Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (154)
- UIC School of Law (140)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (126)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (92)
- University of Michigan Law School (85)
- BLR (71)
- American University Washington College of Law (64)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (56)
- University of Colorado Law School (54)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (43)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (39)
- Duke Law (35)
- University of Georgia School of Law (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (34)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Notre Dame Law School (32)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (29)
- Liberty University (27)
- Fordham Law School (26)
- The University of Akron (26)
- Barry University School of Law (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (24)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (24)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (22)
- Cleveland State University (21)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (21)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (20)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (301)
- Constitutional Law (202)
- Constitutional law (189)
- Constitution (173)
- Supreme Court (146)
-
- First Amendment (83)
- Judicial review (67)
- United States Supreme Court (61)
- Originalism (59)
- Judges (57)
- Federal (56)
- State (56)
- Courts (53)
- Federalism (53)
- Constitutional interpretation (51)
- New York (47)
- Fourteenth Amendment (46)
- Due process (43)
- Law (41)
- Legal History (41)
- Legislation (41)
- Law and Society (40)
- Separation of powers (40)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (36)
- Defendant (34)
- Court of Appeals (31)
- Interpretation (31)
- 1990) (30)
- Equal protection (30)
- Textualism (30)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- UIC Law Review (138)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Faculty Scholarship (118)
- Touro Law Review (108)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (94)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (90)
- ExpressO (69)
- Michigan Law Review (64)
- Publications (54)
- Articles (47)
- Northwestern University Law Review (45)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (43)
- American University Law Review (31)
- Scholarly Works (30)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Akron Law Review (25)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (24)
- Barry Law Review (21)
- Arkansas Law Review (20)
- Working Paper Series (19)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (17)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (17)
- Brooklyn Law Review (16)
- Catholic University Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Journal Articles (15)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1831 - 1860 of 2122
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Jurisprudence And Personality In The Work Of John Rawls, David G. Carlson
Jurisprudence And Personality In The Work Of John Rawls, David G. Carlson
Articles
The article argues that John Rawls's concept of the person undergoes a significant shift between A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism, necessitating a corresponding change in jurisprudence. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls employs a "correlative jurisprudence," where law is determinate, complete, and judges merely apply existing law. This approach is tied to a narrow, passive view of personality, treating individuals as mere loci of liberty and rights. In contrast, Political Liberalism presents a dynamic, contradictory conception of the person as a union of moral capacity and a determinate conception of the good. This shift, the article contends, requires …
“Now The Machine Runs Itself”: Carl Schmitt On Hobbes And Kelsen, David Dyzenhaus
“Now The Machine Runs Itself”: Carl Schmitt On Hobbes And Kelsen, David Dyzenhaus
Cardozo Law Review
Carl Schmitt claimed that the fundamental distinction of politics is the distinction between friend and enemy. That distinction, he said, has to be put on a substantive basis, which, in the era of the nation state, he supposed must amount to an idea of the homogeneity of the people. Since liberal democracy is opposed to this kind of substance, Schmitt argued that liberalism cannot make the distinction between friend and enemy. It thus cannot defend itself against its enemies. It is no wonder that he remains the leading theorist of fascism.
John Marshall And The Moral Basis For Judicial Review, David F. Forte
John Marshall And The Moral Basis For Judicial Review, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
During the last two decades, many observers have been disappointed in some of the appointments to the federal bench and in the judicial philosophies some judges have brought with them. But if we turn to the source of our constitutional order, we would find in the example of John Marshall the moral basis for the judicial craft.
