Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (548)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (67)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (44)
- Internet Law (34)
- Marketing Law (34)
-
- Computer Law (30)
- International Trade Law (27)
- Cultural Heritage Law (22)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (18)
- International Law (18)
- Courts (17)
- Food and Drug Law (14)
- Supreme Court of the United States (13)
- Judges (12)
- Transnational Law (12)
- Privacy Law (11)
- Consumer Protection Law (9)
- First Amendment (8)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (8)
- Labor and Employment Law (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Contracts (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Medical Jurisprudence (5)
- Military, War, and Peace (5)
- Property Law and Real Estate (5)
- Education Law (4)
Articles 421 - 450 of 550
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Leveling The Patent Playing Field, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 636 (2007), Peter N. Detkin
Leveling The Patent Playing Field, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 636 (2007), Peter N. Detkin
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
While large companies continue to thrive on pervasive technological advancements, small inventors have been limited by their inability to exploit their patents. Patent portfolio licensing created a pioneering way to increase the utility of patents; however, in practice this business model has typically favored powerful players in the technology industry. A new market has emerged based on innovative business models which favor small inventors. This market seeks to aggregate and distribute patents to companies that infringe on intellectual property or that want to draw on it as a source. By matching patent owners with patent users, this market may enable …
Avoiding The "Fifth Beatle" Syndrome: Practical Solutions To Minimizing Joint Inventorship Exposure, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 645 (2007), Andrew B. Dzeguze
Avoiding The "Fifth Beatle" Syndrome: Practical Solutions To Minimizing Joint Inventorship Exposure, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 645 (2007), Andrew B. Dzeguze
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Inventorship disputes appear to be proliferating. This is not surprising in light of the 1993 relaxation of the standards for joint inventorship. Although the vast majority of claims fail, the handful of cases indicating successful inventorship claims can be quite lucrative, which makes it reasonable to expect the upward trend in number of cases to continue. Moreover, the lack of clarity on certain key aspects of inventorship law is apt to encourage further claims. This article begins, as a cautionary tale of sorts: an analysis of the unclear aspects of inventorship law. This includes the as yet unresolved variations in …
Patent Reform, Injunctions, And Equitable Principles: A Triangle Of Changes For The Future, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 671 (2007), Matthew J. May
Patent Reform, Injunctions, And Equitable Principles: A Triangle Of Changes For The Future, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 671 (2007), Matthew J. May
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In eBay v. MercExchange, the Supreme Court held the Federal Circuit could no longer utilize their long-standing “general rule” that an injunction should follow the finding of patent infringement. The Supreme Court held that courts should utilize a set of rules known as the four-factor test, which utilizes traditional principals of equity. Concurrently, Congress has been debating patent reform with one of the topics being the use of injunctive relief as a remedy for patent infringement. These two changes could potentially have a significant effect on the technological and economic landscape of patents in the future. It now may be …
What The Pct Can Learn From Two African Systems, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 693 (2007), Zion H. Park
What The Pct Can Learn From Two African Systems, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 693 (2007), Zion H. Park
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The purpose and goal of patent law is to help society by encouraging innovation. While the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) has made international patent procurement easier and more accessible, the current system is still plagued with redundancies and inefficiencies. These flaws are barriers to patent offices and individual patentees, hindering innovation and the growth of developing nations. Ultimately, these problems are hindrance to society, contradicting the goal of patent law. This comment compares the PCT to two similar but less prominent African regional patent systems: African Regional Industrial Property Organization (“ARIPO”) and African Industrial Property Convention (“OAPI”). ARIPO and OAPI …
Injunctions In Patent Cases After Ebay, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 44 (2007), Edward D. Manzo
Injunctions In Patent Cases After Ebay, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 44 (2007), Edward D. Manzo
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The United States Constitution gives Congress the power to grant to inventors exclusive rights to their inventions. Accordingly, 35 U.S.C. § 154(a) states that every patent grants to the patentee exclusive rights to make and use their inventions, and 35 U.S.C. § 283 provides that a court may grant injunctions in accordance with the principles of equity. The Federal Circuit developed a general standard that a permanent injunction should issue, except in extraordinary standards, after a patent is judicially declared valid. However, in May 2006, the Supreme Court overruled that standard in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., declaring that the …
Painstaking Semantics: Selecting Website Trade Dress Elements To Survive A Copyright Preemption Challenge, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 97 (2007), J. Scott Anderson
