Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (155)
- Law and Society (133)
- Legal History (98)
- Judges (90)
- Criminal Law (80)
-
- Criminal Procedure (78)
- Common Law (74)
- Courts (74)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (65)
- Intellectual Property Law (60)
- International Law (59)
- First Amendment (54)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (51)
- Legislation (51)
- Law and Gender (50)
- Human Rights Law (48)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (44)
- Evidence (43)
- Contracts (42)
- Torts (36)
- Arts and Humanities (34)
- Philosophy (31)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (27)
- Legal Profession (26)
- Law and Politics (24)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (24)
- Education Law (23)
- Law and Economics (23)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (204)
- Constitutional Law (41)
- Politics (General) (33)
- Law and Society (29)
- Judges (26)
-
- Philosophy (25)
- Legal History (24)
- Common Law (19)
- First Amendment (18)
- Legislation (16)
- Political Systems and Governments (16)
- Democracy (15)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (14)
- Torts (14)
- Contracts (13)
- Courts (13)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (13)
- Government (General) (11)
- Supreme Court of the United States (11)
- Ethics (10)
- International Law (10)
- Economics Law (9)
- Education Law (9)
- Evidence (9)
- Judiciary Branch (9)
- Civil Rights (8)
- Human Rights Law (8)
- Legal Analysis and Writing (8)
- Penology (8)
- Property--Personal and Real (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 180 of 858
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Sustainability Reporting And New Governance: South Africa Marks The Path To Improved Corporate Disclosure, Ruth Jebe
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in corporate disclosure of environmental and social information in the form of sustainability reporting. This growth trajectory, coupled with dissatisfaction with current reporting schemes, has fueled debate over the future of sustainability reporting. The discussion consists primarily of criticism of existing reporting systems and is often polarized between proponents of continued voluntary reporting and proponents of increased mandatory reporting. Missing from the debate is a critical recognition: the shortcomings of existing reporting mechanisms reflect the public policy drawbacks of the processes that created them.
This Article addresses the question of how to …
Judicial Conflict Resolution (Jcr): A New Jurisprudence For An Emerging Judicial Practice, Michal Alberstein
Judicial Conflict Resolution (Jcr): A New Jurisprudence For An Emerging Judicial Practice, Michal Alberstein
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained largely unexplored. To date, most cases settle or reach plea-bargaining, and the greater part of judges' time is spent on managing cases and encouraging parties to reach consensual solutions. Adjudication based on formal rules is a rare phenomenon which judges mostly avoid. This Article argues that the various Conflict Resolution methods, which are used outside the courtroom, as alternatives to adjudication, could have a strong and positive influence, both theoretical and practical, on judicial activities inside the courts. Theoretically, the Article develops a …
Goveille V. Liberty Mutual: An Opportunity To Correct The Problems Of Erisa Preemption, Edward A. Zelinsky
Goveille V. Liberty Mutual: An Opportunity To Correct The Problems Of Erisa Preemption, Edward A. Zelinsky
Articles
No abstract provided.
Biometric Passwords And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, Kara Goldman
Biometric Passwords And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, Kara Goldman
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Taking Users' Rights To The Next Level: A Pragmatist Approach To Fair Use, Niva Elkin-Koren, Orit Fischman-Afori
Taking Users' Rights To The Next Level: A Pragmatist Approach To Fair Use, Niva Elkin-Koren, Orit Fischman-Afori
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
Exceptions and limitations to the rights of copyright owners aim to promote copyright goals in a rapidly changing world. Policymakers are often faced with the choice of either adopting an open-norm, such as fair use, to facilitate flexibility and adaptability, or opt for a strictly defined list of exceptions and limitations to facilitate more certainty and predictability. So far, this binary choice between bright-line rules and vague standards has created a deadlock.
