Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Jurisdiction Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 3211 - 3240 of 4324

Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction

Doing Business On An Indian Reservation: Can The Non-Indian Enforce His Contract With The Tribe?, Richard M. Grimsrud May 1981

Doing Business On An Indian Reservation: Can The Non-Indian Enforce His Contract With The Tribe?, Richard M. Grimsrud

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Introduction To The Symposium "State Courts And Federalism In The 1980'S", John R. Pagan May 1981

Introduction To The Symposium "State Courts And Federalism In The 1980'S", John R. Pagan

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Florida Appellate Reform One Year Later, Arthur J. England, Jr., Richard C. Williams, Jr. Apr 1981

Florida Appellate Reform One Year Later, Arthur J. England, Jr., Richard C. Williams, Jr.

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction To Modify Alimony Payments Of Chapter 13 Debtors, Peter Swiecicki Apr 1981

Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction To Modify Alimony Payments Of Chapter 13 Debtors, Peter Swiecicki

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article examines a bankruptcy court's power to modify a chapter 13 debtor's alimony payments. Part I discusses the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction in chapter 13 cases and the connection between the chapter 13 case and alimony modification proceedings. It then outlines the domestic relations limitation and the resulting conflict between bankruptcy courts and state courts with respect to alimony modification. Part II analyzes various arguments for and against allowing bankruptcy courts to hear alimony modification requests in chapter 13 cases. This analysis reveals that any state interests are far outweighed by the substantial benefits to be gained from consolidating the …


Restating Territorial Jurisdiction And Venue For State And Federal Courts, Kevin M. Clermont Mar 1981

Restating Territorial Jurisdiction And Venue For State And Federal Courts, Kevin M. Clermont

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

"Jurisdiction must become venue," concluded Professor Albert A. Ehrenzweig. Perhaps it should. More certain is the proposition that comprehending jurisdiction requires mastering its relationship with venue. Such conclusions lie at some distance, however, bringing to mind that every journey must begin with a single step. A solid first step takes me to the subject of this Symposium, the Restatement (Second) of Judgments. This, put simply, is a masterful work. Even while still in tentative drafts, it proved an invaluable aid to judge, practitioner, teacher, and student. Yet in a work of such scope, anyone could find grounds for differing. …


Publicity And Privacy - Distinct Interests On The Misappropriation Continuum, Larry L. Saret, Martin L. Stern Jan 1981

Publicity And Privacy - Distinct Interests On The Misappropriation Continuum, Larry L. Saret, Martin L. Stern

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Younger Abstention Doctrine: Bleak Prospects For Federal Intervention In Pending State Proceedings, David C. Levenreich Jan 1981

The Younger Abstention Doctrine: Bleak Prospects For Federal Intervention In Pending State Proceedings, David C. Levenreich

Duquesne Law Review

The Younger abstention doctrine limits the ability of a federal court to enjoin a pending state proceeding. The author discusses the bases of the Younger and Pullman abstention doctrines, including the policy foundation of federalism. He examines the development of the Younger doctrine, analyzes its operation, and notes the restricted exceptions to it. He concludes that the availability of federal injunctive relief against pending state proceedings is severely limited, to the possible detriment of the vindication of federally extended rights.


The Court Of Justice Of The European Communities: The Scope Of Its Jurisidction And The Evolution Of Its Case Law Under The Eec Treaty, John Mackenzie Stuart Jan 1981

The Court Of Justice Of The European Communities: The Scope Of Its Jurisidction And The Evolution Of Its Case Law Under The Eec Treaty, John Mackenzie Stuart

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

The European Court of Justice, as the sole judicial institution of the European Communities, has evolved into a vigorous body asserting a strong cohesive influence upon the Member States through application of the principles asserted in the Communities' Treaties. In this article, Lord Mackenzie Stuart examines the jurisdiction of the Court in light of recent case law. In particular, Judge MacKenzie Stuart discusses doctrines of jurisdiction adopted by the Court and the application of these doctrines to recent developments involving free movement of goods and of persons within the Communities and other Treaty principles such as equal pay for men …


Parallel State And Federal Court Class Actions, Kevin T. Keating Jan 1981

Parallel State And Federal Court Class Actions, Kevin T. Keating

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.


