Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (200)
- University of Michigan Law School (50)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (29)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (28)
- University of Georgia School of Law (18)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (17)
- American University Washington College of Law (12)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (11)
- BLR (8)
- Brooklyn Law School (8)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- University of Kentucky (8)
- West Virginia University (8)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Florida International University College of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Maine School of Law (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- Duke Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (72)
- Criminal law (34)
- International Criminal Court (20)
- International Law (19)
- Law (19)
-
- Extradition (16)
- Terrorism (16)
- Constitution (15)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (15)
- Court (14)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Courts (13)
- Crimes (13)
- Criminal jurisdiction (13)
- Evidence (12)
- International law (12)
- War crimes (12)
- Crime (10)
- ICC (10)
- Legislation (10)
- Privacy (10)
- Supreme Court (10)
- Discrimination (9)
- Human rights (9)
- Law enforcement (9)
- Civil procedure (8)
- Constitutional law (8)
- Due process (8)
- Federal (8)
- Federalism (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (197)
- Michigan Law Review (35)
- Scholarly Works (27)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (18)
- Touro Law Review (17)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (9)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (8)
- ExpressO (8)
- Kentucky Law Journal (8)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- West Virginia Law Review (8)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Articles (6)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (6)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- American Indian Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (5)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (4)
- American Indian Law Journal (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- MC Law Review (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Notre Dame Law Review (3)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 546
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Kiss The Ring, But Never Touch The Crown: How U.S. Policy Denies Indian Women Bodily Autonomy And The Save Native Women Act's Attempt To Reverse That Policy, Hossein Dabiri
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Girl Next Door: A Comparative Approach To Prostitution Laws And Sex Trafficking Victim Identification Within The Prostitution Industry, Gail M. Deady
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Proper Crime Recording As An Effective Feedback Tool In Articulating A Crime Policy, Kevin A. Unter
Proper Crime Recording As An Effective Feedback Tool In Articulating A Crime Policy, Kevin A. Unter
Georgia Journal of Public Policy
Crime policy is subject to the policy process just like other governmental policies. An effective crime policy is one that reduces the amount of crime in a police department’s jurisdiction, e.g., the city. Accordingly, crime policy consists of the same policy components – agenda setting, formulation, implementation, and feedback. The implementation of any crime policy depends on the information collected by police departments, often through crimes reported to the department via 9-1-1 calls or brought to a police officer’s attention through proactive police work. The success of that police work relative to the reported crime first depends on whether the …
The Exercise Of Jurisdiction By The International Criminal Court Over Palestine, William Thomas Worster
The Exercise Of Jurisdiction By The International Criminal Court Over Palestine, William Thomas Worster
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prosecuting Federal Crimes In State Courts, Michael G. Collins, Jonathan R. Nash
Prosecuting Federal Crimes In State Courts, Michael G. Collins, Jonathan R. Nash
Faculty Articles
Despite the ancient maxim that the courts of one sovereign will not “execute the penal laws of another,” they sometimes do. For example, federal courts can hear state-law criminal prosecutions of federal officers for acts taken in the course of their duties that are brought initially in state court and are then removed to federal court. In addition, some states now open their courthouse doors to officials from other states to pursue tax enforcement actions against delinquent taxpayers. But states still do not (and perhaps cannot) entertain prosecutions of fugitives solely for crimes committed in another state because the Constitution …
Bowman Lives: The Extraterritorial Application Of U.S. Criminal Law After Morrison V. National Australia Bank, Zachary D. Clopton
Bowman Lives: The Extraterritorial Application Of U.S. Criminal Law After Morrison V. National Australia Bank, Zachary D. Clopton
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Alien Tort Statute And The Law Of Nations, Bradford R. Clark, Anthony J. Bellia Jr.
The Alien Tort Statute And The Law Of Nations, Bradford R. Clark, Anthony J. Bellia Jr.
Journal Articles
Courts and scholars have struggled to identify the original meaning of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). As enacted in 1789, the ATS provided "[t]hat the district courts...shall...have cognizance...of all causes where an alien sues for tort only in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States." The statute was rarely invoked for almost two centuries. In the 1980s, lower federal courts began reading the statute expansively to allow foreign citizens to sue other foreign citizens for all violations of modern customary international law that occurred outside the United States. In 2004, the Supreme Court took …
The Reason Behind The Rules: From Description To Normativity In International Criminal Procedure, Noah Weisbord
The Reason Behind The Rules: From Description To Normativity In International Criminal Procedure, Noah Weisbord
Faculty Publications
As the International Criminal Court (ICC) continues to mature in its practices, it provokes discussion on whether the comfortable framework of adversarial and inquisitorial systems should be used to evaluate an institution that exists in a fundamentally different context from that of national criminal justice systems. In order to avoid entangling the ICC in rules that are not tailored to fit its specific goals and institutional context, the normative purposes underlying procedural rules derived from domestic institutions should be reexamined.
