Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

There Has Been An Infringement Of My Work And My Circuit Does Not Allow Me To Sue! The Time Has Come To Hash-Out The Federal Circuit Court Discrepancy On Copyright Registration, 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 344 (2019), Thomas Placzek

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The time has come to relieve the ambiguity created by the continued lack of consensus regarding the proper interpretation of 17 U.S.C. § 411(a). The persistent split amongst the various Federal Courts regarding the meaning of § 411(a)’s registration requirement allows some fortunate artists to immediately enforce their rights in a number of jurisdictions, while artists from other jurisdictions are prohibited from immediately enforcing the same rights. Several circuit and district courts subscribe to the “application approach,” while others employ the “registration approach.” This comment delves into the rationale behind the respective approaches, and discusses the arguments made for and …

Abstraction In Software Patents (And How To Fix It), 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 364 (2019), Athul Acharya

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Software has long posed a quandary for patent law. As many have observed, software is an abstract technology—but abstract ideas are supposedly ineligible for patenting. This Article explores just what that means, what it doesn’t mean, and what might fix the problem of abstraction in software patents. This Article offers two related ways to understand the abstract nature of software. First, computer science defines itself as a “science of abstraction,” and that self-definition finds real doctrinal purchase. Second, software code is designed to be what the doctrine calls “functional”—to describe abstract results that can be executed on heterogenous hardware without …

Overcoming Abstract Idea Exception Of Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance, 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 382 (2019), Sangik Bae

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

This article discusses the judicial abstract idea exception of the current patent subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The current § 101 jurisprudence has been heavily criticized by lower courts and patent-stakeholders because it is hard to delineate the scope of the abstract idea exception within the current patent eligibility standard. In response, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance (2019 PEG). This article addresses the issue of whether the 2019 PEG fills the gap in the ambiguity of the test by summarizing the 2019 PEG. Then, the …

The F Word - An Early Empirical Study Of Trademark Registration Of Scandalous And Immoral Marks In The Aftermath Of The In Re Brunetti Decision, 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 404 (2019), Vicenc Feliu

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

This article seeks to create an early empirical benchmark on registrations of marks that would have failed registration as “scandalous” or “immoral” under Lanham Act Section 2(a) before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s In re Brunetti decision of December 2017 and to briefly examine the possible outcome of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari on that case. The Brunetti decision followed closely behind the Supreme Court’s Matal v. Tam and put an end to examiners denying registration on the basis of Section 2(a). In Tam, the Supreme Court reasoned that Section 2(a) embodied restrictions on free speech, …

Scandal In The Us And Australian Wine Industry! Trademarks And Gis As A Consumer Magnet?, 118 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 421 (2019), Sarah Hinchliffe

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In a dense global market, wine is heavily reliant on catering to the needs of consumers. Consumers, as part of the decision-making process, rely on information – comprising information type, and the way that it is portrayed. This article identifies branding opportunities for New World wineries – particularly in the United States and Australia – to capitalize on without compromising innovation in branding nor breaching IP law. It highlights that wineries in the New World have a plethora of opportunity to create a spunk and pizazz effect in their branding. At the same time, it cautions what wineries should avoid …

The Perspiration Principle,18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 463 (2019), Doug Lichtman

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Should copyright be awarded in an instance where a work of authorship lacks inspiration and is instead simply the result of necessary and genuine hard work? Should patents likewise be offered to inventors whose achievements derive not from any flash of genius but from sweat and labor alone? In this Essay, Professor Lichtman revisits the economic case in favor of a "perspiration principle" under which hard work would be a sufficient trigger for intellectual property protection, even in instances where the resulting achievements lack the creative spark that patent and copyright law typically require.

