Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Global Copyright, Local Speech, Michael Dan Birnhack

ExpressO

Copyright is no longer a matter of "promoting the progress of science" in the words of the U.S. Constitution. It is now more than ever before a matter of trade. Furthermore, under the WTO's TRIPS Agreement, we now have a global copyright (G©) regime.

The globalization of copyright law destabilized previous balances. The shift to a trade environment requires us to reevaluate the previous balance. The concern explored in this article is that the old foundations will collapse under the heavy weight of global forces. The concern is that local culture, access to information, research and free speech in general, …

Global Pharmaceutical Patent Law In Developing Countries- Amending Trips To Promote Access For All, Angela J. Anderson

ExpressO

This comment will analyze the need to amend and revise the current global pharmaceutical patent system under TRIPS to take into account the needs of developing countries and overall public health. This comment will emphasize that the current international trade rules, which although administered by the WTO, are dictated by developed country governments and powerful pharmaceutical companies, and therefore, without reform will further diminish the access of poor people in developing countries to vital medicines. Part II of this comment will provide a general overview of the international trade law governing patents on pharmaceuticals focusing specifically on the development of …

Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents: Reevaluating The Patent "Privilege" In Historical Context, Adam Mossoff

ExpressO

The conventional wisdom holds that American patents have always been grants of special monopoly privileges lacking any justification in natural rights philosophy, a belief based in oft-repeated citations to Thomas Jefferson's writings on patents. Using privilege as a fulcrum in its analysis, this Article reveals that the history of early American patent law has been widely misunderstood and misused. In canvassing primary historical sources, including political and legal treatises, Founders' writings, congressional reports, and long-forgotten court decisions, it explains how patent rights were defined and enforced under the social contract doctrine and labor theory of property of natural rights philosophy. …

Commercializing Open Source Software: Do Property Rights Still Matter?, Ronald J. Mann

ExpressO

A major shift toward open source software is underway. Companies are more critically evaluating the cost effectiveness of their IT investments, seeing the benefits of collaborative development, and looking for ways to avoid vendor lock-in. At the same time, academics and industry visionaries are criticizing the use of a traditional appropriation mechanism for innovation—the patent—by bemoaning the decisions of U.S. and foreign governments to permit software patents, the rising numbers of patents on software-related innovations (the so-called “arms race” build-up), and the cost and frequency of patent litigation in the software industry. The critics generally have applauded the shift towards …

Patent Misuse In Patent Pool Licensing: From National Harrow To “The Nine No-Nos” To Not Likely, Daniel P. Homiller

Duke Law & Technology Review

Courts and the Justice Department’s Antitrust division have become increasingly tolerant of patent licensing practices that were previously viewed with suspicion. This trend has put pressure on the doctrine of patent misuse, which arose in the 1940s as a doctrine distinct from, but closely related to, standard antitrust analysis. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently overturned an International Trade Commission order that held unenforceable, on the grounds of patent misuse, six patents licensed as a package by U.S. Philips Corporation. The Federal Circuit’s decision raises the question of just how much remains of the doctrine of …

Network Science And Law: A Sales Pitch And An Application To The "Patent Explosion", Katherine J. Strandburg

ExpressO

The network may be the technological metaphor of the present era. A network, consisting of “nodes” and “links,” may be a group of individuals linked by friendship; a group of computers linked by network cables; a system of roads or airline flights -- or another of a virtually limitless variety of systems of connected “things.” The past few years have seen an explosion of interest in “network science” in fields from physics to sociology. Network science highlights the role of relationship patterns in determining collective behavior. It underscores and begins to address the difficulty of predicting collective behavior from individual …

Merck V. Integra: Bailing Water Without Plugging The Hole, Benjamin G. Jackson

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

‘Law Is Life!’: Flag Wars, Local Government Law, And The Gentrification Of Olde Towne East, Linda Goode Bryant

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Videotaped Confessions And The Genre Of Documentary, Jessica Silbey

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 32 - Language Learning In The United States Of America, Rosetta Stone

Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)

Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?

