Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (290)
- Internet Law (160)
- Science and Technology Law (145)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (113)
- Computer Law (93)
-
- International Trade Law (78)
- International Law (76)
- Library and Information Science (70)
- First Amendment (69)
- Arts and Humanities (67)
- Constitutional Law (66)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (53)
- Law and Society (50)
- Communications Law (48)
- Law and Economics (48)
- Contracts (43)
- Legislation (38)
- Legal History (32)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (31)
- Privacy Law (31)
- Scholarly Communication (28)
- Jurisprudence (24)
- Litigation (24)
- Scholarly Publishing (24)
- Courts (22)
- Legal Writing and Research (22)
- Music (21)
- Business (20)
- Institution
-
- American University Washington College of Law (153)
- Boston University School of Law (135)
- University of Georgia School of Law (134)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (119)
- Fordham Law School (118)
-
- University of Richmond (72)
- Marquette University Law School (63)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (55)
- William & Mary Law School (49)
- Georgetown University Law Center (48)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (45)
- Pepperdine University (44)
- The University of Akron (42)
- University of Kentucky (42)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (41)
- Columbia Law School (36)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (36)
- BLR (33)
- Duke Law (33)
- New York Law School (32)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (32)
- University of New Hampshire (32)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (30)
- University of Washington School of Law (28)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (26)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (26)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (25)
- University of Colorado Law School (25)
- Pace University (24)
- University of Michigan Law School (21)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (179)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (108)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (93)
- Faculty Publications (63)
- Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series (63)
-
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (56)
- Law Faculty Publications (55)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (55)
- Scholarship Chronologically (53)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (44)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (43)
- Scholarly Works (43)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (36)
- Articles (35)
- ExpressO (33)
- Pepperdine Law Review (32)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (31)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (27)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (27)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (26)
- Cybaris® (25)
- Touro Law Review (25)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (24)
- Publications (22)
- Akron Intellectual Property Journal (20)
- Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (20)
- Library Staff Publications (19)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (19)
- Akron Law Review (18)
- Faculty Articles (18)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 241 - 270 of 2092
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Copyright Co-Ownership In Uncertain Times: How Security Interests Can Save The Day, Evie Whiting, Ashleigh Stanley
Copyright Co-Ownership In Uncertain Times: How Security Interests Can Save The Day, Evie Whiting, Ashleigh Stanley
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
Films and television series are increasingly being created undera co-production model, making copyright co-ownership a common occurrence in the world of Hollywood content creation. So long as each co-owner’s rights are pre-negotiated and specifically delineated in their contracts, the co-owners can rest assured that their rights to the project and any potential derivative works are safe. Or can they?
In the modern entertainment landscape, where tentpole programming and related spinoffs and derivatives are the gold standard of content creation, the proper protection of co-owned copyrights is more important than ever. But tenuous financial outlooks pose a looming, existential threat to …
Transfers And Licensing Of Copyrights To Nft Purchasers, Michael D. Murray
Transfers And Licensing Of Copyrights To Nft Purchasers, Michael D. Murray
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Property as a concept in the law means the right to own and control something and to exclude others from using and controlling it. This concept often is expressed as the rights owner having a monopoly over the thing that is owned. When the term “intellectual” is added to the concept of property, it means that the thing protected is a non-tangible item devised, imagined, developed, or invented by a person or group, and that thing has value deserving of protection in the law. Copyright is one form of intellectual property (“IP”), the others being trademarks, patents, right of publicity, …
Nft Ownership And Copyrights, Michael D. Murray