Insolvency And Trademarks: How The Bankruptcy Code's Treatment Of Trademarks Promotes Naked Licensing, 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 475 (2019), Michael Hopkins

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In 1988, Congress amended § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, which deals with the rejection of executory contracts, in order to allow intellectual property licensees to retain usage rights. However, this amendment did not include adding trademarks to the Bankruptcy Code’s definition of “intellectual property.” As such, Circuit Courts are divided on what remedies are available to trademark licensees following a licensor’s rejection of their agreement. Recently, the circuit split escalated when the First Circuit decided Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, which was inconsistent with the Seventh Circuit’s 2014 holding in Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing. …

When Enough Is Not Enough: Can Post Filing Experimental Data Bridge The Gap In Patent Disclosure Of Non-Enabling Specifications In The Unpredictable Arts?, 18 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 496 (2019), Fei Sha

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

On issues of 35 U.S.C. §112, the Federal Circuit has been inconsistent in determining the extent to which patent applicants need to disclose examples of their claimed inventions in patent specifications to fully enable their patent claims. Confusion as to how many or what types of examples amount to sufficient disclosure is augmented for inventions in the unpredictable arts, such as chemistry, biotechnology, and pharmaceuticals. Current practice skewing towards disclosure of examples in greater numbers is a misguided effort to satisfy enablement, as shown by patents at issue in two recent Federal Circuit cases. A qualitative approach to disclosure is …

The Forking Phenomenon And The Future Of Cryptocurrency In The Law, 19 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2019), Chelsea Button

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In the evolving and ever-changing world of cryptocurrency, new and exciting phenomena arise, including hard forks. Hard forks occur when two groups supporting a cryptocurrency disagree on how the code should evolve. If the changes are incompatible, the code diverges into two chains, essentially doubling the amount of each holder’s coin. Forking a coin is theoretically easy. However, maintaining a fork requires great effort and support by members of the community. This Article discusses the November 15, 2018 Bitcoin Cash hard fork and subsequent lawsuit, analyzing anti-trust, negligence, and conversion claims. Forcing de facto fiduciary duties on developers and miners …

Louboutin Heels And The Competition Goals Of Eu Trade Mark Law, 19 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 38 (2019), Cesar Ramirez-Montes

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

This article critically examines the judicial applications of the EU functionality doctrine and argues that recent CJEU decisions are at odds with the EU legislator’s declared intention to give functionality a much greater role in promoting product market competition. As a statutory ground for refusing registration even in the presence of consumer association and established goodwill, EU functionality serves to avoid undue competitive advantages by refusing protection in support of freedom to compete. EU functionality represents a significant obstacle to registration for purely natural, technical and value adding signs representing the shape of the goods. As of 2015, the wording …

Patent Infringement Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(G) For Goods Made In The United States, 19 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 64 (2019), Peter Hecker

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Section 271(g) filled a loophole that allowed companies to escape patent infringement by producing goods overseas and then importing them. In filling this loophole, Congress may have unintentionally broadened patent liability for the production and use of goods in the United States. This paper discusses important ramifications of this broadened language and encourages the Federal Circuit or Congress to clarify the extent of patent infringement under Section 271(g).

The New Approaches To Digital Anti-Piracy In The Entertainment Industry, 19 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 75 (2019), Igor Slabykh

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

This article is about digital anti-piracy. The entertainment industry has been combating piracy over the internet for the last 40 years. This article gives an overview of the digital anti-piracy approaches, analyzes the reasons why people commit piracy, demonstrates the disappointing results of the current state of anti-piracy, and offers new approaches that may help to reduce digital piracy.

Determinants Of Patent Quality: Evidence From Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Brian J. Love, Shawn P. Miller, Shawn Ambwani

University of Colorado Law Review

We study the determinants of patent "quality"-the likelihood that an issued patent can survive a post-grant validity challenge. We do so by taking advantage of two recent developments in the United States patent system. First, rather than relying on the relatively small and highly selected set of patents scrutinized by courts, we study the larger and broader set of patents that have been subjected to inter partes review, a recently established administrative procedure for challenging the validity of issued patents. Second, in addition to analyzing characteristics observable on the face of challenged patents, we utilize datasets recently made available by …

Internet Of Infringing Things: The Effect Of Computer Interface Copyrights On Technology Standards, Charles Duan

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

You connect to the Internet via your Wi-Fi access point. You surf the Web using a browser and send emails through your email server. You probably use some USB peripherals-say a mouse, keyboard, or printer. Maybe you even watch cable or broadcast television.

