs of divergence from European Union (E.U.) law may outweigh the gains. The authors conclude that the U.K. will likely need to recreate many E.U.-derived IP protections to maintain a robust creative sector and global trade efficiency.

Transmuting The Politico-Legal Lump: Brexit And Britain's Constitutional Order, Richard Mullender

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Roads To Reversing Brexit: Local And Transnational Constitutional Principles, Rob Howse

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Exit Rights: What The Theory Of The Firm Says About The Conduct Of Brexit Negotiations, Richard A. Epstein

Cardozo Law Review

The United Kingdom's (U.K.) June 2016 decision to exercise its great surprises option to leave the European Union (E.U. or Union) represents one of the in the complex history of supranational organizations. Most of the discussion in the wake of that decision has tended to stress the particulars of the referendum with regard to the short-term advantages and disadvantages of a decision that has clearly divided class and region within the U.K. Older individuals, and those who did not live and work in the Greater London area, tended to vote in favor of exit. Those who were younger and in …

Brexit And The Future Of Liberal Democracy, Larry Alexander

Cardozo Law Review

I write this short Essay as one who is not an expert on the causes of Brexit or of its American near-equivalent, the election of Donald Trump. My piece is purely an exercise in armchair speculation, quite possibly wrong, but also quite possibly correct. And if it is correct, I leave it to others to answer Lenin's famous question: "What is to be done?"

Echoes Of The Past: The 1975 Eec Referendum Forty Years On, Warren Swain

Cardozo Law Review

The article examines the 1975 referendum on Britain's continued membership in the European Economic Community (EEC), highlighting the political, economic, and social dynamics that shaped the campaign and its outcome. It draws parallels with the 2016 Brexit referendum, emphasizing the role of the political establishment, public opinion, and sovereignty concerns. The 1975 referendum resulted in a decisive vote to remain in the EEC, but the article suggests that the underlying issues, such as concerns over sovereignty and economic impact, persisted and ultimately contributed to the 2016 decision to leave the EU.

The Core Case For Weak-Form Judicial Review, Rosalind Dixon

Cardozo Law Review

This Article contributes to debates over the democratic desirability of judicial review, by stating a quasi-general case for the desirability of judicial review that is "weak"-or broad but non-final-rather than "strong"-form in nature. Judicial review of this kind, the article argues, can help counter blockages in the legislative process-such as legislative "blind spots" and "burdens of inertia"-that can otherwise impair the enjoyment of individual rights even of a kind recognized by democratic majorities. This, the Article suggests, provides an important, if contingent, outcome-based case in favor of courts exercising powers of weak-form review. The case for weak judicial review of …

Court Transparency And The First Amendment, David S. Ardia

Cardozo Law Review

"Publicity is the very soul of justice," legal philosopher Jeremy Bentham once warned.1 Regrettably, lady justice is at risk of losing her soul. In courts across the country, secrecy is increasingly the norm. Indeed, the extent of secrecy in American courts is astonishing, especially given the assumption by many that the First Amendment guarantees a right of public access to the courts. In reality, the United States Supreme Court has explicitly held only that there is a First Amendment right of public access to criminal trials and pre-trial proceedings. The Court has never addressed the question of whether there is …

Maximinimalism, Jamal Greene

Cardozo Law Review

The article explores Chief Justice John Roberts' judicial approach, characterizing it as "maximinimalism"—a blend of narrow decision-making with deep, impactful reasoning. While Roberts is often seen as a minimalist for his emphasis on deciding cases narrowly, his rulings in significant cases like Citizens United v. FEC, Shelby County v. Holder, and NFIB v. Sebelius reveal a deeper, more substantive approach that challenges the law, thus embodying maximalist tendencies. This duality allows the Court to influence the law profoundly while maintaining judicial restraint.

The Roberts Court And The New Textualism, Anton Metlitsky

Cardozo Law Review

The article explores the Roberts Court's approach to statutory interpretation, focusing on its adherence to the "new textualism," a methodology emphasizing the plain meaning of statutory text. While recent cases like King v. Burwell, Bond v. United States, and Yates v. United States appear to prioritize statutory purpose over textual meaning, the Court's reasoning reinforces its commitment to textualism by framing decisions within textualist methodology, even when outcomes seem to depart from strict textual interpretation.

