Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Comments: Avoiding Those Wearing Propeller Hats: The Use Of Blue Ribbon Juries In Complex Patent Litigation, Jordan M. Halle

University of Baltimore Law Review

I cannot stop without calling attention to the extraordinary condition of the law which makes it possible for a man without any knowledge of even the rudiments of chemistry to pass upon such questions as these... How long we shall continue to blunder along without the aid of unpartisan and authoritative scientific assistance in the administration of justice, no one knows; but all fair persons not conventionalized by provincial legal habits of mind ought, I should think, unite to effect some such advance.

Parke-Davis & Co. v. H.K. Mulford Co., 189 F. 95,115 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1911), affd in part, rev'd in …

Issues And Best Practices In Connection With Educational Resources And Other Materials In The “Cloud”, Michael Landau, Donna K. Lewis

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Step-Plus-Function Claims: An Analysis Of Federal Circuit Law, Kyle O. Logan

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Standard Essential Patents, Trolls, And The Smartphone Wars: Triangulating The End Game, Daryl Lim

Faculty Scholarly Works

Few legal issues in recent years have captured the public's attention more powerfully than litigation over standard essential patents ("SEPs"). This Article explains how SEP litigation overlaps with two other major centers of patent litigation-litigation involving smartphones and patent assertion entities ("PAEs"). It observes that attempting to pre-empt patent hold-ups by imposing blanket ex ante disclosure obligations and royalty caps on standard setting organizations ("SSOs") is misdirected and counterproductive. Instead, the solution lies in clear and balanced rules to determine "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) royalties and injunctive relief. This solution will help parties make more realistic assessments of their …

Patent Dialogue, Jonas Anderson

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

This Article examines the unique dialogic relationship that exists between the Supreme Court and Congress concerning patent law. In most areas of the law, Congress and the Supreme Court engage directly with each other to craft legal rules. When it comes to patent law, however, Congress and the Court often interact via an intermediary institution: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In patent law, dialogue often begins when Congress or the Supreme Court acts as a dialogic catalyst, signaling reform priorities to which the Federal Circuit often responds.

Appreciating the unique nature of patent dialogue has important …

Informal Deference: A Historical, Empirical, And Normative Analysis Of Patent Claim Construction, Jonas Anderson, Peter S. Menell

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

Patent scope plays a central role in the operation of the patent system, making patent claim construction a critical aspect of just about every patent litigation. With the resurgence of patent jury trials in the 1980s, the allocation of responsibility for interpreting patent claims between trial judge and jury emerged as a salient issue. While the Supreme Court’s Markman decision usefully removed claim construction from the black box of jury deliberations notwithstanding its "mongrel" mixed fact/law character, the Federal Circuit's adherence to the view that claim construction is a pure question of law subject to de novo appellate review produced …

Copyright Crime And Punishment: The First Amendment's Proportionality Problem, Margot Kaminski

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Advancing National Intellectual Property Policies In A Transnational Context, Marketa Trimble

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

How Real Is The Concern That Seed Patents Will Turn Farmers Into Inadvertent Infringers?, Christopher M. Holman

Faculty Works

The fear that farmers could be found liable for patent infringement based on the inadvertent presence of patented genetically modified plants on the farmer’s fields has led to calls for limitations on the scope and enforceability of patents. These “reforms” would be especially problematic for agricultural biotechnology companies like Monsanto, but the repercussions could be more widespread, impacting a host of important cutting-edge technologies like synthetic biology and nanotechnology. Although stories of farmers being sued by Monsanto after their fields where inadvertently contaminated by genetic drift are widely circulated, inadvertent infringement based upon genetic drift or the presence of trace …

Masthead, Volume 5 Issue 1 (2014)

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Volume 5 (2014), Case Western Reserve Journal Of Law, Technology & The Internet

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

The Exclusive Economic Zone: A 'No-Man's Land' For United States Patent Law, Matthew T. Hanna

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Use Of Technology Transfers To Promote Domestic Innovation Of Climate Change Technologies In China, Ankit Patel

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Hacking The Planet, The Dalai Lama, And You: Managing Technical Vulnerabilities In The Internet Through Polycentric Governance, Amanda Craig, Scott Shackelford

