Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

How To Get Away With Discrimination: The Use Of Algorithms To Discriminate In The Internet Entertainment Industry, Sumra Wahid

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

In July 2021, Ziggi Tyler posted a video on TikTok, a popular video sharing platform, where he expressed his frustration with being a Black content creator on TikTok. The video showed Ziggi typing phrases such as “Black Lives Matter” or “Black success” into his Marketplace creator bio, which the app would immediately flag as inappropriate content. However, when Ziggi replaced those words with “white supremacy” or “white success,” no inappropriateness warning appeared. Although a TikTok spokesperson responded to the video clarifying that the app had mistakenly flagged phrases without considering word order, Ziggi refused to let an algorithm absolve TikTok …

Introductory Remarks, Ethan Bordman, Ira S. Dizengoff, Sophie Dizengoff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article discusses the legal implications and challenges surrounding college athletes' rights to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL), following the NCAA's 2021 decision to lift its ban on athletes cashing in on their fame. The symposium explores the evolving legal landscape, including regulatory frameworks, equity issues, and the role of collectives, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines to address the complexities arising from this change.

Panel 2: Regulations & Other Congressional Concerns, Sam C. Ehrlich, Dan Lust, Matt Mitten, John T. Wolohan, Andrew Zimbalist, Maureen Weston

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the evolution of college athletes' name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights, highlighting the shift from NCAA control to a chaotic regulatory landscape influenced by court rulings and state laws. The NCAA seeks Congressional intervention for antitrust immunity to address these challenges.

The Ftc's "Made In America" Enforcement Policy Is Too Stringent For Small Businesses To Comply With, Jamie Cutler

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) "Made in America" policy is overly stringent and disproportionately burdensome for small businesses. The policy requires products labeled as "Made in America" to contain "all or virtually all" parts and processing from the U.S., a standard that is often ambiguous, economically prohibitive, and misaligned with consumer perceptions. The note contends that this strict enforcement creates a "Hobson's choice" for small businesses, making it infeasible for them to comply without suffering financial harm or reputational damage. It advocates for lowering the threshold to allow more flexibility, which would support small businesses, promote …

Fragmented Music Copyright Protection: A Better Arrangement, Matthew B. Goldman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note explores the challenges of music copyright law, particularly in determining the protectability of fragmented elements within musical works. It argues that by applying doctrinal tools such as the idea-expression distinction, merger, scenes a faire, and thin copyright, courts can better balance the protection of original expression with the need to allow future creativity. The analysis focuses on two key cases, Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin and Gray v. Perry, to illustrate how these tools can be effectively used to resolve music copyright disputes.

Randomness, Ai Art, And Copyright, Richard H. Chused

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that art created with the assistance of AI tools should generally be eligible for copyright protection. It posits that human agency is present in the creation of AI-generated art, as traditional artistic works also incorporate randomness and unpredictability. By examining works by artists like Alexander Calder, Robert Rauschenberg, and John Cage, the analysis demonstrates that randomness and unpredictability have long been protected under copyright law, suggesting that AI-generated art should receive similar treatment.

Trademarks And Censorship In The Time Of Covid-19, Xuan-Thao Nguyen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

During the devastating year of 2020, China quickly conquered the novel coronavirus and roared back economically while the United States faced staggering deaths and economic losses. But underneath the divergent experience of the two countries is an untold story of trademark and censorship in the time of COVID-19. This Article observes that while the United States Supreme Court has lifted the ban on trademark registrations for unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, opening the door for offensive COVID-19 trademark applications, China has transformed trademark law into the law for censorship as Chinese authorities press forward to achieve twin victories over the coronavirus and …

Protecting Ravenstail: Cultural Appropriation And The Outer Limits Of Copyright Law, Nosson Sternbach

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the challenges minority cultures, particularly indigenous communities, face in protecting their cultural heritage through copyright law, focusing on the Sealaska Heritage Institute Inc. v. Neiman Marcus Group LTD, LLC case. It argues that copyright law's requirements—such as fixation, originality, authorship, and duration—create significant barriers for indigenous cultures seeking to safeguard their intellectual property. The note also critiques the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA) for its inefficacy in preventing cultural appropriation, as it requires plaintiffs to prove specific harms and often fails to address the misuse of cultural motifs without explicit tribal names. The Sealaska case highlights …

Dickens V. Lee (1844): A Christmas Tale Of Two Experts Testifying, Mark Rose

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the 1844 case of Dickens v. Lee, highlighting its significance as an early example of the use of expert witnesses in copyright disputes. Dickens successfully sued over the unauthorized adaptation of A Christmas Carol, but the case underscores the challenges of balancing literary and commercial considerations in copyright law. The defense's use of expert testimony to argue market differentiation contrasts with the court's focus on literary similarity, foreshadowing modern debates on substantial similarity in copyright infringement.

