Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (221)
- University of Michigan Law School (92)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (48)
- UIC School of Law (30)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (24)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (16)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- BLR (13)
- Pepperdine University (7)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Marquette University Law School (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- Southern Methodist University (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright law (48)
- Copyright (38)
- Legislation (36)
- Law reform (30)
- Patent law (28)
-
- Technology (24)
- Intellectual Property Law (22)
- Congress (19)
- Intellectual property (18)
- Law (18)
- Copyright infringement (17)
- Fair use (17)
- Copyright Act (16)
- Patents (16)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (14)
- Internet (14)
- Patent (14)
- Copyright Act of 1976 (13)
- Intellectual Property (13)
- Copyright reform (12)
- Regulation (12)
- Constitutional Law (11)
- Drugs (11)
- Lanham Act (11)
- Software (11)
- Trademark (11)
- Copyright Law (10)
- Incentives (10)
- Pharmaceuticals (10)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- UIC Law Review (28)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (27)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (26)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
-
- Michigan Law Review (22)
- Articles (20)
- ExpressO (13)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (13)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (8)
- Cardozo Law Review (7)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Publications (7)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (6)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (6)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (6)
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (6)
- IP Theory (6)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (6)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (5)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Book Chapters (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (4)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 571 - 581 of 581
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Atomic Energy - Patents - Patent Aspects Of Domestic Law, Euratom, And The International Atomic Energy Agency, Peter H. Hay
Atomic Energy - Patents - Patent Aspects Of Domestic Law, Euratom, And The International Atomic Energy Agency, Peter H. Hay
Michigan Law Review
With the growing importance of atomic energy, conventional legal concepts must be adapted and remodeled to fit new situations. In the area of patent law, the traditional notion that the inventor's reward should be a legal monopoly in the invention, in the form of a patent, has to be reconciled with the need for wide dissemination of technical information. The need for secrecy, for government control over weapons, and for cooperation with other countries affects the atomic patent system. These factors are reflected in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and in the agreements establishing two international organizations concerned with …
Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue
Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to review judicial standards applicable to the determination of rights in inventions made by employees of the federal government, to note statutory provisions affecting the problem, to examine the content and effect of the present Executive program for determining such rights, to review and evaluate two fundamental and conflicting theories in this field, and to propose legislation establishing appropriate standards and procedures. This topic is believed to have general interest because, in addition to the urgencies suggested above, the problem touches some of the basic legal philosophy underlying the United States patent system.
Trademarks - Extraterritorial Application Of The Lanham Act, William R. Luney S.Ed.
Trademarks - Extraterritorial Application Of The Lanham Act, William R. Luney S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, an American corporation, had manufactured and sold women's undergarments in the United States and Canada since 1917, under a U.S. registered trademark, "Vanity Fair." Defendant, a Canadian corporation, had registered the same trademark in Canada in 1915, and for this reason plaintiff's application for a Canadian trademark was denied in 1919. From 1945 to 1953, defendant purchased plaintiff's trademarked goods for resale in Canada. In 1953, defendant began selling goods of Canadian manufacture with its own Vanity Fair trademark, and threatened its competitors in Canada with infringement suits if they continued to sell plaintiff's trademarked goods. In an action …
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Federal Jurisdiction In Trade-Mark Infringement Proceedings Under The Lanham Act, Richard R. Dailey
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Federal Jurisdiction In Trade-Mark Infringement Proceedings Under The Lanham Act, Richard R. Dailey
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's trade-mark, "Minute Maid," had been registered under the Lanham Act in 1952 and had been used in interstate commerce in connection with the sale of frozen fruit juice concentrates since that time. Defendant's trade-mark consisted in part of the words "Minute Made." Defendant used its mark wholly within the State of Florida in the processing and sale of frozen meat products. Both plaintiff and defendant were Florida corporations. In a suit for trade-mark infringement, jurisdiction of the federal district court depended. on the provisions of the Lanham Act. The complaint alleged damage to plaintiff's good will established in interstate …
Borderland - Where Copyright And Design Patent Meet, Richard W. Pogue
Borderland - Where Copyright And Design Patent Meet, Richard W. Pogue
Michigan Law Review
Copyright law and design patent law contemplate basically different objects of protection. Yet at the outer fringes of these types of protection certain concepts overlap to form a rather undefined borderland in which it is difficult to say what law is applicable-copyright law, patent law, neither, or both. It is the purpose of this paper to explore this borderland area in the light of traditional copyright and patent law principles, with attention given to policy considerations involved, and to offer suggestions toward drawing a sharper boundary between the two.
