Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (195)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (73)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (34)
- University of Richmond (32)
- University of Michigan Law School (29)
-
- BLR (18)
- UIC School of Law (16)
- University of Colorado Law School (15)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (12)
- Cornell University Law School (11)
- Roger Williams University (10)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- St. Mary's University (8)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- University of Maine School of Law (7)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Duke Law (6)
- New York Law School (6)
- Pace University (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- University of Washington School of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Georgia State University College of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (64)
- Constitution (42)
- Federal (41)
- Supreme Court (38)
- Evidence (34)
-
- Defendant (33)
- State (31)
- Jury (30)
- New York (29)
- Courts (26)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (25)
- Sentencing (25)
- Due process (24)
- Criminal procedure (22)
- Judge (22)
- Police (22)
- Trial (22)
- Discrimination (20)
- Jurisprudence (20)
- Law (20)
- 1990) (19)
- Court (19)
- Court of Appeals (19)
- Constitutional Law (17)
- § 6 (17)
- Criminal law (16)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- Appellate Division (15)
- Juries (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Touro Law Review (70)
- University of Richmond Law Review (28)
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- ExpressO (18)
-
- Articles (16)
- Cardozo Law Review (16)
- Michigan Law Review (16)
- Publications (15)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (13)
- UIC Law Review (13)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Faculty Articles (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Maine Law Review (7)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- Faculty Works (6)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (6)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Georgia State University Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 631 - 650 of 650
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Discretionary Power To Grant Additional Peremptory Challenges In Highly Publicized Criminal Trials: Securing A Fair And Impartial Trial, Joseph A. Matteliano
Discretionary Power To Grant Additional Peremptory Challenges In Highly Publicized Criminal Trials: Securing A Fair And Impartial Trial, Joseph A. Matteliano
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona's Inferior Courts, Harold H. Bruff
Arizona's Inferior Courts, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
For many citizens Arizona's inferior courts provide their primary, perhaps only, contact with the state's justice system. This Article--based in large part upon a thorough empirical and personal study of these lower courts--discusses the role that the courts play, the procedures that they observe, the qualifications of the personnel they employ, and the sufficiency of the justice they render. These findings are then evaluated, and recommendations for change are made.
Invoking Summary Criminal Contempt Procedures--Use Of Abuse? United States V. Dellinger --The "Chicago Seven" Contempts, Michigan Law Review
Invoking Summary Criminal Contempt Procedures--Use Of Abuse? United States V. Dellinger --The "Chicago Seven" Contempts, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In late August of 1968, while delegates to the Democratic National Convention were arriving in Chicago, a group of several thousand demonstrators gathered in the city's Lincoln Park to protest the Convention, the Vietnam War, and the city's refusal to grant the group a permit to hold rallies and marches during the Convention. The week that followed was marred by violent confrontations between the demonstrators and the city's police.1 This violence in Chicago provided the impetus for an indictment by a federal grand jury of the defendants in United States v. Dellinger.
Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley
Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Waiver Of Constitutional Rights: Disquiet In The Citadel, Michael E. Tigar
Foreword: Waiver Of Constitutional Rights: Disquiet In The Citadel, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
Foreword to Harvard Law Review review of Supreme Court 1969 Term
Has The Court Left The Attorney General Behind? The Bazelon-Katzenbach Letters On Poverty, Equality, And The Administration Of Criminal Justice, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Distribution of the first preliminary draft of the proposed American Law Institute Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure last June touched off a brisk exchange of letters between Chief Judge David Bazelon of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, who maintained that the proposed code left a good deal to be desired, and Attorney General Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, who, although he did not explicitly treat any provision of the preliminary draft, sharply challenged the conception of equality underlying Bazelon's criticism of it. By now, both the code, and the Bazelon-Katzenbach correspondence which it evoked, are …
Misconduct Of Judges And Attorneys During Trial: Informal Sanctions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Misconduct Of Judges And Attorneys During Trial: Informal Sanctions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Power To Comment On The Issue Of Guilt: Trial By Jury Or Trial By Judge, Thomas F. Schilpp
Power To Comment On The Issue Of Guilt: Trial By Jury Or Trial By Judge, Thomas F. Schilpp
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Kirchheimer: Political Justice: The Use Of Legal Procedure For Political Ends, Kenneth S. Carlston
Kirchheimer: Political Justice: The Use Of Legal Procedure For Political Ends, Kenneth S. Carlston
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends. By Otto Kirchheimer.
The Judge's Responsibility On A Plea Of Guilty, William J. Thompson
The Judge's Responsibility On A Plea Of Guilty, William J. Thompson
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law - Trial - Duty Of Judge To Instruct On Lesser And Included Crimes, Paul A. Heinen S.Ed.