How Patents Became Politics, Steven Wilf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Political mobilization in the digital age often coalesces around opposition to the far-reaching protection of intellectual property. Both copyright and patent have materialized as the centerpiece of major political and legal debates that take a variety of forms, including the European pirate parties, NGOs such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the United States, and the call for open source software. The commonplace narrative is that self-interested stakeholders over the past century successfully fashioned an ever-expanding intellectual property system, and that resistance to such legal control of knowledge only emerged in our times. By contrast, this article recovers a littleknown …

100 Years Of International Ip - Reflections On Past, Present And Future, Frederick M. Abbott

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article reflects on the past 100 years of international intellectual property (IP) law, highlighting its evolution from regional agreements to global systems like the TRIPS Agreement. It emphasizes that IP rights are shaped by human policies and societal needs, not inherent qualities, making them adaptable. Current challenges include balancing IP protection with public access, addressing cybercrime, and grappling with AI-generated works.

The Next 100 Years Of International Intellectual Property: Integrating Human Rights And Corporate Social Responsibility, Julia Janewa Osei-Tutu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article predicts that international intellectual property (IP) law will increasingly integrate human rights and corporate social responsibility (CSR) into its framework over the next century. This shift reflects a broader trend of balancing IP protection with societal concerns, such as public health, cultural heritage, and human development. The author argues that while the TRIPS Agreement established minimum IP standards, future agreements will prioritize equitable access to knowledge, medicines, and traditional knowledge, aligning IP law with global sustainability and human rights goals.

Three Megatrends In The International Intellectual Property Regime, Peter K. Yu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The international intellectual property (IP) regime has undergone significant transformation over the past century, shaped by three key megatrends: the rise of emerging countries, the increasing complexity of the regime, and spatial transformation driven by new technologies. These trends have reshaped the regime's standards, policies, and challenges, with profound implications for global economic and social welfare. The article critiques the regime's historical bias toward developed nations and its overemphasis on trade interests, advocating for a balanced approach that integrates public welfare and human rights considerations. It concludes that the regime's growing complexity necessitates new institutional frameworks and vocabularies to address …

Nil Collectives - Title Ix's Latest Challenge, Kassandra Ramsey

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the intersection of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Collectives and Title IX, arguing that while NIL Collectives are not directly subject to Title IX, colleges and universities must ensure these organizations comply with Title IX to maintain gender equity. Schools are responsible due to their federal funding and their promotion of these collectives, necessitating guidelines, education, and audits to prevent disparities in opportunities for male and female athletes.

The Exclusive Right To Customize?, Mark A. Lemley, Sari Mazzurco

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Artists, political commentators, and even multinational corporations are increasingly taking existing branded products and modifying them – sometimes to comment on the underlying product, sometimes to make a political or artistic statement unrelated to that product, sometimes to make them look fancier than they are, and sometimes for their own advertising purposes. As ornamenting and customizing existing products has shifted from a personal hobby to a business model, trademark owners have begun to insist that they have the exclusive right to control the appearance of products associated with them or that prominently bear their logos. We call this assertion a …

A Theoretical Analysis Of Orphan Works, Eden Sarid, Omri Ben-Zvi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In American libraries, museums, and archives, there currently are tens of millions of cultural treasures, such as photos, manuscripts, and sound recordings, which hold extraordinary academic, cultural, and historical value. But these valuable items, known as "orphan works, remain out of public reach. Orphan works are subject to copyright, but their copyright owners cannot be located. These works are stuck in limbo-as copyright works, they cannot be used without permission, but permission cannot be granted because the copyright owner is unknown. This exceptional predicament has not escaped the attention of legislators and academics, yet thus far, the United States has …

Ip Law In The Shadow Of Norms, Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the interplay between formal intellectual property (IP) law and social norms in governing creative and innovative communities. It argues that while IP law is essential, it should not overshadow the significant role of norms, which often provide effective governance within specific communities. The author suggests that law should be mindful of diverse norms to promote social justice and innovation, recognizing that norms can both complement and conflict with formal legal frameworks.

Reclaiming Feudalism For The Technological Era, Shelly Kreiczer-Levy

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that traditional personal property law fails to adequately address the complexities of AI-capable assets, such as robots, which require a new framework to balance manufacturer control with user rights. It proposes two models—the connection model and the competition model—to regulate these relationships, emphasizing the need for collaboration, data ownership, and consumer protection in the evolving landscape of technological ownership.

The Past And Future In International Patent Law, Rochelle C. Dreyfuss

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The organizers of the 2022 International Law Weekend asked us to consider how our fields have changed in the last century and to offer our thoughts about the future. For intellectual property, the changes have been formidable. The Industrial Revolution gave way to an Information Revolution. As a result, knowledge products now constitute a significant share of global wealth. And as the world increasingly endures crises like the recent pandemic, climate change, and food and energy insecurity, technological information will become even more important-indeed, crucial to the survival of the planet.

