Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (721)
- Computer Law (196)
- Internet Law (196)
- Privacy Law (148)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (90)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (67)
- Marketing Law (50)
- International Trade Law (43)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (40)
- International Law (40)
- Courts (31)
- Cultural Heritage Law (31)
- Legislation (30)
- Transnational Law (29)
- Litigation (26)
- Food and Drug Law (25)
- Jurisprudence (22)
- Consumer Protection Law (18)
- First Amendment (17)
- Legal History (17)
- Judges (16)
- Supreme Court of the United States (16)
- Business Organizations Law (14)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (13)
- Labor and Employment Law (13)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Law and Society (12)
- Contracts (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 829
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Van Buren V. United States: An Employer Defeat Or Hacker’S Victory – Or Something In Between, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2022), Melanie Assad
Van Buren V. United States: An Employer Defeat Or Hacker’S Victory – Or Something In Between, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2022), Melanie Assad
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The United States Stands Alone: A Divergence In The Treatment Of Genus Claims In Pharmaceutical Patents, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 97 (2022), Sam Habein
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A La Recherche De Breyer Perdu, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 38 (2022), Shubha Ghosh
A La Recherche De Breyer Perdu, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 38 (2022), Shubha Ghosh
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Judicial Errors: Fake Imaging And The Modern Law Of Evidence, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 82 (2022), Guy Alon, Azmi Haider, Hagit Hel-Or
Judicial Errors: Fake Imaging And The Modern Law Of Evidence, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 82 (2022), Guy Alon, Azmi Haider, Hagit Hel-Or
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Coloring Inside The Lines: A Look At Qualitex V. Jacobson, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 49 (2022), Willajeanne Mclean
Coloring Inside The Lines: A Look At Qualitex V. Jacobson, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 49 (2022), Willajeanne Mclean
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Good Day To Be A Bad Spaniel: Broadening The Application Of The Rogers Test, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 193 (2022), Mikhaila Duvall
A Good Day To Be A Bad Spaniel: Broadening The Application Of The Rogers Test, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 193 (2022), Mikhaila Duvall
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Eviscerating Patent Scope, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 121 (2022), Shahrokh Falati
Eviscerating Patent Scope, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 121 (2022), Shahrokh Falati
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
If The Metaverse Is Built, Will Copyright Challenges Come?, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 215 (2022), Levan Nanobashvili
If The Metaverse Is Built, Will Copyright Challenges Come?, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 215 (2022), Levan Nanobashvili
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Caught By The Act: Does The Copyright Act Of 1909 Pose Legal Disasters For Modern Music?, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 292 (2022), Raine Odom
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Malicious V. Negligent Loss Of Data: The Second Circuit's Questionable Test To Determine Data Breach Standing, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 271 (2022), Lukasz Kornas
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Research On The Dilemma And Improvement Of The Copyright Fair Use Doctrine Related To Machine Learning In China, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2022), Yang Gao, Paul Kossof, Yan Dong
Research On The Dilemma And Improvement Of The Copyright Fair Use Doctrine Related To Machine Learning In China, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2022), Yang Gao, Paul Kossof, Yan Dong
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Unintended Repercussions: Copyright Termination And The Punitive Effect Of 17 U.S.C. §203(A)(3) On The Rights Of Creators, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 23 (2022), Loren Mulraine
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Myths And Clichés: The Doctrinal Myopia Of Publicity Right, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 50 (2022), Mira Moldawer
Myths And Clichés: The Doctrinal Myopia Of Publicity Right, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 50 (2022), Mira Moldawer
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
It's A Pirate's Life For Me: Stealing Scripts Instead Of Jewels, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 112 (2022), Alexa Buechler
It's A Pirate's Life For Me: Stealing Scripts Instead Of Jewels, 22 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 112 (2022), Alexa Buechler
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Federal Circuit’S Unconventionality Approach To Patent-Ineligibility Challenges In A Motion To Dismiss, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