Nft Ownership And Copyrights, Michael D. Murray
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have made enormous waves in the art, music, entertainment, and collectibles world, but the backwash of this blockchain technology has inundated and overwhelmed many peoples’ understanding of intellectual property (IP) law in general and copyright law in particular when it comes to NFTs and blockchains. Artists and creatives who mint NFTs often have very different understandings and expectations from collectors and investors who purchase and use them when it comes to the copyrights associated with the content linked to an NFT. Art law attorneys may not have gone fully down the rabbit hole that is the current …
Generative Ai Art: Copyright Infringement And Fair Use, Michael D. Murray
Generative Ai Art: Copyright Infringement And Fair Use, Michael D. Murray
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The discussion of AI copyright infringement or fair use often skips over all the required steps of the infringement analysis in order to focus on the most intriguing question, “Could a visual generative AI generate a work that potentially infringes a preexisting copyrighted work?” and then the discussion skips further ahead to, “Would the AI have a fair use defense, most likely under the transformative test?” These are relevant questions, but without considering the actual steps of the copyright infringement analysis, the discussion is misleading or even irrelevant. This neglecting of topics and stages of the infringement analysis fails to …
Copyrighting Brain Computer Interface: Where Neuroengineering Meets Intellectual Property Law, Favio Ramirez Caminatti
Copyrighting Brain Computer Interface: Where Neuroengineering Meets Intellectual Property Law, Favio Ramirez Caminatti
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Mickey Mouse – Finally Whistling His Way Into The Public Domain, Holly Lechner
Mickey Mouse – Finally Whistling His Way Into The Public Domain, Holly Lechner
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Reconceptualizing Open Access To Theses And Dissertations, Orit Fischman Afori, Dalit Ken-Dror Feldman
Reconceptualizing Open Access To Theses And Dissertations, Orit Fischman Afori, Dalit Ken-Dror Feldman
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
Theses and dissertations (TD) are academic research projects that are conducted by graduate students to acquire a high academic degree, such as a PhD. The perception of the written TD has evolved over the years, following changes concerning the purpose of advanced academic studies. Today, these academic fruits should meet a high standard of academic innovation, which is understood broadly as encompassing not only knowledge concerning basic science but also the knowledge that generates social and economic value for society.
The modern perception of TD has generated a call for their greater accessibility, as part of the Open Science movement. …
©Ancelling Dr. Seuss, Cathay Y. N. Smith
©Ancelling Dr. Seuss, Cathay Y. N. Smith
Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings
Dr. Seuss Enterprises announced in March 2021 that it would no longer license or publish six of its children’s books because those books portrayed people in racist or culturally stereotypical ways. Since then, the public has learned through news reports and social media that other publishers have similarly reviewed and altered their catalogues of classic children’s works, including withdrawing them from the public, editing them to remove problematic content, or adding disclaimers to warn the public about racially insensitive or outdated content. The public reaction to Dr. Seuss’s decision and these other actions has been largely divided. Some criticized these …
Comments On Council Draft 7 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg
Comments On Council Draft 7 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
CD7 adopts several of the suggestions in my comments on PD8; I appreciate those modifications. CD7 does not, however, respond to a number of other criticisms and suggestions regarding PD8. For the benefit of the Council, I reprise the suggestions that I consider to be most significant to ensuring the accuracy of the draft (page and line references have been changed to reflect CD7)
Of Lock-Breaking And Stock Taking: Ip, Climate Change And The Right To Repair In Canada, Graham Reynolds
Of Lock-Breaking And Stock Taking: Ip, Climate Change And The Right To Repair In Canada, Graham Reynolds
All Faculty Publications
This paper argues that Canadian governments have both legal and moral obligations to act to combat climate change. In seeking to fulfill these obligations, Canadian governments should pay particular attention to Canada’s intellectual property (IP) regime. This paper argues that given the centrality of IP to Canada’s economy, a comprehensive review is required in order to determine whether and the extent to which elements of Canada’s IP regime contribute to climate change or impede climate action. To illustrate the need for such a review, this paper will highlight one example of how Canada’s IP regime, as currently structured, impedes the …
The Sour Reality Of Copyright Infringement, Vanessa R. Carreno Alvarez
