Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UC Law SF (846)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (587)
- Fordham Law School (515)
- Seattle University School of Law (202)
- UIC School of Law (90)
-
- DePaul University (77)
- University of Washington School of Law (70)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (60)
- University of Georgia School of Law (52)
- Pace University (49)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (42)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Michigan Law School (35)
- American University Washington College of Law (24)
- Marquette University Law School (23)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (23)
- Columbia Law School (21)
- BLR (19)
- Brooklyn Law School (19)
- University of Miami Law School (16)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (14)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (13)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (12)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (12)
- University of Kentucky (11)
- University of New Hampshire (11)
- Boston University School of Law (10)
- Florida International University College of Law (9)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (9)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (290)
- Intellectual property (89)
- Copyright law (78)
- Trademark (78)
- Copyright infringement (67)
-
- Music (60)
- Patent (59)
- Fair use (55)
- First Amendment (54)
- Internet (53)
- Sports (49)
- Intellectual Property Law (37)
- First amendment (36)
- Infringement (35)
- Lanham Act (31)
- Copyright Act (30)
- Antitrust (27)
- Technology (27)
- Intellectual Property (25)
- Right of publicity (24)
- Sound recordings (24)
- Art (23)
- Free speech (23)
- Arts and Entertainment (20)
- Constitution (20)
- Trademark law (20)
- DMCA (18)
- Media (18)
- Privacy (18)
- Berne Convention (17)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (508)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (487)
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (77)
-
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (67)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (62)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (57)
- Faculty Scholarship (48)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog (47)
- Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum (44)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (42)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (38)
- ExpressO (19)
- Pepperdine Law Review (19)
- Articles (15)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (14)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (14)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (14)
- Cybaris® (12)
- Cardozo Law Review (11)
- Michigan Law Review (11)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (11)
- UIC Law Review (11)
- American Indian Law Journal (9)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (9)
- University of Miami Business Law Review (9)
- FIU Law Review (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (7)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2701 - 2730 of 3052
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
New Technologies On The Block: New Kids On The Block V. News America Publishing, Inc. , Randy S. Frisch
New Technologies On The Block: New Kids On The Block V. News America Publishing, Inc. , Randy S. Frisch
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Protecting Plant-Derived Drugs: Patents And Beyond, Liz Hanellin
Protecting Plant-Derived Drugs: Patents And Beyond, Liz Hanellin
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Ronald J. Palenski
Introduction, Ronald J. Palenski
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fordham University Sesquicentennial 1841-1991 And Dedication, Editorial Board
Fordham University Sesquicentennial 1841-1991 And Dedication, Editorial Board
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Free Press-Fair Trial Conflict–What's A Lawyer To Say?, C. Evan Stewart
The Free Press-Fair Trial Conflict–What's A Lawyer To Say?, C. Evan Stewart
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Stranger In Parodies: Weird Al And The Law Of Musical Satire, Charles J. Sanders, Steven R. Gordon
Stranger In Parodies: Weird Al And The Law Of Musical Satire, Charles J. Sanders, Steven R. Gordon
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Antitrust & Professional Sports' Eligibility Rules: The Past, The Present, And The Future, Cathy E. Shore
Antitrust & Professional Sports' Eligibility Rules: The Past, The Present, And The Future, Cathy E. Shore
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Preemption Of The Right Of Publicity In Sing-Alike Cases, Leonard A. Wohl
Federal Preemption Of The Right Of Publicity In Sing-Alike Cases, Leonard A. Wohl
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Alternatives To Copyright Law Protection Of Graphic Characters: The Lanham Act And Antidilution Statutes, Robert E. Anderson
Alternatives To Copyright Law Protection Of Graphic Characters: The Lanham Act And Antidilution Statutes, Robert E. Anderson
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In an "information age" dominated by mass media entertainment, graphic characters have become increasingly valuable commodities. Federal trademark law and state antidilution statutes provide alternatives to copyright law protection of such hot properties as the "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles." This Essay explores how courts determine the existence of secondary meaning in characters, as well as which aspects of a character, such as a costume or nickname, may receive protection. The Essay concludes with an examination of new trends introduced by the entertainment industry and the law of unfair competition.