Under current case law, each of those computer systems and devices may very well be copyright-infringing contraband. This is through no fault of your own-you need not be pirating music or streaming illegal movies to infringe a copyright. The infringement simply exists, hard-wired within each of those devices and many more that you use, a result of …

Improper Appropriation, Daniel Gervais

Lewis & Clark Law Review

The traditional test for copyright infringement is satisfied when the owner of a valid copyright establishes, first, that her work was actually copied and second, that the copying amounts to an improper or unlawful appropriation. As applied by courts, the second prong of the test is often applied quantitatively that is, when the amount of the copyrighted work that is copied is more than de minimis. This seems odd for a test expressed using a term wrought with moral overtones (impropriety). This Article discusses whether this test could be applied differently by requiring an examination of the (im)propriety of the …

Craft Beer And The Rising Tide Effect: An Empirical Study Of Sharing And Collaboration Among Seattle's Craft Breweries, Zahr K. Said

Lewis & Clark Law Review

This qualitative empirical research project studies Seattle’s craft brewing industry as a thriving entrepreneurial ecosystem that displays widespread collaboration and innovation. Drawing on data collected in 22 face-to-face formal interviews conducted with industry participants, the Article explores the community’s attitudes, practices, and norms with respect to collaboration and intellectual property (IP). It joins a growing body of qualitative empirical IP scholarship that maps misalignments between law and practice “on the ground,” seeking to offer a more accurate and pluralistic account of an innovative industry. The craft brewing community in Seattle cooperates extensively while continuing to compete actively for consumers. In …

Equitable Estoppel And Information Costs In Contemporary Copyright, Molly Shaffer Van Houweling

Lewis & Clark Law Review

The failure of the contemporary copyright system to provide clear notice of the existence of copyrights and the identity of copyright owners leaves even well-meaning actors vulnerable to infringement actions and severe remedies. This Article describes how the doctrine of equitable estoppel has sometimes been used to address these informationcost problems by requiring the actor best positioned to communicate about the existence of rights to do so. Renewed focus on equitable estoppel in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., may present new opportunities to apply the doctrine in this useful way.

The Interaction Of Patent Exhaustion And Transactions In Patented Goods After Impression Products V. Lexmark International, Andrew Beckerman Rodau

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Patent Eligibility Of Predictive Algorithm In Second Generation Personalized Medicine, Jerry I-H Hsiao

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Natural Cycles: When An Algorithm Digitally Mandates Your Sexual Health, Jacqueline Tran

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Driverless Cars And Resource Allocation, Jeff Daniel Clark

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Case For Dhs To Classify The Internet Of Things As Critical Infrastructure In The United States, Jessica G. Martz

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Gotta Catch ‘Em All! The Rise Of Esports And The Evolution Of Its Regulations, Elizabeth Chung

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Agriculture & Blockchain: Identifying Liability And Guaranteeing Quality, Morgan Crider

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Regulations For Smart Mobility: Proceed With Caution, Connor Saenz

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Saliency, Anchors & Frames: A Multicomponent Damages Experiment, Bernard Chao

Michigan Technology Law Review

Modern technology products contain thousands, sometimes hundreds of thousands, of different features. Nonetheless, when electronics manufacturers are sued for patent infringement, these suits typically accuse only one feature, or in more complex suits, a handful of features, of actual patent infringement. But damages verdicts often do not reflect the relatively small contribution an individual patent makes to an infringing product. One study observed that verdicts in these types of cases average 9.98% of the price of the entire product. While both courts and commentators have blamed the law of patent damages, the role cognitive biases play in these outsized damages …

Patents For Sharing, Toshiko Takenaka

Michigan Technology Law Review

Spurred by the Internet, emerging technologies have changed the way commercial firms innovate and have made it possible for individuals to play an important role in that innovation. Producers in the Information Communication Technologies (ICT), and other sectors dealing with complex technologies with many separately patentable components, find it increasingly difficult to make products without infringing on patents held by others. Numerous overlapping patents often cover such products. Producers have developed a new way to use patents: as inclusive rights for sharing their technologies with others through cross-licensing and other private ordering arrangements in order to ensure the freedom to …

Intellectual Property Law, David Mccombs, Phillip B. Philbin, Brett Bostrom, Katharyn Zagorin

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.