Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (90)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (89)
- Internet Law (79)
- Computer Law (55)
- Communications Law (31)
-
- International Law (30)
- Law and Economics (28)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (25)
- International Trade Law (25)
- Privacy Law (24)
- Legislation (23)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (21)
- Constitutional Law (18)
- Law and Society (17)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (16)
- Supreme Court of the United States (14)
- Commercial Law (12)
- Contracts (12)
- Courts (12)
- Food and Drug Law (12)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Economics (11)
- Legal History (11)
- Administrative Law (10)
- Legal Education (9)
- Business Organizations Law (8)
- Property Law and Real Estate (8)
- Institution
-
- BLR (77)
- Fordham Law School (34)
- UIC School of Law (34)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (33)
- University of Michigan Law School (27)
-
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (21)
- Marquette University Law School (19)
- UC Law SF (16)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (15)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (14)
- University of Richmond (14)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (9)
- University of New Hampshire (8)
- Columbia Law School (7)
- Duke Law (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- University of Washington School of Law (7)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (6)
- Boston University School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- Santa Clara Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- University of Maine School of Law (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual Property Law (83)
- Copyright (62)
- Intellectual property (56)
- Patent (34)
- Law and Technology (30)
-
- Internet (24)
- Technology (23)
- Trademark (23)
- Patents (22)
- Fair use (21)
- Science and Technology (21)
- Law and Economics (20)
- Copyright law (19)
- Software (19)
- International Law (17)
- Infringement (15)
- Law and Society (15)
- Licensing (15)
- Computer Law (14)
- Continuing legal education (13)
- Copyright infringement (13)
- Database (13)
- Economics (13)
- Intranet (13)
- Journal (13)
- Law (13)
- Legal (13)
- Legal careers (13)
- Management (13)
- Marketing (13)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (77)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (33)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (28)
- Faculty Scholarship (27)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (21)
-
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (19)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (16)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (15)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (13)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (13)
- Faculty Publications (11)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (11)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (11)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (9)
- Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal (8)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles (7)
- Cardozo Law Review (6)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (6)
- American University Law Review (5)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (4)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (4)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (4)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (4)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (3)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 491
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
The Intellectual Property Marketplace: Past, Present And Future, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 605 (2006), James E. Malackowski
The Intellectual Property Marketplace: Past, Present And Future, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 605 (2006), James E. Malackowski
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article provides an overview of the evolution of the intellectual property marketplace, describes existing mechanisms by which intellectual property value is transacted, and hypothesizes future marketplace mechanisms. A discussion of intellectual property value is also presented. Specifically, analyses of value indications as evidenced by the public and private equity markets are described. Finally, two future critical issues for intellectual property practitioners relating to intellectual property value are described: class action shareholder litigation and royalty stacking.
Traditional Knowledge And The Fight For The Public Domain, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 317 (2006), Doris E. Long
Traditional Knowledge And The Fight For The Public Domain, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 317 (2006), Doris E. Long
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
What are the challenges facing the protection of traditional knowledge internationally? Can the protection of such rights, which have traditionally existed outside the boundaries of intellectual property, be achieved in the face of current challenges to protections epitomized by such emerging international movements as enhanced access to information and culture as a human right? This article examines some of the emerging issues in this hotly contested area and suggests that such movements, which are not adverse to intellectual property and traditional knowledge rights, should be used to craft a new method for addressing the issue of traditional knowledge protection internationally.
Patent Cooperation Treaty – Implementation V. U.S. Law, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 641 (2006), Richard Lazarus
Patent Cooperation Treaty – Implementation V. U.S. Law, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 641 (2006), Richard Lazarus
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
What ways can an individual attack the enforceability of a patent that relies on the benefit of an earlier filed Patent Cooperation Treaty application (“PCT”)? This article highlights the top five PCT issues that an attorney should look for to successfully defend a client against infringement. The strategies discussed include: (1) searching for new matter; (2) searching for errors in inventorship; (3) examining an international filing date; (4) checking for withdrawal of an international application; and (5) examining estoppel arguments in international applications.