Foreword: Engaging Documentaries Seriously, Regina Austin, Foreword

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Seven Ambiguities: Lawyers And The Making Of Well-Founded Fear, A Law-Genre Documentary, Shari Robertson, Michael Camerini

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Comic Book Citation Format, Britton Payne

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Decontextualization Of Musical Works: Should The Doctrine Of Moral Rights Be Extended?, Sarah C. Anderson

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Television Remixed: The Controversy Over Commercial–Skipping, Ethan O. Notkin

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Pollen Drift And The Bystanding Farmer: Harmonizing Patent Law And Common Law On The Technological Frontier, Paul J. Heald, James C. Smith

Popular Media

Patent law provides an impressive laundry list of defenses available to farmers who are the victims of unwanted pollen drift. The common law works hand-in-hand with patent law to ensure that a farmer’s choices are respected. Strong arguments can be made that positive economic relief should be afforded to farmers who can show the value of their crop has been diminished due to pollen drift. GMO pollen drift is a new, high-tech problem, but well-established principles of federal and state law appear prepared to offer viable low-tech solutions.

Addressing Questionable Business Method Patents Prior To Issuance: A Two-Part Proposal, Andrew Kopelman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Crime Victims As Subjects Of Documentaries: Exploitation Or Advocacy?, Roslyn Myers

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Super-Grokster: Untangling Secondary Liability, Comic Book Heroes And The Dmca, And A Filtering Solution For Infringing Digital Creations, Britton Payne

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Of The Inequals Of The Uruguay Round, Srividhya Ragavan

Faculty Scholarship

Ten years ago, the TRIPs Agreement set a distinct tone in international law by requiring members to prioritize international trade obligations as a means to achieve national goals. Within the next five years, the AIDS crisis highlighted that compromising pressing national responsibilities - like a looming public health crisis - to fulfill international obligations may, in fact, detrimentally affect international trade. Meanwhile, access to medication continues to be an unresolved issue even as we celebrate the tenth anniversary of TRIPs and the end of the transitional period. This Article suggests that the success of TRIPs depends on its ability to …

Of Monks, Medieval Scribes, And Middlemen, Peter K. Yu

Faculty Scholarship

Today's copyright debate has generally focused on the digital dilemma created by Internet and new media technologies. Threats created by emerging communications technologies, however, are not new. Throughout history, there have been remarkable similarities between the threats created by new technologies and those posed by older ones.

During the oral argument in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Justice Stephen Breyer questioned whether the petitioners' counsel would apply the test proposed for the new technology to some once-new technologies, such as the photocopying machine, the videocassette recorder, the iPod, and the printing press. When the counsel quickly responded in the …

Trips And Its Discontents, Peter K. Yu

Faculty Scholarship

The TRIPs Agreement was established at the ministerial meeting in Marrakesh in April 1994. Since its establishment, many less developed countries have become dissatisfied with the international intellectual property system. From their perspective, the system fails to take into consideration their needs, interests, and local conditions. The strong protection mandated by the Agreement also threatens their much-needed access to information, knowledge, and essential medicines.

This year marks the tenth anniversary of the TRIPs Agreement. It provides an excellent opportunity to assess the Agreement's achievements and shortfalls, in particular its impact on the international community as well as on other areas …

Populism And Patents, Kimberly A. Moore

ExpressO

Lawyers and other commentators often remark that American courts, and particularly American juries, are prejudiced against large corporate entities. Existing empirical research attempting to confirm this suspicion is contradictory and suffers from a number of shortcomings. In this Article, Professor Moore reexamines the issue by reporting the results of research on an original dataset of over 4000 patent cases and more than a million patents. The results cast substantial doubt on the hypothesis that individuals and corporations are treated identically in jury trials of patent property rights. In jury trials of patent cases between corporations and individuals, the individual won …

The Secret Is Out: Patent Law Preempts Mass Market License Terms Barring Reverse Engineering For Interoperability Purposes, Daniel Laster

