Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1300)
- Constitutional Law (957)
- International Law (884)
- State and Local Government Law (768)
- Civil Procedure (750)
-
- Litigation (671)
- Legislation (648)
- Administrative Law (591)
- Criminal Law (546)
- Judges (510)
- Jurisprudence (505)
- Supreme Court of the United States (497)
- Conflict of Laws (493)
- Environmental Law (493)
- Property Law and Real Estate (459)
- Legal History (453)
- Law and Society (449)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (442)
- Natural Resources Law (442)
- Water Law (429)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (411)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (407)
- Torts (401)
- Law and Politics (399)
- Human Rights Law (392)
- Criminal Procedure (372)
- Contracts (360)
- Transnational Law (357)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (682)
- University of Colorado Law School (262)
- Seattle University School of Law (247)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (218)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (193)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (179)
- University of Georgia School of Law (160)
- William & Mary Law School (104)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (98)
- Pepperdine University (89)
- Duke Law (87)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (76)
- American University Washington College of Law (74)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (73)
- West Virginia University (73)
- University of Kentucky (71)
- Brigham Young University Law School (68)
- University of Washington School of Law (67)
- Brooklyn Law School (61)
- UIC School of Law (61)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (59)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (56)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (55)
- Cornell University Law School (53)
- BLR (48)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (44)
- Notre Dame Law School (43)
- University of Richmond (41)
- University of Miami Law School (40)
- New York Law School (39)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (889)
- Courts (127)
- Federalism (114)
- United States (105)
- Federal courts (99)
-
- Personal jurisdiction (94)
- Federal jurisdiction (93)
- Supreme Court (86)
- Constitutional law (85)
- Congress (79)
- International law (76)
- Civil procedure (73)
- Due process (67)
- Constitution (66)
- Judicial review (62)
- International Law (59)
- Sovereignty (55)
- United States Supreme Court (55)
- Separation of powers (54)
- Conflict of laws (53)
- California (52)
- Extraterritoriality (52)
- Colorado (51)
- Choice of law (50)
- Constitutional Law (48)
- Legislation (47)
- Litigation (47)
- Conflict of Laws (45)
- Diversity jurisdiction (45)
- Federal government (45)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (541)
- Seattle University Law Review (232)
- Faculty Scholarship (231)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (132)
- Articles (126)
-
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (116)
- Indiana Law Journal (100)
- Cardozo Law Review (94)
- Faculty Publications (80)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (76)
- West Virginia Law Review (72)
- Publications (65)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (63)
- Kentucky Law Journal (62)
- BYU Law Review (58)
- Pepperdine Law Review (58)
- Washington Law Review (56)
- Scholarly Works (52)
- Touro Law Review (52)
- UIC Law Review (52)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (49)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (49)
- ExpressO (48)
- American Indian Law Review (43)
- William & Mary Law Review (42)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (39)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (38)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (37)
- Northwestern University Law Review (35)
- Journal Articles (32)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2341 - 2370 of 4323
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Citizen Suit Notice Jurisdictional And Why Does It Matter?, Karl S. Coplan
Is Citizen Suit Notice Jurisdictional And Why Does It Matter?, Karl S. Coplan
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The question of whether notice is jurisdictional or not has important ramifications for citizen suit litigation. The characterization of the notice requirement as “jurisdictional” implicates the proper procedure for raising notice objections, the means of curing notice defects, the question of waiver of notice objections, and the timing of raising notice objections. This article will conduct a brief review of the case law concerning the jurisdictional nature (or not) of the notice requirement, a consideration of the as-yet unnoticed impact of Steel Co. on the issue, and a discussion of the procedural and litigation ramifications of characterizing the notice element …
Yahoo! Cyber-Collision Of Cultures: Who Regulates?, Horatia Muir Watt
Yahoo! Cyber-Collision Of Cultures: Who Regulates?, Horatia Muir Watt
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article furthers this comparison of cyberconflicts and the real world, attempting to ascertain what lessons, if any, can be drawn from it. Part I of the Article explores the interests at stake in cyberconflicts and the relationship between technology and the law. Part II uses the French Yahoo! court's decision to show that real-world conceptions of prescriptive jurisdiction retain their legitimacy in cyberspace. Finally, Part III notes that the prospect of near perfect compliance offered by Internet technology provides the opportunity to engineer mature, well-calibrated solutions to international regulatory conflicts, which might then even serve as a model in …
Essay: Jurisdiction In Family Law Matters: The Minnesota Perspective, Robert E. Oliphant
Essay: Jurisdiction In Family Law Matters: The Minnesota Perspective, Robert E. Oliphant
William Mitchell Law Review
This article adds to the growing library of analysis and commentary on Minnesota family law. It surveys, reviews, analyzes, and comments on the decisions of Minnesota's appellate courts in the sometimes challenging and always interesting areas of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. The article examines many of the more common issues associated with jurisdiction that impact Minnesota family law in the areas of child support, custody, property division, maintenance, and paternity. It investigates the jurisdictional questions involved when applying Minnesota's long-arm statute and weighs the potential constitutional barriers to its application. It also examines relevant provisions of the Parental Kidnapping …
The Canmar Fortune: The Supreme Court Of Canada Puts Jurisdiction Agreements Back On Course, Janet Walker
The Canmar Fortune: The Supreme Court Of Canada Puts Jurisdiction Agreements Back On Course, Janet Walker
Articles & Book Chapters
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in The Canmar Fortune endorses the "strong cause test" for determining when to give effect to exclusive jurisdiction agreements.