Recent Developments In Patent Law, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 630 (2006), Bradley C. Wright
Recent Developments In Patent Law, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 630 (2006), Bradley C. Wright
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Over the past year, the United States patent law has developed significantly. Numerous cases were decided, shaping the future of patent law. This article tracks the development of patent law over the past year by analyzing important court decisions. These decisions affect various aspects of patent law, including the patentability of subject matter, the validity of patents, and the patent procurement process. While the specific impact of each decision varies, the combination of the decisions resulted in noteworthy changes to patent law in the United States.
The Impact Of The New World Order On Economic Development: The Role Of The Intellectual Property Rights System, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2006), Joseph Straus
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article provides a close look at the development of intellectual property protection contrasted with the development of globalization. Specifically, the agreements forming the legal framework of the World Trade Organization are discussed and their impact on the economic development of developing countries examined. A closer look is given to China and India, where only recently intellectual property protection standards complying with mandatory rules of the TRIPS Agreement have been introduced, and where the most remarkable economic, scientific, and technological development can be observed. This article emphasizes the necessity of all members of the World Trade Organization to comply with …
The Wipo "Internet Treaties" The United States As The Driver: The United States As The Main Source Of Obstruction — As Seen By An Anti-Revolutionary Central European, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 17 (2006), Mihály Ficsor
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The copyright policy of the United States developed from initial isolationism, through the 1891 Chase Act, various bilateral and inter-American agreements and the establishment of the Universal Copyright Convention, to active participation in the international copyright cooperation. This development was completed by the United States’ accession to the Berne Convention in 1988. Since then, the United States has played a leading role in this field, which was manifested both during the negotiations of the 1994 TRIPS Agreement and the preparatory work of the two 1996 WIPO “Internet Treaties”, the WCT and the WPPT. These WIPO Treaties, the preparation and adoption …
Recent Developments In Copyright Law: Selected U.S. Supreme Court, Court Of Appeals, And District Court Opinions Between February 1, 2005 And May 1, 2006, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 40 (2006), Tyler T. Ochoa
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article highlights nine selected U.S. copyright law decisions handed down between February 1, 2005 and May 1, 2006. Two of the decisions concern peer-to-peer file sharing, including the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in MGM v. Grokster. One of the decisions questions the applicability of the idea/expression dichotomy to works of visual art. Two of the decisions discuss ownership of the renewal rights in a work under the 1909 Act when the author is deceased. One of the decisions interprets the requirement that an author register his or her work before filing an infringement action. Two of the decisions …
The Cache Cow: Can Caching And Copyright Co-Exist?, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 101 (2006), Nicole Bashor
The Cache Cow: Can Caching And Copyright Co-Exist?, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 101 (2006), Nicole Bashor
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Copyright protection in a digital environment is difficult. Protection is made more difficult because of the scope of the Internet, uncertainty of a governing Internet agency, and copyright enforcement problems. Copyright protection is further complicated because search engines utilize a process involving copying web sites and displaying cached links to web sites without the web site owner's express permission. By analyzing the intersection of copyright law and the search engine caching process, it is clear that search engines are on dangerous ground and possibly violate the copyrights of web site owners. Accordingly, a solution is proposed that compensates web site …
Why Bother Calling Patents Property? The Government's Path To License Any Patent And Maybe Pay For It, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 151 (2006), Bradley M. Taub
Why Bother Calling Patents Property? The Government's Path To License Any Patent And Maybe Pay For It, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 151 (2006), Bradley M. Taub
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In 2006 the Federal Circuit in Zoltek Corp. v. United States denied a patent owner the basic protections of the Constitution. In 2005 the United States Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London effectively wrote the Public Use Clause out of the Fifth Amendment. This comment focuses on the constitutional and statutory rights of patent owners in light of Zoltek, Kelo, and 28 U.S.C. § 1498. After Zoltek and Kelo several questions remain, which this comment asks and analyzes. First, can the Federal Government unilaterally take a patent owner’s patent reasoning the taking benefits the economy, public safety, …
Recent Developments In Trade Secrets Law, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 59 (2006), R. Mark Halligan
Recent Developments In Trade Secrets Law, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 59 (2006), R. Mark Halligan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
As companies are increasingly trying to protect information by designating it as a trade secret, courts are increasingly trying to resolve litigation disputes relating to trade secrets misappropriation issues. Trends have emerged from these court cases, further defining the limits of trade secrets protection and attempting to carve out uniform rules concerning such protection. This article highlights some of the most interesting and recent developments in Trade Secrets Law.
