Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- University of Michigan Law School (138)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (88)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (57)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (40)
- University of Colorado Law School (37)
- Fordham Law School (32)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (27)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- UIC School of Law (15)
- University of Richmond (14)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (12)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- The University of Akron (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (9)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (134)
- United States Supreme Court (124)
- Constitution (92)
- Jurisprudence (88)
- Constitutional law (64)
-
- Federal (50)
- State (47)
- New York (39)
- Defendant (33)
- Judicial review (32)
- 1990) (30)
- Court of Appeals (30)
- Originalism (30)
- Stare decisis (30)
- Due process (29)
- First Amendment (27)
- Judges (27)
- § 6 (27)
- Constitutional interpretation (26)
- Law (25)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (25)
- Statutory interpretation (25)
- Supreme Court of the United States (25)
- Federalism (24)
- Fourteenth Amendment (24)
- Police (23)
- Discrimination (22)
- Federal courts (22)
- Separation of powers (21)
- Fifth Amendment (20)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (208)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (97)
- Touro Law Review (82)
- Faculty Scholarship (67)
-
- Publications (37)
- Northwestern University Law Review (36)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (30)
- Articles (25)
- Arkansas Law Review (19)
- Fordham Law Review (16)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (14)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (13)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Akron Law Review (11)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- Journal of Law and Policy (11)
- Scholarly Works (10)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (10)
- University of Richmond Law Review (10)
- Brooklyn Law Review (9)
- Catholic University Law Review (9)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (9)
- Faculty Articles (8)
- Journal Articles (8)
- Scholarly Articles (8)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (8)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Publication Type
Articles 1081 - 1110 of 1139
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
California Federal Savings & (And) Loan Association V. Guerra: Supreme Court Affirms California's Efforts To Accommodate Pregnancy In Fair Employment Laws, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 181 (1987), Judith Gallo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Strict Constructionism And The Strike Zone, Douglas O. Linder
Strict Constructionism And The Strike Zone, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rationalism In Constitutional Law, Robert F. Nagel
Almost An Age Of Justice, Steve Gey
Almost An Age Of Justice, Steve Gey
Florida State University Law Review
THE UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS OF THE WARREN COURT. By Bernard Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press. 1985. Pp. 470 . $29.95
Government Nonacquiescence Case In Point: Social Security Litigation
Government Nonacquiescence Case In Point: Social Security Litigation
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Two Models Of The Fourth Amendment, Craig M. Bradley
Michigan Law Review
Fourth amendment critics rank in rows, and it has been repeatedly pointed out that individual cases are inconsistent with each other or that whole chunks of doctrine, such as the automobile exception or the plain view exception, are either misconceived, too broad, or too narrow. But these critics all play the Court on its own field, simply arguing as tenth Justices that the doctrines should be tinkered with in different ways than the Court has done. This Article, in contrast, suggests that current fourth amendment law, complete with the constant tinkering which it necessarily entails, should be abandoned altogether. Instead, …
The Constitution And Informational Privacy, Or How So-Called Conservatives Countenance Governmental Intrustion Into A Person's Private Affairs, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1985), Michael P. Seng
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules And Standards, Pierre Schlag
Consequences Of Supreme Court Decisions Upholding Individual Constitutional Rights, Jesse H. Choper
Consequences Of Supreme Court Decisions Upholding Individual Constitutional Rights, Jesse H. Choper
Michigan Law Review
The thrust of this Article is to attempt to ascertain just what differences the Court's judgments upholding individual constitutional rights have made for those who fall within the ambit of their protection. It seeks to address such questions as: What were the conditions that existed before the Court's ruling? How many people were subject to the regime that was invalidated by the Justices? Was the Court's mandate successfully implemented? What were the consequences for those affected? At a subjective level, were the repercussions perceived as salutary by those (or at least most of those) who were the beneficiaries of the …
