Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (139)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (74)
- University of Michigan Law School (70)
- University of Colorado Law School (68)
-
- UIC School of Law (56)
- Georgetown University Law Center (47)
- University of Richmond (40)
- Pepperdine University (39)
- Duke Law (33)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (32)
- Roger Williams University (32)
- BLR (31)
- Fordham Law School (29)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (29)
- William & Mary Law School (25)
- University of Georgia School of Law (23)
- Cornell University Law School (22)
- New York Law School (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (17)
- Notre Dame Law School (17)
- Cleveland State University (16)
- Columbia Law School (14)
- University of the Pacific (14)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (176)
- Judges (154)
- Constitution (149)
- Constitutional law (117)
- Constitutional Law (114)
-
- Judicial review (81)
- Courts (77)
- Federal (62)
- Jurisprudence (60)
- Judge (49)
- State (48)
- United States Supreme Court (48)
- Due process (46)
- New York (44)
- Constitutional interpretation (41)
- Court (40)
- Federalism (40)
- First Amendment (40)
- Congress (38)
- Law (38)
- Separation of powers (38)
- Judiciary (34)
- Originalism (34)
- Fourteenth Amendment (31)
- Court of Appeals (30)
- Defendant (30)
- Politics (30)
- Supreme court (30)
- Legislation (29)
- Constitutional (27)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (208)
- Touro Law Review (134)
- Faculty Scholarship (77)
- UIC Law Review (52)
- Michigan Law Review (51)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (44)
- Cardozo Law Review (43)
- Publications (38)
- University of Richmond Law Review (34)
- Articles (31)
- ExpressO (29)
- Northwestern University Law Review (26)
- Faculty Publications (23)
- Pepperdine Law Review (23)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (20)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (17)
- Scholarly Works (17)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (16)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (13)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (13)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Journal Articles (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (11)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (11)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (10)
- McGeorge Law Review (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1111 - 1140 of 1498
Full-Text Articles in Judges
The "Blue Slip": Enforcing The Norms Of The Judicial Confirmation Process, Brannon P. Denning
The "Blue Slip": Enforcing The Norms Of The Judicial Confirmation Process, Brannon P. Denning
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction To The Symposium: The Judicial Process Appointments Process, Carly Van Orman
Introduction To The Symposium: The Judicial Process Appointments Process, Carly Van Orman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Comparing Judicial Selection Systems, Lee Epstein, Jack C. Knight, Olga Shvetsova
Comparing Judicial Selection Systems, Lee Epstein, Jack C. Knight, Olga Shvetsova
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Aba's Role In Prescreening Federal Judicial Candidates: Are We Ready To Give Up On The Lawyers?, Laura E. Little
The Aba's Role In Prescreening Federal Judicial Candidates: Are We Ready To Give Up On The Lawyers?, Laura E. Little
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Questioning Of Lower Federal Court Nominees At Senate Confirmation Hearings, William Ross
The Questioning Of Lower Federal Court Nominees At Senate Confirmation Hearings, William Ross
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Piercing The Veil: William J. Brennan's Account Of Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight
Piercing The Veil: William J. Brennan's Account Of Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
When I was first introduced to the constitutional regulation of criminal procedure in the mid-1950s, a single issue dominated the field: To what extent did the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment impose upon states the same constitutional restraints that the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments imposed upon the federal government? While those Bill of Rights provisions, as even then construed, imposed a broad range of constitutional restraints upon the federal criminal justice system, the federal system was (and still is) minuscule as compared to the combined systems of the fifty states. With the Bill of Rights provisions …
The Supreme Court As A Strategic National Policymaker, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, Andrew D. Martin
The Supreme Court As A Strategic National Policymaker, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, Andrew D. Martin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Ideology Of Judging And The First Amendment In Judicial Election Campaigns, W. Bradley Wendel
The Ideology Of Judging And The First Amendment In Judicial Election Campaigns, W. Bradley Wendel
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law Of Obscenity And The Assault On Genius, Edward De Grazia
Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law Of Obscenity And The Assault On Genius, Edward De Grazia
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Comparing Judicial Selection Systems, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, Olga Shvetsova
Comparing Judicial Selection Systems, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, Olga Shvetsova
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court In Real Time: Haste, Waste, And Bush V. Gore, Michael Herz
The Supreme Court In Real Time: Haste, Waste, And Bush V. Gore, Michael Herz
Articles
No abstract provided.
Reconstructing The Rule Of Law, Robin West
Reconstructing The Rule Of Law, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The action taken in Bush v. Gore by the five conservative Justices on the United States Supreme Court, Bugliosi argued, was not just wrong as a matter of law, but criminal: It was a malem in se, fully intended, premeditated theft of a national election for the Presidency of the United States. Now, as Balkan and Levinson would argue, this seventh, "prosecutorial" response -- that the Court's action was not just wrong but criminal -- is also not available to a devotee of either radical or moderate indeterminacy. Even assuming both criminal intent and severe harm-a wrongful, specific intent to …
Terry Firma: Background Democracy And Constitutional Foundations, Frank I. Michelman
Terry Firma: Background Democracy And Constitutional Foundations, Frank I. Michelman
Michigan Law Review
Ages ago, I had the excellent luck to fall into a collaboration with Terrance Sandalow to produce a casebook now long forgotten. There could have been no more bracing or beneficial learning experience for a fledgling legal scholar (meaning me). What brought us together indeed was luck from my standpoint, but it was enterprise, too - the brokerage of an alert West Publishing Company editor picking up on a casual remark of mine as he made one of his regular sweeps through Harvard Law School. A novice law professor, I mentioned to him how much I admired a new essay …
Why The Courts, Anthony Lewis
Assessing The New Judicial Minimalism, Christopher J. Peters
Assessing The New Judicial Minimalism, Christopher J. Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
In this article, which has been published in slightly revised form at 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1454 (2000), I critique some recently prominent arguments for "judicial minimalism" in constitutional decisionmaking. Current minimalist arguments, I contend, are primarily "policentric," that is, focused on the role the judiciary can play in bolstering the accountability and deliberativeness of the political branches. Drawing in part on a previous article, I offer an alternative approach to minimalism that is "juricentric" - focused on the inherent democratic legitimacy of the adjudicative process and the unique competence of that process to produce decisions about individual rights. I …
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, R. Kent Newmyer
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Michigan Law Review
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and constitutional judicial review really can make a difference. Gerald Rosenberg, for example, in The Hollow Hope, expressly questions whether judicial review achieves effective social change. Similarly, Michael Klarman explores whether the Supreme Court's desegregation decisions were effective, except insofar as they produced a right-wing backlash that induced action to desegregate. In Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Mark Tushnet approvingly invokes these arguments (pp. 137, 145), but he goes much further. Professor Tushnet contends that, on balance, constitutional judicial review is harmful. He …
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process And The Wages Of Judicial Supremacy, John C. Yoo
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process And The Wages Of Judicial Supremacy, John C. Yoo
Michigan Law Review
William H. Rehnquist is not going to be Chief Justice forever - much to the chagrin of Republicans, no doubt. In the last century, Supreme Court Justices have retired, on average, at the age of seventy-one after approximately fourteen years on the bench. By the end of the term of the President we elect this November, Chief Justice Rehnquist will have served on the Supreme Court for thirty-two years and reached the age of eighty. The law of averages suggests that Chief Justice Rehnquist is likely to retire in the next presidential term. In addition to replacing Chief Justice Rehnquist, …
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On Clinton: Reconsidering The Role Of Natural Law In John Marshall's Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1141 (2000), James W. Ely
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.