This paper argues that in order to promote a reasoned implementation of fair use and serve both the purpose of copyright law and the rule of law, courts …
This Book Is Not Yet Rated: Age Ratings In The Literary Market Vs. Minors' First Amendment Right To Receive Information, Nathalie De Choudens Baez
This Book Is Not Yet Rated: Age Ratings In The Literary Market Vs. Minors' First Amendment Right To Receive Information, Nathalie De Choudens Baez
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tzadek, Tzadek Tirdof -Justice, Justice You Shall Pursue: Romer, Lawrence, & Windsor: A Critique Of Justice Scalia's Dissenting Opinions, Kris Mcdaniel-Miccio
Tzadek, Tzadek Tirdof -Justice, Justice You Shall Pursue: Romer, Lawrence, & Windsor: A Critique Of Justice Scalia's Dissenting Opinions, Kris Mcdaniel-Miccio
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Gendering The Compliance Agenda: Feminism, Human Rights And Violence Against Women, Megan Louise Pearce
Gendering The Compliance Agenda: Feminism, Human Rights And Violence Against Women, Megan Louise Pearce
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that while the due diligence standard in international human rights law has been a significant step forward in addressing violence against women, it has not yet delivered real change. The gap between legal promise and reality persists, and the article contends that addressing this gap requires integrating feminist insights into compliance theories. By applying feminist critiques to these theories, the article seeks to illuminate why the due diligence standard has been ineffective in eliminating violence against women and to highlight areas for future research.
Accident Of Birth Or Matter Of Choice: Legal Recognition Of Transsexual People In The Common Law, Kevin K.S. Tso
Accident Of Birth Or Matter Of Choice: Legal Recognition Of Transsexual People In The Common Law, Kevin K.S. Tso
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The purpose of the Article is to look at the recognition-or lack thereof-of transsexual people at common law in relation to the "proper" sex and gender with which they associate themselves. This Article will begin by addressing and defining transsexualism and how the medical community's position on this topic has evolved over the years. It will then look at the historical foundations of transsexualism in the common law, especially at the Corbett decision that held sway in England and Wales for over thirty-five years and was followed internationally. The Article will then provide an overview of the current positions in …
Individualized Injunctions And No-Modification Terms: Challenging "Anti-Reform" Provisions In Arbitration Clauses, Myriam E. Gilles
Individualized Injunctions And No-Modification Terms: Challenging "Anti-Reform" Provisions In Arbitration Clauses, Myriam E. Gilles
Articles
The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion and American Express v. Italian Colors have considered only whether class actions for monetary damages may be barred by arbitration clauses requiring individual adjudication. The Justices have not examined the enforceability of arbitration clauses or arbitral rules which explicitly prohibit claimants from seeking or arbitrators from granting broad injunctive relief in an individual dispute. I term these "anti-reform" provisions because they broadly prohibit an individual arbitral claimant from seeking to end a practice, change a rule, or enjoin an act that causes injury to itself and to similarly-situated non-parties. This …
Mos Americanus Or Common Law In Partibus Infidelium, Peter Goodrich
Mos Americanus Or Common Law In Partibus Infidelium, Peter Goodrich
Articles
No abstract provided.
Why Instrumentalism Matters, Kyron J. Huigens
Why Instrumentalism Matters, Kyron J. Huigens
Articles
Alon Harel argues that the acts of a public official acting with "fidelity of deference," are "necessary," "non-contingent," "intrinsic," "constitutive," integrative," "expressive," or "inherent" features of legal punishment. Accordingly, he calls his argument "noninstrumental." This can be taken as an argument for logical necessity, definition, extension, or modest or immodest conceptual necessity. Only the last interpretation fits Harel's text, but such an argument fails because instrumentality is necessarily present in any event in the natural world, including punishment. Harel does not say which aspects of natural instrumentality he means to exclude from his argument, or how, or why.
