Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (85)
- Science and Technology Law (56)
- Computer Law (33)
- Internet Law (30)
- Communications Law (25)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (17)
- International Trade Law (16)
- International Law (14)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (10)
- Courts (10)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Legislation (7)
- Contracts (6)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Food and Drug Law (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Torts (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Business (4)
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Cultural Heritage Law (4)
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (41)
- Fordham Law School (34)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (27)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (21)
- UC Law SF (21)
-
- Santa Clara Law (17)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (16)
- University of Richmond (15)
- Marquette University Law School (14)
- American University Washington College of Law (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (12)
- Boston University School of Law (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (10)
- University of Washington School of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- University of New Hampshire (8)
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- Duke Law (7)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (4)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (44)
- Intellectual property (42)
- Patent (39)
- Trademark (28)
- Technology (22)
-
- Law (20)
- JTIP (17)
- Journal (17)
- Legal (17)
- NJTIP (17)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (17)
- Northwestern University (17)
- Northwestern University School of Law (17)
- Copyright law (16)
- Patents (14)
- Fair use (12)
- Google (12)
- Adwords (11)
- Patent law (11)
- Copyright infringement (9)
- Patent infringement (9)
- Innovation (8)
- Patentability (8)
- Federal Circuit (7)
- Infringement (7)
- Internet (7)
- Rosetta Stone (7)
- Free speech (6)
- Patent Infringement (6)
- Antitrust (5)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (34)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (33)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (29)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (19)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (19)
-
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (19)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (17)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (14)
- Articles (9)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (9)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (9)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (9)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- American University Law Review (6)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (6)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (6)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Scholarship Chronologically (5)
- William & Mary Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal (4)
- Georgia Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 300 of 410
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
The Ongoing Royalty: What Remedy Should A Patent Holder Receive When A Permanent Injunction Is Denied?, Tim Carlton
The Ongoing Royalty: What Remedy Should A Patent Holder Receive When A Permanent Injunction Is Denied?, Tim Carlton
Georgia Law Review
Until recently, when an accused patent infringer was found liable for infringement, the Federal Circuit would grant,upon request, a permanent injunction preventing the infringer from further engaging in the infringing activity. In eBay v. MercExchange, the Supreme Court, in a rare review of a patent case, changed the Federal Circuit's standard of automatically granting permanent injunctions upon a finding of infringement. As a result, district courts are faced with a new dilemma: How should damages be calculated when a permanent injunction is denied? Some district courts that denied the patent holder's request for a permanent injunction have imposed an ongoing …
Gone In Sixty Milliseconds: Trademark Law And Cognitive Science, Rebecca Tushnet
Gone In Sixty Milliseconds: Trademark Law And Cognitive Science, Rebecca Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Trademark dilution is a cause of action for interfering with the uniqueness of a trademark. For example, consumers would probably not think that "Kodak soap" was produced by the makers of Kodak cameras, but its presence in the market would diminish the uniqueness of the original Kodak mark. Trademark owners think dilution is harmful but have had difficulty explaining why. Many courts have therefore been reluctant to enforce dilution laws, even while legislatures have enacted more of them over the past half century. Courts and commentators have now begun to use psychological theories, drawing on associationist models of cognition, to …
The True Colors Of Trademark Law: Greenlighting A Red Tide Of Anti Competition Blues, Ann Bartow
The True Colors Of Trademark Law: Greenlighting A Red Tide Of Anti Competition Blues, Ann Bartow
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tearing Fashion Design Protection Apart At The Seams, Lisa J. Hedrick
Tearing Fashion Design Protection Apart At The Seams, Lisa J. Hedrick
