Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Disruptive Technology And Common Law Lawmaking: A Brief Analysis Of A&M Records, Inc. V. Napster, Inc., Michael W. Carroll

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

This symposium Article analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision in A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. After setting the stage with a comparison to the rise of cable television, and a description of the technologies underpinning Napster's service, the Article analyzes the doctrinal developments in the Ninth Circuit's opinion. The principal analytical points are that: (1) the court's definitions of "sampling" and "space-shifting" were overbroad, leading to oversimple fair use analysis; (2) the court's treatment of vicarious liablility for copyright infringement is doctrinally incoherent because it suggests that liability depends on whether a third party has "turn[ed] a blind eye" toward …

Extending The Revisionist Project, Lewis Grossman

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Intellectual Property: Old Boundaries And New Frontiers, Richard A. Epstein

Indiana Law Journal

Addison C. Harris Lecture, November 9,2000.

Piracy, Prejudice, And Perspectives: An Attempt To Use Shakespeare To Reconfigure The U.S.-China Intellectual Property Debate, Peter K. Yu

Articles

No abstract provided.

From Pirates To Partners: Protecting Intellectual Property In China In The Twenty-First Century, Peter K. Yu

Articles

No abstract provided.

Offensive Protection: The Potential Application Of Intellectual Property Law To Scripted Sports Plays, Proloy K. Das

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Inter-America Bar Association: Resolutions Of The Xxxv Conference

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright At The Supreme Court: A Jurisprudence Of Deference, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

Resolving Tensions Between Copyright And The Internet, Walter Effross

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Strategic Disclosure In The Patent System, Douglas Lichtman, Scott Baker, Kate Kraus

Scholarship@WashULaw

Patent applications are evaluated in light of the prior art. What this means is that patent examiners evaluate a claimed invention by comparing it with what in a rough sense corresponds to the set of ideas and inventions already known to the public. This is done for three reasons. First, the comparison helps to ensure that patents issue only in cases where an inventor has made a non-trivial contribution to the public's store of knowledge. Second, it protects a possible reliance interest on the part of the public since, once an invention is widely known, members of the public might …

Protecting Folklore Under Modern Intellectual Property Regimes: A Reappraisal Of The Tensions Between Individual And Communal Rights In Africa And The United States , Paul Kuruk

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Digital Frontiers: Law And The Internet: Letter To The U.S. Senate From Marci A. Hamilton, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

Promoting Innovation Competition Through The Aspen/Kodak Rule, Jonathan Baker

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Farewell Madison Avenue, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Top Ten Intellectual Property Law Questions That Should Be Asked About Any Merger Or Acquisition, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

Withdrawal Of The Reference: Rights, Rules, And Remedies For Unwelcomed Web-Linking, Walter Effross

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Patenting Medical Procedures: A Search For A Compromise Between Ethics And Economics, Beata Gocyk-Farber

Cardozo Law Review

When doctor Samuel Pallin, an Arizona ophthalmologist, brought an infringement suit for his patent covering the "stitchless" incision in cataract surgery, he probably did not expect that he would provoke one of the most emotional patent debates in history. Physicians across the country expressed condemnation of medical process patents, calling such patents "horrendous" and warning that Dr. Pallin's victory may have "profoundly devastating and mind-boggling consequences" for medical science. The resonance in the medical community was so strong that the American Medical Association House of Delegates passed a resolution "vigorously" condemning the patenting of medical and surgical procedures and promising …

Computer Science Concepts In Copyright Cases: The Path To A Coherent Law, Marci A. Hamilton, Ted Sabety

Articles

No abstract provided.

Judicial Plagiarism: It May Be Fair Use But Is It Ethical?, Jaime S. Dursht

Cardozo Law Review

Plagiarism is the intentional appropriation of the creative product or scholarship of another without attribution. Judicial plagiarism arises when judges author opinions that employ materials from copyrighted sources such as law journals or books, but neglect to give credit to the author. In opinion writing-a form of writing in which use and citation to authority is customary-the offense of plagiarism lies simply in neglecting to identify the source. In the academic world, plagiarism is considered to be a "capital offense, punishable by academic death for student or faculty," and it is treated no more favorably in professions in which responsible …

National Sovereignty And Transnational Problem Solving, Judith H. Bello

Cardozo Law Review

Many of the most difficult problems that challenge nation states in the increasingly interdependent world do not respect borders: illicit drug trafficking, refugees, illegal immigration, environmental degradation, illegal arms sales, nuclear proliferation, terrorism, bribery, and corruption. Nation states acting alone are helpless to resolve or most effectively alleviate these problems.

National Laws And International Markets: Strategies Of Cooperation And Harmonization In The Enforcement Of Competition Law, Spencer Weber Waller

Cardozo Law Review

This Article contrasts how two leading competition law systems, the United States and the European Union ("EU"), have reacted to the growing internationalization of markets and the relative decline of the ability of any single jurisdiction to regulate transnational business behavior. For reasons unique to their respective histories, cultures, and politics, these two jurisdictions have adopted very different strategies for dealing with this problem.

