Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Recent Developments In Intellectual Property Law — A 2014 Retrospective, W. Keith Robinson

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The year 2014 was an eventful one for intellectual property law. Every branch of government affected intellectual property law in one way or another. The Supreme Court ruled on several important intellectual property law cases; federal and state legislatures contemplated and enacted various new statutes that changed the intellectual property law landscape; and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office continued to implement new procedures governing the issuance and reconsideration of intellectual property rights. These events captured the consciousness of the American public and garnered significant media attention, more so than any year in recent memory. As these events proved, technological …

The Dtsa: The Litigator’S Full-Employments Act, Sharon Sandeen

Faculty Scholarship

Civil litigation is expensive, both for the party bringing suit and the party that must defend against such claims. For a variety of reasons, not the least of which are the usual requests for preliminary relief and protective orders, trade secret litigation is particularly expensive. These costs can have a crippling effect on small businesses and start-up companies that are accused of trade secret misappropriation, often resulting in litigation expenses that exceed the alleged harm to the plaintiff. Such litigation is particularly costly and unjust in cases where the plaintiff asserts rights that, due to common misunderstandings about the limited …

Association Of Molecular Pathology V. Myriad Genetics, Inc.: Determining The Scope Of The Supreme Court's Holding For Patentable Subject Matter, Ashley Winkler

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

What Is Owed: Obligation’S Relevance In Property And Intellectual Property Theory, Kali Murray

Texas A&M Journal of Property Law

This Essay explores how Gerhart’s theory of social obligation in property law offers us an innovative way to characterize key theories in patent law. Consequently, throughout this Essay, I employ lessons from patent law that provide a concrete example of how obligations may work in various doctrinal subjects. Part I outlines the basic contours of Gerhart’s theory of obligation. Part II outlines the three basic functions of obligation in property and intellectual property theory. It is hoped that this Essay will serve a substantive function by continuing the ongoing dialogue between property law and intellectual property law in ways that …

Authors Alliance: A Force To Promote Authorship For Public Good, Michael Wolfe, Adrian K. Ho

Library Faculty and Staff Publications

No abstract provided.

Restoring The Fact/Law Distinction In Patent Claim Construction, Jonas Anderson, Peter Menell

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

The Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz brings the standard of review of patent construction rulings into line with foundational juridical principles of appellate review, resolving one of the most divisive issues in patent litigation over the past two decades. This article shows that the decision's efficacy depends critically upon how district courts adapt their case management. District judges will need to implement effective procedures for ferreting out subsidiary factual disputes bearing on claim construction, scour the intrinsic evidence for contraindications, develop a sufficient evidentiary record for resolving the dispute, and explain their analysis. The article also …

Court Competition For Patent Cases, Jonas Anderson

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

The traditional academic explanation for forum shopping is simple: litigants prefer to file cases in courts that offer some substantial advantage — either legal or procedural — over all other courts. But the traditional explanation fails to account for competition for litigants among courts. This Article suggests that forum shopping in patent law is driven in part by the creation of procedural and administrative distinctions among courts that are designed to attract, or in some cases to repel, patent litigants.

This Article makes two primary contributions to the literature, one theoretical and one normative. First, it theorizes that judicial competition …

Weighing Down The Cloud: The Public Performance Right And The Internet After Aereo, Samuel J. Dykstra

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

In American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., the Supreme Court concluded that Aereo’s streaming of broadcast television programs over the Internet to its subscribers was an infringing public performance under the Copyright Act of 1976 (“Copyright Act”). The Court interpreted the “Transmit Clause” of the Copyright Act to mean that when determining whether a performance created by a transmission is to “the public” the relevant audience is not that of a particular transmission, but of the work being transmitted. Thus, it did not matter that Aereo operated by creating unique copies and via separate transmissions available to only one …

Collective Management In The European Union, Lucie Guibault, Stef Van Gompel

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

No abstract provided.

Applying Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Restrictions, Jonas Anderson

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

The US Supreme Court’s difficulty in promulgating a standard for patent-eligibility has not gone unnoticed in the academy. Hundreds of academic conferences, including this one, have been devoted to the topic. The goal of this Article is not to solve the seemingly intractable problem of patent-eligibility doctrine. The goal of this Article is rather more modest. Instead of normatively assessing patent-eligible subject matter doctrine, this Article seeks to identify which foundational theories of patent-eligible subject matter can most readily be applied by courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office via Section 101. In doing so, this Article categorizes the …

Specialized Standards Of Review, Jonas Anderson

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

The applicable standard of review on appeal is governed by a simple rule: appellate courts review questions of law de novo, questions of fact for “clear error,” and questions of discretion for “abuse of discretion.” Despite the apparent simplicity of the rule, its application has been uneven, to state it mildly. Scholars have written extensively about the application of the rule, but have yet to consider whether the traditional rule of “deference” should be altered when the appellate court is a specialized court.