On Complaining About The Burger Court, Robert F. Nagel
On Complaining About The Burger Court, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court (Was It Really So Defense-Minded?), The Burger Court (Is It Really So Prosecution-Oriented?), And Police Investigatory Practices, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
In one sense the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure may be said to. have been launched by the 1956 case of Griffin v. Illinois (establishing an indigent criminal defendant's right to a free transcript on appeal, at least under certain circumstances) and to have been significantly advanced by two 1963 cases: Gideon v. Wainwright (entitling an indigent defendant to free counsel, at least in serious criminal cases) and Douglas v. California (requiring a state to provide an indigent with counsel on his first appeal from a criminal conviction). But these were not the cases that plunged the Warren …
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
A Comment On The Burger Court And "Judicial Activism", Robert F. Nagel
A Comment On The Burger Court And "Judicial Activism", Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Equal Protection Clause In The Supreme Court 1873-1903, Richard S. Kay
The Equal Protection Clause In The Supreme Court 1873-1903, Richard S. Kay
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roe V. Wade And The Lesson Of The Pre-Roe Case Law, Richard Gregory Morgan
Roe V. Wade And The Lesson Of The Pre-Roe Case Law, Richard Gregory Morgan
Michigan Law Review
The politically unsettled and judicially confused law of abortion in 1971 and 1972, when the Court twice heard arguments and deliberated Roe, should have warned it not to decide the case. By doing so; the Court thrust itself into a political debate and stunted the development of a thoughtful lower-court case law. If the Court did perceive the warnings but continued toward a decision anyway, perhaps trusting that its own considerable wits would devise an answer the lower courts had not, the result suggests that the judicial system's axioms deserve more respect than they received. This Article, by showing …
Freedom And Constraint In The Jewish Judicial Process, Norman Lamm, Aaron Kirschenbaum
Freedom And Constraint In The Jewish Judicial Process, Norman Lamm, Aaron Kirschenbaum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Theory Of Adjudication And The Task Of The Great Judge, David A.J. Richards
The Theory Of Adjudication And The Task Of The Great Judge, David A.J. Richards
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On "The Nature Of The Judicial Process", Ernest Nagel
Reflections On "The Nature Of The Judicial Process", Ernest Nagel
Cardozo Law Review
More than half a century has gone by since Cardozo delivered the three series of lectures, subsequently published in three wellknown books, in which he presented his philosophy of law with impressive learning and arresting (but sometimes distracting) eloquence. His jurisprudential views as well as his judicial decisions were influential in his lifetime; and his philosophical writings continue to be read, though it is difficult to say how widely or with what effect on their readers. In any event, during the past fifty years there has been a renaissance of active interest in legal philosophy, in this country as well …
The Eighteenth-Century Background Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, William E. Nelson
The Eighteenth-Century Background Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, William E. Nelson
Michigan Law Review
This analysis of Marshall's constitutional jurisprudence avoids the pitfalls of previous theories. It does not see the Federalist political program as the source of Marshall's constitutional doctrines and thus does not need to explain how Marshall qualified his political principles or how he convinced non-Federalist judges to accept them. Instead, this essay argues that legal, not political, principles underlay Marshall's jurisprudence, but it attempts to understand those principles in a manner consistent with the unavoidable twentieth-century assumption that law is a body of flexible rules responsive to social reality rather than a series of immutable, unambiguous doctrines derived from a …
The Restoration Of In Re Winship: A Comment On Burdens Of Persuasion In Criminal Cases After Patterson V. New York, Ronald J. Allen
The Restoration Of In Re Winship: A Comment On Burdens Of Persuasion In Criminal Cases After Patterson V. New York, Ronald J. Allen
Michigan Law Review
At the conclusion of its last term, the Supreme Court rendered what should have been a most unremarkable decision. In Patterson v. New York, the Court upheld New York's affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance, which requires a defendant who seeks to reduce his offense from murder to manslaughter to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted under extreme emotional disturbance. Had the case come before the Court seven years earlier, it could have been swiftly dispatched with a brief opinion upholding the New York statute on the grounds that the issue of extreme emotional disturbance …