This article draws out basic principles that may be of use in reexamining the reasoning behind the rules of procedure …
Israel, Palestine, And The Icc, Daniel Benoliel, Ronen Perry
Israel, Palestine, And The Icc, Daniel Benoliel, Ronen Perry
Michigan Journal of International Law
In the wake of the Israel-Gaza 2008-09 armed conflict and recently commenced process at the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Court will soon face a major challenge with the potential to determine its degree of judicial independence and overall legitimacy. It may need to decide whether a Palestinian state exists, either for the purposes of the Court itself, or perhaps even in general. The ICC, which currently has 113 member states, has not yet recognized Palestine as a sovereign state or as a member. Moreover, although the ICC potentially has the authority to investigate crimes which fall into its subject-matter …
The Challenges For Asian Jurisdictions In The Development Of International Criminal Justice, Mark Findlay
The Challenges For Asian Jurisdictions In The Development Of International Criminal Justice, Mark Findlay
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The paper reviews the different frameworks for international criminal justice in which China’s influence can be measured, or should be present, looking specifically at procedural traditions on which international criminal law and its jurisprudence are said to be based. Understanding China as a transitional hybrid criminal justice model undergoing radical transformation in its justice delivery and discourse, it is argued, assists significantly in forecasting where the synthesis of international criminal procedure may be heading. Attached to a re-interpretation and critique of individualised liability is the unpacking of China’s in principle commitment to communitarian rights and social protection as a foundation …
Reconsidering Reprisals, Michael A. Newton
Reconsidering Reprisals, Michael A. Newton
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The prohibition on the use of reprisals is widely regarded as one of the most sacrosanct statements of the jus in bello applicable to the conduct of modern hostilities. The textual formulations are stark and subject to no derogations. Supporters of the bright line ban describe it as a vital bulwark against barbarity. In the words of the International Committee of the Red Cross, the prohibition is absolute, despite the fact that the declarations of key states indicate residual ambiguity over the scope of permissible reprisals, particularly in the context of non-international armed conflicts. Reprisals are a recurring feature of …
Everyone Knows Medellin; Has Anyone Heard Of O'Brien? Reconciling The United States And The International Community By Amending The Vccr, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 817 (2010), Steven M. Novak
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Penguatkuasaan Kesalahan Jenayah Islam Di Brunei Darussalam., Suhaimi Haji Gemok
Penguatkuasaan Kesalahan Jenayah Islam Di Brunei Darussalam., Suhaimi Haji Gemok
Student Works (2010-2019)
Successful law depends on its effective enforcement. This rule applies within the enforcement of Islamic criminal law. Based on the Islamic principle of ‘al-Amru bi al-Makruf wa al-Nahyu an al-Munkar', the government and public are obliged to ensure that it is carried out. This research focuses on the issue of enforcement with several objectives, firstly, to discuss the concept of criminal enforcement according to the Islamic law. Secondly, to evaluate the historical development of criminal enforcement in Brunei Darussalam. Thirdly, to identify and analyse current issues and problems facing the religious enforcement unit in enforcing syariah criminal offences. These objectives …
R. V. Munyaneza: Pondering Canada's First Core Crimes Conviction, Robert Currie
R. V. Munyaneza: Pondering Canada's First Core Crimes Conviction, Robert Currie
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Canada recently completed its first genocide trial, which resulted in the conviction of the Rwandan accused, Desiré Munyaneza, for crimes committed during the Rwandan genocide. While the case is still under appeal, it represents a significant success for Canada’s relatively new core crimes legislation, the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, and was the first prosecution undertaken pursuant to that law. Drawing upon the Munyaneza case, the authors analyze the legislation and evaluate its effectiveness. They conclude that the model is an effective one that both bodes well for Canada’s future participation in the battle against impunity, and provides …
Human Rights And Military Decisions: Counterinsurgency And Trends In The Law Of, Dan E. Stigall, Christopher L. Blakesley, Chris Jenks
Human Rights And Military Decisions: Counterinsurgency And Trends In The Law Of, Dan E. Stigall, Christopher L. Blakesley, Chris Jenks
Scholarly Works
The past several decades have seen a Copernican shift in the paradigm of armed conflict, which the traditional Law of International Armed Conflict (LOIAC) canon has not fully matched. Standing out in stark relief against the backdrop of relative inactivity in LOIAC, is the surfeit of activity in the field of international human rights law, which has become a dramatic new force in the ancient realm of international law. Human rights law, heretofore not formally part of the traditional juridico-military calculus, has gained ever increasing salience in that calculus. Indeed, human rights law has ramified in such a manner that …
The Jurisdictional Entrapment Defense: An Analytic Framework For Claims Of Manufactured Jurisdiction In Child Exploitation Prosecutions, Leonid Feller
The Jurisdictional Entrapment Defense: An Analytic Framework For Claims Of Manufactured Jurisdiction In Child Exploitation Prosecutions, Leonid Feller
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles And Options, Gregory S. Mcneal
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles And Options, Gregory S. Mcneal
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
"I'D Grab At Anything. And I'D Forget." Domestic Violence Victim Testimony After Davis V. Washington, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (2008), Nancee Alexa Barth
"I'D Grab At Anything. And I'D Forget." Domestic Violence Victim Testimony After Davis V. Washington, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (2008), Nancee Alexa Barth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nontestimonial Declarations Against Penal Interest: Eschewing The Corroboration Requirement For Inculpatory Statements, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 969 (2008), Michael Duffy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introductory Note To Genocide Accountability Act, Mark A. Drumbl
Introductory Note To Genocide Accountability Act, Mark A. Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
On December 21, 2007, President George W. Bush signed into law the Genocide Accountability Act of 2007 (GAA) (Public Law 110-151). Co-sponsored on a bipartisan basis by several Senators, this bill passed in the Senate on March 29, 2007, and passed in the House .of Representatives on December 5, 2007, in both cases by voice vote. The GAA received considerable support from human rights groups throughout the legislative process.