The Patent Reform Act’S Proposed First-To-File Standard: Needed Reform Or Constitutional Blunder?, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 129 (2006), Karen E. Simon
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2005 would bring U.S. patent law into harmony with most other countries by adopting a first-to-file standard for determining patent rights. This comment questions whether overturning the first-to-invent standardand two hundred years of settled law is permissible under the Patent Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The comment concludes that the Patent Reform Act of 2005, as proposed, violates the Constitution, and supports its argument by placing intocontext of the founding fathers fear of extending government monopolies. The comment proposes that Congress focus on procedural reform, and not change thefundamental standard for awarding patent rights.
“One For All: The Problem Of Uniformity Cost In Intellectual Property Law.” American University Law Review 55, No.4 (May 2006): 845-900., Michael W. Carroll
“One For All: The Problem Of Uniformity Cost In Intellectual Property Law.” American University Law Review 55, No.4 (May 2006): 845-900., Michael W. Carroll
American University Law Review
Intellectual property law protects the owner of each patented invention or copyrighted work of authorship with a largely uniform set of exclusive rights. In the modern context, it is clear that innovators' needs for intellectual property protection vary substantially across industries and among types of innovation. Applying a socially costly, uniform solution to problems of differing magnitudes means that the law necessarily imposes uniformity cost by underprotecting those who invest in certain costly innovations and overprotecting those with low innovation costs or access to alternative appropriability mechanisms. This Article argues that reducing uniformity cost is the central problem for intellectual …
From Pirates To Partners (Episode Ii): Protecting Intellectual Property In Post-Wto China, Peter K. Yu
From Pirates To Partners (Episode Ii): Protecting Intellectual Property In Post-Wto China, Peter K. Yu
American University Law Review
In From Pirates to Partners: Protecting Intellectual Property in China in the Twenty-First Century, I criticized the ineffectiveness and short-sightedness of the U.S.-China intellectual property policy. As I argued, the approach taken by the administration in the 1980s and early 1990s had created a cycle of futility in which China and the United States repeatedly threatened each other with trade wars only to back down in the eleventh hour with a compromise that did not provide sustainable improvements in intellectual property protection. Since I wrote that article five years ago, China has joined the WTO and undertook a complete overhaul …
The Saga Of A Song: Authorship And Ownership In The Case Of ‘Guantanamera’, Peter L. Manuel
The Saga Of A Song: Authorship And Ownership In The Case Of ‘Guantanamera’, Peter L. Manuel
Publications and Research
No abstract provided.
What Do We Owe Each Other In The Global Economic Order?: Constructivist And Contractualist Accounts, John Linarelli
What Do We Owe Each Other In The Global Economic Order?: Constructivist And Contractualist Accounts, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
No legal system deserving of continued support can exist without an adequate theory of justice. A world trade constitution cannot credibly exist without a clear notion of justice upon which to base a consensus. This paper examines two accounts of fairness found in moral philosophy, those of John Rawls and Tim Scanlon. The Rawlsian theory of justice is well-known to legal scholars. Scanlon's contractualist account may be less well-known. The aim of the paper is to start the discussion as to how fairness theories can be used to develop the tools for examining international economic policies and institutions. After elaborating …
Video Game Music: Where It Came From, How It Is Being Used Today, And Where It Is Heading Tomorrow, Michael Cerrati
Video Game Music: Where It Came From, How It Is Being Used Today, And Where It Is Heading Tomorrow, Michael Cerrati
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
This article addresses the many facets of the video game industry and the exceptional role that music has played and continues to play in this expanding industry. Part I tracks the history of music's role as video games developed over the years. Part II discusses the manner in which music is obtained for use in video games and the contractual setting in which this takes place. Part III comments on the current state of the video game industry, exploring ways to shift the paradigm from one that is publicity-driven, to one that recognizes the importance of music. The final section, …
All Mixed Up: Bridgeport Music V. Dimension Films And De Minimis Digital Sampling, Jennifer R. R. Mueller
All Mixed Up: Bridgeport Music V. Dimension Films And De Minimis Digital Sampling, Jennifer R. R. Mueller
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Metaphor, Objects, And Commodities, George H. Taylor, Michael J. Madison
Metaphor, Objects, And Commodities, George H. Taylor, Michael J. Madison
Cleveland State Law Review
As its two main Parts will evidence, this Comment remains the product of two distinct if overlapping voices. Part II returns to the conceptual origins of Radin's theory in her general critique of objectification and commodification. It asks whether a more positive concept of objectification can be recovered that is distinguishable from reification, the latter seeming to be the more appropriate locus of Radin's criticism. Part III's response to Radin is similar, but it tries to exemplify both our appreciation of and our differences from her work through more detailed analysis of intellectual property law and theory.
