Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (38)
- Law and Economics (22)
- Arts and Humanities (16)
- First Amendment (16)
- Philosophy (16)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (12)
- Courts (11)
- Economics (11)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (10)
- Torts (8)
- Litigation (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (6)
- Legal History (5)
- Banking and Finance Law (4)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Computer Law (4)
- Health Law and Policy (4)
- Internet Law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Property Law and Real Estate (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Food and Drug Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual property (140)
- Copyright (135)
- Patents (47)
- Patent (36)
- Fair use (31)
-
- Trademark (30)
- Patent law (27)
- Property (21)
- Innovation (20)
- Infringement (17)
- Market failure (17)
- Copyright law (16)
- Property rights (15)
- Technology (15)
- Free speech (14)
- Privacy (14)
- Tort (14)
- Restitution (13)
- Federal Circuit (12)
- Contract (11)
- Licensing (11)
- Litigation (11)
- Antitrust (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Locke (10)
- Patent infringement (10)
- Economics (9)
- Harm (9)
- IP (9)
- Law and economics (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 363 of 363
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Notes On Preemption And Misc - 1981, Wendy J. Gordon
Notes On Preemption And Misc - 1981, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
As one of my students indirectly commented (the Herzog midterm?), section 301 PURPORTS to be exclusive. "Nothing in this title shall annul state rights etc." One student, Chris Binnig, indirectly suggested a way out of the exclusivity problem, other than the common sense of Abrams, namely that 301 talks about the general scope of copyright- something which may require some policy inquiry.
Notes On Misc Re Contract - 1981, Wendy J. Gordon
Notes On Misc Re Contract - 1981, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Once there is a patent, voluntarily-accepted user restrictions may not be enforceable. Or, at least, an attempt on the patentee's part to condition access of certain types on obtaining such restrictions, may be impossible. See 30 BNA PTCJ 104 (5/30/85)(Restrictions voided on availability of deposited yeast strains.) Filed under Yeast case.
Lecture Draft On Sensory Recall Device - 1980, Wendy J. Gordon
Lecture Draft On Sensory Recall Device - 1980, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Perception is a bodily function. The brain “sees” according to the orders which the optic nerve relays from its position at the back of the eye. Similarly, it is the brain which also "hears." As we know from our dreaming and our remembering, neither eye nor ear is indispensable to having the sensations of seeing and hearing.