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pre-Commencement Discovery And The Odex Litigation: Copyright Versus Confidentiality Or Is It Privacy?, Sze Shun, George Wei
Pre-Commencement Discovery And The Odex Litigation: Copyright Versus Confidentiality Or Is It Privacy?, Sze Shun, George Wei
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
This article examines whether internet service providers are under any duty to disclose the names of subscribers whose accounts can be shown to be associated with infringing activity. This question involves tension between the economic interests of copyright owners/licensees, the privacy interests of internet users and the economic interests of the internet service provider. This tension in turn raises age-old problems of balance and proportionality between privacy, confidentiality and other competing rights and freedoms as well as the interests of society at large. The article concludes by briefly touching on privacy areas from outside of copyright and the Internet: including …
Identifying And Keeping The Genie In The Bottle: The Practical And Legal Realities Of Trade Secrets In Bankruptcy Proceedings, Sharon Sandeen
Identifying And Keeping The Genie In The Bottle: The Practical And Legal Realities Of Trade Secrets In Bankruptcy Proceedings, Sharon Sandeen
Faculty Scholarship
Anyone who has been paid attention to developments in the world of business over the past quarter century can attest to the fact that intellectual property (IP) is a hot commodity. Indeed, in contrast to the companies that emerged out of the Industrial Revolution, the companies that have spawned as part of the so-called “Information Age” attribute much of their value and future prospects to intangible, rather than tangible, assets. Unfortunately, while bankruptcy courts have generally recognized the need to distinguish between tangible and intangible assets, particularly when determining whether a claim is secured or unsecured, they often fail to …
Trademarks And The Beijing Olympics: Gold Medal Challenges, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 433 (2008), Doris E. Long
Trademarks And The Beijing Olympics: Gold Medal Challenges, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 433 (2008), Doris E. Long
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
There is no question that the Summer Olympics in Beijing pose a tremendous marketing opportunity. They also pose a great opportunity for the development of effective techniques for enforcing intellectual property rights. China has already enacted special regulations governing the protection of Olympic symbols and has established special regulations governing the enforcement of those regulations. Yet many of the cultural and political issues that impact China’s enforcement activities in other arenas (including counterfeiting and piracy of IP protected goods and services) remain problematic. Furthermore, while the Olympic symbols may be the subject of heightened protection, cultural perceptions of the differences …
Virtual China, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 469 (2008), Steven Hetcher
Virtual China, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 469 (2008), Steven Hetcher
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Although the Chinese government has devoted significant resources to censoring the online activities of its citizens, it may soon be facing a new challenge. Virtual-world computer games in which player controlled personas interact in cyberspace are growing in both sophistication and popularity. In such games, the very actions of the characters may represent banned themes which unfold in real time. These lucrative games do not lend themselves to the traditional text-based censorship techniques and site blocking may not be feasible for economic reasons. A deeper understanding of the threat virtual-world gaming represents to Chinese censorship efforts can be gained by …
Striking The "Rights" Balance Among Private Private Incentives And Public Fair Uses In The United States And China, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 488 (2008), Llewellyn Joseph Gibbons, Xiao Li Wang
Striking The "Rights" Balance Among Private Private Incentives And Public Fair Uses In The United States And China, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 488 (2008), Llewellyn Joseph Gibbons, Xiao Li Wang
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Any economically efficient intellectual property rights system must contain a balance between the required creativity and innovation needed to obtain the intellectual property rights and the economic investment needed to obtain that level of creativity. Most intellectual property rights systems are uniform across all industries. However, this results in inefficiencies in certain industries that may need more or less intellectual property rights protection than others. Governments that attempt to correct the inefficiencies can create long-term consequences in the quality or quantity of new creative works. On one hand, granting more intellectual property rights to certain industries may result in spoilage …
The Controversy Surrounding Continuing Applications And Requests For Continued Examination, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 545 (2008), Scott D. Barnett
The Controversy Surrounding Continuing Applications And Requests For Continued Examination, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 545 (2008), Scott D. Barnett