Federal Circuit’S Unconventionality Approach To Patent-Ineligibility Challenges In A Motion To Dismiss, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The State Of Trade Secret Protection In China In Light Of The U.S.-China Trade Wars: Trade Secret Protection In China Before And After The U.S.-China Trade Agreement Of January 15, 2020, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 108 (2021), Paolo Beconcini
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Closing The Patent Loophole Across Borders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 358 (2021), Mattias Rättzén
Closing The Patent Loophole Across Borders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 358 (2021), Mattias Rättzén
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Immunex V. Sandoz: Drafting Assignments As Licenses To Avoid Obviousness-Type Double Patenting, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 412 (2021), Michael Mand
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Flipping The Dmca And Its Progeny On Their Heads: Content Creators Reclaiming Revenue From Improper Copyright Claims, 54 Uic L. Rev. 757 (2021), Justin Lizalek
Flipping The Dmca And Its Progeny On Their Heads: Content Creators Reclaiming Revenue From Improper Copyright Claims, 54 Uic L. Rev. 757 (2021), Justin Lizalek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substantial Similarity’S Silent Death, 48 Pepp. L. Rev. 713 (2021), Daryl Lim
Substantial Similarity’S Silent Death, 48 Pepp. L. Rev. 713 (2021), Daryl Lim
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Saving Substantial Similarity, 73 Fla. L. Rev. 591 (2021), Daryl Lim
Saving Substantial Similarity, 73 Fla. L. Rev. 591 (2021), Daryl Lim
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Substantial similarity, an analysis of the similarity between two works, is the fulcrum of copyright infringement. Recent cases involving Led Zeppelin's signature song “Stairway to Heaven,” the award-winning movie “The Shape of Water,” and Google and Oracle's dispute over computer code all required courts to grapple with this fundamental analysis. This Article reveals that today's copyright plaintiffs have only a one-in-ten chance of winning--the worst in a century--and also discusses the cause of this trend--defendants' devastatingly effective use of pretrial motions and the rise of lawsuits against nonrival defendants. Scholarly debates on substantial similarity typically revolve around the works of …
The (Unnoticed) Revitalization Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, 95 St. John's L. Rev. 65 (2021), Daryl Lim
The (Unnoticed) Revitalization Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, 95 St. John's L. Rev. 65 (2021), Daryl Lim
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Former Chief Judge Paul Michel’S Keynote Address At The 64th Annual Intellectual Property Conference At The Uic John Marshall Law School — The Arc Of American Patent Law: Balance And Rebalance And Rebalance Intellectual Property Policy, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 102 (2021), Paul Michel
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Automated Trade Secret Asset Management: Sfp Classification, Eona Proofs, Blockchaining, And Dtsa Civil Seizure Orders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 145 (2021), R. Mark Halligan
Automated Trade Secret Asset Management: Sfp Classification, Eona Proofs, Blockchaining, And Dtsa Civil Seizure Orders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 145 (2021), R. Mark Halligan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
This Is Fisa Calling To Let You Know You May Be Eligible For A Motion To Suppress: New Notice Requirement From United States V. Moalin, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2021), Jennifer Armstrong
This Is Fisa Calling To Let You Know You May Be Eligible For A Motion To Suppress: New Notice Requirement From United States V. Moalin, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2021), Jennifer Armstrong
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Trademark Law After Uspto V. Booking.Com: “Generic.Com” Takeover, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 182 (2021), Paige Miller
Trademark Law After Uspto V. Booking.Com: “Generic.Com” Takeover, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 182 (2021), Paige Miller
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Filtering Innovation Wheat From Chaff: Quick Citations As Indicators Of Patented Invention Value, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 202 (2021), Richard Gruner
Filtering Innovation Wheat From Chaff: Quick Citations As Indicators Of Patented Invention Value, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 202 (2021), Richard Gruner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of Employment Test Under The Work-Made-For-Hire Doctrine Revisited: How Covid-19, Remote Working, And The Restatement (Third) Of Agency Could Change It, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 232 (2021), Diana Simon
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Proposal For A More Objective Method In Determining The Extent Of Similarities Between Musical Works For The Purpose Of Probative Copying, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 251 (2021), Rachael Belensz
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Carpenter V. United States: Step Forward For Smartphones And Their Data, But Maybe Not For Other Technologies, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 308 (2021), Stephen Bartholomew
Carpenter V. United States: Step Forward For Smartphones And Their Data, But Maybe Not For Other Technologies, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 308 (2021), Stephen Bartholomew
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.