My own field is international patent law, where there …

Advances In Patent Rights Acquisition In International Patent Law, Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the significant developments in international patent law over the past century, focusing on how procedural changes facilitated by treaties like the Paris Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) have led to substantive shifts in domestic patent laws. It argues that while these procedural streamlinings aim to enhance efficiency, they have also influenced substantive legal changes, such as the U.S. transition from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file patent system. The author highlights the need to recognize how procedural harmonization can shape substantive patent law and policy.

Nine Copyright Things Every Library And Archive Should Know In 2023, Elizabeth Townsend Gard

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that libraries are currently experiencing a "golden age" of protection from copyright liability, despite ongoing challenges. It highlights recent legal developments, such as the expansion of the public domain, updates to Section 108 of the Copyright Act, and the implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty, which collectively enhance libraries' ability to serve the public. However, the article also acknowledges significant legal setbacks, including adverse court rulings on controlled digital lending and state e-book laws, which complicate the landscape for libraries seeking to balance copyright compliance with public access.

Re-Striping: Predatory Trademarks And Common Signs, Lior Zemer, Or Morag, Yochai Rosner

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Trademark laws were traditionally designed based on the belief that there was an infinite supply of eligible registrable signs. However, current studies show that trademark supply is finite, and that we are close to exhausting it. While trademark protection allows proprietors to distinguish between their goods or services from others, and allowing the public to do the same, the extent of such protection requires constant legal attention and reconsideration which, as contemporary trademark policies show, does not take place in the expected frequency.

One of the immediate consequences from this lack of attention is the rapid growth in strength of …

Should The Ncaa Be Subject To Title Ix?, Sarah Allen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should be held accountable under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, despite its current exemption, due to its significant role in college athletics and the persistent gender disparities in treatment of male and female athletes. It advocates for overturning the Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Smith to bring the NCAA under Title IX purview.

Name, Image And Likeness: Giving College Athletes The Clearest Guidance To Best Profit Off Their Nil, Scott Semaya

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Alston has created a legal and regulatory void by invalidating the NCAA's restrictions on student-athletes' ability to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL). While the ruling opened the door for student-athletes to earn compensation, it left unresolved questions about the scope and enforcement of NIL rights. The lack of federal legislation has led to a patchwork of state laws, causing confusion and inequities for student-athletes, schools, and the NCAA. The note advocates for immediate federal intervention to establish uniform guidelines and level the playing field, while also …

Keynote Address, Andrew Zimbalist

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the evolution of name, image, and likeness (NIL) policies in college athletics, highlighting the legal, economic, and educational implications of allowing college athletes to profit from their NIL. It argues that while recent legal cases and state legislation have expanded NIL rights, the lack of enforceable guardrails has created a chaotic system dominated by booster collectives, exacerbating financial and equity issues in college sports. The analysis critiques the NCAA's ineffective oversight and advocates for congressional intervention to establish a national framework addressing these challenges.

“Can I Post This?”: A Call For Nuanced Interpretation Of Dmca Enforcement In The Age Of Social Media, Erin E. Bronner

Fordham Law Review

This Note advances recent scholarship critiquing the notice-and-takedown procedures used by online service providers (OSPs) under the safe-harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)—specifically in the context of user-generated content (UGC) posted by end users on social media. Rights holders have increasingly put legal pressure on technology platforms to fortify their copyright protection mechanisms. Over the past decade, this imperative has manifested through an increased use of automated content recognition (ACR) technology to remove allegedly infringing UGC. ACR technology has gradually overtaken the manual, human review of UGC that the DMCA envisioned.

However, reliance on mass automated takedowns …

Keeping It Real: Property Analogies For Graffiti Infringement, Shelby Pickar-Dennis

University of Colorado Law Review

No abstract provided.

Where In The World: Protecting Indigenous Textiles In Guatemala Through Geographical Indications, Lucie Couillard Sosa

Brooklyn Journal of International Law

There is a current movement by indigenous weavers in Guatemala to protect their textile designs due to the harm caused by the absence of the weavers’ intellectual property ownership over the designs and patterns. The exploitation and appropriation of their designs by domestic and international companies has hurt weavers’ livelihoods and has led to culturally inappropriate and insensitive uses of religious and traditional patterns. Conventional intellectual property law (copyright, trademark, and patent law) fails to protect indigenous peoples’ intellectual property rights. A key weakness within conventional intellectual property law is the emphasis and focus on individuality of the creation process. …

Automatic Takedowns: How Contentid Has Changed Copyright Enforcement, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Entertainment Law Society, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Countering Personalized Speech, Leon G. Ho

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

Social media platforms use personalization algorithms to make content curation decisions for each end user. These personalized recommendation decisions are essentially speech conveying a platform's predictions on content relevance for each end user. Yet, they are causing some of the worst problems on the internet. First, they facilitate the precipitous spread of mis- and disinformation by exploiting the very same biases and insecurities that drive end user engagement with such content. Second, they exacerbate social media addiction and related mental health harms by leveraging users' affective needs to drive engagement to greater and greater heights. Lastly, they erode end user …