ExpressO

As patent protection has emerged to protect software, courts and commentators have mistakenly focused on copyright law and overlooked the centrality of patent preemption to limit contract law where a mass market license which prohibits reverse engineering (RE) for purposes of developing interoperable products leads to patent-like protection. Review of copyright fair use cases on RE and Congress’s policy favoring RE for interoperability purposes in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act reinforce the case for patent preemption. Also, the fundamental freedom to RE embodied in state trade secret law, coupled with federal patent and copyright law and policies, cumulatively should override …

Choice In Government Software Procurement: A Winning Combination, Mclean Sieverding

ExpressO

Governments are such significant purchasers of IT products and services that their purchasing decisions have a substantial impact on the world’s IT marketplace. This fact calls into question the wisdom of decisions by a few policymakers (on national, state, and local levels) around the world that have sought to require that governmental procurement officials give varying degrees of preference to open source software (OSS) when evaluating competing software solutions, claiming, among other things, that such preferences are justified because OSS is cheaper and more interoperable than proprietary software and needs government handicapping in order to enter the market to compete …

Is Something Amiss? A Commentary On The Aftermath Of Phillips V. Awh Corp., Holly L. Bonar

ExpressO

In Phillips v. AWH Corp., decided en banc in July of 2005, the Federal Circuit held that dictionaries or other similar sources may be used to assist a construing court in its quest to interpret the claim language, but must take an inferior role to the meanings of claim terms as they would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the intrinsic evidence. The court further noted that the usage of a term in the specification is the "single best guide to the meaning of [a] disputed term." This decision reversed the court's opinion …

Fair Use And The First Amendment: Corporate Control Of Copyright Is Stifling Documentary Making And Thwarting The Aims Of The First Amendment, Paige Gold

ExpressO

Documentary motion pictures constitute a crucial part of contemporary public debate, because in today’s highly consolidated mass media environment, documentaries offer the kinds of independent voices that the First Amendment was designed to protect. However, current intellectual property practices are chilling speech by forcing documentary filmmakers to tailor their films to accommodate new, strict licensing practices. When filmmakers are compelled to edit their work to meet insurance requirements, it harms the interests of not just the filmmaker, but also the public. Thus, the “clearance culture,” in which anything and everything that could possibly lead to a lawsuit must be cleared, …

Barriers To Innovation: Intellectual Property Transaction Costs In Scientific Collaboration, Megan Ristau Baca

Duke Law & Technology Review

The institution of university science research has evolved over the past century, from one of open science and free information to one of competition and jealously guarded intellectual property rights. This iBrief analyzes the background factors driving the evolution of the institution of science, evaluates the net effects on the progress of science, and considers potential short-term solutions to alleviate the legal transaction costs necessary for scientific collaboration.

Rule-Making Petition Concerning Eligibility, Under 37 C.F.R. § 11.7 To Sit For The Examination For Registration To Practice In Patent Cases Before The United States Patent And Trademark Office, Thomas G. Field Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarship

This Petition under 5 U.S.C. § 553(e) is filed on behalf of Petitioner and other parties with legally-cognizable interest (hereafter “Signatories”) in the specification of credentials under guidelines promulgated by the PTO Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”) and amended from time without public notice or opportunity to comment. Signatories include individuals likely to be unfairly refused permission to sit, individuals whose status is uncertain, and professors with an interest in whether their students may or may not be permitted to sit. Signatories hereby request that the PTO, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2)(D), amplify the qualifications sufficient to …

Patent Drafter Estoppel: Why Didn't Sage Products Create A New Foreseeability Limitation On The Application Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents?, Christopher M. Kaiser

ExpressO

This article reviews the 1997 Federal Circuit Case of Sage Products v. Devon and the case law that has followed it. There is some belief among patent practitioners that Sage Products created a new legal doctrine limiting the application of the doctrine of equivalents in patent infringement cases. The new doctrine, sometimes referred to as “patent drafter estoppel,” would bar the application of the doctrine of equivalents any time an accused equivalent structure should have been foreseen by a reasonable patentee. Federal Circuit case law since Sage Products has diverged into two lines of thought: one that supports the thinking …