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On August 21, 2007, the USPTO published new rules altering the manner in which continuing applications and requests for continued examination could be filed. These new rules represented a drastic departure from traditional practice, and consequently, generated a considerable reaction from the patent community. While some members of the patent community supported the new rules, many others felt that the rules would be insufficient in promoting the USPTO’s goals, and served mainly as an unnecessary roadblock to good-faith patent prosecution. Prior to the rules going into effect, they were challenged in the case Tafas v. Dudas. In Tafas, the district …
Why Pay For What's Free?: Minimizing The Patent Threat To Free And Open Source Software, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 595 (2008), Kirk D. Rowe
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The growing popularity of free and open source software as a viable alternative to proprietary software has made it an unwitting participant in an inevitable intellectual property law confrontation that will pit patent against copyright. Where proprietary software is primarily protected by patents, which seek to exclude others from the use of specific ideas, open source software utilizes a variation of copyright protection, which seeks to force the inclusion rather than the exclusion of third parties’ access to expression. Because these methods of protection are as different as the software models themselves, it is difficult to predict the outcome of …
Copyright Misuses, Fair Use, And Abuse: How Sports And Media Companies Are Overreaching Their Copyright Protections, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 621 (2008), Cory Tadlock
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
A recent FTC complaint has generated questions about the legality and effects of blanket copyright warnings issued by large sports and media companies. Copyright warnings from the NFL, MLB, and major motion picture studios often assert that no use whatsoever of their materials can be made without express permission, contrary to several provisions of U.S. copyright law. This comment proposes limiting the content and language of such warnings so consumers have a clearer view of what copyright law allows, and are not intimidated into foregoing their rights to use protected works. Exceptions like fair use and the idea-expression dichotomy prevent …
Chief Judge Paul R. Michel's Address To The Federal Circuit Judicial Conference On The State Of The Court, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 647 (2008), Paul R. Michel
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On May 15, 2008, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Paul R. Michel delivered the annual State of the Court speech. Chief Judge Michel delivered this speech during the Federal Circuit Judicial Conference, held at the Grand Hyatt hotel in Washington. The text of that speech and the corresponding graphics appear here.
Protection Of U.S. Trade Secret Assets: Critical Amendments To The Economic Espionage Act Of 1996, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 656 (2008), R. Mark Halligan
Protection Of U.S. Trade Secret Assets: Critical Amendments To The Economic Espionage Act Of 1996, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 656 (2008), R. Mark Halligan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In order to protect the economic interests of the United States, the Economic Espionage Act was enacted in 1996. Although intended to prevent and deter trade secret theft, the EEA is limited to criminal prosecutions. Critical amendments to the EEA are required to create a civil cause of action in the new information-based economy and the international marketplace. The following proposed amendments to the EEA provide a federal civil cause of action, allowing companies to protect trade secret assets and to ensure the continued growth and protection of trade secret assets in the international marketplace.
Post-Quanta, Post-Sale Patentee Controls, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 682 (2008), Harold C. Wegner
Post-Quanta, Post-Sale Patentee Controls, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 682 (2008), Harold C. Wegner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., the Supreme Court recalibrated the balance between the rights of a patentee to contractually control the post-sale transfer and the use of patented goods. Specifically, the Court extended the doctrine of patent exhaustion to cover the exhaustion of patents not recited in the license, as well as the practice of technology that does not infringe any patent, but which can only be used in a manner by customers that would infringe a patent. While Quanta arose out of facts concerning computer technology, the implications of this decision will be widespread, permeating diverse …
Throwing Judge Bryson's Curveball: A Pro Patent View Of Process Claims As Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 701 (2008), Christopher A. Harkins
Throwing Judge Bryson's Curveball: A Pro Patent View Of Process Claims As Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 701 (2008), Christopher A. Harkins