Mondale On Mapp, Yale Kamisar
Mondale On Mapp, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Any judicial reversal of the Mapp rule threatens to have just the opposite effect. Law enforcement officials are likely to treat a decision that illegally obtained evidence may be admitted into state criminal trials as though that were a practical suspension of the constitutional rules as to lawful arrest, search, and seizure. They are likely to feel that once again "the judiciary is okaying it." With the smell of revelations of FBI "black-bag jobs" and intelligence agency abuses still in the air, is this how we want the Court to contribute to the atmosphere of police practices as we enter …
The Uniqueness Of The Warren And Burger Courts In American Constitutional History, P. Allan Dionisopoulos
The Uniqueness Of The Warren And Burger Courts In American Constitutional History, P. Allan Dionisopoulos
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Secondary Boycott: From Antitrust To Labor Relations, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Secondary Boycott: From Antitrust To Labor Relations, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
The ethos of the labor movement cuts against the American grain at several points. Our national instinct, reflected in many statutes and much judge-made law, is to exalt the rugged individualist over the anonymous group, to favor wide-open competition rather than a controlled market, and to prize the right of each person to remain aloof from the quarrels and concerns of his neighbors. It is not for nothing that our most universal folk hero is the frontiersman, who proudly stands alone and self-sufficient. Yet the ordinary workingman does not have the capacity to assume that heroic stance. For him strength …
Egalitarianism And The Warren Court, Philip B. Kurland
Egalitarianism And The Warren Court, Philip B. Kurland
Michigan Law Review
As late as 1966, an English philosopher could say that the word "equality," unlike the words "freedom," "liberty," and "justice," was not a "value word" but only a descriptive one. He was not denigrating the term or the concept. He was saying that "when people talk about equality in a political or moral context what they really mean to talk about is some closely evaluative concept, such as impartiality or justice." What may have been true in England in 1966 was only partially true in the United States. While the word "equality" may still be used here to invoke other …
Comment On: State V. Clifton Pearce, James Hinton Pou Bailey
Comment On: State V. Clifton Pearce, James Hinton Pou Bailey
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unconstitutional Conditions Upon Public Employment: New Departures In The Protection Of First Amendment Rights, Harold H. Bruff
Unconstitutional Conditions Upon Public Employment: New Departures In The Protection Of First Amendment Rights, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court And Desegregation, Robert L. Carter
The Warren Court And Desegregation, Robert L. Carter
Michigan Law Review
When Chief Justice ·warren assumed his post in October 1953, the underpinnings of the "separate but equal" concept had become unmoored beyond restoration. Full-scale argument on the validity of apartheid in public education was only weeks away, and the portent of change in the constitutional doctrine governing American race relations was unmistakable. Although the groundwork had been carefully prepared for the Chief Justice's announcement in Brown v. Board of Education that fundamental principles forbade racial segregation in the nation's public schools, the decision, when it was delivered on :May 17, 1954, was more than a break with the past. In …
Recent Developments In The Law Of Search And Seizure, Jerold H. Israel
Recent Developments In The Law Of Search And Seizure, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
This article is designed to provide a survey of recent decisions dealing with several important issues in the area of search and seizure. It is intended primarily as a basic collection of sources. I have, therefore, sought to keep my own commentary at a minimum and the citations to relevant cases at a maximum. Wherever space permits, I have let the courts speak for themselves. In most instances, however, it has been necessary to provide fairly general descriptions of the cases.
One Civil Libertarian Among Many: The Case Of Mr. Justice Goldberg, Ira H. Carmen
One Civil Libertarian Among Many: The Case Of Mr. Justice Goldberg, Ira H. Carmen
Michigan Law Review
It is common knowledge that in recent times the constitutional issues of greatest magnitude and of greatest public interest lie in the area of civil liberties. These cases almost always call for the delicate balancing of the rights of the individual, allegedly protected by a specific clause in the Constitution, and the duties that state or federal authority can exact from citizens in order that society may maintain a minimum standard of peace and security. It follows, therefore, that it is these often dramatic decisions which will largely color the images we have of participating Justices. Assume a free speech …