Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (139)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (74)
- University of Michigan Law School (70)
- University of Colorado Law School (68)
-
- UIC School of Law (56)
- Georgetown University Law Center (47)
- University of Richmond (40)
- Pepperdine University (39)
- Duke Law (33)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (32)
- Roger Williams University (32)
- BLR (31)
- Fordham Law School (29)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (29)
- William & Mary Law School (25)
- University of Georgia School of Law (23)
- Cornell University Law School (22)
- New York Law School (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (17)
- Notre Dame Law School (17)
- Cleveland State University (16)
- Columbia Law School (14)
- University of the Pacific (14)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (176)
- Judges (154)
- Constitution (149)
- Constitutional law (117)
- Constitutional Law (114)
-
- Judicial review (81)
- Courts (77)
- Federal (62)
- Jurisprudence (60)
- Judge (49)
- State (48)
- United States Supreme Court (48)
- Due process (46)
- New York (44)
- Constitutional interpretation (41)
- Court (40)
- Federalism (40)
- First Amendment (40)
- Congress (38)
- Law (38)
- Separation of powers (38)
- Judiciary (34)
- Originalism (34)
- Fourteenth Amendment (31)
- Court of Appeals (30)
- Defendant (30)
- Politics (30)
- Supreme court (30)
- Legislation (29)
- Constitutional (27)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (208)
- Touro Law Review (134)
- Faculty Scholarship (77)
- UIC Law Review (52)
- Michigan Law Review (51)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (44)
- Cardozo Law Review (43)
- Publications (38)
- University of Richmond Law Review (34)
- Articles (31)
- ExpressO (29)
- Northwestern University Law Review (26)
- Faculty Publications (23)
- Pepperdine Law Review (23)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (20)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (17)
- Scholarly Works (17)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (16)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (13)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (13)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Journal Articles (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (11)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (11)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (10)
- McGeorge Law Review (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1141 - 1170 of 1498
Full-Text Articles in Judges
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulatory Takings And "Judicial Supremacy", J. Peter Byrne
Regulatory Takings And "Judicial Supremacy", J. Peter Byrne
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The thesis of this Article is that the Court of Federal Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have become exposed to this classic critique of constitutional decision-making through the recent expansions of the regulatory takings doctrine. Though the chief agent for this expansion has been the Supreme Court, these lower courts have made their own prominent contributions to broadening regulatory takings, and they are far more vulnerable to political reprisals. Like the Due Process Clause in the gilded age, the Takings Clause today can easily be and has been seen as an avenue for inappropriate judicial …
Judges And Federalism: A Comment On "Justice Kennedy's Vision Of Federalism", Robert F. Nagel
Judges And Federalism: A Comment On "Justice Kennedy's Vision Of Federalism", Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Are There Nothing But Texts In This Class? Interpreting The Interpretive Turns In Legal Thought, Robin West
Are There Nothing But Texts In This Class? Interpreting The Interpretive Turns In Legal Thought, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Allan Hutchinson remarks at the beginning of his interesting article that Gadamer's writings have had only a peripheral influence on legal scholarship -- only occasionally cited, and then begrudgingly so, and never given the serious attention they deserve or require. Nevertheless, Hutchinson acknowledges, Gadamerian influences can be noted -- particularly in the now widely shared understanding that adjudication is, fundamentally, an interpretive exercise. Even with this qualification, though, I think Hutchinson understates Gadamer's impact. Whatever may be true of Gadamer's influence in other disciplines, his influence in law has been unambiguously both broad and deep -- although it has come …
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Humenansky V. Regents Of The University Of Minnesota: Questioning Congressional Intent And Authority To Abrogate Eleventh Amendment Immunity With The Adea, Eric Hunter
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Failed Coup On The Judicial Monarchy (Review Of God And Man In The Law, By Robert Lowry Clinton), David D. Garner
A Failed Coup On The Judicial Monarchy (Review Of God And Man In The Law, By Robert Lowry Clinton), David D. Garner
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dynamics And Determinants Of The Decision To Grant En Banc Review, Tracey E. George
The Dynamics And Determinants Of The Decision To Grant En Banc Review, Tracey E. George
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The ability of U.S. Courts of Appeals to control the development of law within their respective circuits has been strained by the practice of divisional sittings, the growing caseload at the circuit court level, the increasing number of judges sitting within each circuit, and the decreasing probability of Supreme Court intervention. The primary method of maintaining coherence and consistency in doctrinal development within a federal circuit is en banc review. Yet, many critics contend that en bane rehearing is a time-consuming, inefficient procedure that fails to serve its intended purpose and too often is abused for political ends. This Article …
Cardozo And The Art Of Biography, Andrew L. Kaufman
Cardozo And The Art Of Biography, Andrew L. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Benjamin Cardozo On The Supreme Court, Andrew L. Kaufman
Benjamin Cardozo On The Supreme Court, Andrew L. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Imperial Is The Supreme Court? An Analysis Of Supreme Court Abortion Doctrine And Popular Will, Michael Vitiello
How Imperial Is The Supreme Court? An Analysis Of Supreme Court Abortion Doctrine And Popular Will, Michael Vitiello
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Too Much (Legislation) Is Never Enough: Utilizing A Court's Equity Power To Enjoin Lawful Firearm Sales, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1225 (1999), Edward G. Renner
Too Much (Legislation) Is Never Enough: Utilizing A Court's Equity Power To Enjoin Lawful Firearm Sales, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1225 (1999), Edward G. Renner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Understanding The Limits Of Power: Judicial Restraint In General Jurisdiction Court Systems, Justice Philip A. Talmadge
