Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (195)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (73)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (34)
- University of Richmond (32)
- University of Michigan Law School (29)
-
- BLR (18)
- UIC School of Law (16)
- University of Colorado Law School (15)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (12)
- Cornell University Law School (11)
- Roger Williams University (10)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- St. Mary's University (8)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- University of Maine School of Law (7)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Duke Law (6)
- New York Law School (6)
- Pace University (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- University of Washington School of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Georgia State University College of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (64)
- Constitution (42)
- Federal (41)
- Supreme Court (38)
- Evidence (34)
-
- Defendant (33)
- State (31)
- Jury (30)
- New York (29)
- Courts (26)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (25)
- Sentencing (25)
- Due process (24)
- Criminal procedure (22)
- Judge (22)
- Police (22)
- Trial (22)
- Discrimination (20)
- Jurisprudence (20)
- Law (20)
- 1990) (19)
- Court (19)
- Court of Appeals (19)
- Constitutional Law (17)
- § 6 (17)
- Criminal law (16)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- Appellate Division (15)
- Juries (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Touro Law Review (70)
- University of Richmond Law Review (28)
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- ExpressO (18)
-
- Articles (16)
- Cardozo Law Review (16)
- Michigan Law Review (16)
- Publications (15)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (13)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Faculty Articles (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Maine Law Review (7)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- Faculty Works (6)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (6)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Georgia State University Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 650
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Discovering Who We Are: An English Perspective On The Simpson Trial, William T. Pizzi
Discovering Who We Are: An English Perspective On The Simpson Trial, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence--Past, Present, And Future: A Twenty-Year Perspective, Faust Rossi
The Federal Rules Of Evidence--Past, Present, And Future: A Twenty-Year Perspective, Faust Rossi
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This Essay surveys three major transformations in state and federal rules of evidence since the introduction of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Rules have not only inspired a movement toward codification in the states, they have also liberalized the admission of expert testimony and hearsay. This partially explains thirteen states' reluctance to codify. Judges have furthered this trend by admitting far more discretionary hearsay evidence than Congress intended. Professor Rossi doubts this expansion of the hearsay exceptions would have occurred without the adoption of the FRE and suggests that the newly formed Advisory Committee will produce greater substantive changes …
Legal And Political Hermeneutics, Or Principles Of Interpretation And Construction In Law And Politics, With Remarks On Precedents And Authorities, Francis Lieber
Cardozo Law Review
The second edition of the Hermeneutics was published in 1839, and has now been out of print for almost forty years. In 1860 Dr. Lieber carefully revised it, and made additions to both text and notes, expecting to publish a third edition, with a second part, of "Special Hermeneutics, or Legal Rules of Interpretation and Construction," by an eminent member of the New York Bar, Mr. William Curtis Noyes. This plan, however, was not carried out, and Mr. Noyes died December 25, 1863, without having written his proposed part. The text of the present edition, and Dr. Lieber's own notes, …
Reply: Self-Incrimination And The Constitution: A Brief Rejoinder To Professor Kamisar, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Reply: Self-Incrimination And The Constitution: A Brief Rejoinder To Professor Kamisar, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Michigan Law Review
A Reply to Yale Kamisar's Response to the "Fifth Amendment Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause"
Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Michigan Law Review
In Part I of this article, we examine the global puzzle of the Self-Incrimination Clause and the local confusion or perversion lurking behind virtually every key word and phrase in the clause as now construed. In Part II we elaborate our reading of the clause and show how it clears up the local problems and solves the overall puzzle.
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Ms. Renee B. Lettow have written a lively, provocative article that will keep many of us who teach constitutional-criminal procedure busy for years to come. They present a reconception of the "first principles" of the Fifth Amendment, and they suggest a dramatic reconstruction of criminal procedure. As a part of that reconstruction, they propose, inter alia, that at a pretrial hearing presided over by a judicial officer, the government should be empowered to compel a suspect, under penalty of contempt, to provide links in the chain of evidence needed to convict him.
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Lessons From Reforming Inquisitorial Systems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Error In Closing Argument, H. Patrick Furman
Avoiding Error In Closing Argument, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Impeachment By Conviction Evidence: Judicial Discretion And The Politics Of Rule 609, Victor Gold
Impeachment By Conviction Evidence: Judicial Discretion And The Politics Of Rule 609, Victor Gold
Cardozo Law Review
No provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence has sparked more controversy than Rule 609, which deals with the admissibility of convictions to impeach a witness. When first proposed, the provision was the subject of fierce debate, sparking repeated revision during its drafting and while it was under consideration by Congress. Ultimately, no one side in this legislative battle prevailed entirely; the Rule strikes a compromise between sharply conflicting policies. The text of Rule 609, incorporating no less than three balancing tests, two references to fairness, one to justice, and several other undefined terms, leaves the task of resolving the …
Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion In The United States: The Limits Of Comparative Criminal Procedure As An Instrument Of Reform, William T. Pizzi
Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion In The United States: The Limits Of Comparative Criminal Procedure As An Instrument Of Reform, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Some Worries About Sentencing Guidelines, William T. Pizzi
Some Worries About Sentencing Guidelines, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Forensic Expertise In Dutch Criminal Procedure, Johannes F. Nijboer
Forensic Expertise In Dutch Criminal Procedure, Johannes F. Nijboer
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.