Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (214)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (89)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (76)
- UIC School of Law (65)
- University of Michigan Law School (44)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (39)
- University of Maine School of Law (37)
- University of Colorado Law School (35)
- BLR (32)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (31)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (28)
- Georgetown University Law Center (27)
- Pepperdine University (27)
- University of Georgia School of Law (27)
- American University Washington College of Law (24)
- Fordham Law School (24)
- Brooklyn Law School (22)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (21)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (19)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (18)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (16)
- New York Law School (15)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (14)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (13)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (12)
- St. Mary's University (12)
- Cleveland State University (11)
- Duke Law (11)
- Notre Dame Law School (11)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (169)
- Jurisprudence (168)
- Supreme Court (95)
- Courts (59)
- Constitution (56)
-
- Constitutional law (42)
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Judicial review (39)
- Judge (36)
- Law (30)
- Legislation (30)
- Judiciary (28)
- New York (28)
- State (27)
- Federal (26)
- Statutory interpretation (26)
- Textualism (25)
- General Law (24)
- First Amendment (23)
- United States Supreme Court (23)
- Constitutional interpretation (22)
- Court (21)
- Law and Society (21)
- Defendant (20)
- Justice (20)
- Due process (19)
- Jurisdiction (19)
- Jury (19)
- Legal History (19)
- Court of Appeals (18)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (214)
- Touro Law Review (75)
- UIC Law Review (57)
- Faculty Scholarship (54)
- Cardozo Law Review (51)
-
- Michigan Law Review (36)
- Maine Law Review (35)
- Northwestern University Law Review (33)
- Publications (32)
- ExpressO (31)
- Articles (28)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (27)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (27)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (16)
- Fordham Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Works (16)
- Pepperdine Law Review (15)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Faculty Publications (12)
- Brooklyn Law Review (11)
- NYLS Law Review (11)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (11)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (10)
- Faculty Articles (10)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (10)
- Catholic University Law Review (9)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (9)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (9)
- American University Law Review (8)
- Arkansas Law Review (8)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1111 - 1140 of 1285
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Social Restraint Or Implicit Collusion?: Toward A Game Theoretic Analysis Of Stare Decisis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor
Social Restraint Or Implicit Collusion?: Toward A Game Theoretic Analysis Of Stare Decisis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
A Survey Of Article Iii Procedural Issues Considered At The Federal Circuit During Its First Decade, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 25 (1993), Jerry R. Selinger
A Survey Of Article Iii Procedural Issues Considered At The Federal Circuit During Its First Decade, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 25 (1993), Jerry R. Selinger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Moral Reasoning And The Quest For Legitimacy, Michael D. Daneker
Moral Reasoning And The Quest For Legitimacy, Michael D. Daneker
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disagreement And Interpretation, Robert F. Nagel
Hermeneutics And Constitutional Interpretation, Aharon Barak
Hermeneutics And Constitutional Interpretation, Aharon Barak
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Philosophical Reconstruction Of Judicial Review, Carlos Santiago Nino
A Philosophical Reconstruction Of Judicial Review, Carlos Santiago Nino
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Natural Law Ambiguities, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
I share with Fred Schauer the relatively unpopular belief that the positivist insistence that we keep separate the legal "is" from the legal "ought" is a logical prerequisite to meaningful legal criticism, and therefore, in the constitutional context, is a logical prerequisite to meaningful criticism of the Constitution. As Schauer argues, despite the modern inclination to associate positivism with conservatism, the positivist "separation thesis," properly understood, facilitates legal criticism and legal reform, not reactionary acquiescence. If we want to improve law, we must resist the urge to see it through the proverbial rose-colored glasses; we must be clear that a …
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Name-Calling And The Clear Error Rule, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Publications
The apex of American legal thought is embodied in two types of writings: the federal appellate opinion and the law review article. In this Article, the author criticizes the whole enterprise of doctrinal constitutional law scholarship, using a recent U.S. Supreme Court case and a Harvard Law Review article as quintessential examples of the dominant genre. In a rhetorical tour de force, the author argues that most of modern constitutional scholarship is really advocacy in the guise of scholarship. Such an approach to legal scholarship may have some merit as a strategic move towards a political end; however, it has …
Three Mistakes About Interpretation, Paul Campos
The Code Of The Moral, Niklas Luhmann
Clerks In The Maze, Pierre Schlag
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks On The Process Of Judging, William H. Rehnquist
Remarks On The Process Of Judging, William H. Rehnquist
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Improving One's Situation: Some Pragmatic Reflections On The Art Of Judging, Catharine Pierce Wells
Improving One's Situation: Some Pragmatic Reflections On The Art Of Judging, Catharine Pierce Wells
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Book Review —Rewriting The History Of The Judiciary Act Of 1789: Exposing Myths,Challenging Premises And Using New Evidence, Roger J. Miner '56
Book Review —Rewriting The History Of The Judiciary Act Of 1789: Exposing Myths,Challenging Premises And Using New Evidence, Roger J. Miner '56
Book Reviews
No abstract provided.
Understanding Disagreement, The Root Issue Of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein To Positivism, Critical Theory, And Judging, Thomas Morawetz
Understanding Disagreement, The Root Issue Of Jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein To Positivism, Critical Theory, And Judging, Thomas Morawetz
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Muncipal Law, Honorable Leon D. Lazer
Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag
Pre-Figuration And Evaluation, Pierre Schlag
Publications
In this response to Professor Rubin, Professor Schlag argues that a prescriptive theory of evaluation does not free an evaluator from the bias inherent in his own pre-figurations. On the contrary, the belief that better evaluative criteria will advance the cause of fairer evaluation is itself an effect of flawed and unrationalized pre-figurations of conventional legal thought. Professor Schlag argues that the evaluation question and its attendant disputes arise from a more significant development--the unraveling of the dominant paradigm of legal thought, the decomposition of normative legal thought.