From Satirical To Satyrical: When Is A Joke Actionable, Sandra Davidson Scott
From Satirical To Satyrical: When Is A Joke Actionable, Sandra Davidson Scott
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
This Article explores the often sexy landscape of satire and parody, asking the question, Has the law gone too far in denying plaintiffs recovery for satire that cannot be taken as literally true? The case of Pring v. Penthouse International provides the touchstone. The author addresses topics including Jerry Falwell's unsuccessful suit against Hustler magazine, the public figure/private person distinction, commercial appropriation of name and likeness, and the opinion/fact distinction. The Article concludes that courts show more sensitivity to commercial than personal injury and fail to appreciate that satire can damage reputations by raising suspicions that statements are based on …
Scarcity Of The Airwaves: Allocating And Assigning The Spectrum For High Definition Television (Hdtv), Janine S. Natter
Scarcity Of The Airwaves: Allocating And Assigning The Spectrum For High Definition Television (Hdtv), Janine S. Natter
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
High Definition Television (HDTV) promises a dramatic technological advancement in the quality of video and audio television. This Note asserts that local broadcast television networks must be allocated additional space on the electromagnetic spectrum to transmit the improved signals required for a competitive HDTV system in the United States. Unless additional spectrum frequencies are allocated for broadcast television, the spectrum presently allocated may be insufficient to satisfy all applicants. Therefore, a scheme must be developed to determine which applicants will be granted the right to use any additional frequencies. The author discusses various methods of assigning the spectrum and proposes …
U.S. Communications Policymaking: Who & (And) Where, Mark S. Nadel
U.S. Communications Policymaking: Who & (And) Where, Mark S. Nadel
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The author describes the major communications policy forums and provides a directory of the principal individuals and organizations involved in creating the agendas of the forums and other major participants. The Directory covers federal, state, and some local government bodies, and key international communications forums. The Directory also lists academic research centers, policy journals, major conferences and seminar programs, foundations, and advocacy groups.
California V. Fcc: A Victory For The States, Ann E. Rendahl
California V. Fcc: A Victory For The States, Ann E. Rendahl
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In California v. FCC, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the FCC's Computer III Order, a regulatory scheme that changed the method of regulating enhanced services. This Note evaluates the FCC's Computer III Order, focusing on the history of the computer inquiries and the ensuing policy debate between the FCC and state regulatory commissions. The Note analyzes the case law concerning the FCC's preemptive power under the Communications Act of 1934, including the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana Public Service Commission and succeeding court of appeal decisions. The author describes the parties' arguments in California v. FCC, explains the Ninth Circuit's …
Digital Sound Sampling And A Federal Right Of Publicity: Is It Live Or Is It Macintosh?, 10 Computer L.J. 365 (1990), Tamara J. Byram
Digital Sound Sampling And A Federal Right Of Publicity: Is It Live Or Is It Macintosh?, 10 Computer L.J. 365 (1990), Tamara J. Byram
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
State Art And Artifacts Indemnity: A Solution Without A Problem, Nan Morris
State Art And Artifacts Indemnity: A Solution Without A Problem, Nan Morris
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Prices for art works have risen enormously in recent years. For a museum to bring a major exhibition to the public often depends on the costs involved in insuring it. The Federal Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act provides some relief from these expenses. Additionally, three states, Florida, Iowa, and Texas, have enacted similar statutes to aid their museums in hosting exhibitions not covered by the federal act. Do these state statutes really fill a need, and, if so, why do so few museums seem interested in them? The author concludes that state indemnity will help exhibitors and that disinterest on …
Personal Reflections On Art Law, Jessica L. Darraby
Personal Reflections On Art Law, Jessica L. Darraby
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
No abstract provided.
Children Watching Television Advertising: What's Wrong With This Picture, Peter Hallifax
Children Watching Television Advertising: What's Wrong With This Picture, Peter Hallifax
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In 1983 the FCC abandoned its role as regulator of children's television advertising. Since then, Congress has been trying, so far without success, to enact legislation compelling the FCC to resume its former role. This Note reviews the history of children's television advertising regulation, examines the need for such rules, and concludes that the type of rules contemplated by Congress presume that television advertising directed at children is inherently deceptive. The Note concludes that this presumption is unwarranted, and that the issue should be fully. explored before laws which restrict children's viewing choices are enacted.
California Lawyers For The Arts, Alma Robinson
California Lawyers For The Arts, Alma Robinson
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
No abstract provided.
Emma Bovary, Nathan Marx And The Writer's Art, Vivian Deborah Wilson
Emma Bovary, Nathan Marx And The Writer's Art, Vivian Deborah Wilson
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In this Essay, the author addresses censorship by examining public reaction to two literary works: Flaubert's Madame Bovary and Roth's Defender of the Faith. She presents the dangers of silencing writers to prevent readers from finding in these writings "confirmation for their own fully-developed intolerance, bigotry, hatred and violence."
