Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Are Chatgpt And Other Similar Systems The Modern Lernaean Hydras Of Ai?, Dimitrios Ioannidis, Esq., Dr. Jeremy Kepner, Dr. Andrew Bowne, Lt. Col., Usaf, Harriet S. Bryant

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems (“AI systems”) has created unprecedented social engagement. AI code generation systems provide responses (output) to questions or requests by accessing the vast library of open-source code created by developers over the past few decades. However, they do so by allegedly stealing the open-source code stored in virtual libraries, known as repositories. This Article focuses on how this happens and whether there is a solution that protects innovation and avoids years of litigation. We also touch upon the array of issues raised by the relationship between AI and copyright. Looking ahead, we propose the …

The Fashion Workers Act: Closing The Regulatory Loophole In The New York Fashion Industry, Kayleigh Ristuben

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The fashion industry in New York has largely been unregulated due to a loophole in current law. This has allowed fashion models to face difficulties that would otherwise be addressed by laws regulating other occupations within the entertainment industry. The New York state senate has introduced the Fashion Workers Act which is aimed at addressing these issues and closing the regulatory loophole. This Note analyzes the existing regulatory framework in both New York and California to compare them with the proposed bill. It then uses legislative history from past regulatory attempts to anticipate and address potential industry pushback while offering …

Should Using An Ai Text Generator To Produce Academic Writing Be Plagiarism?, Brian L. Frye, Chat Gpt

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Author's Foreword: I “wrote” this article while taking a bath with a bottle of champagne, by submitting the questions in bold to ChatGPT and copying its responses. I did not bother providing citations for ChatGPT’s claims, because they would obviously be superfluous.

Editor-in-Chief's Foreword: In 2023, the question is unavoidable: when it comes to scholarship, and in our case, legal scholarship, what do we do about artificial intelligence (AI) like ChatGPT? Do we need to do anything? In the Comment that follows, author Brian L. Frye and ChatGPT tried to provide an answer to these questions. Actually, ChatGPT did most …

Income Tax (Treasury) Unhappy: Efficacy Of Media Campaigns And Tax Noncompliance, Limor Riza

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This Article systematically evaluates the effectiveness of governmental media campaigns and considers whether we should invest in educating society via such campaigns to increase tax compliance, primarily in light of the intrinsic flaw of taxation.

Is a radio spot that starts with the sound of scary footsteps approaching you, followed by an announcer who says in a deep and intimidating voice, “we’re closing in on undeclared income,” effective? To answer those questions, this Article proposes and showcases a four-step analysis—the ARMS scheme (Aim, Reason, Media-Methods, Sorting). First, the government’s aim of increased tax compliance is identified and declared (Step I: …

Renewing Faith In Antitrust: Unveiling The Hidden Network Behind Pharmaceutical Product Hopping, Victoria Field

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Patents grant time-limited market exclusivity to drug manufacturers, meaning that other companies are prohibited from copying and selling the patented pharmaceutical. This allows manufacturers to lawfully charge monopoly prices. Generic competition starts at the expiration of the patent. To maintain coveted monopoly power, manufacturers often release an alternative formulation of the drug with a fresh patent that enjoys continued market exclusivity. Manufacturers who can convert their consumer base to the new formulation can continue charging peak prices. This process, called “product hopping,” has been the target of significant antitrust inquiry, with mixed results.

A product hop may be the result …

“Can I Post This?”: A Call For Nuanced Interpretation Of Dmca Enforcement In The Age Of Social Media, Erin E. Bronner

Fordham Law Review

This Note advances recent scholarship critiquing the notice-and-takedown procedures used by online service providers (OSPs) under the safe-harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)—specifically in the context of user-generated content (UGC) posted by end users on social media. Rights holders have increasingly put legal pressure on technology platforms to fortify their copyright protection mechanisms. Over the past decade, this imperative has manifested through an increased use of automated content recognition (ACR) technology to remove allegedly infringing UGC. ACR technology has gradually overtaken the manual, human review of UGC that the DMCA envisioned.

However, reliance on mass automated takedowns …

Access To Medicines And Pharmaceutical Patents: Fulfilling The Promise Of Trips Article 31bis, Ezinne Mirian Igbokwe, Andrea Tosato

Fordham Law Review

The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) has long stood accused of reducing access to medicines for the poorest and most vulnerable nations. Enacted in 1994 as one of the founding pillars of the World Trade Organization, TRIPS has enabled pharmaceutical companies to enforce their patent rights in almost every country, precluding cheaper generics from being distributed, save for very limited exceptions.

