Jurisdiction Commons^™

Fslic Claims Exclusive Jurisdiction To Adjudicate Claims Against Assets It Holds As Receiver: Is It Proper?, Dan H. Matthews

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

In Re United States Catholic Conference: Considering Non-Party Rights, David P. Brooks

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Alien Tort Statute: International Human Rights Watchdog Or Simply Historical Trivia, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 341 (1988), Debra A. Harvey

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sanctioning Frivolous Litigation In State And Federal Courts: Introduction And Overview, Roger J. Miner '56

Court Conferences and Events

No abstract provided.

Discovery In Complex Litigation: The Dilemma Faced By The Judiciary, Brian Havey

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Overcoming Bank Secrecy: Assistance In Tax Matters In Switzerland On Behalf Of Foreign Criminal Authorities, Lionel Frei

NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Problem Diskrecije U Americkoj Pravnoj Misli, Charles M. Yablon

Articles

No abstract provided.

Does The Tax Injunction Act Of 1937 Affect State Court Jurisdiction Over State Tax Challenges Under Section 1983 Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1871?

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Surrogate Parenting After Baby M: The Ball Moves To The Legislature’S Court, John R. Dunne, Gregory V. Serio

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Case Digest, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Alien Tort Statute Grants Federal Court Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Foreign Sovereign for Tort Committed in Clear Violation of International Law and Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is not Exclusive Jurisdictional Grant Over Sovereign-- Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. v. Argentina Republic 830 F.2d 421 (2nd Cir. 1987)

Jurisdiction By Necessity: Examining One Proposal For Unbarring The Doors Of Our Courts, Tracy L. Troutman

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Although the usually proclaimed goals of the United States legal system are "fair play and justice," a person who is injured in some way, who feels that he has had his rights violated, or who seeks to enforce a business agreement, may not necessarily have a remedy in its judicial system. Often a court may claim it lacks power to hear a case because it does not have jurisdiction over the defendant or the subject matter of the suit. Another motive of a court for refusing to hear the case may be simply the necessity to clear its docket. One …

Case Digest, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Private Citizens Do Not Have a Cause of Action to Enforce Judgments of the International Court of Justice--Committee of United States Citizens in Nicaragua v. Reagan, 859 F.2d 929 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Precludes Domestic Court Jurisdiction Over a Cause of Action Arising Out of Airplane Crash in a Foreign Country When the Airplane Is Owned by an Instrumentality of the Foreign Government -Compania Mexicana de Aviacion v. U.S. Dist. Court, 859 F.2d 1354(9th Cir. 1988).

An Unrecognized Panamanian Regime Lacks Standing to Intervene in an Action Brought by the Recognized Panamanian Government to Enjoin the …

A Comparison Of Soviet And American Maritime Arbitration, Timothy A. Power

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Maritime arbitration has a long history both in the United States, where it dates from the late 19th century, and in the Soviet Union, where the permanent arbitration body known as the Maritime Arbitration Commission (MAC or Commission) has existed since 1930. Although both countries have similar procedures for maritime arbitration, the history, ideology, and commercial goals of each country have created systems that differ markedly in approach and style. The American experience has fostered an ad hoc system where the parties establish arbitration panels as disputes arise and where the parties have almost unlimited discretion in choosing arbitrators and …

Case Digest, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Picketing Outside Foreign Embassies is Protected Speech Under the First Amendment and Restrictions on this Speech Must Serve a Compelling Government Interest and be Narrowly Tailored to the Specific Situation--Boos v. Barry, 108S.Ct. 1157 (1988).

====================

Notions of Comity and the Act of State Doctrine Preclude U.S. Federal Courts from Exercising Jurisdiction over the Actions of Foreign Corporations when Those Actions Constitute a Violation of U.S. Antitrust Laws but are Protected by Legislation in a Foreign Country--O.N.E. Shipping Ltd. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., 830 F.2d 449 (2d Cir.1987).

The Idea Of Sovereignty: Native Peoples, Their Lands, And Their Dreams, Charles F. Wilkinson

Publications

No abstract provided.

International Concurrent Jurisdiction: Dealing With The Possibility Of Parallel Proceedings In The Courts Of More Than One Country, Bernd U. Graf

LLM Theses and Essays

This thesis will examine how legal systems deal with the phenomenon of multiple assumptions of jurisdiction over the same dispute. We will first look at public international law rules on jurisdiction, regulating (or not regulating) conflicting states' interests, which will give only modest guidance. In view of those rules, the subsequent chapters will deal with various national laws relating to the possibility of parallel proceedings in the courts of more than one country, and thus the possibility of the emergence of conflicting orders or judgments.

