Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Holistic Claim Construction, Lidiya Mishchenko

Cardozo Law Review

Jurisprudence in the area of defining patent scope is opaque and inconsistent. District courts and litigants cannot be certain of the bounds of the exclusive territory covered by a patent—defined by the patent’s claims—until the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—the single patent appellate court in the nation—says what it is in an appeal after final judgement. The appellate court appears to simply redo the analysis of the district courts, yet often inexplicably reaches a different conclusion based on the patent’s text. Though much has been written about the Federal Circuit’s unpredictable, textualist approach to claim construction, no scholarship …

Cardozo Aelj Interview Series: Professor Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Saurabh Vishnubhakat

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

In this interview, Cardozo Professor Saurabh Vishnubhakat discusses what he hopes to bring to Cardozo as the new Director of Intellectual Property and Information Law Program, his professional background, and what drew him to the field of intellectual property.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on September 22, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

The Franchise Era: Hollywood’S Reuse Of Ip, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center

2023–2024 Flyers

Join the IP Law Society and the Entertainment Law Society for the first panel of the semester! After a summer that started with the Super Mario Bros. movie and ended with the Barbie movie, this panel examines if Hollywood’s obsession with franchises is killing creativity, the movie star, the writers’ room, and the industry at large. Led by lawyers in the TV/film and branding industries, this panel aims to teach about the legal framework that allows for these franchises and how lawyers can provide for protections and allowances in contracts.

A Conversation With Professor Dov Greenbaum (Reichman University), Cardozo Intellectual Property & Information Law Program

2023–2024 Flyers

Join us for a conversation with Prof. Dov Greenbaum of the Harry Radzyner Law School at Reichman University in Herzliya, Israel. Professor Dov Greenbaum directs Reichman University’s Zvi Meitar Institute for Legal Implications of Emerging Technologies and is an adjunct professor at Yale University in Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry. Dr. Greenbaum holds degrees and postdocs from Yeshiva University, Yale, UC-Berkeley, Stanford, and ETH Zurich. His doctoral research focused on informatics and big data. Before academia, he practiced law in Silicon Valley and in Israel.

Cardozo Hosts 2023 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo News 2023

Featuring nearly 200 professors, lawyers from private practice and industry, and government and public policy professionals, Cardozo School of Law hosted the 2023 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference (IPSC) on August 3-4.

Cardozo Aelj Author Interview Series: Scott Semaya, Class Of 2023, Scott Semaya

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo AELJ Author Interview Series seeks to give our readers further insight into the Articles and Notes published in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. In this interview, Scott Semaya discusses his Note, Name, Image and Likeness: Giving College Athletes the Clearest Guidance to Best Profit off Their NIL, which was published in Volume 41, Issue 2.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on June 6, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Copyright’S Law Of Dissemination, Jacob Noti-Victor

Cardozo Law Review

Intellectual property law generally rests on the assumption that markets will bring about an ideal allocation of resources. Nonetheless, United States copyright law remains riddled with regimes that bypass or restructure normal market licensing between copyright owners and distributors such as streaming services, radio stations, and libraries. This Article provides the first comprehensive account of this “law of dissemination,” examining how a range of seemingly unrelated judicial doctrines, statutory safe harbors, and regulatory institutions together affect the relationship between copyright owners and the entities that disseminate creative works to the public.

While these regimes are often treated as unintelligible historical …

Cardozo Aelj Author Interview Series: Caitlin Muraca, Caitlin Muraca

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo AELJ Author Interview Series seeks to give our readers further insight into the Articles and Notes published in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. In this interview, Caitlin Muraca discusses her Note, Combating False Election Information in a Section 230 Protected World: to Moderate or Not to Moderate, which was published in Volume 41, Issue 2.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on April 27, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

A Comparative Case Against Criminalizing Ip Infringements In The Uk And China, Dennis J. Baker, Xiaoxiao Wang

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

In this Article, it is argued comparatively that across the world intellectual property rights have been expanded to the point of absurdity. Beyond lengthy monopoly protections being backed up with prison sentences of up to ten years in both China and the UK, these monopolies have been extended in the UK to cover vague concepts such as publicity rights and performance rights. It is argued that due to the incredible lobbying power of Western multinational corporations, China was railroaded into enacting Western-style offenses in order to join the WTO. It is submitted that numerous economic studies have shown that intellectual …