Despite the dearth of legal scholarship on specialized deference, the Supreme Court is keenly interested in the …

The Federal Circuit And Ultramercial:Software And Business Method Patents Tumble Further Down The Rabbit Hole, Mark Patrick

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Tangled Web: Cross-Border Conflicts Of Copyright Law In The Age Of Internet Sharing, Elisabeth Fiordalisi

Loyola University Chicago International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fracking Fad: The Morally Ambiguous Method Of Extraction And The Trade Secret Protections Of Its Chemical Formulas, Vince Villio

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

"Hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) has taken the nation’s political soapbox by storm in the last decade, despite being in practice since the mid-20th century. The recent surge of debate comes from an increasing amount of states passing regulatory schemes for when fracking is used in the extraction of natural gas and other energy producing materials. The regulation of energy extraction has been and continues to be a state issue rather than federal. One of the major concerns of the energy industry with new regulation is the increasing demand for disclosure of the chemicals and processes used in fracking, something the industry …

Occupy Copyright: A Law & Economic Analysis Of U.S. Author Termination Rights, Kate Darling

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Inventing Around Copyright, Dan L. Burk

Northwestern University Law Review

Patent law has long harbored the concept of “inventing around,” under which competitors to a patent holder may be expected, and even encouraged, to design their technologies so as to skirt the boundaries defined by patent claims. It has become increasingly clear that, for better or for worse, copyright also fosters inventing around. Copyright is not based on written claims, but because copyright links exclusive rights to technological actions such as reproduction, distribution, or transmission, the language of the copyright statute, and judicial readings of the statute, create boundaries around which potential infringers may technologically navigate. For example, the Aereo …

Where Have All The Patent Lawyers Gone? Long Time Passing..., Kenneth L. Port, Molly R. Littman, Lucas Hjelle

Faculty Scholarship

This article pursues two distinct, but related hypotheses. First, as total LSAT takers decline, we expect to see a decline in the number of new attorneys admitted to the patent bar. Second, as the number of new patent attorneys shrinks and the number of women pursuing engineering degrees increases, we expect that the patent bar will become more female.

In order to test these hypotheses, we gathered and collated data from the Law School Admission Counsel (LSAC) regarding students taking the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), …

Intellectual Property And Gender: Reflections On Accomplishments And Methodology, Kara W. Swanson

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

The Costs And Benefits Of Regulatory Intervention In Internet Disputes: Lessons From Broadcast Signal Retransmission Consent Negotiations, Rob Frieden

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The Internet increasingly provides an alternative distribution medium for video and other types of high value, bandwidth intensive content commonly called Internet Protocol Television ("IPTV"). While many consumers have become indifferent about their wire line or wireless service provider, they expect their video service providers to offer access anytime, anywhere, via any device, and in any format. These early adopters of new technologies have no patience with the concept of "appointment television" that limits access to a specific time, presentation, and channel. My article offers a clear assessment of whether and how the FCC can resolve disputes that can prevent …

Richard Sherman, Rhetoric, And Racial Animus In The Rebirth Of The Bogeyman Myth, Nick J. Sciullo

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

After the Seattle Seahawks won the NFC Championship game, the postgame interview of Richard Sherman, a defensive back for the Seahawks, became subject to racialized discourse in the media. This article draws upon important concepts of black danger, blackness and the media, and racial animus to explain how media pundits and online commentaries about the interview have created a modem-day version of the bogeyman. In so doing, the article theorizes a new logic to racial animus-the myth of the bogeyman-to expound on the confluence of race, law, and sports. This new approach will help to explain covert racism in the …

Recovery Of Nazi-Related Art: Legal Aspects Under German And U.S. Law Exemplified By The Gurlitt Case, Michael Rebholz

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Since November 3, 2013, a case regarding Nazi-looted art-known as the Gurlitt casehas garnered the attention of the media and the art industry in both Germany and the United States. This case arose from German authority's confiscation of approximately 1500 pieces of valuable art found in Cornelius Gurlitt's apartments in Germany and Austria. He claimed that he was the legal owner of the artworks that people believed to have been destroyed during World War It. This article first answers the question of how this case would be resolved under German law by focusing primarily on the question of whether Cornelius …

Transformative Use And The Right Of Publicity: A Relationship Ready For Revision, Justin L. Rand

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The only consistency in right of publicity jurisprudence has been inconsistency. The right can be defined as the ability to control the commercial use of one's identity, and its scope has varied from state to state and era to era. While aspects of the right of publicity partially overlap with copyright and trademark, its historical origins and underlying policy justifications are distinct. Indeed, understanding the unique position of the right has become increasingly important in the digital revolution, where celebrities are vigorously fighting to protect their identities from outside, commercial exploitation. Yet, in their efforts to monetize their names, images, …