Customary International Law, The Separation Of Powers, And The Choice Of Law In Armed Conflicts And Wars, John C. Dehn

Cardozo Law Review

After over fourteen years of continuous armed conflict, neither courts nor commentators are closer to a common understanding of how, or the extent to which, international and U.S. law interact to regulate acts of belligerency by the United States. This Article articulates and defends the first normative theory regarding the general relationship of customary international law to the U.S. legal system that fully harmonizes Supreme Court precedent. It then applies this theory to customary international laws of war to articulate the legal framework regulating the armed conflicts of the United States. It demonstrates that the relationship of customary international law …

The Uniform Trust Code And The Common Law: An Analysis Of Three Sections Of The Code That Deviate From The Common Law And Why The Drafters Changed The Law, Christina Bogdanski

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Costs Of "Broken Windows" Policing: Twenty Years And Counting, K. Babe Howell

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Privacy Petitions And Institutional Legitimacy, Lauren Henry Scholz

Cardozo Law Review

This Article argues that a petitions process for privacy concerns arising from new technologies would substantially aid in gauging privacy social norms and legitimating regulation of new technologies. An accessible, transparent petitions process would empower individuals who have privacy concerns by making their proposals for change more visible. Moreover, data accumulated from such a petitions process would provide the requisite information to enable institutions to incorporate social norms into privacy policy development. Hearing and responding to privacy petitions would build trust with the public regarding the role of government and large companies in shaping the modern privacy technical infrastructure. This …

Governance And Uncertainty, Justin R. Pidot

Cardozo Law Review

Government actors create law against a backdrop of uncertainty. Limited information, unpredictable events, and lack of understanding interfere with accurately predicting a legal regime's costs, benefits, and effects on other legal and social programs and institutions. Does the availability of no-fault divorce increase the number of terminated marriages? Will bulk-collection of telecommunications information about American citizens reveal terrorist plots? Can a sensitive species breed in the presence of oil and gas wells? The answers to these questions are far from clear, but lawmakers must act nonetheless.

The problems posed by uncertainty cut across legal fields. Scholars and regulators in a …

For Whom The Data Tolls: A Reunified Theory Of Fourth And Fifth Amendment Jurisprudence, Bryan H. Choi

Cardozo Law Review

Data privacy demands a reunified theory of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. Data technologies allow personal information to be disembodied from physical bodies and "possessed" simultaneously by both first persons and third parties. As a result, the government has been able to use a divide-and-conquer strategy to obtain incriminating evidence alternately from the data intermediary or from the suspect.

Currently, Fourth Amendment doctrine and Fifth Amendment doctrine work at cross-purposes. The privacy community has already sounded the alarm on the "third-party doctrine," which allows the government to sidestep the Fourth Amendment when demanding evidence from third parties. But few have …

Hijacking Justice: Assessing The Emergency Driven Analysis Of Confrontation Clause Jurisprudence, Steven C. Berlowitz

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

How Wartime Detention Ends, Deborah N. Pearlstein

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Offices Of Goodness: Influence Without Authority In Federal Agencies, Margo Schlanger

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Theory Of Local Common Law, Annie Decker

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Overruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Infringement Continuum, Bernard Chao

Cardozo Law Review

For many years, patent law has struggled with the issue of permissible claim scope. A patent's specification and its claims often suffer from a surprising disconnect. The specification generally describes an invention in terms of one or more specific implementations, suggesting a relatively narrow invention. But claims are drafted far more broadly. They frequently encompass unforeseen variations and even cover after-arising technology.

Although there are numerous existing doctrines that try to prevent claims from straying too far from their specification, these doctrines offer binary outcomes ill suited for patent law. Under these doctrines, as a claim encompasses subject matter further …

Remaking Mexico: Law Reform As Foreign Policy, Deborah M. Weissman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

An Empirical Study Of The Use Of Legal Scholarship In Supreme Court Trademark Jurisprudence, Derek Simpson, Lee Petherbridge

Cardozo Law Review

Although the usefulness of law review and law journal articles to the decisional lawmaking process is a topic that has captured the imagination of jurists, reporters, and legal academics like few others, very little is actually known about how and why courts use such legal scholarship. This Article addresses that lack of knowledge. It reports an empirical study of the Supreme Court's use of legal scholarship in its trademark jurisprudence that spans the years 1949-2011. Among its contributions are: (1) the identification of Supreme Court trademark cases using and not using legal scholarship, including the identification of the pieces of …

Cosmopolitanism In Constitutional Law, Vlad Perju

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Forfeiture And The Sixth Amendment: The Role Of The Jury At Common Law, Richard E. Finneran, Steven K. Luther

Cardozo Law Review

Throughout its recent jurisprudence after Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court has emphasized that its analysis of the Sixth Amendment jury trial right centers upon the historical role of the jury at common law. Just last year, in Southern Union Co. v. United States, the Court extended the Sixth Amendment jury trial right to criminal fines after concluding that the jury's verdict determined the maximum fine that could be imposed at common law. The Court remained silent, however, with regard to another financial penalty commonly applied in the federal system: criminal forfeitures. Given that the Supreme Court …