Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Privacy Versus The First Amendment: A Skeptical Approach, Solveig Singleton

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction To Keynote Address, John D. Feerick

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Resolving Tensions Between Copyright And The Internet, Walter Effross

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Panel Ii: The Economic And Regulatory Issues Of Convergence, William Baer, Lawrence Grossman, Jeffrey Lanning, Robert Joffe

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel I: The First Amendment Implications Of Convergence, Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Nicholas Jollymore, Janine Jaquet, Jonathan Zittrain

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Agricultural Disparagement Statutes: Tainted Beef, Tainted Speech, And Tainted Law, Margot S. Fell

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Keynote Colloquy: Finding Justice In The Internet Dimension, Hon. Alex Kozinski

Seattle University Law Review

The Internet community—just like all other speech communities—ought to be afforded First Amendment protections. I don't see any reason why Internet speech should be treated any less favorably than other kinds of speech. But the vastly overblown claim that the communications medium somehow deserves to be put outside normal legal constraints--because it's so global, or because it's so different—is self-defeating. It substitutes generalities and sentiments for real thinking. The kind of analysis we've seen at this conference—the kind of debate we've had here—is very useful, because we're talking about the specifics of what legal constraints should be allowed. Not whether …

An Analysis Of The Personal Use Principle Under Copyright Law, Hsin-Chih Cheng

LLM Theses and Essays

Personal use is when an individual uses a copyrighted work for private purposes, such as learning or entertainment. Personal use is a right given in the Copyright Clause of the U.S. Constitution, however, an issue arises when the individual wants to make a copy of the copyrighted work. New technologies like photocopying and videotaping make this issue more prominent today. Some copyright owners think that the individual’s copying for private use is harmful to their potential market and they argue for compensation. Does the individual have the right under the personal use principle to reproduce the copyrighted work for private …

Communication Breakdown:  Developing An Antitrust Model For Multimedia Mergers And Acquisitions, H. Peter Nesvold

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Rosenberger V. Rector & Visitors Of The University Of Virginia:  The Myth Of The Content Neutral Establishment Clause, Mark Daniel Salzberg

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel I:  The Changing Landscape Of Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, Creighton O'M. Condon, Robert D. Joffe, Nicholas J. Jollymore, John R. Tyler

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Ii:  Censorship Of Cable Television’S Leased And Public Access Channels:  Current Status Of Alliance For Community Media V. Fcc , Stuart W. Gold, Marjorie Heins, James N. Horwood, Robert T. Perry

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Rules Of The Road:  The Constitutional Limits Of Restricting Indecent Speech On The Information Superhighway, Stacey J. Rappaport

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Rico And The First Amendment:  Alexander V. United States, Bruno C. Bier

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Censorship On The Internet: Do Obscene Or Pornographic Materials Have A Protected Status?, Paula Franzese, J. Robert Flores, Peter D. Kennedy, Robert T. Perry

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The Technological Advances In Media, John M. Phelan, Robert F. Schneider, Steven Shapiro, Jacob Zamansky

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel Iv: Censorship Of Cable Television’S Leased And Public Access Channels, Majorie Heins, James N. Horwood, Robert T. Perry, Michael Sitcov

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Constitutionality Of Current Crime Victimization Statutes: A Survey , Debra A. Shields

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Right Of Publicity Vs. The First Amendment: A Property And Liability Rule Analysis, Roberta Rosenthal Kwall

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Defending The “Decency Clause” In Finley V. National Endowment For The Arts, J. Sarah Kim

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Letter Re: A Property Right In Self Expression: Equality And Individualism In The Natural Law Of Intellectual Property, Henry H. Perritt Jr.

Scholarship Chronologically

I liked your A Property Right in Self Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property very much. I have the following comments or suggestions:

Aals Speech, Wendy J. Gordon

Scholarship Chronologically

Marshall has also said I can speak as long as I want, so scream when you've had enough.

Cd-Rom Symposium Transcript One - 1992, Wendy J. Gordon

Scholarship Chronologically

Enclosed are the corrected pages of the transcript. The article itself will follow shortly.

Simon & Schuster, Inc. V. Members Of The New York State Crime Victims Board: The Demise Of New York’S Son Of Sam Law And The Decision That Could Have Been, Ralph W. Johnson, Iii

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Notes On Economics Of Suppression - 1990, Wendy J. Gordon

Scholarship Chronologically

The Treatise suggests that the two major strains in copyright are the economic or instrumental perspective, and the authors' rights perspective. This dual perspective parallels the configuration in property and tort law as a whole, where quandaries such as the suppression problem are sometimes analyzed in terms of whether the individual holding an entitlement is a "steward" entrusted with the resource solely for sake of the social good that is likely to result from his or her productive use of it, or a "sovereign" to be left unregulated in managing the resource.

Intellectual And Informational Property Rights: Panel Iv - Introduction: Property In Mass Media Law, Lee C. Bollinger

Faculty Scholarship

This is the panel on intellectual and informational property rights. As you can see, there are three panelists other than myself: Ed Kitch, Stephen Carter, and Frank Easterbrook.

I want to begin with just a few thoughts on an area that I know something about: press and media law. I would like to say two things about the notion of property and how it arises in the context of a few problems in the area of mass media law.