General Jurisdiction Of Courts - A Critique Of The Maryland Law, Bernard Auerbach Jan 1981

General Jurisdiction Of Courts - A Critique Of The Maryland Law, Bernard Auerbach

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Practice Of Extradition From Antiquity To Modern France And The United States: A Brief History, Christopher L. Blakesley Jan 1981

The Practice Of Extradition From Antiquity To Modern France And The United States: A Brief History, Christopher L. Blakesley

Scholarly Works

In order to understand the perceptions of extradition’s function and purpose in modern France and the United States, it is important to consider the evolution of thought regarding extradition. This article will focus on the history of extradition law as it has influenced contemporary law in the United States and France. The purpose of the article is to provide insight into the development of the “modern” extradition. Although the process has not always been executed by use of a treaty agreement, treaty authorized extraditions have existed since antiquity. Moreover, a treaty authorized extradition for common crimes, as opposed to political …


Venue In The Federal Courts Under The "Doing Business" Provision Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(C): A Provision Subject To Reinterpretation?, Paul Lansing, Robert C. Castle Jan 1981

Venue In The Federal Courts Under The "Doing Business" Provision Of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(C): A Provision Subject To Reinterpretation?, Paul Lansing, Robert C. Castle

University of Richmond Law Review

A determination of whether venue is proper for a civil action commenced in federal court requires the application of the rules set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1391 to the facts of the particular case. Making such a determination has often proved difficult for litigants and courts alike because the basic rules governing venue for civil actions brought in federal courts set forth in section 1391 are not without ambiguity. Section 1391(b), for example, provides in part that "[a] civil action. .. may be brought only in the judicial district. . . in which the claim arose." The language of …


Postconviction Remedies, And Federal Jurisdiction: Tensions In The Allocation Of Judicial Power, Robert Popper, William B. De Meza Jan 1981

Postconviction Remedies, And Federal Jurisdiction: Tensions In The Allocation Of Judicial Power, Robert Popper, William B. De Meza

University of Richmond Law Review

Postconviction Remedies deals with a subject of great importance to the practitioner of criminal law. It is concerned with the procedures available to persons who seek relief from their convictions after trial and after direct review in the appellate courts. Though not usually a part of the law school curriculum and therefore not part of the attorney's formal training, the intricacies of postconviction remedies must be mastered by the lawyer who wishes to render skillful service to the convicted client. The trial and appeal are important battles, but others remain to be fought which can decide crucial issues seriously affecting …


Case Digest, Journal Staff Jan 1981

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Act of State Doctrine does not Preclude Inquiry by United States Court into Alleged Repudiation by a Foreign Government of its Obligation Arising from a Purely Commercial Transaction

Admiralty Jurisdiction Extends inland to Automobile Accident Caused by the Negligence of Ship's Crew

Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Incorporates the Long-Shoremen's and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act, and includes Provisions Depriving Claims by Outer Continental Shelf Employees Injured on the Job against Vessel Ownerbased upon Breach of Warranty of Seaworthiness

University's Restrictive Definition of Domicile, which Precludes Nonimmigrant Aliens from Attaining "In-State" Status for Tuition Purposes, Does not Violate Due Process

Order …


Case Digest, Journal Staff Jan 1981

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Carrier Who Employs Stevedore under a Long-Term Contract is Vicariously Liable to Cargo Owner for Stevedore's Mishandling of Cargo even after Unloading and Storage

Vessel Owner Denied Duty Remission because of Procedural Failure in Filings with Customs Service

Wife of Harbor Worker Injured Nonfatally in State Territorial Waters May Maintain Action for Loss of Husband's Society

Corporation may Qualify for Tax Treatment as a Western Hemisphere Trade Corporation even though Incidental Purchases are Made Outside the Hemisphere

Importation or Receipt of Goods from the United States Confirmed by Telex to Plaintiff in United States Insufficient Contacts to Establish Personal Jurisdiction …


Case Digest, Journal Staff Jan 1981

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Case Digest--

Spouse of Injured Seaman May Recover Damages for Loss of Society under Maritime Common Law

Federal District Court Lacks Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1350 over Fraud Action Brought by Alien when Claim Fails to Implicate a Treaty or Body of Rules Governing Relations between Foreign States

Jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Requires at Least a Finding of International Shoe "Minimum Contacts"

Appellate Court will not Review the Post-Settlement Appeal of a Pre-Settlement Provisional Remedy without District Court Consideration of the Intervening Events

Foreign States are Subject to Liability for Non-Commercial Torts arising from the Commercial …


Case Digest, Journal Staff Jan 1981

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Case Digest

1. Aliens' Rights

Alien is Ineligible for Naturalization when He is Relieved from Military Service and Waives All Rights under Immigration and Naturalization Laws

Executive Orders Requiring United States Claims Against Iranian Assets to be Submitted to Binding Arbitration are Valid Exercise of Presidential Powers

Injury or Intent to Injure is not an Essential Element of the Crime of Assault on a Foreign Official or an Internationally Protected Person

2. European Economic Community

Community Law Authorizes a Member State of the European Economic Community to Prescribe Penalties for a Contravention of the Prohibition Against Fishing Without Authorization in …


Allstate Insurance Company V. Hague: Abandonment Of Meaningful Constitutional Controls On Choice Of Law, Richard W. Mattson Jan 1981