The Experimental Use Exception To Patent Infringement: Do Universities Deserve Special Treatment?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
The Experimental Use Exception To Patent Infringement: Do Universities Deserve Special Treatment?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
UF Law Faculty Publications
The experimental use exception is a common law exception to the patent-holder's exclusive right of use. It permits the use of another's patented device when such use is for philosophical inquiry, curiosity, or amusement. It has recently come under attack by many who consider it too narrow. They fear that the courts' "narrowing" of the experimental use exception will stifle research and innovation. Much of the discontent with the doctrine has been spurred by a relatively recent Federal Circuit opinion, Madey v. Duke University, which makes clear that a research university does not receive immunity under the experimental use …
Review Of Legal Issues In Electronic Commerce, 2nd Edition (Concord, Ontario: Captus Press, 2005), Chidi Oguamanam
Review Of Legal Issues In Electronic Commerce, 2nd Edition (Concord, Ontario: Captus Press, 2005), Chidi Oguamanam
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
This collection of materials is part of the Canadian Legal Studies Series. According to the publishers, the objective of the Series is to offer ‘‘a wealth of carefully selected, and up-to-date examinations of Canadian legal issues’’. The first of such collections under the same title appeared in 2002. According to Takach, one of the dynamics of computer, and indeed information technology, law is rapid change in technology trends. Thus, after two years, technological developments and corresponding legal responses on the subject of electronic commerce warrant a new edition of materials of this nature.
Calibrating Patent Lifetimes, Eric E. Johnson
Calibrating Patent Lifetimes, Eric E. Johnson
Faculty Articles
The patent system could better achieve its primary mission of incentivizing technological innovation by moving away from the onesize-fits-all 20-year term for patents and moving to a system of varying durations for different categories of invention. The current patent duration is arbitrary, the result of entrenched historical accident. Allowing upward variance from the 20-year term in discrete categories of invention offers the prospect of boosting innovation in impoverished technological sectors. Allowing downward variance in other categories would benefit overall social welfare by removing needless technological monopolization and associated deadweight loss. Current economic models and available economic data do not allow …
Rules V. Standards For Patent Law In The Plant Sciences, Mark D. Janis
Rules V. Standards For Patent Law In The Plant Sciences, Mark D. Janis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article argues that US patent jurisprudence as applied to the plant sciences is moving to a second stage that will be characterized by more by incremental calibration than by spectacular change. The article discusses two doctrines of patent scope that are likely to be implicated in calibrating the utility patent system for the plant sciences: enablement and experimental use. It considers how those doctrines may be refined to serve as calibration tools in the application of patent law to the plant sciences.