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Can a baseball pitcher patent a method of throwing a curveball? On May 8, 2008, Judge Bryson posed that hypothetical as a way of stressing a point during the oral argument of In re Bilski, one of the most highly-attended hearings in the twenty-five year history of the Federal Circuit. In the Bilski case, the Federal Circuit will decide whether to embrace a new patentability test that redefines what is patent-eligible subject matter in the United States, or to create a fourth no-no to patent eligibility. At stake are many computer software patents and business method patents that form the …
Honoring Trademarks: The Battle To Preserve Native American Imagery In The National Collegiate Athletic Association, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 735 (2008), Ian Botnick
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On August 5, 2005, the National Collegiate Athletic Association introduced its plan to end the use of Native American mascots, nicknames and imagery. Schools were required to change their offensive nicknames and mascots and were forced to stop using trademarks bearing Native American imagery. The NCAA ban presents the question of whether schools affected by the ban can bring a trademark action against the NCAA. One interpretation of trademark law provides a school with no redress because the NCAA has not created a competing mark. However, the other interpretation of trademark law provides a school with a valid trademark claim …
Must The Jury Reach A Verdict? The Constitutionality Of Eliminating Juries In Patent Trials By Creating An Article I Tribunal, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 754 (2008), Daniel P. Sullivan
Must The Jury Reach A Verdict? The Constitutionality Of Eliminating Juries In Patent Trials By Creating An Article I Tribunal, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 754 (2008), Daniel P. Sullivan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The February 2007 jury verdict against Microsoft totaling $1.52 billion marked the largest in a patent case ever, following the prevailing trend of juries awarding extraordinarily high damages. Because patent law deals with complex technology and complicated issues of fact and law, and because empirical evidence concludes that juries have significant biases in favor of patentees and against alleged infringers, this comment calls into question whether or not twelve lay persons are sufficiently equipped to handle patent trials. In lieu of juries rendering verdicts in patent trials – and even in lieu of U.S. District Court judges adjudicating patent trials …
The Uneven Application Of Twombly In Patent Cases: An Argument For Leveling The Playing Field, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2008), R. David Donoghue
The Uneven Application Of Twombly In Patent Cases: An Argument For Leveling The Playing Field, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2008), R. David Donoghue
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Supreme Court's recent Twombly decision has tightened pleading standards by retiring Conley v. Gibson’s “no set of facts” language. While Twombly has been applied beyond antitrust law, its impact on patent pleadings is not yet settled. Currently, a troubling dichotomy has emerged: lower courts are holding defendants to a heightened pleading standard for affirmative defenses and counterclaims, while allowing plaintiffs to continue the pre-Twombly “bare-bones” pleadings practice. This dichotomy is inconsistent with the Twombly Court’s goal of controlling the ballooning size of and costs of complex civil litigation. Holding patent plaintiffs to a heightened pleading standard would be at …
What The Story Of The Invention Of The Transistor Teaches Us About 21st Century Patent Practice, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 80 (2008), Lawrence B. Ebert
What The Story Of The Invention Of The Transistor Teaches Us About 21st Century Patent Practice, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 80 (2008), Lawrence B. Ebert
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In 1947, scientists at Bell Laboratories internally disclosed a remarkable new invention that would later become known as the “transistor.” Following the initial disclosure, Bell Labs methodically planned and facilitated the patenting, publication, and licensing of this new technology. The manner in which Bell Labs handled the disclosure and licensing of this pioneering invention provides a template that present-day inventors would be well-advised to emulate.
Sacking Super Sack: Using Existing Rules To Prevent Patentees From Fleeing An Improvident Patent Infringement Lawsuit, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 90 (2008), Vangelis Economou
Sacking Super Sack: Using Existing Rules To Prevent Patentees From Fleeing An Improvident Patent Infringement Lawsuit, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 90 (2008), Vangelis Economou
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Federal Circuit’s Super Sack decision is striking: a patentee’s covenant-not-to-sue for infringement divested the court of subject-matter jurisdiction in deciding the invalidity counterclaim. However, the intent and spirit of the Declaratory Judgment Act and of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) suggest that Super Sack may have missed the mark. An in-depth analysis of the Declaratory Judgment Act, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and post-Super Sack patent cases reveals numerous policy reasons for the Federal Circuit to overturn Super Sack.