The Sour Reality Of Copyright Infringement, Vanessa R. Carreno Alvarez
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright’S Capacity Gap, Andrew Gilden, Eva E. Subotnik
Copyright’S Capacity Gap, Andrew Gilden, Eva E. Subotnik
Faculty Publications
Most areas of law require that individuals meet a certain threshold of capacity before their decisions — e.g., to marry, to enter into a contract, or to execute an estate plan — are given legal effect. Copyright law, by contrast, gives legal effect to creative decisions by granting the decisionmaker many decades of exclusive rights so long as they are a human being and have demonstrated a “creative spark.” This Article examines the overlooked consequences of this gap in capacity standards between copyright and other areas of law. It shows that this gap has produced numerous opportunities for vulnerable creators …
Impossibility Of Emergent Works’ Protection In U.S. And Eu Copyright Law, Mateusz Blaszczyk
Impossibility Of Emergent Works’ Protection In U.S. And Eu Copyright Law, Mateusz Blaszczyk
Scholarly Works
Protection of emergent works is impossible. Without an author, there is no expression of ideas which can be original, and thus no copyrightable work. Indeed, the whole system of copyright law, its conceptual building blocks of idea-expression dichotomy, originality, authorship, and the concept of a protectable work operate in the notation of human creativity. Emergent works fall outside of copyright’s positive ontology, being akin to ideas, facts, or subject-matter predicated by technical considerations, rather than authorial creativity. In other words, they do not exist as things in law and thus cannot as such be owned. Rather, like any idea, they …
There's No Such Thing As Independent Creation, And It's A Good Thing, Too, Christopher Buccafusco
There's No Such Thing As Independent Creation, And It's A Good Thing, Too, Christopher Buccafusco
Faculty Scholarship
Independent creation is the foundation of U.S. copyright law. A work is only original and, thus, copyrightable to the extent that it is independently created by its author and not copied from another source. And a work can be deemed infringing only if it is not independently created. Moreover, independent creation provides the grounding for all major theoretical justifications for copyright law. Unfortunately, the doctrine cannot bear the substantial weight that has been foisted upon it. This Article argues that copyright law’s independent creation doctrine rests on a set of discarded psychological assumptions about memory, copying, and creativity. When those …
Conceptualizing A "Right To Research" And Its Implications For Copyright Law: An International And European Perspective, Christophe Geiger, Bernd Justin Jutte
Conceptualizing A "Right To Research" And Its Implications For Copyright Law: An International And European Perspective, Christophe Geiger, Bernd Justin Jutte
American University International Law Review
Copyright, at international, European, and national levels, does not provide a legal framework that prioritizes enabling and incentivizing research using protected works and information to the extent necessary and desirable in a digital, data-driven society in order to build a sustainable ecosystem for innovation and creativity. While small progress has been made, for example with the recent introduction of specific exceptions for research purposes and for text and data mining in certain national legislations as well as in the European Union law, a horizontal approach towards a more research-friendly copyright ecosystem has so far failed to evolve. By revisiting international …
Decentralized Collaboration Through Private Ordering, Edward Lee
Decentralized Collaboration Through Private Ordering, Edward Lee
American University Law Review
This Article sets forth the theory of decentralized collaboration to explain how NFT projects coordinate business and creative collaborations in a decentralized manner through NFTs. Conducting an empirical study of the Top 25 NFT projects, this Article shows that a majority of the Top 25 NFT projects have employed a new, more innovative approach to creative production. Decentralized collaboration refers to the creative activities among unrelated actors who are involved in creating a shared content production project through a decentralized, asynchronous process open to the public. Utilizing a combination of smart contracts that create non-fungible tokens (NFTs) recorded on blockchain …
The Knottiest Of Gordian Knots: Article 17 Of The Copyright Directive, Mark Hyland, Thomas Perry
The Knottiest Of Gordian Knots: Article 17 Of The Copyright Directive, Mark Hyland, Thomas Perry
Articles
This article analyses the much debated Article 17 of the EU Copyright Directive (Directive 2019/790) in the light of last year’s comprehensive European Commission guidance. The aim of the guidance is to support a correct and coherent transposition of Article 17 across the EU27. Following the recent landmark judgment in Case C-401/19, Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU, some commentators have now suggested that it might be timely for the European Commission to issue further guidance on Article 17.