Indiana Law In Evolution, Yvonne Cripps
Indiana Law In Evolution, Yvonne Cripps
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Patent Cooperation Treaty: At The Center Of The International Patent System, Jay Erstling
The Patent Cooperation Treaty: At The Center Of The International Patent System, Jay Erstling
Faculty Scholarship
In view of the fact that the PCT is composed of almost 130 countries and that more than 100 national and regional patent offices, as well as WIPO itself, perform PCT functions, it is remarkable that the system operates so smoothly and continues to gain momentum. Perhaps the system’s greatest strength comes from the immense diversity of legal, linguistic, and national cultures that constitute the PCT. While the system has served to harmonize divergent practices, it has also been obliged to accommodate to the sometimes inflexible peculiarities of national law and procedure. The PCT’s ability to strike a balance between …
Copyright And Trademark Legal Research, Terrance K. Manion, Colleen C. Williams
Copyright And Trademark Legal Research, Terrance K. Manion, Colleen C. Williams
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
Paying For Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement As A Regulatory Design Problem, C. Scott Hemphill
Paying For Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement As A Regulatory Design Problem, C. Scott Hemphill
Center for Contract and Economic Organization
Over the past decade, drug makers have settled patent litigation by making large payments to potential rivals who, in turn, abandon suits that (if successful) would increase competition. Because such "pay-for-delay" settlements postpone the possibility of competitive entry, they have attracted the attention of antitrust enforcement authorities, courts, and commentators. Pay-for-delay settlements not only constitute a problem of immense practical importance in antitrust enforcement, but also pose a general dilemma about the proper balance between innovation and consumer access.
This Article examines the pay-for-delay dilemma as a problem in regulatory design. A full analysis of the relevant industry-specific regulatory statute, …
Academic Discourse And Proprietary Rights: Putting Patents In Their Proper Place, Margo A. Bagley
Academic Discourse And Proprietary Rights: Putting Patents In Their Proper Place, Margo A. Bagley
Faculty Articles
This Article provides a fresh perspective on the Bayh-Dole debate by focusing on the impact of patent novelty rules on academic discourse. The Article proposes that to begin to reverse an observed deterioration in disclosure norms, flexibilities must be built into the patent system so that patents can be facilitators of the academic knowledge dissemination enterprise. In particular, the Article advocates creation of an opt-in extended grace period that would provide more time for academic researchers to publish and present early-stage research before having to file a patent application. Such an extension, coupled with early application publication, would both address …
Beyond Abstraction: The Law And Economics Of Copyright Scope And Doctrinal Efficiency, Matthew Sag
Beyond Abstraction: The Law And Economics Of Copyright Scope And Doctrinal Efficiency, Matthew Sag
Faculty Articles
Uncertainty as to the optimum extent of protection generally limits the capacity of law and economics to translate economic theory into coherent doctrinal recommendations in the realm of copyright. This Article explores the relationship between copyright scope, doctrinal efficiency, and welfare from a theoretical perspective to develop a framework for evaluating specific doctrinal recommendations in copyright law.
The usefulness of applying this framework in either rejecting or improving doctrinal recommendations is illustrated with reference to the predominant law and economics theories of fair use. The metric-driven analysis adopted in this Article demonstrates the general robustness of the market-failure approach to …
Plagiarism In Cyberspace: Learning The Rules Of Recycling Content With A View Towards Nurturing Academic Trust In An Electronic World, Deborah R. Gerhardt
Plagiarism In Cyberspace: Learning The Rules Of Recycling Content With A View Towards Nurturing Academic Trust In An Electronic World, Deborah R. Gerhardt
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Plagiarism is an issue of trust. If we respect honor codes, we gain the comfort of knowing that what we read is spoken in the voice of the author and what we write will not be misrepresented as someone else’s original work. Are these simple comforts anachronistic? Perhaps. Acts of plagiarism among students are on the rise, and recently, a series of famous academics, historians, journalists, and even a Tony-award nominated playwright have been accused of plagiarism. If our academic communities hope to reverse this trend, we must reflect on how and why plagiarism occurs and what we can do …
A Duty Everlasting: The Perils Of Applying Traditional Doctrines Of Spoliation To Electronic Discovery, Michael R. Nelson, Mark H. Rosenberg
A Duty Everlasting: The Perils Of Applying Traditional Doctrines Of Spoliation To Electronic Discovery, Michael R. Nelson, Mark H. Rosenberg
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding electronic discovery are expected to take effect on December 1, 2006. These amendments are designed to alleviate the burden, expense and uncertainty that has resulted from the application of traditional discovery principles in the electronic age. These principles worked well in an era where discovery was primarily limited to the production of paper documentation, but have proved unworkable when applied to the discovery of electronic data, particularly in the “corporate world,” where even the most routine business discussions are captured in electronic format.5