Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (828)
- Seattle University School of Law (192)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (27)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (10)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- BLR (5)
- Barry University School of Law (5)
- New York Law School (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- American Dental Association (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Bridgewater College (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Inc. (73)
- Student comment (46)
- Texas (38)
-
- Texas Supreme Court (34)
- Fourteenth Amendment (25)
- Negligence (20)
- First Amendment (19)
- Jr. (19)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Texas Constitution (19)
- Due process (18)
- Due Process Clause (17)
- Equal Protection Clause (17)
- Sixth Amendment (17)
- Criminal law (16)
- Legal malpractice (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- Law (14)
- U.S. Const. amend. XIV (13)
- Constitution (12)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Constitutional law (12)
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct (12)
- Sanctions (12)
- St. Mary’s School of Law (12)
- Supreme Court (12)
- Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (12)
- § 1 (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (827)
- Seattle University Law Review (192)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (26)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (8)
-
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (7)
- Barry Law Review (5)
- ExpressO (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Articles (3)
- Articles & Chapters (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Faculty Publications By Year (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Reports & Public Policy Documents (2)
- The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association (2)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 1271
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Principles Of Governmental Immunity In Texas: The Texas Government Waives Sovereign Immunity When It Contracts - Or Does It Comment., Renna Rhodes
St. Mary's Law Journal
When the government causes injury through negligence or by breaching a contract, the injured party must face the obstacle of governmental immunity. The doctrine of governmental immunity can act as a total bar to recovery, especially in Texas. Over the years, governmental immunity increasingly has faced attack from courts and commentators. Some states, including Texas, have revised the common-law doctrine, allowing the government to be sued in certain situations. In Texas, principles of governmental immunity are often misconstrued. Which principles of governmental immunity apply to a particular situation in Texas depends on whether the defendant is a state entity or …
Scientific Evidence Under Daubert., John H. Mansfield
Scientific Evidence Under Daubert., John H. Mansfield
St. Mary's Law Journal
The controversy over the proper standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence is an argument over the value of a jury trial compared with a bench trial or decisions by scientists. The argument has both a constitutional dimension in the provisions relating to a jury trial, compulsory process and due process, and a nonconstitutional dimension in the ordinary law of evidence. In the recent case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court took a different approach, basing its decision almost entirely on an interpretation of the particular words used in Rule 702 of the Federal …
Speaking The Language Of Exclusion: How Equal Protection And Fundamental Rights Analyses Permit Language Discrimination Comment., Donna F. Coltharp
Speaking The Language Of Exclusion: How Equal Protection And Fundamental Rights Analyses Permit Language Discrimination Comment., Donna F. Coltharp
St. Mary's Law Journal
In the summer of 1995, the en banc Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Flores v. State upheld a lower court’s ruling to give a drunk-driving (DWI) offender a year in prison as opposed to probation. The trial judge denied the defendant probation due to his inability to speak English. The county in which the defendant was arrested and convicted did not provide a DWI rehabilitation program in Spanish, leading the judge to determine the defendant would not benefit from probation. In his appeal, Mr. Flores claimed the lower court violated his equal protection and due process rights under the …
Changing The Nature Of Corporate Representation: Attorney Liability For Aiding And Abetting The Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Comment., Stanley Pietrusiak Jr.