The Server Test Quandary And Embedding Permission Culture, Michael Goodyear
The Server Test Quandary And Embedding Permission Culture, Michael Goodyear
Articles & Chapters
The practice of embedding—inserting code that displays content located elsewhere on the Internet—is ubiquitous online. Millions of users insert or encounter embeds daily. As a core type of link, embedding has helped disseminate information far and wide, furthering the goals of both copyright law and the Internet. For over a decade, embedding has been considered lawful under copyright law, guaranteed by a Ninth Circuit doctrine known as the server test, which holds that a person only displays a work when he or she hosts and serves it. This rule, which has greatly influenced the growth of the modern Internet, has …
A Logical Proof That The Common Good, Not Economics, Underlies Copyright, Michelle M. Wu
A Logical Proof That The Common Good, Not Economics, Underlies Copyright, Michelle M. Wu
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Copyright experts endlessly debate its purpose: economic or common good. Both sides cite to judicial language backing their interpretations, and the frequency and cost of litigation between those representing the two interests have noticeably increased over recent years.
This article aims at a simpler way to resolve the dispute, by taking a step back and starting with the definition of a government. The government of a democratic republic, particularly one described as “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” has a single purpose: to address the common concerns of its people.
The following philosophical argument is a …
Keeping It Real: Property Analogies For Graffiti Infringement, Shelby Pickar-Dennis
Keeping It Real: Property Analogies For Graffiti Infringement, Shelby Pickar-Dennis
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Sample Clearance Has Affected Hip-Hop Music-Making, Bryan J. Brewster
How Sample Clearance Has Affected Hip-Hop Music-Making, Bryan J. Brewster
Capstone Projects and Master's Theses
This paper will explain how sample clearance has impacted hip-hop music-making. It will explain what a sample is and show the historical significance of sampling in hip-hop. I will briefly discuss the basics of copyright and the process of clearing a sample. This paper will also look into legal cases of copyright infringement to show the impact of specific cases and analyze data to determine if the amount of sample clearance has changed because of the decisions of the courts. The main goal of this paper is to highlight the significance of sampling in hip-hop, the inherent challenges of legally …
The Status Of Reproduction Rights Organisations (Rros) In Africa, Desmond Oriakhogba, Dick Kawooya
The Status Of Reproduction Rights Organisations (Rros) In Africa, Desmond Oriakhogba, Dick Kawooya
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
This report is based on desk research conducted from June 2021 to May 2022 by way of a survey of publicly available information on Reproduction Rights Organisations (RROs) in all 55 African Union (AU) member states. It is the first of a two-part study. The second part of the study will be conducted as empirical research where data will be obtained from relevant stakeholders in the collective management systems of African countries to address key issues flagged in this report as requiring further evidence.
This report examines the current status of RROs in Africa to help inform policy and legislative …
The 14th Annual Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture - Mr. Justice Laddie And His Intellectual Property Cases: Of Millefeuilles And A Fish Called Elvis, David Vaver
Articles & Book Chapters
For me, it was a trip through the judgments of a master craftsman who could succinctly summarize the dispute before him; weigh the conflicting evidence; say what rang true and what did not; state the applicable law, often from first principles set in their historical and policy context; and end by saying who won and lost and what to do. Copyright law might be "over-strong", as he suggested in a 1996 lecture;14 but when he had to decide whether a TV documentary critical of cheque-book journalism could freely use another channel's footage to make its point, Laddie J. said his …
Proving Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Proving Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
William & Mary Law Review
Proof that a defendant actually copied from a copyrighted work is a critical part of a claim for copyright infringement. Indeed, absent such copying, there is no infringement. The most common method of proving copying involves the use of circumstantial evidence, consisting of proof that a defendant had “access” to the protected work, and a showing of “similarities” between the copy and the protected work. In inferring copying from the combination of such evidence, courts have for many decades developed a framework known as the “inverse ratio rule,” which allows them to modulate the level of proof needed on access …
Research Exceptions In Comparative Copyright, Sean Flynn, Luca Schirru, Michael Palmedo, Andrés Izquierdo
