Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (223)
- UIC School of Law (135)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (122)
- Universitas Indonesia (122)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (74)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (66)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (61)
- University of Maine School of Law (54)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (46)
- University of Georgia School of Law (42)
- Pepperdine University (39)
- Brooklyn Law School (35)
- Fordham Law School (32)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (32)
- BLR (28)
- Georgetown University Law Center (27)
- University of Colorado Law School (23)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (22)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (21)
- American University Washington College of Law (19)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (18)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (17)
- University of Richmond (16)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (15)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (15)
- Barry University School of Law (14)
- Duke Law (14)
- Notre Dame Law School (14)
- St. Mary's University (13)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (13)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (147)
- Courts (122)
- Supreme Court (107)
- Constitution (88)
- Judges (73)
-
- Federal (58)
- State (54)
- Constitutional Law (53)
- New York (48)
- Federal courts (44)
- United States Supreme Court (40)
- Defendant (38)
- Court of Appeals (36)
- Court (35)
- Law (32)
- 1990) (31)
- Constitutional law (31)
- Due process (30)
- Judge (29)
- § 6 (28)
- Jury (27)
- Legislation (27)
- Litigation (27)
- Congress (26)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (26)
- Discrimination (23)
- Evidence (23)
- First Amendment (23)
- Jurisdiction (23)
- Stare decisis (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (218)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (110)
- Faculty Scholarship (54)
-
- Maine Law Review (54)
- Northwestern University Law Review (48)
- Michigan Law Review (41)
- Cardozo Law Review (40)
- Articles (32)
- Indiana Law Journal (31)
- Scholarly Works (30)
- ExpressO (28)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (27)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (24)
- Fordham Law Review (21)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (20)
- Brooklyn Law Review (19)
- Pepperdine Law Review (19)
- Publications (16)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (16)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (15)
- Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Faculty Articles (13)
- Faculty Publications (13)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (13)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (12)
- Barry Law Review (11)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (11)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1441 - 1470 of 1661
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
La Cour Constitutionnelle Roumaine. Premiers Pas. (The Romanian Constitutional Court. First Steps), Dana Neacsu
La Cour Constitutionnelle Roumaine. Premiers Pas. (The Romanian Constitutional Court. First Steps), Dana Neacsu
Law Faculty Publications
As a panel member, Constitutional Law Study and Research Group, University of Aix-Marseille III, France this Paper covered the early jurisprudence of the Romanian Constitutional Court (September 1993) (in French)
The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability Or Judicial Activism?, Introduction To A Review Of Recent Decisions Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, The Honorable Pauline Newman
The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability Or Judicial Activism?, Introduction To A Review Of Recent Decisions Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit, The Honorable Pauline Newman
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Mspb Cases In 1991-1992: Theoretical Critique And Practical Applications, G. Jerry Shaw, Jr., William S. Bransford, Richard A. Moore, Christopher M. Okay
Survey Of Mspb Cases In 1991-1992: Theoretical Critique And Practical Applications, G. Jerry Shaw, Jr., William S. Bransford, Richard A. Moore, Christopher M. Okay
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Journeying Through The Valley Of Evil., Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Court’S Role In Interbranch Disputes Over Oversight Of Agency Rulemaking, John J. Gibbons
The Court’S Role In Interbranch Disputes Over Oversight Of Agency Rulemaking, John J. Gibbons
Cardozo Law Review
This paper is adapted from the Uri and Caroline Bauer Memorial Lecture delivered at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, on March 10, 1992.
The Habeas Hagioscope, Larry Yackle
The Habeas Hagioscope, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
If you would understand American law, American politics, and the elusive difference between the two, look no further. Federal habeas corpus for state prisoners opens a window on the workings of our national government, overt and covert. I mean in this Article to describe the scene that is revealed. A rich account of experience in recent years can contribute to a deeper understanding of our government by arranging the players and the set in context and sequence. The record will show a number of things to be true.
The Stare Decisis "Exception" To The Chevron Deference Rule, Rebecca White
The Stare Decisis "Exception" To The Chevron Deference Rule, Rebecca White
Scholarly Works
In this article, the author discusses how Chevron intersects with one important competing norm - stare decisis. Stare decisis counsels the Court to adhere to its own decisions, particularly statutory ones, absent substantial justification for departure. To what extent should stare decisis apply when an agency's interpretation of a statute, otherwise deserving of deference under Chevron, conflicts with a prior interpretation of the statute by the Supreme Court?
This article suggests the following answer: If the Court's prior opinion upheld the agency's interpretation as one reasonable reading of the statute, but not the only one possible, and the agency thereafter …
Courts And Cultural Distinctiveness, Marie R. Deveney
Courts And Cultural Distinctiveness, Marie R. Deveney
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The claim that minority ethnic and religious groups are culturally distinct from the dominant society is often, either implicitly or explicitly, a key element of demands these groups make to courts and legislatures for accommodation of their needs. In such cases, the decision maker's understanding of what constitutes "cultural distinctiveness" is crucial, for it can strongly influence the outcome of the accommodation question. In this brief Essay related to Peter Welsh's and Joseph Carens's papers and Dean Suagee's remarks delivered at the Preservation of Minority Cultures Symposium, I contrast these panelists' subtle and sophisticated understandings of cultural distinctiveness with the …
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Judicial Federalism: Current Trends And Long-Term Prospects, Stanley H. Friedelbaum
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Canons Of Statutory Construction And Judicial Constraints: A Response To Macey And Miller, Lawrence C. Marshall
The Canons Of Statutory Construction And Judicial Constraints: A Response To Macey And Miller, Lawrence C. Marshall
Vanderbilt Law Review
Professors Jonathan Macey and Geoffrey Miller claim to have set out to provide a positivist explanation for why judges ever invoke canons in the course of interpreting statutes.' In truth, though, their question is a far broader one. What they really seek to explain is why judges ever use any interpretive tools in the course of interpreting statutes. Why, Macey and Miller want to know, don't judges simply decide what result in the case will best promote a good outcome on the grounds of public policy, intrinsic fairness, economic efficiency or wealth maximization? This question is perplexing to Macey and …
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Muncipal Law, Honorable Leon D. Lazer
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance Of Complexity, Christopher B. Mueller
Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance Of Complexity, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.