Understanding The Limits Of Power: Judicial Restraint In General Jurisdiction Court Systems, Justice Philip A. Talmadge
Seattle University Law Review
This Article draws on my legislative and judicial background to focus both on the tendency of the courts to exceed their core constitutional role and the implications of such judicial activism. This article contend that modern courts of general jurisdiction are too often embroiled in sociopolitical controversies best left to the political branches of government. Part I addresses the concept of judicial restraint in our constitutional system and the need to define the core powers of the judicial branch of government. Part II discusses principles of judicial restraint in the federal courts. Part III, using the example of Washington State …
Marshall’S Questions, Walter E. Dellinger Iii, H. Jefferson Powell
Marshall’S Questions, Walter E. Dellinger Iii, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
What Spending Clause? - (Or The President's Paramour): An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, And Story On Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Of The United States Constitution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (1999), Jeffrey T. Renz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Bribery Statute And The Ethics Of Purchasing Testimony, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1999), Camille Knight
Federal Bribery Statute And The Ethics Of Purchasing Testimony, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1999), Camille Knight
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Finding The Constitution: An Economic Analysis Of Tradition's Role In Constitutional Interpretation, Adam C. Pritchard, Todd J. Zywicki
Finding The Constitution: An Economic Analysis Of Tradition's Role In Constitutional Interpretation, Adam C. Pritchard, Todd J. Zywicki
Articles
In this Article, Professor Pritchard and Professor Zywicki examine the role of tradition in constitutional interpretation, a topic that has received significant attention in recent years. After outlining the current debate over the use of tradition, the authors discuss the efficiency purposes of constitutionalism--precommitment and the reduction of agency costs--and demonstrate how the use of tradition in constitutional interpretation can serve these purposes. Rejecting both Justice Scalia's majoritarian model, which focuses on legislative sources of tradition, and Justice Souter's common-law model, which focuses on Supreme Court precedent as a source of tradition, the authors propose an alternative model--the "finding model"-- …
The Warren Court And The Concept Of A Right, David Luban
The Warren Court And The Concept Of A Right, David Luban
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Warren Court is dead. None of its Justices remain on the benchindeed, only Justice White survives-and the recent history of the Supreme Court has been in large part a history of repudiating controversial Warren Court doctrines. Public opinion likewise repudiates Warren-style judicial activism, and constitutional scholarship-which as recently as the mid- 1980s consisted in considerable measure of theoretical defenses for Warren Court-inspired methods of interpreting the Bill of Rights-has grown increasingly skeptical of expansive interpretive strategies. It is quite possible that future constitutional historians will regard the Warren era as an aberration. The Warren Court, after all, was not …
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Scholarly Works
In this Article, Professor Lazos examines initiatives and referendums in which a majority is in a position to vote on the content of a minority's democratic civic standing. Case law fails to set forth a single test for judicial review; consequently, doctrinal and theoretical coherence in this area is nonexistent. Professor Lazos proposes a test that takes into account social dynamics and focuses on the impact of these measures. First, she examines outcomes over the last three decades of approximately eighty such initiatives and referendums, from the anti-integration movement of the sixties to today's ideological and cultural versions, such as …
Democracy And Inclusion: The Role Of The Judge In A Pluralist Polity, Sylvia R. Lazos
Democracy And Inclusion: The Role Of The Judge In A Pluralist Polity, Sylvia R. Lazos
Scholarly Works
The Supreme Court plays a critical role in resolving clashes between majority and minority interests and perspectives. The Equal Protection Clause, and at times the Due Process Clause, have become key vehicles for considering the most problematic intergroup conflicts that divide our society. Prior to this article, the Court heard cases dealing with affirmative action in government procurement programs, legislative districts designed to increase minority representation, state sponsored male-only military schooling, and a state constitutional amendment that would have proscribed antidiscrimination legislation protecting gay men and lesbians. While the Court declined to challenge California's anti-affirmative action referendum (Proposition 209) and …
Buried Voices, Dominant Themes: Justice Hans Linde And The Move To Structural Constitutional Interpretation, Marci A. Hamilton
Buried Voices, Dominant Themes: Justice Hans Linde And The Move To Structural Constitutional Interpretation, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Limits Of Judicial Review: A Structural Interpretive Approach, Jack Wade Nowlin
The Constitutional Limits Of Judicial Review: A Structural Interpretive Approach, Jack Wade Nowlin
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Extending The Constitution, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197 (1998), Amy Walsh
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Extending The Constitution, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 197 (1998), Amy Walsh
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deciding The Stop And Frisk Cases: A Look Inside The Supreme Court's Conference, John Q. Barrett
Deciding The Stop And Frisk Cases: A Look Inside The Supreme Court's Conference, John Q. Barrett
Faculty Publications
In our system of constitutional decision-making, the Supreme Court makes law as an institution in its formal written opinions. The Court and its individual members make their official legal marks in the printed pages of the United States Reports. In June 1968, in Terry v. Ohio and Sibron v. New York, the two decisions that approved the constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment of police stop and frisk practices, the Court filled many official pages with rich discussion. Over the ensuing thirty years, these Court and individual opinions have shaped the course of constitutional analysis in our courts and guided the …
Authorizing Interpretation, Pierre Schlag