Painstaking Semantics: Selecting Website Trade Dress Elements To Survive A Copyright Preemption Challenge, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 97 (2007), J. Scott Anderson
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The intersection between trade dress law and copyright law must be understood when seeking trade dress protection for elements that may fall within the subject matter of copyright. The technological elements that create the look and feel of a website may include both trade dress elements and copyrightable works. Website owners are beginning to rely on the protections of trade dress law instead of or in addition to copyright law when the look and feel of a website is imitated by a competitor. Asserting trade dress protection for website look and feel requires careful pleading and will provoke a variety …
The Preserve Access To Affordable Generics Act: Will Congress's Response To Reverse Payment Patent Settlements Enhance Competition In The Pharmaceutical Market?, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 150 (2007), Reza Bagherian
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In response to the Supreme Court’s failure to grant writ of certiorari to Federal Trade Commission v. Schering-Plough Corp., Congress proposed the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act to once again amend the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984. Traditionally, the courts have used two antitrust standards, the rule of reason and the per se illegal rule, to determine whether a reverse payment patent settlement restrains trade. In Schering-Plough, the Eleventh Circuit articulated a third standard and held the reverse payment settlements between a pioneer drug company and two generic drug companies valid. This article proposes that traditional analysis of the rule …
Step-Plus-Function: Just What Have We Stepped Into?, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 117 (2007), Paul R. Kitch
Step-Plus-Function: Just What Have We Stepped Into?, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 117 (2007), Paul R. Kitch
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
While most attorneys have heard of means-plus-function, most have not heard of or given much thought to its sibling, step-plus-function. Both claims arise under the same section of the patent laws, namely 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. While means-plus-function limitations are directed to structural limitations and most often appear in apparatus claims, step-plus-function limitations are directed to steps and most often appear in method claims. Means-plus-function limitations generally arise when the patentee chooses to recite a “means for” performing a specified or recited function rather than reciting the structure or material that performs that function. Step-plus-function limitations, on the …
Yesterday's Technology, Tomorrow: How The Government's Treatment Of Intellectual Property Prevents Soldiers From Receiving The Best Tools To Complete Their Mission, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 171 (2007), Daniel Larson
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Department of Defense is currently entrenched in a procurement system that does not respect the intellectual property of its contractors. This, in turn, has led to research and development firms’ increasing reluctance to contract with the Department of Defense. As a result of this reluctance, the United States has increasingly relied upon weapons systems that, in many cases, have not significantly evolved since the Vietnam War. In order to revive the United States’ flagging military technology sector Congress should look to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 and provisions of the Bayh-Dole Act in order to encourage the private sector’s creation …
The Crossroads Of Patentability & Validity: Why Resolving Congressional Intent Will Not Fix Functional Claims, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 218 (2007), Nathaniel V. Riley
The Crossroads Of Patentability & Validity: Why Resolving Congressional Intent Will Not Fix Functional Claims, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 218 (2007), Nathaniel V. Riley
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Functional claims have caused many headaches for academics, judges and practitioners who have struggled to define precisely what constitutes “functional” claim language and to determine the proper scope afforded to broad means-plus-function claim elements. The debate between academics and judges regarding functional claim interpretation has typically focused on Congressional intent behind the statute, specifically whether 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6 was intended solely as a claim interpretation tool or only as means for narrowing functional claims during an infringement analysis. The Federal Circuit famously adopted a hybrid approach in In re Donaldson, but since then several authors have levied …
Can Copyright Lend Its Cinderellaic Magic To Chinese Folklore?, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 203 (2006), Deming Liu
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Folklore in China is disappearing and facing challenges for its very survival. To salvage folklore in China, some have called for immediate legislative action and proposed the law of copyright or sui generis protection as some potential solutions. However, copyright is traditionally concerned with the creations of individuals rather than the cumulative creations of an ethnic group or region. Furthermore, even sui generis protection, which is better adapted to folklore in theory, could be susceptible in practice to the abuses of private monopolies or state tyranny. Overall, the protection of folklore depends more on a consistent governmental policy of open-mindedness …
Taming The Code: Effectively Implimenting Software Patents, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 382 (2006), Anthony E. Anderson
Taming The Code: Effectively Implimenting Software Patents, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 382 (2006), Anthony E. Anderson