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This Article analyzes key vulnerabilities in the Internet's infrastructure, protocols, and code, and how they may be better managed through interventions at multiple levels. In particular, this Article examines the concept of polycentric governance and its applicability to technical vulnerabilities in the Internet. This theory has been championed by proponents such as Nobel Laureate Elinor Ostrom and promotes self-organization and networking regulations at multiple levels to address an array of global issues, from urban crime, to climate change and cyber attacks. However, there has not yet been a consideration of the applicability of this framework to technical Internet vulnerabilities explicitly, …

The Role Of Stare Decisis At The U.S. International Trade Commission, Justin Hendrix, P. Andrew Riley, Christine Lehman

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Protecting Cultural Heritage By Strictly Scrutinizing Museum Acquisitions, Leila Alexandra Amineddoleh

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

There are many ways to protect cultural heritage as a valuable commodity. Although heightened security measures and extensive surveillance methods can deter theft, a more effective means for reducing theft is the elimination of the demand for black market art items. Trade in unprovenanced antiquities is a demand-driven crime; the market for illegal or undocumented items is driven by buyers’ wants. The most effective method of protection for cultural heritage is to eliminate the demand for black market for these precious objects, thereby reducing the market, a method known as the “market reduction approach.” There is a well-documented link between …

Faith And Martyrdom: The Tragedy Of Aaron Swartz, Austin C. Murnane

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

“Sharing” With The Court: The Discoverability Of Private Social Media Accounts In Civil Litigation, Zoe Rosenthal

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Hazard:The California Resale Royalty Act And The Futility Of State-Level Implementation Of Droit De Suite Legislation, Nithin Kumar

Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts

Répétition d’un Ballet, the famous painting by French artist Edgar Degas, sold for $401,000 in 1965. The jubilant seller bragged that Degas originally asked a mere $100 for the painting. In his early career, celebrated American artist Norman Rockwell sold original works like Homecoming Marine and Breaking Home Ties for a few hundred dollars each. In the last decade, these paintings were resold for $9.2 million and $15.4 million at Sotheby’s auctions, but the Rockwell estate received nothing in these transactions. Over the centuries, great wealth in the arts has rarely translated into great wealth for the artist. Since …

Regulating The Unregulable: Finding The Proper Scope For Legislation To Combat Copyright Infringement On The Internet, Melis Atalay

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This note seeks to critically evaluate the current trend of copyright legislation, and use the response for legislation to hypothesize what sort copyright legislation for the Internet may be successful in the future. The SOPA/PIPA legacy provides evidence for today's legislature that broad reforms will not work. Indeed the reigning in seen in OPEN was a reflection of SOPA/PIPA progeny being responsive to public outcry over SOPA/PIPA. I conclude that OPEN would have been an appropriate balance of constriction and Internet availability. If passed, OPEN would have been a step in the right direction to combat the illegal access and …

Celebrity Politicians And Publicity Rights In The Age Of Obama, Michael G. Bennett

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The right of publicity is a relatively marginalized yet increasingly radical form of intellectual property. Typically, celebrities use it to prevent freeloaders from profiting on their fame by making unauthorized use of their image, likeness or signature to make goods or services more attractive to consumers. The right of publicity allows famous individuals to stop this type of behavior by providing a property right in identity or persona. Brandished by celebrities who are also political figures, though, the doctrine can become a powerful means of chilling political speech, and therefore a direct threat to First Amendment free speech rights. The …

Bag Men And The Ghost Of Richard Jewell: Some Legal And Ethical Lessons About Implied Defamation, Headlines, And Reporting On Breaking Criminal Activity From Barhoum V. Nyp Holdings, Clay Calvert, Daniel Axelrod, Sarah Papadelias, Linda Riedemann

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article analyzes and explores the complex issues of libel by implication and defamatory meaning raised in the ongoing libel suit of Barhoum v. NYP Holdings. The case pivots on the New York Post's "BAG MEN" cover that ran on April 18, 2013, and featured a large photo of two men cleared of wrongdoing in connection with the Boston Marathon bombing. This article, which compares and contrasts Barhoum to decisions such as Kaelin v. Globe Communications Corp. and Stanton v. Metro Corp., also examines the possible impact of the New York Post's tiny front-page disclaimer. Furthermore, this article considers how …

Rethinking Online Privacy Litigation As Google Expands Use Of Tracking: Giving Meaning To Our Online Browsing And The Federal Wiretap Act, Filip Babic