How Wartime Detention Ends, Deborah N. Pearlstein
How Wartime Detention Ends, Deborah N. Pearlstein
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Emergence Of Constitutionalism As An Evolutionary Adaptation, Fábio Portela L. Almeida
The Emergence Of Constitutionalism As An Evolutionary Adaptation, Fábio Portela L. Almeida
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The emergence of modern societies is an evolutionary puzzle. Homo sapiens is the only animal species capable of cooperating in large-scale societies consisting of genetically unrelated individuals. From a biological point of view, this feature leads to enormous questions. Social scientists typically assume that human life is lived in large-scale societies as a result of cultural, social and institutional history. In this perspective, social institutions such as law, economy and religion enhance cooperation to higher levels. Gene-culture coevolutionary theories have studied this issue in an integrated framework that accounts for social and biological theories of cooperation. These theoretical approaches have …
Offices Of Goodness: Influence Without Authority In Federal Agencies, Margo Schlanger
Offices Of Goodness: Influence Without Authority In Federal Agencies, Margo Schlanger
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Mandatory Death Penalty In Ghana: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective On Dexter Johnson V. Republic, Andrew Novak
The Mandatory Death Penalty In Ghana: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective On Dexter Johnson V. Republic, Andrew Novak
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the Supreme Court of Ghana's decision to uphold the mandatory death penalty, contrasting it with the global trend towards abolition. It highlights the tension between the court's textual interpretation of the constitution and international human rights pressures, emphasizing the need for legislative reform to align with human rights standards.
The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Overruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton
The Conflict Between Stare Decisis And Overruling In Constitutional Adjudication, Steven J. Burton
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Theory Of Local Common Law, Annie Decker
Constitutional Venue, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay C. Nash
Constitutional Venue, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay C. Nash
Articles
A foundational concept of American jurisprudence is the principle that it is unfair to allow litigants to be haled into far away tribunals when the litigants and the litigation have little or nothing to do with the location of such courts. Historically, both personal jurisdiction and venue each served this purpose in related, but distinct ways. Personal jurisdiction is, at base, a limit on the authority of the sovereign. Venue, in contrast, aims to protect parties from being forced to litigate in a location where they would be unfairly disadvantaged. The constitutional boundaries of these early principles came to be …
When A U.S. Domestic Court Can Enjoin A Foreign Court Proceeding, Samantha Koeninger, Richard Bales
When A U.S. Domestic Court Can Enjoin A Foreign Court Proceeding, Samantha Koeninger, Richard Bales
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
A federal court, at its discretion, may enjoin a parallel proceeding in a foreign court. Currently, there is a split among the federal courts of appeals as to the circumstances under which an anti-suit injunction should be granted. The Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits have adopted the "liberal approach." These courts have found that a court may enjoin a foreign proceeding if the parallel litigation is vexatious and duplicative. In contrast, the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Eighth, and D.C. Circuits have adopted the "restrictive approach." These courts require a higher standard, and have found that if the parallel litigation is …
The Pitfalls Of The Pittman-Robertson Act: Threats To An American Wildlife Act That Ensnare Hunters And Hikers Alike, Greg Huffaker
The Pitfalls Of The Pittman-Robertson Act: Threats To An American Wildlife Act That Ensnare Hunters And Hikers Alike, Greg Huffaker
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
No abstract provided.
The Infringement Continuum, Bernard Chao
The Infringement Continuum, Bernard Chao
Cardozo Law Review
For many years, patent law has struggled with the issue of permissible claim scope. A patent's specification and its claims often suffer from a surprising disconnect. The specification generally describes an invention in terms of one or more specific implementations, suggesting a relatively narrow invention. But claims are drafted far more broadly. They frequently encompass unforeseen variations and even cover after-arising technology.