Woe Unto You Trade-Mark Owners, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr.
Woe Unto You Trade-Mark Owners, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
THE new Trade-Mark Act,1 widely heralded as giving added protection to trade-mark owners, has in its nearly four years of operation resulted, in several spectacular instances, in narrowing the rights conferred by the registration and use of trade-marks. Text author Rudolph Callmann remarked after the act's first birthday: "Despite all the efforts of the bar, our courts still cling to the familiar anachronisms."2 Where do trade-mark owners stand today? The Supreme Court has to date failed to answer this question, and the federal courts have refused to consider the import of the new legislation. Many commentators, attorneys and scholars thought …
The Compulsory Manufacturing Provision-An Anachronism In The Copyright Act, Clinton R. Ashford S. Ed.
The Compulsory Manufacturing Provision-An Anachronism In The Copyright Act, Clinton R. Ashford S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The protection afforded foreign authors under the United States Copyright Act at the present time is subject to stringent restrictions. Copyright will not be granted to a person who is neither a citizen nor a resident of the United States unless he complies with a great many formalities, and, in addition, conforms with the compulsory manufacturing requirement. It is the object of this comment to examine the manufacturing provision, section 16 of the Copyright Law, and to show why it should be deleted from the act.
Compulsory Licensing By Judicial Action: A Remedy For Misuse Of Patents, Neal Seegert
Compulsory Licensing By Judicial Action: A Remedy For Misuse Of Patents, Neal Seegert
Michigan Law Review
Having viewed the fundamental problems, it is pertinent to outline some of the alleged abuses of the American patent system as it operates in our modern business and industrial economy and to canvass some of the proposed remedies. First are abuses that might be termed attempts to extend the duration of the patent monopoly. These stem mainly from the procedural aspects of the patent laws. Foremost among them is the problem of long pendency of applications, particularly the dilatory tactics that are possible under the law, which postpone issuance of the patent, thus extending the time duration of the patent …
A Review Of The New Trade-Mark Manual, Lenore B. Stoughton
A Review Of The New Trade-Mark Manual, Lenore B. Stoughton
Michigan Law Review
The United States Trade-Mark Act of July 5, 1946, is a statute designed to be of far-reaching effect. The appraisal of the statute must be made in the light of that fact rather than in the light of the confusion and disputation which have arisen as to the proper interpretation of many of its provisions.
One might have supposed that an act which had been subjected to intensive study and extensive revision over so many years before its final enactment would emerge in complete clarity. Such has not proved to be the case; and it should not have been expected. …
✪ An Act To Amend And Consolidate The Acts Representing Copyright ✪, United States Congress
✪ An Act To Amend And Consolidate The Acts Representing Copyright ✪, United States Congress
Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909
The Copyright Act of 1909 was a landmark U.S. law that governed copyright protection from March 4, 1909, until it was superseded by the Copyright Act of 1976. Although rarely needed, this law is still applied to certain categories of works created before January 1, 1978 that were not covered by the 1976 modifications.
The 1909 Act established key provisions for copyright law at the time, balancing the rights of creators with public access. It prescribed a copyright term of 28 years with the possibility of renewal for another 28 years, the requirement for publication with a copyright notice, and …