Roth At Fifty: Reconsidering The Common Law Antecedents Of American Obscenity Doctrine, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 393 (2008), James R. Alexander
Roth At Fifty: Reconsidering The Common Law Antecedents Of American Obscenity Doctrine, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 393 (2008), James R. Alexander
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prosecuting Aggression, Noah Weisbord
Prosecuting Aggression, Noah Weisbord
Faculty Publications
The Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court will soon have its first opportunity to revise the Rome Statute and activate the latent crime of aggression, which awaits a definition of its elements and conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction. The working group charged with drafting a provision is scheduled to complete its task by 2008 or 2009, one year before the International Criminal Court’s first review conference.
Beginning with a history of the crime meant to put the current negotiations in the context of past initiatives, this article sets out the status of the negotiations and begins …
More Stories Of Jurisdiction-Stripping And Executive Power: Interpreting The Prison Litigation Reform Act (Plra), Giovanna Shay, Johanna Kalb
More Stories Of Jurisdiction-Stripping And Executive Power: Interpreting The Prison Litigation Reform Act (Plra), Giovanna Shay, Johanna Kalb
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legitimating Penal Law, Markus D. Dubber
Creating An Adolescent Criminal Class: Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Over Status Offenders, Soma R. Kedia
Creating An Adolescent Criminal Class: Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Over Status Offenders, Soma R. Kedia
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that status offenders, who commit non-criminal offenses such as truancy or running away, are unfairly treated similarly to juvenile delinquents in the court system. This treatment often leads to detention in the same facilities as delinquents, which can exacerbate behavioral issues and increase the likelihood of future criminal behavior. The author advocates for a distinct approach to handling status offenders, emphasizing the need for social services and alternative programs tailored to their specific needs rather than punitive measures.
Symposium: Fraud And Federalism: Overlapping Jurisdictions, Overlapping Crimes - Introduction
Symposium: Fraud And Federalism: Overlapping Jurisdictions, Overlapping Crimes - Introduction
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Freedom Of Speech And Expression: Ninth Circuit Holds That California Penal Code Section 148.6 Violates The First Amendment In Chaker V. Crogan, Harvey Gee
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The Ninth Circuit Court ruled that California Penal Code section 148.6, which criminalized knowingly filing false allegations of misconduct against peace officers, violated the First Amendment. The court determined that the law impermissibly targeted criticism of police officers, constituting a content-based restriction on speech, and thus was unconstitutional.
Selective Prosecution In Russia - Myth Or Reality?, Yelina Kvurt
Selective Prosecution In Russia - Myth Or Reality?, Yelina Kvurt
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note examines the issue of selective prosecution, focusing on the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and argues that the Russian legal system lacks an explicit defense against such practices, which violate constitutional guarantees of equality before the law. It advocates for the adoption of a legal standard to address selective prosecution, drawing parallels with the U.S. legal framework while acknowledging the need to adapt it to Russia's unique judicial context.
Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction: Bigger Picture Or Smaller Frame?, Robert Currie, Steve Coughlan
Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction: Bigger Picture Or Smaller Frame?, Robert Currie, Steve Coughlan
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The authors review extensively Canadian law and practice on the exercise of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction, and the extent to which that may have changed in recent years. They conclude that, while there are now many more instances of Canada asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction, any change in policy is more apparent than real. What has changed is how often the situations that prompt extraterritorial jurisdiction arise, particularly in that there are now many international treaties requiring Canada to exercise jurisdiction in this way. The authors also argue that this policy of cautious expansion and constructive engagement with international practice is desirable and …
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.