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Software patents are a sore subject for many programmers. Although still in their infancy, they have managed to anger many of those in the programming community. Software patents started to evolve in the early 80’s through multiple court decisions that eventually defined software as statutory patentable material. Although patentable, software has proven to be a formidable match for the examination process. The examination process has proven ineffective in properly examining software patent applications and as result multiple lawsuits based on frivolous patents have emerged. Potential battles such as the one between Creative and Apple over Creative’s patent for a hierarchal …
Special 301: Trips Plus – Alive And Kicking, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 651 (2006), Vicki Allums
Special 301: Trips Plus – Alive And Kicking, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 651 (2006), Vicki Allums
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Despite significant strides and multilateral agreements, including requirements for enforcing intellectual property, trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy remain a persistent problem for intellectual property owners as reflected in the 2006 Special 301 Report issued by the Office of the United States Trade Representative on April 28, 2006. Border measures are a key tool in the United States fight against counterfeiting and piracy at U.S. borders in the global economy where goods are manufactured in different countries and sold worldwide. How does the United States prevent infringing works from crossing its borders and assist its trading partners in creating border enforcement …
Trademark Parodies: When Is It Ok To Laugh?, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 72 (2006), Emily Adelman
Trademark Parodies: When Is It Ok To Laugh?, 6 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 72 (2006), Emily Adelman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In trademark parodies, there is a fine line between what is considered a First Amendment right to freedom of speech and what constitutes an unlawful appropriation, or trademark infringement. Current judicial decisions have been inconsistent across the different jurisdictions, thus making it unclear to parodists as to what may be lawfully appropriated when creating their parodies. This comment proposes that a new balancing test be used that is specific to trademark parodies. This new test will help to create more concrete guidelines that will reduce the amount of subjectivity that is currently used in trademark parody analysis.
Ending The Circuit Split Over Use Of A Competing Mark In Advertising—The Blackstone Code, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 157 (2006), Douglas L. Rogers
Ending The Circuit Split Over Use Of A Competing Mark In Advertising—The Blackstone Code, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 157 (2006), Douglas L. Rogers
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In KP Permanent, the Supreme Court recently confirmed that plaintiffs in trademark infringement cases under the Lanham Act have the burden of proving likelihood of confusion. As such, this article argues that lower courts do not have the authority to switch that burden of proof for such claims, even though they involve nominative uses (in which defendant is using the actual mark of plaintiff as plaintiff’s source identifier and not as a description of the defendant's products or services). This article also argues that because Congress created affirmative fair use defenses for descriptive uses of marks and for trademark dilution, …
Has The Supreme Court Incorrectly Expanded § 271(E)(1) To Risk A Regulatory Taking?, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 216 (2006), Tara Stuart
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The U.S.S.C. expanded the scope of the Hatch-Waxman Act’s safe harbor provision in Merck III to include protection for infringing use of any type of invention as long as a researcher intended to perform research reasonably relevant to FDA approval. This broad interpretation is inconsistent with the legislative intent of the Hatch-Waxman Act, and the policies of the U.S. patent system. Many patent owners may unnecessarily experience such a reduction in their property rights as to constitute a regulatory taking. The proposed narrow interpretation would rectify the constitutional problems and inconsistencies in infringement exemptions. Section 271(e)(1) should apply only to …
Redefining Utility In Determining The Patentability Of Dna Sequences, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 238 (2006), Diana A. Villamil
Redefining Utility In Determining The Patentability Of Dna Sequences, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 238 (2006), Diana A. Villamil
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On September 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit in In re Fisher upheld the PTO’s final rejection for lack of utility of a patent application for certain DNA sequence fragments generated from maize plants. The court, supporting a heightened utility standard, adopted the “real-world” test for establishing substantial and specific utility required by the PTO. This decision severely limits the granting of patent rights to DNA sequence fragments, which are capable of having value within the biotech community as research tools. This comment proposes the restoration of a less stringent utility standard to more correctly reflect the purposes of patent law …
The Metes And Bounds Of The Defendant Class Action In Patent Cases, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 292 (2006), Donald E. Burton
The Metes And Bounds Of The Defendant Class Action In Patent Cases, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 292 (2006), Donald E. Burton
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Despite significant hurdles, the defendant class action in a patent infringement case is a potentially useful alternative to multiple lawsuits in many jurisdictions because a patentee who emerges from the class action proceeding with a favorable Markman ruling and a declaration of validity should normally be in a very strong position to collect damages. While nothing on the face of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 precludes its application to defendant classes in patent infringement cases, the 23(b) requirements will be a major obstacle in convincing a court to certify a class of alleged infringers. Other practical considerations include personal …