Intellectual Property Issues In Genomics, Rebecca S. Eisenberg

Articles

Controversy over intellectual property rights in the results of large-scale cDNA sequencing raises intriguing questions about the roles of the public and private sectors in genomics research, and about who stands to benefit (and who stands to lose) from the private appropriation of genomic information. While the US Patent and Trademark Office has rejected patent applications on cDNA fragments of unknown function from the National Institutes of Health, private firms have pursued three distinct strategies for exploiting unpatented cDNA sequence information: exclusive licensing, non-exclusive licensing and dedication to the public domain.

The Trips Agreement: Imperialistic, Outdated, And Overprotective, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

According to Professor Hamilton, the TRIPS Agreement constructs international copyright law in the image of Western, Protestant-based capitalist copyright law. She suggests that the Agreement Imposes presuppositions about human value, effort, and reward that contain political, sociological, and legal ramifications. In fact, the Agreement, with its focus upon valuing individual human creative achievement, could spur further developments in Westernbased human rights in the rest of the world. By transplanting Western ideas to the rest of the world, TRIPS may actually encourage anti-authoritarian revolution.

She further suggests that the TRIPS Agreement seeks to establish a free market of intellectual property goods. …

The Evolution Of Free Trade In The Americas: Nafta Case Studies, Claudio Grossman

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Art Speech, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

Although many scholars have been in favor of providing first amendment protection for art, no one has offered a justification for its constitutional protection suited to art's singular capacities. Rather, commentators and courts have been inclined to place art under the rubric of general speech, which limits protection to ideas and content. Professor Hamilton argues that art offers significantly more than its content and deserves first amendment protection tailored to its particular potential. Art enables individuals to experience unfamiliar worlds and thereby to gain new perspectives on the prevailing status quo, including the government's. It performs this function without exposing …

The Visual Artists Rights Act Of 1990: American Artists Burned Again, Robert J. Sherman

Cardozo Law Review

This Note explores those sections of VARA which specify the conditions under which a visual artist may waive the protection granted by the 1976 Copyright Act. Specifically, it discusses the waiver provisions which address the most troublesome protected works-works of art that are incorporated into buildings. Part I of this Note explains the evolution of droit moral doctrine in European copyright law, the role it plays in the Berne Convention, and a comparison between its application in Europe and the United States. Part II presents a discussion of the United States accession to the Berne Convention and the hurdles to …

Assembling A Theory Of Infringement: Third Party Liability Based On In Vivo Production Of Patented Pharmaceuticals, Eitan Alexander Ogen

Cardozo Law Review

This Note addresses the novel and still unresolved issues raised by the facts underlying Zenith. Part I describes the patent law system and its importance to the pharmaceutical industry. Part II discusses statutory interpretation issues raised by Zenith, relating to direct infringement and associated third party liability, as they pertain to the metabolic processes of living beings. Part III analyzes these issues in light of the existing case law. Part IV integrates the discussion by proposing a set of factors to be weighed in analyzing infringement actions against third parties that is consistent with the prevailing jurisprudence, the …

A New Use For An Old License: Who Owns The Right?, Barbara D. Griff

Cardozo Law Review

In order to establish this referential background, this Note begins in Part I with a look at historic new use cases focusing on whether a grant of dramatic rights included motion picture rights, whether a grant of silent motion picture rights included rights to talkies, and whether motion picture rights included television rights. Part I continues with a survey of the current landscape and provides an overview of cases involving a grant of motion picture or television rights seeking to include videocassette rights when the original contract was signed prior to the invention or popularization of the video cassette recorder …

[email protected] - “Owning A Bitchin’ ” Corporate Trademark As An Internet Address - Infringement?, James West Marcovitz

Cardozo Law Review

Is the unauthorized use of a famous trademark as an Internet address infringement? In other words, to what extent may an individual, business, or corporation use another's trade or service mark. The Lanham Act prohibits the use of "any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services ... [which] is likely to cause confusion" as to the source of the goods or services in question. This Note examines whether the Lanham Act, in its current form, can be used to enjoin the …

The Unconscious And The Law The Law And The Unconscious, Jorge Degregorio

Cardozo Law Review

The god Apollo, whose diverse gifts included the ability to interpret dreams, was recognized as the first author of the law, which was dictated through his oracle in Delphi. For his sacred person, dreams were laws and laws, dreams. Let us invent a story in order to fill in the missing pages of the myth:

Laws, as well as the power to decipher the soul's mysteries from dreams, were bestowed upon the Androgyns by the god. Once they acquired the power of law and of dream interpretation, they attempted to scale Olympus and sit on the gods' stage. Zeus, presiding …