Changing The Nature Of Corporate Representation: Attorney Liability For Aiding And Abetting The Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Comment., Stanley Pietrusiak Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
In 1983, the American Bar Association (ABA) comprehensively defined corporate counsel’s ethical duties in situations where a corporate officer engages in conduct which could substantially harm the organization. In such cases, the nature of the corporate attorney’s duties depends on whether the officer’s conduct is illegal or whether the officer made a policy decision which falls short of illegality. Rule 1.13 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct imposes the duty on corporate counsel to take steps to stop corporate officers from engaging in illegal conduct which is likely to result in substantial injury to the organization. Conversely, counsel is …
Same-Sex Harassment - The Next Step Up In The Evolution Of Sexual Harassment Law Under Title Vii Comment., Regina L. Stone-Harris
Same-Sex Harassment - The Next Step Up In The Evolution Of Sexual Harassment Law Under Title Vii Comment., Regina L. Stone-Harris
St. Mary's Law Journal
Women sexually harassed by male co-workers are protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Yet, men are not protected because the federal courts in the Fifth Circuit do not protect men who are sexually harassed by other men. Male victims of sexual harassment are protected if they live in another district which does offer Title VII protection to same-sex victims. But should geography dictate protection? The federal courts are currently split as to whether a claim of sexual harassment between members of the same gender is actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. In the absence …
Third World Texas: Nafta, State Law, And Environmental Problems Facing Texas Colonias Symposium - The Environment And The United States-Mexico Border - Comment., David L. Hanna
St. Mary's Law Journal
The horrendous conditions along the Texas-Mexico border stem from factors on both sides of the Rio Grande River, including maquiladoras, migrant farms, poverty, poor land development, and bureaucracy. The adverse living conditions in Texas’s third world border region have resulted in immense health and safety problems. The United States government promised the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) would bring new environmental prosperity to the border region. Yet, aside from one sentence in the preamble, NAFTA does not directly address environmental protection. The United States and Mexico, as part of a series of environmental side agreements, created the Border Environmental …
Nafta And The Environment: Dealing With Abnormally High Birth Defect Rates Among Children Of Texas-Mexico Border Towns Symposium - The Environment And The United States-Mexico Border - Comment., Kelly L. Reblin
St. Mary's Law Journal
Along the 868-mile Texas-Mexico border thousands of young women live in fear as deadly birth defects with unknown causes threaten the lives of their unborn children. A total of ninety cases of the birth defect anencephaly, meaning the fetus has no brain, were reported in the fourteen Texas border counties between 1986 and 1991. The cause of these birth defects has yet to be determined officially; yet, researchers and residents along the Texas-Mexico border blame poor environmental conditions caused by the maquiladora industry and inadequate sewage facilities. The Texas Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control investigated the …
Giving Texas Lawyers Their Dues: The State Bar's Liability Under Hudson And Keller For Political And Ideological Activities., Ralph H. Brock
Giving Texas Lawyers Their Dues: The State Bar's Liability Under Hudson And Keller For Political And Ideological Activities., Ralph H. Brock
St. Mary's Law Journal
The State Bar must provide information for members to assess the propriety of mandatory dues and establish a procedure for members to challenge improper expenditures, however, the Texas State Bar provides no such procedure. Although most states have unified bars, opposition to compulsory bar membership is steady—due largely, to using membership dues to lobby state legislatures in favor of positions which some members may oppose. Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson and Keller v. State Bar of California are the culmination of labor union and unified bar cases which uphold compulsory membership but establish constitutional limits on the uses of mandatory …
Hopwood V. Texas: A Victory For Equality That Denies Reality Recent Development., Robert A. Lauer
Hopwood V. Texas: A Victory For Equality That Denies Reality Recent Development., Robert A. Lauer
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Toward A Pragmatic Model Of Judicial Decisionmaking: Why Tort Law Provides A Better Framework Than Constitutional Law For Deciding The Issue Of Medical Futility, Brent D. Lloyd
Seattle University Law Review
Recognizing that courts will eventually have to confront the issue of medical futility, this Comment argues that there is no principled basis for omitting these difficult questions from a legal analysis of the issue and that courts should therefore decide the issue in a manner that honestly confronts them. Specifically, the argument advanced here is that courts confronted with cases of medical futility should decide the issue under principles of tort law, rather than under principles of constitutional law. The crux of this argument is that tort principles provide an open-ended analytical framework conducive to considering troublesome questions like those …
The Presumption Of Innocence: Patching The Tattered Cloak After Maryland V. Craig., Ralph H. Kohlmann
The Presumption Of Innocence: Patching The Tattered Cloak After Maryland V. Craig., Ralph H. Kohlmann
St. Mary's Law Journal
Over one hundred years ago, the United States Supreme Court recognized the importance of the presumption of innocence in a criminal justice system which is based on due process. The Court declared the presumption of innocence is “the undoubted law, axiomatic, and elementary, and its enforcements lies at the foundation … of our criminal law.” The Court’s changing view of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause is the most recent contribution to the reduction in the practical value of the presumption of innocence. In Maryland v. Craig, the Court decided that while face-to-face confrontation forms the core of values furthered in …