But in 2001, TRIPS was amended expressly to address this issue, allowing countries with limited resources to lodge a formal request to obtain patented medicines at a sustainable cost. Generics manufacturers worldwide can answer this …

Ukraine On My Mind: Cultural Heritage And The Current Armed Conflict, Irina Tarsis

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The following keynote address was delivered on October 7, 2022, during the Fordham Law Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal Symposium, “Duplicate, Decolonize, Destroy: Current Topics in Art & Cultural Heritage.” It was prefaced by a YouTube video of “Ukrainian Folk Song ARMY REMIX | Andriy Khlyvnyuk x The Kiffness.” The upbeat remix of a folk song was performed as a collaboration between South African musical talent David Scott, known as the Kiffniss, and Andriy Khlyvnyuk, the lead singer of the Ukrainian band, Boombox (Бумбокс), who took leave from his concert tours to join the military forces of Ukraine …

Trademark Counterfeiting Enforcement Beyond Borders: The Complexities Of Enforcing Trademark Rights Extraterritorially In A Global Marketplace With Territorial-Based Enforcement, Kari Kammel, Matthew Azim-Kramer, Daniel Duquet, Lillie Patterson

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

We focus on the enforcement of trademark rights, particularly those used against counterfeiters, or those who use unauthorized trademarks of another. We examine the concept of extraterritorial enforcement of trademark rights—the extending of enforcement across national borders—and reviewing how different countries and jurisdictions view this concept or even allow it.

The By-Design Approach Revisited: Lessons From Covid-19 Contact Tracing Apps, Mickey Zar, Niva Elkin-Koren

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This paper challenges the by-design regulatory approach by exploring the case study of Contact Tracing Apps. It aims to account for the gap between the hopes that were pinned on digital technologies and the rock of reality into which they have crashed. This gap, we argue, results from overestimating the regulatory power of technology and underestimating the co-influence of various regulatory pillars. To address this gap, it is necessary to adopt an ecosystem perspective on sociotechnical systems, where technological design is but one form of regulation. This perspective allows technological design to acquire a social meaning through interaction with other …

In The Thick(Et) Of It: Addressing Biologic Patent Thickets Using The Sham Exception To Noerr-Pennington, Anna Zhou

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

A biologic patent thicket occurs when a pharmaceutical company acquires a “dense web” of patents and other intellectual property rights regarding a specific product. While applying for multiple patents is permissible, the resulting protections can have antitrust implications. In an industry like biologics, where companies can acquire patent exclusivity and regulatory exclusivity over their products, the process of continuously accumulating these exclusivities seems to be an attempt to keep biosimilars at bay. Keeping competitors out of the market drives up prices and raises questions about how these regulatory and patent pathways are being used.

Recent class action litigation in the …

Global Digital Governance Through The Back Door Of Corporate Regulation, Orit Fischman-Afori

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Today, societal life is increasingly conducted in the digital sphere, in which two core attributes are prominent: this sphere is entirely controlled by enormous technology companies, and these companies are increasingly deploying artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. This reality generates a severe threat to democratic principles and human rights. Therefore, regulating the conduct of the companies ruling the digital sphere is an urgent agenda item worldwide. Policymakers and legislatures around the world are taking their first steps in establishing a digital governance regime, with leading proposals in the EU. Although it is understood that it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive …

Solutions Still Searching For A Problem: A Call For Relevant Data To Support “Evergreening” Allegations, Erika Lietzan, Kristina Acri Née Lybecker

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

For years pharmaceutical policymaking discussions have been revolving around allegations of supposed “evergreening” by pharmaceutical companies, and policymakers have considered a range of significant policy reforms—including to antitrust law and drug regulatory law—to address this purported problem. This Article evaluates empirical data offered to substantiate “evergreening” and explains that these data—though mostly accurate—do not support proposed policy changes.

The “evergreening” claim is that by securing additional patents and FDA-related exclusivities after approval of their new drugs, brand drug companies enjoy a period of exclusivity in the market that is longer than the initial patent(s) and exclusivity on the drug would …

User-Generated Data Network Effects And Market Competition Dynamics, Uri Y. Hacohen

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This Article defines User-Generated Data (“UGD”) network effects, distinguishes them from the more familiar concept of traditional network effects, and explores their implications for market competition dynamics. It explains that UGD network effects produce various efficiencies for digital service providers (“data platforms”) by empowering their services’ optimization, personalization, and continuous diversification. In light of these efficiencies, competition dynamics in UGD-driven markets tend to be unstable and lead to the formation of dominant multi-industry conglomerates. These processes will enhance social welfare because they are natural and efficient. Conversely, countervailing UGD network effects also empower data platforms to detect and neutralize competitive …

Silly Gene Patent Is Not My Lover: A Retrospective Analysis Of Myriad, Stephanie Huang

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. established that an isolated fragment of a gene—the basic unit of heredity—is not patent-eligible subject matter while simultaneously holding that complementary DNA (cDNA) of a gene is patent-eligible subject matter. The decision has been controversial and criticized for including two holdings that are internally inconsistent from both scientific and patent law perspectives. But are the short- and long-term criticisms overstated? A decade after Myriad, the various impacts of the case remain relevant, particularly to the biotechnology and genetic testing fields.