The Ip Asset Class: Protecting And Unlocking Inherent Value, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 402 (2006), Stephen Bennett
The Ip Asset Class: Protecting And Unlocking Inherent Value, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 402 (2006), Stephen Bennett
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Intangible inputs are as important, or more important, to wealth creation than tangible assets and corporate leaders are beginning to recognize the value of their intangible assets. Investors are also focusing on companies whose primary property value is largely intangible intellectual property. IP investment strategies involve either attempts to raise and employ immediate capital through securitization or to protect the value of IP through insurance. The nexus between finance and IP presents a revenue opportunity for law firms. There is already a contingent of the legal community that services clients concerning IP issues but only a much smaller niche segment …
Why Are Competitor's Advertising Links Displayed When I Google My Product? An Analysis Of Internet Search Engine Liability For Trademark Infringement, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 431 (2006), Isaiah A. Fishman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Traditional federal trademark law is being challenged in the current case of Google v. AmericanBlind. When internet issues clash with trademark infringement, courts are often faced with the dangerous task of either refusing to stretch not specifically internet tailored trademark law to grant remedy to a perceived wrong or refusing to grant remedy because of the chilling effect the remedy may have on traditional trademark. By analyzing the history of trademark law in relation with internet issues, focusing on domain name cases, pop-up advertising cases, and search engine cases, it becomes clear that specific congressional action is the most viable …
Smithkline V. Apotex: Broadening The Scope Of Inherent Anticipation And Its Impact On The Patentability Of Chemical Structures, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 456 (2006), Bryan William Jones
Smithkline V. Apotex: Broadening The Scope Of Inherent Anticipation And Its Impact On The Patentability Of Chemical Structures, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 456 (2006), Bryan William Jones
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
In SmithKline v. Apotex, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit invalidated the main patent on Paxil as inherently anticipated. In doing so, the court over-stepped the bounds of appellate review, and broadened the scope of the inherent anticipation doctrine to include chemical structures that are not measurably produced by strict practice of the prior art. This holding does not comport with well-settled precedent and could have dire consequences for the patentability of many chemical structures. A more equitable invalidity analysis would require a chemical structure to derive directly from a disclosed reaction in order to be anticipated; in …
The Conundrum Confronting Congress: The Patent System Must Be Left Untouched While Being Radically Reformed, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 268 (2006), Robert A. Armitage
The Conundrum Confronting Congress: The Patent System Must Be Left Untouched While Being Radically Reformed, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 268 (2006), Robert A. Armitage
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Patent systems reforms have been recommended by a variety of interests, including the Federal Trade Commission and the National Academies of Science and the private sector. Although calls for radical reforms have undeniable merit, the effectiveness of the existing patent system as an incentive to investment in innovation must be left untouched in the reform process. Unwise reforms include awarding patent injunctions only sparingly and limiting patent damages to nominal amounts for inventions relating to patentable combinations made of existing components. There are, however, “three pillars” that should guide reform: (1) introduce full transparency and objectiveness into the tests for …
Biotechnology's Prescription For Patent Reform, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 318 (2006), Christopher M. Holman
Biotechnology's Prescription For Patent Reform, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 318 (2006), Christopher M. Holman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On June 8, 2005, Congressman Lamar Smith introduced H.R. 2795, the “Patent Reform Act of 2005,” aimed at improving the quality and certainty of issued patents, simplifying the patent procurement process, harmonizing U.S. law with international practice, and reining in abusive patent enforcement practices. Congress has set the legislation aside for the time being, but will likely revisit the issue again shortly. The biotechnology industry, one of the fastest growing sectors in the United States economy, strongly opposes many of the proposed reforms. This paper considers the Congressional testimonies of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (“BIO”) and other representatives of biotechnology’s …
Suppression Of Innovation Or Collaborative Efficiencies?: An Antitrust Analysis Of A Research & Development Collaboration That Led To The Shelving Of A Promising Drug, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 348 (2006), Saami Zain
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article discusses antitrust issues present in research and development collaborations between competitors. In particular, it illustrates that, although often very beneficial, these collaborations may have the potential for considerable harm via suppression of innovation. The article examines a recent case involving a collaboration to develop drugs, which arguably resulted in the suppression of a promising drug.