The Habeas Corpus Revolution: A New Role For State Courts., Charles F. Baird
The Habeas Corpus Revolution: A New Role For State Courts., Charles F. Baird
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article’s purpose is to portray recent changes in the United States Supreme Court’s habeas corpus jurisprudence—limiting the scope of the federal writ while reducing the federal judiciary’s role overseeing the criminal justice systems. Seemingly, the Court gave little thought to whether this reduction in federal oversight should be accompanied by a greater measure of review on the part of state courts. The writ of habeas corpus, often referred to as the Great Writ, is the primary means of enforcing rights guaranteed under the United States Constitution and federal courts are the principal guardians of these rights. While commitment to …
Obligations Of Hiv-Infected Health Professionals To Inform Patients Of Their Serological Status: Evolving Theories Of Liability, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 317 (1994), Theodore R. Leblang
Obligations Of Hiv-Infected Health Professionals To Inform Patients Of Their Serological Status: Evolving Theories Of Liability, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 317 (1994), Theodore R. Leblang
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Liability Of Blood Banks And Manufacturers Of Clotting Products To Recipients Of Hiv-Infected Blood: A Comparison Of The Law And Reaction In The United States, Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, And Australia, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 465 (1994), Joseph Kelly
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Capital Punishment: The Humanistic And Moral Issues Address., Helen Prejean
Capital Punishment: The Humanistic And Moral Issues Address., Helen Prejean
St. Mary's Law Journal
Death row reminds us that justice is not equal. Death sentences, opposed to being reserved for only the most heinous crimes, are generally related to the profile of the victim and identity of those most outraged by the crime. The majority of people on death row killed a white person, even though one-half of homicide victims in the United States are people of color. Because of this, and the fact that the law almost always sides with people of wealth and power, the death penalty works to compound societal trauma instead of healing or solving anything. The skewed and harmful …
Use Of A Pen Register May Be A Search Within The Purview Of Article I, Section 9 Of The Texas Constitution., Angie Patrick
Use Of A Pen Register May Be A Search Within The Purview Of Article I, Section 9 Of The Texas Constitution., Angie Patrick
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Richardson v. State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted Richardson’s second petition for discretionary review to determine whether law enforcement’s use of a pen register constitutes a search. The use of a pen register may be a search within the purview of Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution. Courts use the reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test, from Katz v. United States, to determine whether a search has occurred under the Fourth Amendment. In Richardson, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reviewed whether the use of a pen register equates to a search despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s determination in …
Foreigners On Texas's Death Row And The Right Of Access To A Consul Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., S. Adele Shank, John Quigley
Foreigners On Texas's Death Row And The Right Of Access To A Consul Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., S. Adele Shank, John Quigley
St. Mary's Law Journal
Foreign nationals arrested in the United States confront the disadvantage of mounting a criminal defense in several ways. In most cases, they are unfamiliar with U.S. customs, police policies, and criminal proceedings. Although U.S. courts strive to prevent bias against accused based on alienage, discrimination does occur. To minimize the disadvantages experienced by accused foreigners, international law guarantees the right of consular access. Under internationally accepted norms applicable in the United States, an accused foreigner is entitled to contact his home-state consult office for assistance. Furthermore, mere involvement of a consul may encourage local government to follow procedural norms and …
The Subjection Of Women . . . Still: Unfulfilled Promises Of Protection For Women Victims Of Domestic Violence Comment., James Martin Truss
The Subjection Of Women . . . Still: Unfulfilled Promises Of Protection For Women Victims Of Domestic Violence Comment., James Martin Truss
St. Mary's Law Journal
Throughout American history, women have fought to realize a full and independent legal identity, equal to men. Nonetheless, issues such as domestic violence have often remained obscured due partly to the judicial system’s reluctance to intrude into “family matters.” Although courts have long-since renounced the common-law rule which allowed a husband to discipline his wife, the plight of the battered woman remained largely ignored by courts and legislatures. The pervasiveness and severity of domestic violence are widely documented. On June 1, 1991, the Texas Supreme Court created the Gender Bias Task Force of Texas (Task Force) to consider whether gender …
J.E.B. V. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B.: Excellent Ideology, Ineffective Implementation., Nancy J. Cutler
J.E.B. V. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B.: Excellent Ideology, Ineffective Implementation., Nancy J. Cutler
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Did We Treaty Away Ker-Frisbie Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Timothy D. Rudy
Did We Treaty Away Ker-Frisbie Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Timothy D. Rudy
