Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (155)
- UIC School of Law (140)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (126)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (92)
- University of Michigan Law School (85)
- BLR (71)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (66)
- American University Washington College of Law (65)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (58)
- University of Colorado Law School (54)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (51)
- University of Georgia School of Law (36)
- Duke Law (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (34)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Notre Dame Law School (32)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (29)
- Fordham Law School (27)
- Liberty University (27)
- The University of Akron (26)
- Barry University School of Law (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (24)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (24)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (22)
- Cleveland State University (21)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (21)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (20)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (300)
- Constitutional Law (197)
- Constitutional law (192)
- Constitution (180)
- Supreme Court (147)
-
- First Amendment (84)
- Judicial review (67)
- Originalism (66)
- United States Supreme Court (61)
- Judges (57)
- Federal (56)
- State (56)
- Constitutional interpretation (53)
- Federalism (53)
- Courts (52)
- Fourteenth Amendment (47)
- New York (47)
- Due process (43)
- Law (41)
- Legal History (41)
- Separation of powers (41)
- Law and Society (40)
- Legislation (40)
- Interpretation (37)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (36)
- Defendant (34)
- Court of Appeals (31)
- Equal protection (31)
- Textualism (31)
- 1990) (30)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Faculty Scholarship (147)
- UIC Law Review (138)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (108)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (94)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (90)
- ExpressO (69)
- Michigan Law Review (64)
- Publications (54)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (51)
- Articles (50)
- Northwestern University Law Review (47)
- American University Law Review (31)
- Scholarly Works (31)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Akron Law Review (25)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (24)
- Barry Law Review (21)
- Arkansas Law Review (20)
- Working Paper Series (19)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (17)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (17)
- Brooklyn Law Review (16)
- Catholic University Law Review (16)
- Fordham Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (16)
- Journal Articles (15)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1711 - 1740 of 2176
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Getting Beyond Formalism In Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters, Erwin Chemerinsky
Getting Beyond Formalism In Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters, Erwin Chemerinsky
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reconceptualizing Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners: How Should Aedpa's Standard Of Review Operate After Williams V. Taylor?, Adam N. Steinman
Reconceptualizing Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners: How Should Aedpa's Standard Of Review Operate After Williams V. Taylor?, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
This Article aims to expand the debate over the proper standard of review that applies in state prisoner habeas corpus actions in federal court. To date, this debate has centered on whether federal habeas courts should defer to the state court's resolution of federal legal questions, or whether federal habeas courts should assess and apply federal law de novo. However, in Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), the Supreme Court held that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) imposes a deferential standard of review that precludes a federal habeas court from granting relief based simply on its …
The Muddy Boundaries Between Res Judicata And Full Faith And Credit, Stewart E. Sterk
The Muddy Boundaries Between Res Judicata And Full Faith And Credit, Stewart E. Sterk
Articles
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires states to respect and recognize the legal decisions of other states, but its application is limited when it comes to judgments that attempt to control future behavior or infringe on a state's sovereignty. The article argues that while the clause ensures finality and uniformity, it does not obligate states to enforce sister-state injunctions or orders that dictate conduct beyond their borders. This distinction is particularly evident in cases involving family law, where states retain flexibility to modify or ignore prior judgments based on evolving circumstances, such as the best …
Assessing The New Judicial Minimalism, Christopher J. Peters
Assessing The New Judicial Minimalism, Christopher J. Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
In this article, which has been published in slightly revised form at 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1454 (2000), I critique some recently prominent arguments for "judicial minimalism" in constitutional decisionmaking. Current minimalist arguments, I contend, are primarily "policentric," that is, focused on the role the judiciary can play in bolstering the accountability and deliberativeness of the political branches. Drawing in part on a previous article, I offer an alternative approach to minimalism that is "juricentric" - focused on the inherent democratic legitimacy of the adjudicative process and the unique competence of that process to produce decisions about individual rights. I …
The Treaty Power And American Federalism, Part Ii, Curtis A. Bradley
The Treaty Power And American Federalism, Part Ii, Curtis A. Bradley
Michigan Law Review
In an article published in this Review two years ago, I described and critiqued what I called the "nationalist view" of the treaty power. Under this view, the national government has the constitutional power to enter into treaties, and thereby create binding national law by virtue of the Supremacy Clause, without regard to either subject matter or federalism limitations. This view is reflected in the writings of a number of prominent foreign affairs law scholars, as well as in the American Law Institute's Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States. In my article, I argued that this …
Disentangling Deregulatory Takings, Jim Rossi, Susan G. Rose-Ackerman
Disentangling Deregulatory Takings, Jim Rossi, Susan G. Rose-Ackerman
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Constitutional takings protections, such as those in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, create a potential for state liability for changes in regulatory policy by governments. This Article critiques takings jurisprudence in the context of two infrastructure investment issues: the stranded cost problem facing United States utility industries, which has given rise to claims of compensation for deregulatory takings; and the development of standards to protect direct foreign investment in developing countries. In both contexts, traditional legal doctrines do not adequately provide for the type of remedy sought so courts are in need of standards to assist them …
Checking Congress And Balancing Federalism: A Lesson From Separation-Of-Powers Jurisprudence, Keith Werham
Checking Congress And Balancing Federalism: A Lesson From Separation-Of-Powers Jurisprudence, Keith Werham
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Christians And The Military, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Christians And The Military, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Michigan Law Review
If one wishes to revisit a classic, Albert Crunus's The Fall is a riskier choice than Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, which Steven Lubet eloquently discussed last year in these pages. It is not only that Camus's work will be less familiar to legal audiences than Lee's, despite the fact that The Fall is becoming recognized through critical "revisitation" as perhaps Crunus's greatest novel. It is also that the legal protagonist of The Fall, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, does not have Atticus Finch's immediate appeal. Finch is idealistic, Clamence is existential; Finch is pious, Clamence is debauched; Finch is hopeful, Clamence …
Carl Schmitt And The Three Moments Of Democracy, Andreas Kalyvas
Carl Schmitt And The Three Moments Of Democracy, Andreas Kalyvas
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Andreas Kalyvas, Jan Müller
Schmitt Reads Marx, Jorge E. Dotti
The Exile Of The Nomos: For A Critical Profile Of Carl Schmitt, Giacomo Marramao
The Exile Of The Nomos: For A Critical Profile Of Carl Schmitt, Giacomo Marramao
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carl Schmitt's Antiliberalism: Its Theoretical And Historical Sources And Its Philosophical And Political Meaning, Carlo Galli
Carl Schmitt's Antiliberalism: Its Theoretical And Historical Sources And Its Philosophical And Political Meaning, Carlo Galli
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carl Schmitt: The Defective Guidance For The Critique Of Political Liberalism, Emanuel Richter
Carl Schmitt: The Defective Guidance For The Critique Of Political Liberalism, Emanuel Richter
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carl Schmitt And His Influence On Historians, Reinhard Mehring
Carl Schmitt And His Influence On Historians, Reinhard Mehring
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Schmitt, History, And Habermas: Comments On Mehring And Rasch, Joseph W. Bendersky
Schmitt, History, And Habermas: Comments On Mehring And Rasch, Joseph W. Bendersky
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Normless And Exceptionless Exception: Carl Schmitt's Theory Of Emergency Powers And The "Norm-Exception" Dichotomy, Oren Gross
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Schmittian Positions On Law And Politics?: Cls And Derrida, John P. Mccormick
Schmittian Positions On Law And Politics?: Cls And Derrida, John P. Mccormick
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Norman Dorsen
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On Clinton: Reconsidering The Role Of Natural Law In John Marshall's Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1141 (2000), James W. Ely
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.