Copyright Piracy In China, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 583 (2006), Ralph Oman
Copyright Piracy In China, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 583 (2006), Ralph Oman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Copyrights play a major role in promoting economic development and creating a national identity, and they have a tremendous impact on the social and economic well-being of nations. Within the past fifteen years, China has passed a strong copyright law, upgraded enforcement, and joined the Berne Convention. However, since then, the forward momentum has subsided and piracy has grown deep roots in China. If protecting their own citizens’ rights was not important enough, the threat of international trade sanctions for having inadequate intellectual property protection may force China to reevaluate their current situation and step up international protection.
Intellectual Property Rights In The Internet Era: The New Frontier, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 589 (2006), Lulin Gao
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
With the rapid development of information and Internet technologies, how to protect intellectual property (IP) rights in the Internet era became a new frontier for IP practitioners and scholars internationally. This article highlights some important IP protection issues related to copyright, patent, trademark, and domain names, as well as the impact of technological advances on IP protection in the Internet era. The author believes that in order to solve these new emerging issues, the most important principle is keeping the balance between different sides with stakes in the IP right. Finally, international cooperation must be enhanced with more technical assistance …
Some Remarks On The Limits Of Harmonization, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 596 (2006), Graeme B. Dinwoodie
Some Remarks On The Limits Of Harmonization, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 596 (2006), Graeme B. Dinwoodie
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Some Remarks on the Limits of Harmonization
The Intellectual Property Marketplace: Past, Present And Future, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 605 (2006), James E. Malackowski
The Intellectual Property Marketplace: Past, Present And Future, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 605 (2006), James E. Malackowski
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article provides an overview of the evolution of the intellectual property marketplace, describes existing mechanisms by which intellectual property value is transacted, and hypothesizes future marketplace mechanisms. A discussion of intellectual property value is also presented. Specifically, analyses of value indications as evidenced by the public and private equity markets are described. Finally, two future critical issues for intellectual property practitioners relating to intellectual property value are described: class action shareholder litigation and royalty stacking.
Traditional Knowledge And The Fight For The Public Domain, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 317 (2006), Doris E. Long
Traditional Knowledge And The Fight For The Public Domain, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 317 (2006), Doris E. Long
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
What are the challenges facing the protection of traditional knowledge internationally? Can the protection of such rights, which have traditionally existed outside the boundaries of intellectual property, be achieved in the face of current challenges to protections epitomized by such emerging international movements as enhanced access to information and culture as a human right? This article examines some of the emerging issues in this hotly contested area and suggests that such movements, which are not adverse to intellectual property and traditional knowledge rights, should be used to craft a new method for addressing the issue of traditional knowledge protection internationally.
Patent Cooperation Treaty – Implementation V. U.S. Law, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 641 (2006), Richard Lazarus
Patent Cooperation Treaty – Implementation V. U.S. Law, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 641 (2006), Richard Lazarus
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
What ways can an individual attack the enforceability of a patent that relies on the benefit of an earlier filed Patent Cooperation Treaty application (“PCT”)? This article highlights the top five PCT issues that an attorney should look for to successfully defend a client against infringement. The strategies discussed include: (1) searching for new matter; (2) searching for errors in inventorship; (3) examining an international filing date; (4) checking for withdrawal of an international application; and (5) examining estoppel arguments in international applications.