Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (231)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (118)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (51)
- University of Michigan Law School (30)
-
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (26)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (22)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (21)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (20)
- Pepperdine University (19)
- University of Colorado Law School (19)
- BLR (18)
- Barry University School of Law (18)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (18)
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Georgetown University Law Center (13)
- Notre Dame Law School (13)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (13)
- Fordham Law School (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Association of American Law Schools (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (84)
- Jurisprudence (76)
- Statutory interpretation (37)
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Judges (27)
-
- Law (27)
- Courts (22)
- Constitution (20)
- Supreme Court (20)
- Congress (18)
- Regulation (17)
- Litigation (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- Law and Society (15)
- Textualism (15)
- Constitutional law (14)
- First Amendment (14)
- Judicial review (14)
- Legal History (14)
- Legislative history (14)
- General Law (12)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- Politics (12)
- International Law (11)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (11)
- Administrative Law (10)
- Copyright (10)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Remedies (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (229)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (117)
- Cardozo Law Review (30)
- Faculty Scholarship (26)
-
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (23)
- Articles (20)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (20)
- ExpressO (17)
- Michigan Law Review (16)
- Barry Law Review (15)
- Northwestern University Law Review (15)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (13)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (12)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (12)
- Journal of Law and Policy (11)
- Publications (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (9)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (7)
- Indiana Law Journal (6)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (6)
- Arkansas Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- IP Theory (5)
- Journal of Legislation (5)
- Notre Dame Law Review (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (5)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 691 - 720 of 960
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Delivering The Goods: Herein Of Mead, Delegations, And Authority, Patrick Mckinley Brennan
Delivering The Goods: Herein Of Mead, Delegations, And Authority, Patrick Mckinley Brennan
Working Paper Series
This paper argues, first, that the natural law position, according to which it is the function of human law and political authorities to instantiate certain individual goods and the common good of the political community, does not entail judges' having the power or authority to speak the natural law directly. It goes on to argue, second, that lawmaking power/authority must be delegated by the people or their representatives. It then argues, third, that success in making law depends not just on the exercise of delegated power/authority, but also on the exercise of care and deliberation or, in the article's terms, …
Extraordinary Rendition: A Wrong Without A Right, Robert Johnson
Extraordinary Rendition: A Wrong Without A Right, Robert Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
When The Music Stops, Why Not Require Certain Title Vii Plaintiffs To Find A Chair On Which To Rest Their Complaint?, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 505 (2009), Catherine R. Caifano
When The Music Stops, Why Not Require Certain Title Vii Plaintiffs To Find A Chair On Which To Rest Their Complaint?, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 505 (2009), Catherine R. Caifano
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Door Open Or Closed? Evaluating The Future Of The Federal Medical Peer-Review Privilege, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561 (2009), Ghazal Sharifi
Is The Door Open Or Closed? Evaluating The Future Of The Federal Medical Peer-Review Privilege, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561 (2009), Ghazal Sharifi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
You Can Move In But You Can't Stay: To Protect Occupancy Rights After Halprin, The Fair Housing Act Needs To Be Amended To Prohibit Post-Acquisition Discrimination, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 751 (2009), Scott N. Gilbert
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Irs's Flawed Solution To The Controversy Over Deductible Claims Against The Estate And The Necessity For A Date-Of-Death Standard, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 789 (2009), Lisa K. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unaccountability Of The Accounting Regulators: Analyzing The Constitutionality Of The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1019 (2009), Whitney Innes
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Redefining Disposable Income In Chapter 13 Plans: Moving Forward Into A "New Era In The History Of Bankruptcy Law", 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1107 (2009), Lauren Sylvester
Redefining Disposable Income In Chapter 13 Plans: Moving Forward Into A "New Era In The History Of Bankruptcy Law", 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1107 (2009), Lauren Sylvester
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confessions Of A Whistleblower: The Need To Reform The Whistleblower Provision Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 241 (2009), Jisoo Kim
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis Of The Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 111 (2009), Steven R. Morrison
When Is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis Of The Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 111 (2009), Steven R. Morrison
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ride At Your Own Risk: Bicyling And Government Tort Immunity In Illinois, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 293 (2009), John Ochoa
Ride At Your Own Risk: Bicyling And Government Tort Immunity In Illinois, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 293 (2009), John Ochoa
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Judging Culture To Taxing 'Indians': Tracing The Legal Discourse Of The 'Indian Mode Of Life', Constance Macintosh
From Judging Culture To Taxing 'Indians': Tracing The Legal Discourse Of The 'Indian Mode Of Life', Constance Macintosh
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In this article I consider how judicial decision making characterizes Indigenous peoples’ culture outside the context of determinations under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. I am concerned with how contemporary jurisprudence sometimes subjects Indigenous people to stereotyped tests of Aboriginality when they seek to exercise legislated rights. These common law tests of Aboriginality tend to turn on troubling oppositional logics, such as whether or not the Indigenous person engages in waged labour or commercial activities. These tests arose in historic legislation and policy that were premised on social evolutionary theory and were directed at determining whether an Indigenous …
The Missing Jurisprudence Of The Legislated Constitution, Robin West