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This note will argue that Google's new privacy policies violate the Wiretap Act as amended by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act. The Wiretap Act provides a cause of action against anyone who "intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication." The Wiretap Act, originally drafted to prevent eavesdropping on telephone conversations, requires interception of the contents of communication and not merely the circumstances surrounding the communication. As Google's practices have made it easier for users to characterize their searches as the "contents of communication," the Wiretap …

Foreigners In U.S. Patent Litigation: An Empirical Study Of Patent Cases Filed In Nine U.S. Federal District Courts In 2004, 2009, And 2012, Marketa Trimble

Scholarly Works

One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against foreign (non-U.S.) infringers. Jurisdictional rules can prevent patent holders from filing patent infringement suits where they have the greatest likelihood of success in enforcement, such as where the infringer is located, has his seat, or holds his assets; instead, patent holders must file lawsuits in the country where the infringed patent was issued. But filing a patent lawsuit in a U.S. court against a non-U.S. infringer may be subject to various difficulties associated with the fact that U.S. substantive patent law (particularly as regards its …

The Territoriality Referendum, Marketa Trimble

Scholarly Works

Many Internet users have encountered geoblocking tools – tools that prevent users from accessing certain content on the Internet based on the location from which the users are connecting to the Internet. Because at least some users want to access such content, they turn to tools that enable them to evade geoblocking, to appear on the Internet as if they were located in another location, and to access the content that is available in this other location. So far these activities appear to be under the radar of intellectual property (“IP”) owners, perhaps because geoblocking evasion by users for the …

Secondary Liability, Isp Immunity, And Incumbent Entrenchment, Marketa Trimble, Salil K. Mehra

Scholarly Works

More than fifteen years have passed since the two major U.S. statutes concerning the secondary liability of Internet service providers were adopted--the Communications Decency Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The statutes have been criticized; however, very little of the criticism has come from Internet service providers, who have enjoyed the benefits of generous safe harbors and immunity from suit guaranteed by these statutes. This Article raises the question of whether these statutes contribute to incumbent entrenchment--solidifying the position of the existing Internet service providers to the detriment of potential new entrants. The current laws and industry self-regulation may …

A Material World: Using Trademark Law To Override Copyright's First Sale Rule For Imported Copies, Mary Lafrance

Scholarly Works

When the Supreme Court held that the first sale rule of copyright law permits the unauthorized importation and domestic sale of lawfully made copies of copyrighted works, regardless of where those copies were made, copyright owners lost much of their ability to engage in territorial price discrimination. Publishers, film and record producers, and software and videogame makers could no longer use copyright law to prevent the importation and domestic resale of gray market copies, and therefore could no longer protect their domestic distributors against competition from cheaper imported copies.

However, many of these copyright owners can take advantage of a …

Conferring About The Conference (Recalibrating Copyright: Continuity, Contemporary Culture, And Change), Marketa Trimble

Scholarly Works

Professor Marketa Trimble and her colleagues Professors Jessica Silbey and Aaron Perzanowski reflect on papers presented at the University of Houston Law Center's Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law's annual conference held in Spring of 2014.

Copyright Trolls And Presumptively Fair Uses, Brad A. Greenberg

University of Colorado Law Review

The "troll" label, long a staple of the patent system, had little connotation and even less application in the copyright context until 2010. That is when the so-called copyright troll emerged to acquire unenforced copyrights being infringed in the digital marketplace. Trolls threaten to chill speech and discourage innovation by exploiting copyright incentives without contributing to the market for creative works. Yet, despite the copyright troll's conspicuous arrival, little scholarship has discussed how trolls undermine copyright policy goals or potential measures for mitigating the harms they impose. This Article is the first to hone in on the fair use doctrine …

The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, And Everyday Intellectual Property, Jessica Silbey

Books

Are innovation and creativity helped or hindered by our intellectual property laws? In the two hundred plus years since the Constitution enshrined protections for those who create and innovate, we're still debating the merits of IP laws and whether or not they actually work as intended. Artists, scientists, businesses, and the lawyers who serve them, as well as the Americans who benefit from their creations all still wonder: what facilitates innovation and creativity in our digital age? And what role, if any, do our intellectual property laws play in the growth of innovation and creativity in the United States?

Incentivizing …