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
Citations To Authority By The Arkansas Appellate Courts, 1950-2000, A. Michael Beaird
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federalism And The Public Good: The True Story Behind The Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act, Marci A. Hamilton
Federalism And The Public Good: The True Story Behind The Religious Land Use And Institutionalized Persons Act, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.
O Constitucionalismo Americano Confronta O Novo Paradigma Constitucional De Denninger, Michel Rosenfeld
O Constitucionalismo Americano Confronta O Novo Paradigma Constitucional De Denninger, Michel Rosenfeld
Articles
No abstract provided.
Ruminations On Terrorism & Anti-Terrorism In Law And Literature, Christopher L. Blakesley
Ruminations On Terrorism & Anti-Terrorism In Law And Literature, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
Discussing terrorism in light of the September 11 atrocities is daunting. It requires one to wonder how to maintain an equilibrium in the face of a menace that wishes its own death as long as it flows from the slaughter of ‘the enemy.‘ How is it possible to combat this menace without falling into a trap of hatred or blind fear that leads to the use of terror to fight terrorism? The overarching issues relating to September 11, terrorism, and counter-terrorism include: whether oppression can provide any justification for that atrocity; similarly, whether that attack calls for or allows self-defense …
Some Troubling Elements In The Treaty Language Of The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Catherine R. Blanchet
Some Troubling Elements In The Treaty Language Of The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Catherine R. Blanchet
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Note will examine problems that arise from the language of the Rome Statute itself. Part II will examine the potential strategic uses of the Rome Statute's jurisdictional aspects. It will also examine how the fairness concerns raised by this potential usage are exacerbated when the potential State abuser is a permanent member of the Security Council. Part III will look at the language of the Rome Statute's definition of crimes against humanity. It will also examine the various and varying interpretations of this language by the scholars and commentators who have examined the issue.
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Appellate Jurisdiction In Ohio Over Final Appealable Orders , Gary L. Garrison
Cleveland State Law Review
This article focuses on the rules for determining finality and appealability of judgments under section 2505.02 and Ohio R. Civ. P. 54(B). To that end, this article addresses not only the various categories of "final orders" but also the procedural mechanisms by which interlocutory appeals are taken from judgments on one part of a case while the rest of the case remains pending. The objective of this article is two-fold. First and foremost, it provides a resource and guide to appellate practitioners and trial court judges for understanding the "final order rule" and for navigating its various provisions in the …
Rethinking Fairness: Principled Legal Realism And Federal Jurisdiction, Aviam Soifer
Rethinking Fairness: Principled Legal Realism And Federal Jurisdiction, Aviam Soifer
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting U.S. Treaties In Light Of Human Rights Values, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Interpreting U.S. Treaties In Light Of Human Rights Values, Lori Fisler Damrosch
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judging Global Justice: Assessing The International Criminal Court, Diane Orentlicher
Judging Global Justice: Assessing The International Criminal Court, Diane Orentlicher
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Managing Interjurisdictional Waters Under The Great Lakes Charter Annex, Mark Squillace, Sandra Zellmer
Managing Interjurisdictional Waters Under The Great Lakes Charter Annex, Mark Squillace, Sandra Zellmer
Publications
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction To Adjudicate And Jurisdiction To Prescribe In International Criminal Courts, Kenneth S. Gallant
Jurisdiction To Adjudicate And Jurisdiction To Prescribe In International Criminal Courts, Kenneth S. Gallant
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Dubious Concept Of Jurisdiction, Evan Tsen Lee
The Dubious Concept Of Jurisdiction, Evan Tsen Lee
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Is The Sky Falling On The Federal Government? State Sovereign Immunity, The Section Five Power, And The Federal Balance, Ernest A. Young
Is The Sky Falling On The Federal Government? State Sovereign Immunity, The Section Five Power, And The Federal Balance, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
reviewing John T. Noonan, Jr., Narrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States (2002)
An Economic Defense Of Concurrent Antitrust Jurisdiction, William S. Dodge
An Economic Defense Of Concurrent Antitrust Jurisdiction, William S. Dodge
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Multilateral Management As A Fair Solution To The Spratly Disputes, Wei Cui