The Missing Jurisprudence Of The Legislated Constitution, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Does the fourteenth Amendment and its Equal Protection Clause — the promise that "no state shall deny equal protection of the laws" — have any relevance to the progressive project of reducing economic inequality in various spheres of life or, more modestly, of ameliorating the multiple vulnerabilities of this country's poor people? The short answer, I believe, is, it depends. It will depend, in 2020, just as it depends now, on what we mean by the Constitution we are expounding: the Constitution as read and interpreted by courts — the adjudicated Constitution — or what I propose to call the …
Rebalancing The Scales: Restoring The Availability Of Disparate Impact Causes Of Action In Title Vi Cases, Victor Suthammanont
Rebalancing The Scales: Restoring The Availability Of Disparate Impact Causes Of Action In Title Vi Cases, Victor Suthammanont
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Hidden Legacy Of Holy Trinity Church: The Unique National Institution Canon, Anita S. Krishnakumar
The Hidden Legacy Of Holy Trinity Church: The Unique National Institution Canon, Anita S. Krishnakumar
Faculty Publications
This Article explores an underappreciated legacy of the Supreme Court's (in)famous decision in Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States. Although Holy Trinity has been much discussed in the academic literature and in judicial opinions, the discussion thus far has focused almost exclusively on the first half of the Court's opinion—which declares that the "spirit" of a statute should trump its "letter"—and relies on legislative history to help divine that spirit. Scholars and jurists have paid little, if any, attention to the opinion's lengthy second half. In that second half, the Court tells a detailed narrative about the country's …
Representation Reinforcement: A Legislative Solution To A Legislative Process Problem, Anita S. Krishnakumar
Representation Reinforcement: A Legislative Solution To A Legislative Process Problem, Anita S. Krishnakumar
Faculty Publications
One of the most valuable—and disturbing—insights offered by public choice theory has been the recognition that wealthy, well-organized interests with narrow, intense preferences often dominate the legislative process while diffuse, unorganized interests go under-represented. Responding to this insight, legal scholars in the fields of statutory interpretation and administrative law have suggested that the solution to the problem of representational inequality lies with the courts. Indeed, over the past two decades, scholars in these fields have offered up a host of John Hart Ely-inspired representation reinforcing "canons of construction," designed to encourage judges to use their role as statutory interpreters to …
Proving Preemption By Proving Exemption: The Quandary Of The National Securities Market Improvement Act, Jeffrey D. Chadwick
Proving Preemption By Proving Exemption: The Quandary Of The National Securities Market Improvement Act, Jeffrey D. Chadwick
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Claims, Civil Actions, Congress & The Court: Limiting The Reasoning Of Cases Construing Poorly Drawn Statutes, Joan Steinman
Claims, Civil Actions, Congress & The Court: Limiting The Reasoning Of Cases Construing Poorly Drawn Statutes, Joan Steinman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sanctioning The Ambulance Chaser, Anita Bernstein
Sanctioning The Ambulance Chaser, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Poetry Of Law, Sidney W. Delong
Redefining The Question: Applying A Hierarchical Structure To The Mens Rea Requirement For Section 875(C), Karen Rosenfield
Redefining The Question: Applying A Hierarchical Structure To The Mens Rea Requirement For Section 875(C), Karen Rosenfield
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Mission Of The Criminal Law Edit, Alignment And Reform Commission (Clear): An Introductory Commentary, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 611 (2008), John Decker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nontestimonial Declarations Against Penal Interest: Eschewing The Corroboration Requirement For Inculpatory Statements, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 969 (2008), Michael Duffy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Illinois Criminal Code Of 2009: Providing Clarity In The Law, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 815 (2008), Governor James R. Thompson, Justice Gino Divito, Peter G. Baroni, Kathy Saltmarsh, Daniel Mayerfeld
The Illinois Criminal Code Of 2009: Providing Clarity In The Law, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 815 (2008), Governor James R. Thompson, Justice Gino Divito, Peter G. Baroni, Kathy Saltmarsh, Daniel Mayerfeld
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Case Note: Golden Gate Restaurant Association V. City And County Of San Francisco: Setting The Stage For Supreme Court Review Of The Most Important Preemption Matter In The History Of Erisa, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2008), Joshua Waldbeser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Baby Ka-Boom! Coming Developments In Erisa Litigation Due To Social, Demographic, And Financial Pressures From The Baby Boom Generation, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2008), Craig C. Martin, Matthew J. Renaud, Douglas A. Sondgeroth
Baby Ka-Boom! Coming Developments In Erisa Litigation Due To Social, Demographic, And Financial Pressures From The Baby Boom Generation, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2008), Craig C. Martin, Matthew J. Renaud, Douglas A. Sondgeroth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Magic Words And Millionaires: The Supreme Court's Assault On Campaign Funding, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2008), Michael J. Kasper
Magic Words And Millionaires: The Supreme Court's Assault On Campaign Funding, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2008), Michael J. Kasper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Things First: A Principled Approach To Patent Administrative Law, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 29 (2008), Kali Murray
First Things First: A Principled Approach To Patent Administrative Law, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 29 (2008), Kali Murray
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Analysis Of The Contraction Of Limited Tort Immunity For Recreational Liability In Illinois, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 65 (2008), Barnett P. Ruttenberg, Thomas Gianturco
An Analysis Of The Contraction Of Limited Tort Immunity For Recreational Liability In Illinois, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 65 (2008), Barnett P. Ruttenberg, Thomas Gianturco
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Let's Not Jump To Conclusions: Approaching Felon Disenfranchisement Challenges Under The Voting Rights Act, Thomas G. Varnum
Let's Not Jump To Conclusions: Approaching Felon Disenfranchisement Challenges Under The Voting Rights Act, Thomas G. Varnum
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 invalidates voting qualifications that deny the right to vote on account of race or color. This Article confronts a split among the federal appellate courts concerning whether felons may rely on Section 2 when challenging felon disenfranchisement laws. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals allows felon disenfranchisement challenges under Section 2; however, the Second and Eleventh Circuits foresee unconstitutional consequences and thus do not. After discussing the background of voting rights jurisprudence, history of felon disenfranchisement laws, and evolution of Section 2, this Article identifies the points of contention among the …