Martinez, Oliphant And Federal Court Review Of Tribal Activity Under The Indian Civil Rights Act, Robert Laurence

Campbell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Procedural And Substantive Problems In Complex Litigation Arising From Disasters, Jack B. Weinstein

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Exercise Of Jurisdiction Over And Enforcement Of Judgments Against Alien Defendants, Mary Kay Kane, Ronan E. Degnan

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Accountable Accountants: Is Third-Party Liability Necessary?, Victor P. Goldberg

Faculty Scholarship

Should accountants be liable to third parties if they conduct an audit in negligent manner? A half century ago, in Ultramares Corporation v. Touche, Niven & Co., Cardozo argued that they should not, unless their performance could be characterized as fraud. In recent years, courts in a minority of jurisdictions have concluded that Cardozo's argument is no longer compelling and they have found that "foreseeable" third parties could bring a tort action for ordinary negligence against the accountants. In addition to being subject to tort actions, accountants may also be liable under federal and state securities laws.

Suits against …

State Immunity From Federal Suit -- When Can Congress Alter The Balance?, Gene R. Shreve

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Personal Jurisdiction After Asahi: The Other (International) Shoe Drops, R. Lawrence Dessem

Faculty Publications

This articles analyzes the growth and development of the doctrine of personal jurisdiction and the Supreme Court's consideration and application of that doctrine in the recent case of Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court. Asahi is significant both because of the nature of the suit and the nationality of the third-party defendant. The Supreme Court for the first time directly addressed the constitutionality of the ‘stream of commerce’ doctrine of personal jurisdiction, a jurisdictional theory that has been employed increasingly in recent years in products liability actions. Asahi also is one of the few cases in which the Court …

Supreme Court Voting Patterns Related To Jurisdictional Issues, John R. Leathers

Washington Law Review

The past decade of development by the United States Supreme Court of constitutional law related to jurisdiction has been one of amazingly swift occurrences. Although progress in the area has traditionally been glacial, the Court has produced a consistent flow of opinions over the last ten years. With the flow has come a virtual flood of commentary. A consensus is emerging among scholars, perhaps shared by some members of the Court, that the current developmental framework for judicial jurisdiction dating from International Shoe Co. v. Washington may be ripe for revamping, and that the process may produce a new framework. …

The Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act: Is There An Enforcement Role For The Federal Courts?, Ann T. Wilson

Washington Law Review

The number of divorced parents has increased dramatically since 1970. Consequently, the number of custody disputes has risen. In our increasingly mobile society, it is not surprising that many of these disputes occur across state lines. Extended litigation creates additional uncertainty and instability for children involved in these disputes. In response to this growing problem, Congress enacted the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act of 1980 (PKPA). The PKPA requires that state courts enforce and not modify the child custody determinations of other states. The duty to enforce arises if the initial custody determination meets certain conditions. 6 Despite the existence of …

Considering New Issues On Appeal: The General Rule And The Gorilla Rule, Robert J. Martineau

Vanderbilt Law Review

One aspect of the appellate process that most bedevils judges and lawyers occurs when a party attempts to raise an issue in the appellate court that it did not present to the trial court. This question creates problems for the following reasons: (1) the general rule against considering new issues on appeal; (2) the perception that it is unfair to the appellant if the new issue is not considered, yet it is unfair to the appellee if the new issue is considered; and (3) the failure or inability of appellate courts to articulate any principled basis for determining when and …

International Law And The Environment, Daniel Barstow Magraw

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

18 pages.

Contains 3 pages of references.

Agenda: Proceedings Of The Sino-American Conference On Environmental Law, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

On August 16 through 18, 1987 a delegation of 10 Americans met with a 14-member Chinese delegation to compare the systems of environmental law in the two countries. The meetings were held on and near the campus of the University of Peking in Beijing, People's Republic of China. This program was the fruition of nearly three years of discussion, planning, and organization involving Dean Betsy Levin and the Natural Resources Law Center.

The keynote speaker was Qu Geping, Director of the Chinese National Environmental Protection Bureau (comparable to the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). He spoke of the …

The Control Of Air And Water Pollution In The United States Of America, Stuart L. Deutsch, A. Dan Tarlock

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

14 pages.

Contains 2 pages of references.

The Law Of Wildlife Protection In The United States, David H. Getches

Proceedings of the Sino-American Conference on Environmental Law (August 16)

27 pages.

Contains 12 pages of endnotes.