The Future Of Property, Yael R. Lifshitz, Maytal Gilboa, Yotam Kaplan

Cardozo Law Review

Property law focuses predominantly on spatial conflicts of interest between neighbors but neglects temporal conflicts between generations. This lack of attention to the temporal dimension leads to a troubling mismatch in property law: while property rights last forever, the corresponding duties that require property holders to respect the interests of others are remarkably short lived. The result is that property law currently does not adequately protect the rights of future generations. In this Article, we offer a blueprint for correcting this anomaly. We advocate a change in the current conception of property and propose that property law focus more on …

Unwired: Gaining Control Over Addictive Technologies Book Launch With Visiting Professor Gaia Bernstein, Intellectual Property And Information Law Program

2023 Event Invitations

Join Cardozo's Intellectual Property and Information Law Program for A Conversation with Visiting Professor Gaia Bernstein, to discuss her new book, Unwired: Gaining Control Over Addictive Technologies. Bernstein will be joined by Cardozo Professor Sam Weinstein to discuss Unwired and how we can use the legal system to resolve technology overuse.

The Ip Of Gaming Law, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society, Cardozo Gaming Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center

2023 Event Invitations

Join two Cardozo Alumni, Daniel Koburger ’17 from KBL Roche and Mikaela Gross ’16 from Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., who will discuss the nuances of IP in Gaming Law as well as their career experiences. This panel will be moderated by Professor Victor Wang, Director of the Cardozo Patent Diversity Project and Acting Director of the Tech Startup Clinic.

The Coming Copyright Judge Crisis, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Dave Fagundes

Articles

Commentary about the Supreme Court's 2021 decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. has focused on the nexus between patent and administrative law. But this overlooks the decision's seismic and as-yet unappreciated implication for copyright law: Arthrex renders the Copyright Royalty Board ("CRB") unconstitutional. The CRB has suffered constitutional challenge since its 2004 inception, but these were seemingly resolved in 2011 when the D.C. Circuit held that the CRB's composition did not offend the Appointments Clause as long as Copyright Royalty Judges ("CRJs") were removable atwill. But when the Court invalidated the selection process for administrative patent judges on a …

Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society's Spring General Body Meeting, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society (Ipls)

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

A Conversation With Indian Supreme Court Justice S. Ravinda Bhat, Cardozo Intellectual Property And Information Law Program, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2023 Event Invitations

Join us for a conversation with Indian Supreme Court Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat and Professor Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Director of Cardozo’s Intellectual Property & Information Law Program. Hear about Justice Bhat's experience at the highest levels of judicial service and his insight into the law’s perennial capacity for social impact.

Click here to view the flyer.

A Conversation With Indian Supreme Court Justice S. Ravinda Bhat, Cardozo Intellectual Property And Information Law Program, Floersheimer Center For Constitutional Democracy

2022–2023 Flyers

Click here to view the event invitation.

Can Artists Recapture Their Copyrights In Musical Compositions That Have Been Lost To The Public Domain? Skidmore V. Led Zeppelin Applied, Brianna Bell

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Art World Of Digital Assets: How Non-Fungible Tokens Create A Loophole In Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, Sofia Aizenman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Digital Purgatory And The Rights Of The Dead: Protecting Against Digital Disinterment In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence, Greyson Cohen

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

This Note will attempt to show that the existing patchwork of rights of publicity statutes and case law are inadequate to protect citizens from online harms in the age of synthetic media. Particularly, this Note will focus on postmortem right of publicity interests and protections because a robust market for the likenesses of deceased personalities exists and will likely grow in the age of synthetic media.