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article explores whether U.S. ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Civil and Political Covenant) provides the American judiciary with reason to jettison the Ker-Frisbie doctrine. If the United States does not forego use of the Ker-Frisbie doctrine the country will violate its international obligations arising from a major human rights treaty. Part II discusses the customary norm of international law which forbids—and the American rule which permits—forcible abductions overseas. It also reviews whether extraterritorial abductions violate customary international law. Part III discusses applicability of the Civil and Political Covenant to the Ker-Frisbie doctrine and details …
The Natural Law Tradition On The Modern Supreme Court: Not Burke, But The Enlightenment Tradition Represented By Locke, Madison, And Marshall., R. Randall Kelso
The Natural Law Tradition On The Modern Supreme Court: Not Burke, But The Enlightenment Tradition Represented By Locke, Madison, And Marshall., R. Randall Kelso
St. Mary's Law Journal
A traditional common-law style of judicial decisionmaking exists which was present at this nation’s founding. This common law style is derived from natural law tradition. And this tradition stands as an alternative to the formalism of Justice Scalia or the Holmesian style of Chief Justice Rehnquist. This natural law style, with its focus on the religious and communitarian ethical tradition, was the dominant view of judicial interpretation for the framing and ratifying generation of the original Constitution and the Civil War Amendments. The decisionmaking style of Justices O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter appears to have great affinity with this traditional common-law …
The Texas Home Equity Controversy In Context Forum - Introduction., James W. Paulsen
The Texas Home Equity Controversy In Context Forum - Introduction., James W. Paulsen
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Essay provides some historical and legal context for the Texas home equity debate during the 1990s. It begins with an examination of early Texas homestead law, which did not clearly prohibit home equity lending. Part II describes the genesis of the homestead exemption in Texas. Public policy surrounding the homestead law had at least three components: protection of debtors, protection of women, and the fostering of an independent spirit in Texas settlers. Part III evaluates the Texas Constitution’s 1876 ban on home equity loans and the subsequent public debate up until the 1970s. Although criticism of the prohibition on …
Home Equity Reform In Texas Forum., Jerry Patterson
Home Equity Reform In Texas Forum., Jerry Patterson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Texas citizens should vote on home equity reform to be able to decide for themselves whether they desire the benefits of home equity borrowing. Texas is the only state in the nation that prohibits homeowners from using their home equity as they see fit such as to educate their children, to start or expand small businesses, or to enjoy their retirement years. Critics to home equity reform in Texas do not fully understand the scope of the amendments or the benefits that come with reform. The myth that equity loans would trigger an increase in foreclosure rates cannot be documented …
The Spoliation Tort: An Approach To Underlying Principles., Steffen Nolte
The Spoliation Tort: An Approach To Underlying Principles., Steffen Nolte
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Private Plaintiffs May Not Maintain Aiding And Abetting Suits Under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(B) And Securities And Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5., Ginger E. Margolin
Private Plaintiffs May Not Maintain Aiding And Abetting Suits Under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(B) And Securities And Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5., Ginger E. Margolin
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Central Bank v. First Interstate Bank, the United States Supreme Court held that private plaintiffs may not maintain aiding and abetting suits under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Security and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. The Court views Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act as a “catchall antifraud provision” that makes the use of “any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance” in contravention of the provision a violation of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules if such acts occur during the purchase or sale of securities. Rule 10b-5 is substantially the same as Section 10(b). However, neither Section 10(b) …
The Women's Convention And The Equal Protection Clause Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Michael J. Corbera
The Women's Convention And The Equal Protection Clause Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Michael J. Corbera
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article addresses whether the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Women’s Convention) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because international treaties such as the Women’s Convention carry the same weight and are subject to the same treatment as U.S. federal law, the constitutionality of the Convention is dictated by U.S. jurisprudence. Part II of this Article outlines and discusses the origin and content of the Women’s Convention. Part III contains a historical review of gender jurisprudence in the United States, with particular emphasis on …
Chief Justice Calvert: Man Of Imperturable Integrity In Memoriam., Thomas M. Reavley
Chief Justice Calvert: Man Of Imperturable Integrity In Memoriam., Thomas M. Reavley
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Chief Justice Calvert: Simple Rules Made Him Great In Memoriam., Jack Pope
Chief Justice Calvert: Simple Rules Made Him Great In Memoriam., Jack Pope
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Chief Justice Calvert, Our Highly Regarded Of Counsel In Memoriam., Lloyd Lochridge
Chief Justice Calvert, Our Highly Regarded Of Counsel In Memoriam., Lloyd Lochridge
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Shading Of America: Keynote Address Before The 1995 National Conference Of Law Reviews Address., Antonia Hernandez
Shading Of America: Keynote Address Before The 1995 National Conference Of Law Reviews Address., Antonia Hernandez
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.