Multilateral Management As A Fair Solution To The Spratly Disputes, Wei Cui
All Faculty Publications
The Spratlys are a scattered group of islands in the South China Sea over which China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei have made conflicting jurisdictional claims. Although there has been significant academic discussion of this dispute, the Author argues that much of it is hampered by a discourse obsessed with the regional balance of power and security-related strategies that are only tenuously related to each nation's specific legal claims in the Spratlys. In this Article, the Author suggests that a more productive approach to the Spratly disputes is one focused on finding a solution that is fair to all …
Towards Tribal Sovereignty And Judicial Efficiency: Ordering The Defenses Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity And Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Towards Tribal Sovereignty And Judicial Efficiency: Ordering The Defenses Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity And Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Michigan Law Review
In 1985, the Narragansett Indian Tribe ("Tribe") created the Narragansett Indian Wetuornuck Housing Authority ("Authority"). The Authority, which acts on the Tribe's behalf in its housing development and operations, entered into a contract with the Ninigret Development Corporation for the construction of a low-income housing development. After construction began, disputes developed over how to proceed with the construction. When conciliation efforts failed, the Authority cancelled the contract. The Narragansett Tribal Council, the governing body of the Tribe, followed the forum selection clause in the contract and notified the disputants that it would hold a hearing to resolve the dispute. Ninigret …
The Folly Of Federalism, Frank B. Cross
Suspecting The States: Supreme Court Review Of State-Court State-Law Judgments, Laura S. Fitzgerald
Suspecting The States: Supreme Court Review Of State-Court State-Law Judgments, Laura S. Fitzgerald
Michigan Law Review
At the Supreme Court these days, it is unfashionable to second-guess states' fealty to federal law without real proof that they are ignoring it. As the Court declared in Alden v. Maine: "We are unwilling to assume the States will refuse to honor the Constitution or obey the binding laws of the United States. The good faith of the States thus provides an important assurance that 'this Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land.'" Accordingly, without proof that a state has "systematic[ally]" …
Insubstantial Questions And Federal Jurisdiction: A Footnote To The Term-Limits Debate, Jonathan L. Entin
Insubstantial Questions And Federal Jurisdiction: A Footnote To The Term-Limits Debate, Jonathan L. Entin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Devil In Us. V. Jones: Church Burnings, Federalism, And A New Look At The Hobbs Act, Thomas Heyward Carter, Iii
The Devil In Us. V. Jones: Church Burnings, Federalism, And A New Look At The Hobbs Act, Thomas Heyward Carter, Iii
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Script Kiddies Beware: The Long Arm Of U.S. Jurisdiction To Prescribe, John Eisinger
Script Kiddies Beware: The Long Arm Of U.S. Jurisdiction To Prescribe, John Eisinger
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arising Under Jurisdiction In The Federalism Renaissance: Verizon Maryland Inc. V. Public Service Commission Of Maryland
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
No Longer Safe At Home: Preventing The Misuse Of Federal Common Law Of Foreign Relations As A Defense Tactic In Private Transnational Litigation, Lumen N. Mulligan
Michigan Law Review
In an increasingly common litigation strategy, plaintiffs in Patrickson v. Dole Food Company, laborers in the banana industries of Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala and Panama, brought a classaction suit in Hawaii state court against Dole Food and other defendants. Plaintiffs brought only state law causes of action, alleging that they had been harmed by Dole Food's use of DBCP, a toxic pesticide banned from use in the United States. Dole Food removed the case to federal district court seeking the procedural advantages of a federal forum, as corporate defendants facing alien tort plaintiffs seeking redress for overseas conduct invariably do. …
Administrative-Law-Like Obligations On Private[Ized] Entities, Jack M. Beermann
Administrative-Law-Like Obligations On Private[Ized] Entities, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
Privatization is often promoted as a cure for many of the problems of government. In this Article, Professor Beermann argues that the effect of privatization is likely to be muted by the fact that several related phenomena have, in recent years, reduced the differences between government and the private sector, especially when privatization is involved. First, private entities are often compelled to make public or provide to government a great deal of information about themselves, much as the Freedom of Information Act and related statutes require transparency in government. Second, discovery in litigation subjects a great deal of private information …