Although there are numerous existing doctrines that try to prevent claims from straying too far from their specification, these doctrines offer binary outcomes ill suited for patent law. Under these doctrines, as a claim encompasses subject matter further …
Remaking Mexico: Law Reform As Foreign Policy, Deborah M. Weissman
Remaking Mexico: Law Reform As Foreign Policy, Deborah M. Weissman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Empirical Study Of The Use Of Legal Scholarship In Supreme Court Trademark Jurisprudence, Derek Simpson, Lee Petherbridge
An Empirical Study Of The Use Of Legal Scholarship In Supreme Court Trademark Jurisprudence, Derek Simpson, Lee Petherbridge
Cardozo Law Review
Although the usefulness of law review and law journal articles to the decisional lawmaking process is a topic that has captured the imagination of jurists, reporters, and legal academics like few others, very little is actually known about how and why courts use such legal scholarship. This Article addresses that lack of knowledge. It reports an empirical study of the Supreme Court's use of legal scholarship in its trademark jurisprudence that spans the years 1949-2011. Among its contributions are: (1) the identification of Supreme Court trademark cases using and not using legal scholarship, including the identification of the pieces of …
Constitutional Implications Of School Punishment For Cyber Bullying, Raul R. Calvoz, Bradley W. Davis, Mark A. Gooden
Constitutional Implications Of School Punishment For Cyber Bullying, Raul R. Calvoz, Bradley W. Davis, Mark A. Gooden
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
In this article, we address the scope of student free speech rights as it relates to cyber bullying. We provide a review of legal theories under which school administrators can address cyber bullying while still respecting student free speech rights and the First Amendment. Additionally, we address the jurisdiction of administrators to deal with off-campus bullying conduct.
Federally Recognized Rights Of Lgbtq Students To Form Gay-Straight Alliance Organizations (Gsas), Jerry Foxhoven
Federally Recognized Rights Of Lgbtq Students To Form Gay-Straight Alliance Organizations (Gsas), Jerry Foxhoven
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
The purpose of this article is to explore the various avenues that have been used in the federal courts to ensure the right to organize Gay Straight Alliances (GSAs), and to detail the use of the federal courts by students who assert the right to express contrary views on sexual orientation issues.
The Sec Adds A New Weapon: How Does The New Admission Requirement Change The Landscape?, Paul Radvany
The Sec Adds A New Weapon: How Does The New Admission Requirement Change The Landscape?, Paul Radvany
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article will examine the SEC's revised settlement policy in the aftermath of Judge Rakoff's concerns about the SEC's longstanding "no admit, no deny" policy. In order to determine the import of the SEC's new settlement policy on the conduct of companies, as well as ongoing investigations and cases, this Article will also include analysis from lawyers who have advised their clients on the SEC's policy change.
Part II provides an overview of the SEC and its Enforcement Division, and describes the SEC's prosecutorial discretion. Part III examines Judge Rakoff's decisions in SEC v. Bank of Am. Corp.1 4 and …
International Commercial Arbitration, Anticipatory Repudiation, And The Lex Mercatoria, Kyle Winnick
International Commercial Arbitration, Anticipatory Repudiation, And The Lex Mercatoria, Kyle Winnick
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
The scope of this Note is thus two-fold: (1) to delineate the doctrine of anticipatory breach as it is currently under the lex mercatoria; and, (2) to evaluate and argue for its consistency in application by international arbitral tribunals. Section I-A discusses when arbitrators will choose to apply the lex mercatoria as the substantive law of the dispute. Section I-B explains the doctrine of anticipatory repudiation and discusses its inherent ambiguity. Section IC assesses the role of the CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles as a manifestation of the lex mercatoria. Section II-A explores the severability issue and an …
Why Wynne Worries Me, Edward A. Zelinsky
Entanglements: A Study Of Liberal Thought In The Promise Of Marriage, Anat Rosenberg
Entanglements: A Study Of Liberal Thought In The Promise Of Marriage, Anat Rosenberg
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article examines the paradoxical relationship between liberal ideals and status commitments, focusing on the promise of marriage as a microcosm of broader liberal thought. It argues that liberalism did not eliminate or preserve statuses but reinterpreted them, creating a complex interplay where statuses were both maintained and transformed. This analysis reveals persistent conceptual patterns in liberal ideology that entangle progress and hierarchy, challenging the progressive elimination or preservation of statuses. The study suggests that understanding these patterns is crucial for ideology critique and highlights their relevance to contemporary issues like multiculturalism and identity politics.