Part I will explain how synthetic media may contribute to an increase in the harms associated with rights of publicity violations, particularly after death. Part II will begin by outlining the legal landscape of …

A Portrait Of The Artist’S Heirs In Mediation: Adr Techniques To Prevent And Resolve Disputes Following An Author’S Death, Nicholas Beudert

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

If an author's work is powerful enough, or popular enough, it's likely that at some point someone will want to write about her. For scholars embarking upon these projects, the author's body of published work can provide insight into her psyche, but correspondence and other unpublished materials can also be valuable. Copyright law covers all of these materials, and when the author dies, she can bequest her copyright as she would the rest of her estate (if she hasn't transferred it during her lifetime). The recipient of these copyrights may now treat the copyrights as her own, as though she …

Conflict Resolution-Negotiation: Liv V. Pga Tour, Ross Herman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Arbitrating Social Media Content: A Framework For Banning High-Profile Users Through Third-Party Arbitration, Rachel Gershengoren

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Improving New York City's Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate For Public Sector Workers: A Collaborative Framework For Labor-Management Relations In High Impact Circumstances, Chelsea Hill

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Introductory Remarks, Ethan Bordman, Ira S. Dizengoff, Sophie Dizengoff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article discusses the legal implications and challenges surrounding college athletes' rights to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL), following the NCAA's 2021 decision to lift its ban on athletes cashing in on their fame. The symposium explores the evolving legal landscape, including regulatory frameworks, equity issues, and the role of collectives, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines to address the complexities arising from this change.

Panel 2: Regulations & Other Congressional Concerns, Sam C. Ehrlich, Dan Lust, Matt Mitten, John T. Wolohan, Andrew Zimbalist, Maureen Weston

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the evolution of college athletes' name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights, highlighting the shift from NCAA control to a chaotic regulatory landscape influenced by court rulings and state laws. The NCAA seeks Congressional intervention for antitrust immunity to address these challenges.

The Ftc's "Made In America" Enforcement Policy Is Too Stringent For Small Businesses To Comply With, Jamie Cutler

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) "Made in America" policy is overly stringent and disproportionately burdensome for small businesses. The policy requires products labeled as "Made in America" to contain "all or virtually all" parts and processing from the U.S., a standard that is often ambiguous, economically prohibitive, and misaligned with consumer perceptions. The note contends that this strict enforcement creates a "Hobson's choice" for small businesses, making it infeasible for them to comply without suffering financial harm or reputational damage. It advocates for lowering the threshold to allow more flexibility, which would support small businesses, promote …

Fragmented Music Copyright Protection: A Better Arrangement, Matthew B. Goldman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note explores the challenges of music copyright law, particularly in determining the protectability of fragmented elements within musical works. It argues that by applying doctrinal tools such as the idea-expression distinction, merger, scenes a faire, and thin copyright, courts can better balance the protection of original expression with the need to allow future creativity. The analysis focuses on two key cases, Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin and Gray v. Perry, to illustrate how these tools can be effectively used to resolve music copyright disputes.

Randomness, Ai Art, And Copyright, Richard H. Chused

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that art created with the assistance of AI tools should generally be eligible for copyright protection. It posits that human agency is present in the creation of AI-generated art, as traditional artistic works also incorporate randomness and unpredictability. By examining works by artists like Alexander Calder, Robert Rauschenberg, and John Cage, the analysis demonstrates that randomness and unpredictability have long been protected under copyright law, suggesting that AI-generated art should receive similar treatment.

Trademarks And Censorship In The Time Of Covid-19, Xuan-Thao Nguyen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

During the devastating year of 2020, China quickly conquered the novel coronavirus and roared back economically while the United States faced staggering deaths and economic losses. But underneath the divergent experience of the two countries is an untold story of trademark and censorship in the time of COVID-19. This Article observes that while the United States Supreme Court has lifted the ban on trademark registrations for unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, opening the door for offensive COVID-19 trademark applications, China has transformed trademark law into the law for censorship as Chinese authorities press forward to achieve twin victories over the coronavirus and …

Protecting Ravenstail: Cultural Appropriation And The Outer Limits Of Copyright Law, Nosson Sternbach

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the challenges minority cultures, particularly indigenous communities, face in protecting their cultural heritage through copyright law, focusing on the Sealaska Heritage Institute Inc. v. Neiman Marcus Group LTD, LLC case. It argues that copyright law's requirements—such as fixation, originality, authorship, and duration—create significant barriers for indigenous cultures seeking to safeguard their intellectual property. The note also critiques the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA) for its inefficacy in preventing cultural appropriation, as it requires plaintiffs to prove specific harms and often fails to address the misuse of cultural motifs without explicit tribal names. The Sealaska case highlights …