Dicta And Article Iii, Michael C. Dorf
Dicta And Article Iii, Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Les Représentations De «Société Libre Et Démocratique» A La Cour Dickson : La Rhétorique Dans Le Discours Judiciaire Canadien, Andree Lajoie, Regine Robin, Sebastien Grammond, Henry Quillinan, Louise Rolland, Stéphane Perrault, Armelle Chitrit
Les Représentations De «Société Libre Et Démocratique» A La Cour Dickson : La Rhétorique Dans Le Discours Judiciaire Canadien, Andree Lajoie, Regine Robin, Sebastien Grammond, Henry Quillinan, Louise Rolland, Stéphane Perrault, Armelle Chitrit
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
The expression "free and democratic society" is the focus of our research, which sheds light on the contribution of the Supreme Court to the constitutionalization of this concept. Leaving aside the institutional and psycho-social factors, the study confirms the hypothesis that the interpretation of this expression will vary (1) according to the conceptions formerly held by the individual judges and (2) with respect to the factors favoured by a rhetorical Perelman-like analysis, which considers the factual and judicial context and the expectations of both the universal and specific audiences. At the Supreme Court level, the expectations of the latter should …
Rewriting Beginnings: The Lessons Of Gautreaux, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 57 (1994), Janet Koven Levit
Rewriting Beginnings: The Lessons Of Gautreaux, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 57 (1994), Janet Koven Levit
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fundamental Rights In The "Gray" Area: The Right Of Privacy Under The Minnesota Constitution, Michael K. Steenson
Fundamental Rights In The "Gray" Area: The Right Of Privacy Under The Minnesota Constitution, Michael K. Steenson
Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the constitutional aspects of Minnesota privacy law. Part II briefly explains federal privacy law to provide a baseline for consideration of privacy law in Minnesota. Part III examines the right of privacy as it has evolved in the Minnesota common law. Part IV evaluates the Minnesota Supreme Court's application of federal privacy standards and then examines the court's decisions that outline the right of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution. Part V concludes by raising questions concerning the potential application of the court's concept of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution as applied to two areas: same-sex marriages and …
Machiavellian Jurisprudence: The United States Supreme Court's Doctrinal Approach To Political Speech Under The First Amendment, Garth Molander
Machiavellian Jurisprudence: The United States Supreme Court's Doctrinal Approach To Political Speech Under The First Amendment, Garth Molander
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution Of Reasons, Robin West
The Constitution Of Reasons, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Cass Sunstein's book, The Partial Constitution, brings together a number of his constitutional law essays from the last ten years. During that time, Sunstein has argued, powerfully, for the unconstitutionality of regulatory constraints on access to abortion; for the constitutionality of and the need for regulation of violent pornography; for the constitutionality of limits on both campaign spending and congressional control over public broadcasting; for the deep consistency, conventional wisdom to the contrary notwithstanding, of the Court's repudiation of Lochner in 1937 with its 1974 decision in Roe v. Wade; for the view that we should accord far less deference …
Reflections Inspired By My Critics, Philip Chase Bobbitt
Reflections Inspired By My Critics, Philip Chase Bobbitt
Faculty Scholarship
The crucial idea in constitutional law is legitimacy; the crucial idea in jurisprudence is justification.
For some time, the academic debate about U.S. constitutionalism has looked for justifications for our practices, believing this would confer legitimacy on them. In my work, I have endeavored to derive legitimacy from the practices themselves, reserving the task of justification for other purposes.
By showing the way in which legitimacy is established and maintained in a constitutional system like ours, I hoped to derive solutions to a number of classical questions, all of which, I believe, are at bottom questions about legitimacy and legitimation. …
Rethinking Rawls' Theory Of Liberty And Rights, James W. Nickel
Rethinking Rawls' Theory Of Liberty And Rights, James W. Nickel
Articles
No abstract provided.
A Heterodox Catechism, Paul Campos
An Enriched Economic Model Of Political Patronage And Campaign Contributions: Reformulating Supreme Court Jurisprudence, Richard L. Hasen
An Enriched Economic Model Of Political Patronage And Campaign Contributions: Reformulating Supreme Court Jurisprudence, Richard L. Hasen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lee V. Weisman: Whither The Establishment Clause And The Lemon V. Kurtzman Three-Pronged Test?, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Lee V. Weisman: Whither The Establishment Clause And The Lemon V. Kurtzman Three-Pronged Test?, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Note To Our Readers, The Editors
Rhetorical Resonance And Constitutional Vision, W. Cole Durham Jr.
Rhetorical Resonance And Constitutional Vision, W. Cole Durham Jr.
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward A First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Respect: A Comment On George Fletcher’S Constitutional Identity, Robin West
Toward A First Amendment Jurisprudence Of Respect: A Comment On George Fletcher’S Constitutional Identity, Robin West
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty: A Solution To The Problem Of Intentional Aids Transmission Through Rape, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (1993), Stefanie S. Wepner
The Death Penalty: A Solution To The Problem Of Intentional Aids Transmission Through Rape, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 941 (1993), Stefanie S. Wepner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conservatism And The Rehnquist Court, David F. Forte
Conservatism And The Rehnquist Court, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Now that the Supreme Court has been overwhelmingly staffed by appointees of Republican Presidents, we can ask: To what extent have they been faithful to the original version of the Constitution as articulated during its early years? How have they revivified the structural protections? How have they communicated an ethical sense of their own role in the structure? The answer, unfortunately, is that the record remains disappointing.
Apostle Of Fundamental Fairness: New York Court Of Appeals Judge Stewart F. Hancock, Jr.'S State Constitutional Decision-Making, Thompson Gould Page
Apostle Of Fundamental Fairness: New York Court Of Appeals Judge Stewart F. Hancock, Jr.'S State Constitutional Decision-Making, Thompson Gould Page
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disagreement And Interpretation, Robert F. Nagel