Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- University of Michigan Law School (138)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (88)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (57)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (40)
- University of Colorado Law School (37)
- Fordham Law School (32)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (27)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- UIC School of Law (15)
- University of Richmond (14)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (12)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- The University of Akron (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (9)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (134)
- United States Supreme Court (124)
- Constitution (92)
- Jurisprudence (88)
- Constitutional law (64)
-
- Federal (50)
- State (47)
- New York (39)
- Defendant (33)
- Judicial review (32)
- 1990) (30)
- Court of Appeals (30)
- Originalism (30)
- Stare decisis (30)
- Due process (29)
- First Amendment (27)
- Judges (27)
- § 6 (27)
- Constitutional interpretation (26)
- Law (25)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (25)
- Statutory interpretation (25)
- Supreme Court of the United States (25)
- Federalism (24)
- Fourteenth Amendment (24)
- Police (23)
- Discrimination (22)
- Federal courts (22)
- Separation of powers (21)
- Fifth Amendment (20)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (208)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (97)
- Touro Law Review (82)
- Faculty Scholarship (67)
-
- Publications (37)
- Northwestern University Law Review (36)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (30)
- Articles (25)
- Arkansas Law Review (19)
- Fordham Law Review (16)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (14)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (13)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Akron Law Review (11)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- Journal of Law and Policy (11)
- Scholarly Works (10)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (10)
- University of Richmond Law Review (10)
- Brooklyn Law Review (9)
- Catholic University Law Review (9)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (9)
- Faculty Articles (8)
- Journal Articles (8)
- Scholarly Articles (8)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (8)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Publication Type
Articles 1021 - 1050 of 1139
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
Validity Of New York State Ethics Commission Rule 932.2 Barring Public Officers From Holding Political Party Office, William Josephson, Beverly Jean Ross
Validity Of New York State Ethics Commission Rule 932.2 Barring Public Officers From Holding Political Party Office, William Josephson, Beverly Jean Ross
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case Of The Amorous Defendant: Criticizing Absolute Stare Decisis For Statutory Cases, William N. Eskridge Jr.
The Case Of The Amorous Defendant: Criticizing Absolute Stare Decisis For Statutory Cases, William N. Eskridge Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Earlier in this the first year of the new millennium, Professor Larry Marshall was appointed Chief Justice of the United States. The first important case coming before the Marshall Court involved the government's prosecution of Frankly Amorous under the White Slave Traffic Act of June 25, 1910 (the Mann Act), as amended. Defendant Amorous was a law student in Virginia who paid for the airplane ticket of his female lover to travel from North Carolina to Virginia for the admitted purpose of having extramarital sexual relations. The U.S. Attorney prosecuted Amorous for violating the Mann Act, which criminalizes the knowing …
Contempt Of Congress: A Reply To The Critics Of An Absolute Rule Of Statutory Stare Decisis, Lawrence C. Marshall
Contempt Of Congress: A Reply To The Critics Of An Absolute Rule Of Statutory Stare Decisis, Lawrence C. Marshall
Michigan Law Review
In the law school tradition of "suspending belief," Professor Eskridge has created a hypothetical in which I, in my first case as Chief Justice of the United States, must decide whether to adhere to various antiquated and seemingly erroneous precedents interpreting the Mann Act. Eskridge assumes that I will feel compelled to adhere to these decisions, for to do otherwise, he contends, would force me to abandon the proposal for an absolute rule of statutory stare decisis that I advanced recently in this Law Review. Eskridge then offers a variety of critiques of my thesis, coming from perspectives as diverse …
Beyond The Warren Court And Its Conservative Critics: Toward A Unified Theory Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Donald A. Dripps
Beyond The Warren Court And Its Conservative Critics: Toward A Unified Theory Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Donald A. Dripps
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I develops more fully the differences that divide liberal and conservative commentators on criminal procedure, taking special note of the series of Reports prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy and published recently in the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Part II explains my disquiet with the suggestion that original-meaning jurisprudence ought to guide criminal procedure doctrine. Part II also defends the thesis that the fourteenth amendment protects the individual interest in freedom from unjust punishment, rather than any abstract interest in truth for its own sake. Part III considers two familiar controversies in criminal …