Access To Information About Lethal Injections: A First Amendment Theory Perspective On Creating A New Constitutional Right, Clay Calvert, Emma Morehart, Kéran Billaud, Kevin Bruckenstein

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article examines, through the lens of First Amendment theory, current judicial debate regarding the access rights of inmates and the public to detailed facts about lethal- injection drugs, personnel, and procedures. The article uses several 2014 appellate court disputes as analytical springboards, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s groundbreaking decision in Wood v. Ryan. The article argues that the First Amendment doctrine developed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Press-Enterprise II too narrowly cabins and confines access rights in lethal-injection data cases. In contrast, three venerable theories of free expression–the marketplace of ideas, democratic self-governance, …

Adopting Subsequent Remuneration Right In Chinese Copyright Law, Xi Chen

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

One heavily and contentiously argued clause in Chinese Copyright Law amendment drafts focuses on the practicality of granting authors of audiovisual works the legal right to collect subsequent remunerations (“SRR”) when their works are reused in subsequent exploitations. With the rapid increase of social media channels for the Chinese movie industry, and other entertainment industries relying on a heavy usage of audiovisual work, authors demand that they should be entitled to the profit earned from derivative markets and other media channels beyond the first intended market. In order to balance the conflicting interest between the author and the producer, and …

Why Should We Care What Fitbit Shares?: A Proposed Statutory Solution To Protect Sensitive Personal Fitness Information, Michelle M. Christovich

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This note examines the privacy implications of fitness trackers, devices such as Fitbit, which measure users’ movements, fitness habits, and overall health in granular detail. This note explores the privacy dangers of using fitness trackers generally and in the specific context of the workplace and Big Data. This note also draws parallels between the personal health information protected by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) and the personal fitness information collected by fitness trackers. This note argues that a statutory scheme, modeled after HIPAA, should be established in order to protect the sensitive personal fitness information gathered by …

Brief Of Thirty-Four Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Appellants: Altera Corp. V. Papst Licensing Gmbh, Christopher B. Seaman

Scholarly Articles

The amici curiae are law professors who teach and write on civil procedure and/or patent law and policy. As such, amici are interested in the effective functioning of the courts and the patent system in general. Amici believe that this Court’s rigid rule restricting personal jurisdiction in patent declaratory judgment actions both flouts Supreme Court precedent and frustrates the public policy of clearing invalid patents. Although amici hold different views on other aspects of modern patent law and policy, they are united in their professional opinion that this Court should overturn its inflexible jurisdictional rule.

Brief Amicus Curiae Of Intellectual Property Professors In Support Of Neither Party: Halo Elecs. Inc. V. Pulse Elecs. Inc. And Stryker Corp. V. Zimmer, Inc., Christopher B. Seaman, Jason Rantanen

Scholarly Articles

This amicus brief was filed on behalf of several intellectual property law professors in Halo v. Pulse and Stryker v. Zimmer regarding the appropriate standard for enhancing (increasing) damages under section 284 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 284. It advances three primary arguments. First, it asserts that in light of the history of the statutory text and judicial precedent, willful infringement is the appropriate standard (and thus the only valid basis) for awarding enhanced damages under § 284. Second, it contends that Federal Circuit’s two-part, objective/subjective test for determining willfulness articulated in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, …

Understanding Rights Reversion: When, Why, & How To Regain Copyright And Make Your Book More Available, Nicole Cabrera, Jordyn Ostroff, Brianna Schofield

Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.

Are you an author who would like to increase your book’s availability? Have you already entered into a publishing agreement for your book? If you answered “yes” to both of these questions, then read on! This guide addresses the needs of authors who wish to make their works available to a wider audience in ways that may be prohibited by the terms of their existing publishing agreements.

For example, this guide will help authors who want to do things like: • Bring their out-of-print books back into print • Publish digital versions of their books • Make their books openly …

All Your Air Right Are Belong To Us, Chad J. Pomeroy

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

Privacy and property rights are tricky subjects for a variety of reasons. One reason is that they have a unique relationship with each other, and this Article focuses on one of those areas of intersection – that of air rights and invasion of privacy. This is a timely topic due the advent of drones, and this Article will argue that drone surveillance constitutes common law trespass and that any statute or regulation that permits such activity is in derogation of common law and so should be subject to particularly careful thought and consideration.

This is not as straightforward a thesis …

What's The Harm Of Trademark Infringement?, Rebecca Tushnet

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

For decades, the concept of actionable trademark infringement has been expanding. Source confusion, reverse confusion, approval/affiliation confusion, initial interest confusion, post-sale confusion, endorsement confusion, and so on, all have won cases for plaintiffs. Whether or not the confusion cost the plaintiff any sales, or was in any way material to consumers, our concept of trademark infringement now encompasses it. These expansions occurred for reasons that seemed sufficient to courts at the time, when advocates offered theories about how all these kinds of confusion could cause harm to the trademark owner. Primarily, courts feared that non-competing uses would preclude trademark owners …