First, this Note examines whether Myriad …

Policy Implications Of User-Generated Data Network Effects, Uri Y. Hacohen

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

User-generated data (UGD) network effects are an exciting and novel economic force. They upset conventional market competition dynamics, and they lead to the formation of dominant data platforms with market power that spans different and seemingly unrelated markets. This article explains that UGD network effects are a blessing and a curse. They provide dominant data platforms with the opportunity to generate welfare-enhancing efficiencies as well as welfare-reducing anticompetitive harms. After exploring the economic opportunities and social threats, this article explores the implications of UGD network effects on competition policy. Drawing on traditional network effects theory, this article proposes and critically …

From Drawstring To Drawback: A Proposal For The Donation Alternative Program To Promote Environmental Responsibility In Fashion Act, Elliot O. Jackson

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Given the modern interest in resold, repurposed, upcycled, and thrifted goods, the fashion industry was forced to welcome new players into its global market. In turn, these players offer new meaning to the phrase: “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure,” especially in light of post-pandemic consumer relations. Pairing creativity and innovation with existing techniques has allowed many designers, ateliers, and skilled professionals across the world to transform old or mundane goods into vibrant apparel. A worthy example of this practice is Dapper Dan’s transformation of garment bags from a high-fashion brand into upcycled or repurposed, one-of-a-kind products. The origin …

The Patent Written Description Requirement: A Requirement In Search Of A Description, Darlene M.J. Staines

Fordham Law Review

Innovation often requires a hefty investment of time and money. The patent system exists to incentivize innovation by granting inventors the exclusive use of their invention for a set period of time. In return, the public receives the benefit of the inventor’s knowledge, as well as the use of the invention once the exclusivity period ends. One of the hurdles for obtaining a patent is the written description requirement, which demands that the inventor disclose enough information to prove that they actually invented what they are seeking patent protection for. This requirement serves to prevent an undeserving “inventor” from obtaining …

Discretionary Denial Of Inter Partes Review And The Patent Trial And Appeal Board, Xinni Cai

Fordham Law Review

The inter partes review (IPR) is an administrative procedure conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), an adjudicative body within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). IPR provides an opportunity for third parties to challenge a patent’s validity after it has already been granted. A petitioner can file a petition with the PTAB to “institute” IPR. If the review is instituted, the PTAB considers the evidence presented and issues a final written decision, either holding the patent valid or striking it down as invalid. Although IPR was introduced as an alternative to litigation, it is often used …

The Value In Secrecy, Camilla A. Hrdy

Fordham Law Review

Trade secret law is seen as the most inclusive of intellectual property regimes. So long as information can be kept secret, the wisdom goes, it can be protected under trade secret law, even if patent and copyright protections are unavailable. But keeping it a secret does not magically transform information into a trade secret. The information must also derive economic value from being kept secret from others. This elusive statutory requirement—called “independent economic value”—might at first glance seem redundant, especially in the context of litigation. After all, if information had no value, why would the plaintiff have bothered to keep …

Infringement Or Identification?: Nominative Fair Use And The Resale Of Luxury Goods, Jordan Phelan

Fordham Law Review

The market for luxury resale is booming and is predicted to continue its massive growth. Luxury resellers typically market and describe goods using the luxury brand’s trademarks, including the brand name and logos. Luxury brands utilize their market power to “bully” smaller resellers and often take issue with third parties using their trademarks in any context, even when the use of the mark does not encroach on the luxury brand’s share of the market. However, the doctrine of nominative fair use allows the use of a brand’s trademark when referring to that brand’s goods. An alleged infringer will be found …

5b Patent Law Session. Patent Potpouri, Andrew Bowler, Michael Williams, Sepehr Shahshahani, Ari Laakkonen, Marleen Van Den Horst, Simon Holzer

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

1c Plenary Session. Views From The Judiciary, Hugh C. Hansen, Richard Arnold, Stephen Burley, Paolo Catallozzi, Klaus Grabinski, Simon Holzer, Gordon Humphreys, Robin Jacob, Carl Josefsson, Rian Kalden, F. Scott Kieff, Paul R. Michel, Pauline Newman, Peter Charleton, Edger F. Brinkman

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

5d Patent Law Session. Ptab, John B. Pegram, Adam Mossoff, Patricia Martone, Brian Scarpelli, George E. Badenoch, Brian P. Murphy

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

6d Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, Michael S. Shapiro, David O. Carson, Kevin Amer, Joshua L. Simmons, Jennifer Pariser, Sandra Aistars

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

7d Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. U.S. Trademark Law Developments, Matthew D. Asbell, Marshall Leaffer, Jennifer Simmons, Rebecca Tushnet, Gerald M. Levine, Maria A. Scungio

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

5c Patent Law Session. International Patent Developments, Robin Jacob, Peter Charleton, Brian Cordery, John Richards, Heinz Goddar, Melanie Müller, Eva Ehlich, Kevin Mcgough

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

7c Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Trade Secrets, Victoria A. Cundiff, Camilla Alexandra Hrdy, Max Haedicke, James Pooley, Thomas D. Pease, Mark F. Schultz

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

6c Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Frand, Cordula Schumacher, Jorge L. Contreras, Steven Geiszler, David Por, Jyh-An Lee, Steve Akerley, Wolrad Prinz Zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.

6b Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Copyright Protections For Publishers, Ted Shapiro, Kimberley Isbell, Danielle Coffey, Ali Sternburg, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Carlo Scollo Lavizzari

29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)

No abstract provided.