The Computer Fraud And Abuse Act: A Vehicle For Litigating Trade Secrets In Federal Court, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 155 (2008), Graham M. Liccardi
The Computer Fraud And Abuse Act: A Vehicle For Litigating Trade Secrets In Federal Court, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 155 (2008), Graham M. Liccardi
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Federal jurisdictions are split on the reach of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) in situations where computer-stored trade secrets are stolen by former employees who possessed authorization to access and use the trade secret information. This comment explores both the broad and narrow interpretations of the CFAA. It proposes that courts adopt the broad interpretation, which includes principles of agency law, in order to determine when an employee is “without authorization” under the CFAA. Courts should also adopt the broad interpretation in situations where trade secrets are stolen because an employee is only granted a “limited license” to …
An Immoral Fight: Shielding Moral Rights With First Amendment Jurisprudence When Fair Use Battles With Actual Malice, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 190 (2008), Mark A. Petrolis
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Moral rights give an artist personal rights to her work. Because an artist puts her personality, spirit, and soul into the creation of her work, her honor and reputation may be harmed if her works are mistreated. In 1990, the Visual Artists Rights Act incorporated moral rights into U.S. copyright law. However, fair use became an absolute defense to moral rights violations. This comment proposes that fair use should not be an absolute defense, and applies First Amendment jurisprudence developed from defamation law to both fair use and moral rights. Defamation shares similarities with both. Like moral rights, defamation law …
The Curse Of "Copying", 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 296 (2008), Kenneth R. Adamo, Ryan B. Mccrum, Susan M. Gerber
The Curse Of "Copying", 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 296 (2008), Kenneth R. Adamo, Ryan B. Mccrum, Susan M. Gerber
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The concept of “copying” has long been involved with various aspects of intellectual property law, particularly in regard to patents and trademarks. In the absence of legally determined exclusive rights, “copying” is permitted, and is in fact, encouraged. However, because the term “copying” carries an undercurrent of disapproval and unfavorable practices, it is a favorite of patentees looking to portray an accused infringer in the most negative light, especially before a jury. Hence, the curse of “copying.” This article will review the current state of “copying” by addressing the substantive precedent in areas where “copying” has traditionally had a substantive …
Feca Matter: An Epic Copyright Infringement Trial, Congressional Interference, And The Diminution Of Moral Rights In The United States Of America, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 376 (2008), Jacob Armstrong
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Film directors suffered a setback in their collective efforts to maintain the integrity of their films after they are released to the public. In 2005, Congress passed the Family Entertainment Copyright Act, which contained the Family Movie Act, a piece of safe harbor legislation designed to save certain businesses and business practices from ongoing litigation. This Act was not only legislative interference with an ongoing trial, but also served to remove the topic of moral rights from public dialogue. Repealing the Family Movie Act would be a step towards affording directors the ability to prevent misattribution and mutilation of their …
Making A Federal Case For Copyrighting Stage Directions: Einhorn V. Mergatroyd Productions, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 393 (2008), Jennifer J. Maxwell
Making A Federal Case For Copyrighting Stage Directions: Einhorn V. Mergatroyd Productions, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 393 (2008), Jennifer J. Maxwell
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
To date, no court has ruled on whether stage directions are copyrightable. Einhorn v. Mergatroyd Productions is the most recent case to directly address the copyrightability of stage directions and blocking scripts. However, the court was unable to decide the copyright issue because both parties to the suit failed to address a series of questions necessary to the resolution of the claim. Nonetheless, the Einhorn decision gives hope to future directors because it highlights the issues crucial to proving a case of copyright infringement of stage directions. This comment advocates for the copyright protection of stage directions that fulfill the …
Perfect 10 V. Visa: The Future Of Contributory Copyright Infringement, James M. Tilly
Perfect 10 V. Visa: The Future Of Contributory Copyright Infringement, James M. Tilly
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Defending The Public Domain—The First Amendment, The Copyright Power, And The Potential Of Golan V. Gonzales, J. Blake Pinard
Defending The Public Domain—The First Amendment, The Copyright Power, And The Potential Of Golan V. Gonzales, J. Blake Pinard
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bill Graham Archives V. Dorling Kindersley Limited : The Ever-Changing Face Of The Fair Use Defense, Christina Alvarado
Bill Graham Archives V. Dorling Kindersley Limited : The Ever-Changing Face Of The Fair Use Defense, Christina Alvarado
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patents Of Damocles, Christopher R. Leslie