Criminal Law - Trial - Duty Of Judge To Instruct On Lesser And Included Crimes, Paul A. Heinen S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Appellant was one of four defendants who were charged in three separate counts of an indictment with the crimes of attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted grand larceny in the first degree, and assault in the second degree with intent to commit robbery and grand larceny. After all the evidence had been entered, the trial judge submitted only the count of attempted robbery to the jury, instructing them that they return a verdict of guilty or not guilty of that crime. The defense excepted to the court's refusal to submit the other counts charged in the indictment. The defendant …
Criminal Procedure - Standing Of The Press To Protest Judge's Exclusion Of The Public From Criminal Trial, M. Fred Mallender, Ii S.Ed.
Criminal Procedure - Standing Of The Press To Protest Judge's Exclusion Of The Public From Criminal Trial, M. Fred Mallender, Ii S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff newspapers sent reporters to the trial of Minot Jelke. Defendant judge, exercising his discretion, excluded them as well as the general public from the courtroom when testimony dealing with the sordid details of prostitution and pandering was expected. The family and friends of the accused, along with the officers of the court, witnesses and jury were not excluded. Plaintiffs applied to the Supreme Court, Special Term, of New York County for a writ of prohibition to restrain the defendant from enforcing his order. The application for the writ was based on a statute guaranteeing the accused in a criminal …
Constitutional Law - Public Trial In Criminal Cases, Carl S. Krueger S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Public Trial In Criminal Cases, Carl S. Krueger S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The criminal trial has been traditionally open to the public in Anglo-Saxon procedure, as it was in Roman and other civilized societies of an earlier time. The public trial of today, however, has been subjected to considerable criticism on the ground that there is a tendency for criminal trials to degenerate into public spectacles, frequently interrupting the orderly procedure of justice, and not infrequently actually prejudicing the accused. If no useful purpose is served by the presence of the idle public during the deadly serious determination of guilt or innocence, should not the judge, subject to the right of admittance …
Vanderbilt: Cases And Materials On Modern Procedure And Judicial Administration, Charles W. Joiner
Vanderbilt: Cases And Materials On Modern Procedure And Judicial Administration, Charles W. Joiner
Michigan Law Review
A Review of CASES AND MATERIALS ON MODERN PROCEDURE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION by Arthur T. Vanderbilt.
Mr. Justice Murphy And Civil Rights, Thurgood Marshall
Mr. Justice Murphy And Civil Rights, Thurgood Marshall
Michigan Law Review
There is constant danger that the unpopularity of an individual, or of the group of which he is a member, will be reflected in dealings with his rights by his neighbors or by the organized community. In America today this bias is most likely to stern from differences of race, origin, nationality, or religious or political belief. Prejudice may victimize an entire group or any of its members. Any charge of shocking or anti-social conduct against one who is already thus unpopular increases the likelihood of unfair treatment. Not only private citizens, but legislators, judges and administrative officers of government …
Criminal Law And Procedure-Whether Reversible Error For Judge To Give Instructions Relating To Credibility Of Defendant Witness, Edwin Boos
Michigan Law Review
Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as error an instruction given by the judge to the jury. The instruction singled out the defendant from the other witnesses, pointing to his high degree of interest in a verdict of not guilty, as reason for scrutinizing his testimony. The judge also warned the jury that it need not accept blindly the testimony of the accused. Held, reversed, new trial ordered. Swanson v. State, (Ind. 1944) 52 N.E. (2d) 616.
Trials-Right To "Public Trial"-Power Of Judge To Exclude General Public, Francis T. Goheen
Trials-Right To "Public Trial"-Power Of Judge To Exclude General Public, Francis T. Goheen
Michigan Law Review
Convinced of the desirability of such action, a judge, conducting the trial of a criminal case, wishes to clear the court room of all or a portion of the spectators. To what extent may he legitimately do so? He is necessarily limited by the provision in the constitution of almost every state and in the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States that in "all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial." The extent to which the trial court may go in clearing the court room has been most often tested …
The Investigating Magistrate (Juge D'Instruction) In European Criminal Procedure, Morris Ploscowe
The Investigating Magistrate (Juge D'Instruction) In European Criminal Procedure, Morris Ploscowe
Michigan Law Review
For nearly five centuries the distinctive figure in the preliminary stages of European criminal proceedings has been the investigating magistrate, known in France as the juge d'instruction. Although temporarily eclipsed by the revolutionary reforms in France in 1791, he was soon re-established. In other European countries the juge d'instruction continued to be the central figure in the preliminary procedure through all the reforms achieved by the liberal movements of the nineteenth century. The investigating magistrate has remained a purely Continental institution. In theory and in practice he embodies the essential difference between Continental and Anglo-American criminal procedure preliminary to trial.
Constructive Contempt Of Court
Constructive Contempt Of Court
Michigan Law Review
The recent case of Craig v. Hecht (1923) 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 103, aroused an extraordinary amount of interest among laymen, and involved some legal questions of importance to lawyers; but perhaps its most significant result was the opportunity it afforded the legal profession to observe the popular attitude of hostility toward certain phases of judicial administration which lawyers are habitually inclined to overlook.