Allstate Insurance Company V. Hague: Abandonment Of Meaningful Constitutional Controls On Choice Of Law, Richard W. Mattson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments, Gali Hagel, John R. Heldman Jan 1981

Recent Developments, Gali Hagel, John R. Heldman

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Aliens' Rights--The Refugee Act of 1980 as Response to the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees: The First Test

Gali Hagel

The Refugee Act of 1980, reflecting United States commitments under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol, went into effect during a wave of immigration that created a state of emergency in strongly affected southern Florida. Under a severe test of its commitment to the terms of the 1967 Protocol and its implicit sense of moral obligation to grant asylum to individuals fleeing dictatorial rule, the United States responded positively in accepting the Cubans. Although …


Mcmillan V. Mcmillan: Choice Of Law In A Sinkhole, Doug R. Rendleman Jan 1981

Mcmillan V. Mcmillan: Choice Of Law In A Sinkhole, Doug R. Rendleman

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Summary Judgment In Defamation Actions: A Threat To The Substantive Rights Of Public Figure Plantiffs, Robert Ligansky Jan 1981

Summary Judgment In Defamation Actions: A Threat To The Substantive Rights Of Public Figure Plantiffs, Robert Ligansky

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Role Of Comity In The Law Of Federal Courts, Michael L. Wells Jan 1981

The Role Of Comity In The Law Of Federal Courts, Michael L. Wells

Scholarly Works

Considerations of comity often require federal courts to defer to state courts when federal issues could be raised in state proceedings. Contexts in which such deference is required include Younger abstention, habeus corpus exhaustion and procedural default, and Pullman and Burford abstention. In this Article, Professor Wells demonstrates that the Supreme Court's opinions fail to make a distinction between cases where comity requires restraint and those where it does not. The Court's motive in invoking comity is not to decrease access to federal courts, but instead to strike a compromise between the individual's interest in a federal forum and the …


The Use Of Social Science Data In A Change Of Venue Application: A Case Study, Neil Vidmar, John W. T. Judson Jan 1981

The Use Of Social Science Data In A Change Of Venue Application: A Case Study, Neil Vidmar, John W. T. Judson

Faculty Scholarship

This article describes how social science data and professional testimony were used to assist judicial decision-making in an application to have a criminal fraud trial moved from Middlesex County, Ontario, because of prejudicial attitudes extant in the community. Typically, in such applications, tenuous documentation of pre-trial publicity and perhaps some unsubstantiated "opinion" testimony by persons purportedly in touch with the pulse of the community are the only evidence introduced . The presiding judge is required to consider this circumstantial, indirect, evidence and draw a conclusion about the level and extent of public prejudice as the merits of the application are …


Expanding Federal Court Jurisdiction Of Railway Labor Minor Disputes: Richins V. Southern Pacific, Richard H. Page Nov 1980

Expanding Federal Court Jurisdiction Of Railway Labor Minor Disputes: Richins V. Southern Pacific, Richard H. Page

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.


World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. V. Woodson: Reflections On The Road Ahead, Kenneth F. Ripple, Mollie A. Murphy Oct 1980

World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. V. Woodson: Reflections On The Road Ahead, Kenneth F. Ripple, Mollie A. Murphy

Journal Articles

During its past several terms the Supreme Court of the United States has, after a long period of inactivity, engaged in a reexamination of the constitutional limitations on state court jurisdiction. Last term, in World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, this reexamination reached a new plateau. Woodson significantly elucidated the constitutional policy considerations underlying this area. Yet, as so often occurs in constitutional litigation, the resolution of old doubts has also brought into sharper focus other yet unresolved issues.

This article has two purposes. First, it will assess the significance of Woodson in the overall doctrinal development of jurisdictional standards. Second, …


The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Statute, The Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Sep 1980

The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Statute, The Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fairness Or Federalism In The Supreme Court's Minimum Contact Analysis: World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. V. Woodson Sep 1980

Fairness Or Federalism In The Supreme Court's Minimum Contact Analysis: World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. V. Woodson

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act Of 1977, Hamlet J. Barry, Iii Jul 1980

The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act Of 1977, Hamlet J. Barry, Iii

Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1)

48 pages.

Includes footnotes (pages 44 to 47).


The Mineral Leasing Act Of 1920, Patrick H. Martin Jul 1980

The Mineral Leasing Act Of 1920, Patrick H. Martin

Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1)

39 pages (includes sample forms).

Pages M-26; M-36; M-38; and M-40 do not contain pagination or content, and were not scanned.

Contains references (page M-1).


The Resource Conservation And Recovery Act And Mineral Development, Robert E. Hamel Jul 1980

The Resource Conservation And Recovery Act And Mineral Development, Robert E. Hamel

Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1)

30 pages.