Research Exceptions In Comparative Copyright, Sean Flynn, Luca Schirru, Michael Palmedo, Andrés Izquierdo
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
This Article categorizes the world’s copyright laws according to the degree to which they provide exceptions to copyright exclusivity for research uses. We classify countries based on the degree to which they have a research exception in their law that is sufficiently open to be able to permit reproduction and communications of copyrighted work needed for academic (i.e. non-commercial) text and data mining (TDM) research. We show that nearly every copyright law has at least one exception that promotes uses for research purposes. We find six different approaches to the provision of research exceptions that implicate application to TDM. Notably, …
Creativity Without Ip? Vindication And Challenges In The Video Game Industry, Bj Ard
Creativity Without Ip? Vindication And Challenges In The Video Game Industry, Bj Ard
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Article intervenes in the longstanding debate over whether creative production is possible without exhaustive copyright protection. Intellectual property (IP) scholars have identified “negative spaces” like comedy and tattoo art where creativity thrives without IP, but critics dismiss these examples as niche. The video game industry allows for fresh headway. It is now the largest sector in entertainment—with revenues greater than Hollywood, streaming, and music combined—yet IP does not protect key game elements from duplication. Participants navigate this absence using non-IP strategies like those identified in negative-space industries: AAA developers invest in copy-resistant features while indie game developers rely on …
Letting Anarchy Loose On The World: The Anarchist Cookbook And How Copyright Fails The Author, Debora Halbert
Letting Anarchy Loose On The World: The Anarchist Cookbook And How Copyright Fails The Author, Debora Halbert
Akron Law Review
The Anarchist Cookbook by William Powell remains one of the most controversial books in print, even 50 years after its first publication. The story to be told about its ongoing publication can teach us about the politics of authorship, ownership, publication, copyright assignments, the public domain, and the legacies our printed words leave behind. Later in life Powell regretted publishing the book and wished that it would be removed from publication and circulation but stated that he did not own the copyright and so could not control the book. However, even at his death the book remained in print and …
A Potential Status Update For The Visual Artists Rights Act: The Role Of Social Media Response In Judicial Analysis Of Recognized Stature, Olivia Calamia
A Potential Status Update For The Visual Artists Rights Act: The Role Of Social Media Response In Judicial Analysis Of Recognized Stature, Olivia Calamia
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
In 2020, visual artists used the power and reach of social media platforms to share works of art inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement, which experienced renewed vigor following the police murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020. Many of these works have taken the form of murals painted on city streets, building faces, and other spaces that promote public viewing. Many artists hope that their works will endure long past this moment of social and political reckoning. Manhattan based artist Amir Diop expressed his wishes simply but eloquently: “My hope is that [my art] is a …
Are Cryptopunks Copyrightable?, Brian L. Frye
Are Cryptopunks Copyrightable?, Brian L. Frye
Pepperdine Law Review
Larva Labs’ CryptoPunks NFTs are iconic. Created in 2017, they were among the first NFTs on the Ethereum blockchain. Four years later, they are among the most valuable, selling for anywhere from $200,000 to millions of dollars. The CryptoPunks collection consists of 10,000 NFTs, each of which is associated with a unique CryptoPunks image. Everyone knows who owns each CryptoPunks NFT. The Ethereum blockchain provides indelible proof. But people disagree about who owns - and who should own - the copyright in the CryptoPunks images. Most CryptoPunks NFT owners believe they should own the copyright in the image associated with …
Protecting Fair Use From Algorithms, Internet Platforms, And The Copyright Office: A Critique Of The § 512 Study, Mary Kate Sherwood
Protecting Fair Use From Algorithms, Internet Platforms, And The Copyright Office: A Critique Of The § 512 Study, Mary Kate Sherwood
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
In 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a musical group’s parody of a well-known song could be fair use, which is a noninfringing use of copyrighted content. In 2006, the Second Circuit found that an artist’s use of copyrighted photographs in his own artwork constituted fair use. In 2016, the Ninth Circuit found that a video of a child dancing to a short clip of a copyrighted Prince song could be fair use. But in 2022, a creator who attempts to share her fair use of copyrighted material online may not have recourse to the …