Functionality Doctrine In Trade Dress And Copyright Infringement Actions: A Call For Clarification, Beth F. Dumas
Functionality Doctrine In Trade Dress And Copyright Infringement Actions: A Call For Clarification, Beth F. Dumas
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The design features of a useful article will not qualify for either copyright or trade dress protection if they are considered functional. The functionality doctrine is an elusive one; in the trade dress arena, courts have experienced considerable difficulty in setting forth functionality tests clearly. The author synthesizes several functionality standards from recent case law and discusses the merits of each. This Note suggests that in trade dress cases courts should distinguish between mechanical and non-mechanical products and apply different tests to each.
Welcome To The Nineties, Bindrim V. Mitchell: Now Drop Dead, Robert Asa Crook
Welcome To The Nineties, Bindrim V. Mitchell: Now Drop Dead, Robert Asa Crook
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Ten years ago Bindrim v. Mitchell roared like a lion, extending an author's potential to defame through fiction. Today, it appears that the lion may be a mouse. Courts are generally applying a higher degree of scrutiny in an effort to curb the "chilling effect" Bindrim could potentially wreak upon the artistic community. Artists and agents, however, should be wary of certain types of fiction which have no standardized protection. This Note suggests a standard which could protect all authors from nuisance suits brought by readers who assert that the fictional work is "of and concerning" them.
Doctors Can Just Say No: The Constitutionality Of Consumer-Directed Advertising Of Prescription Drugs, Michelle D. Ehrlich
Doctors Can Just Say No: The Constitutionality Of Consumer-Directed Advertising Of Prescription Drugs, Michelle D. Ehrlich
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Advertising prescription drugs directly to consumers is a recent phenomenon and has sparked much ethical debate on how best to protect the interest of consumer/patients, physicians, and manufacturers. This Note examines the current statutory and regulatory provisions governing prescription drug advertising and their application, and concentrates on whether consumer-directed prescription drug advertising is constitutionally protected speech.
When A Promise Is Not A Promise: The Legal Consequences For Journalists Who Break Promises Of Confidentiality To Sources, Kathryn M. Kase
When A Promise Is Not A Promise: The Legal Consequences For Journalists Who Break Promises Of Confidentiality To Sources, Kathryn M. Kase
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
According to both a trial court and an appeals court in Minnesota, a newspaper breached a contract when it identified a source to whom its reporter promised confidentiality. While American journalists are increasingly identifying confidential sources, imposing contract law is an inadequate remedy because it does not consider journalistic factors such as the story's news value. This Note argues that American courts should adopt the British cause of action for breach of confidence, which balances the source's need for confidentiality against the public's need to know.
The University Of California Hate Speech Policy: A Good Heart In Ill-Fitting Garb, Jens B. Koepke
The University Of California Hate Speech Policy: A Good Heart In Ill-Fitting Garb, Jens B. Koepke
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
A rising tide of racism and hate speech is rushing over American university and college campuses. Minority students are alienated and harmed by racist attacks inside and outside the classroom setting. The University of California has addressed the problem of hate speech by developing regulations barring students from using such speech on school grounds. This Note argues that the University of California policy sweeps too broadly and that its application of the "fighting words" doctrine is inappropriate in this context. The Note suggests an alternative policy recognizing the importance of protecting hate speech victims and legitimate speech.
My Life, My Story, Right - Fashioning Life Story Rights In The Motion Picture Industry, Michelle E. Lentzner
My Life, My Story, Right - Fashioning Life Story Rights In The Motion Picture Industry, Michelle E. Lentzner
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
In 1956, Twentieth Century-Fox contracted with Christine Costner Sizemore for rights to her life story. At the time, Sizemore was suffering from a multiple personality disorder, which the resulting movie The Three Faces of Eve dramatized. Sizemore has since recovered. In 1989, she tried to sell option rights for a movie based on her third biography. Twentieth Century-Fox sought an injunction, claiming it exclusively owned the movie rights to her life story. The author explores the parameters necessary for drafting life story contracts, as well as the recourse available to a subject whose life story is appropriated for a movie …
Judicial Discretion And The First Amendment: Extending The Holding Beyond The Facts Through Contiguous Decision-Making, Richard E. Labunski
Judicial Discretion And The First Amendment: Extending The Holding Beyond The Facts Through Contiguous Decision-Making, Richard E. Labunski
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
A revered principle of American law is that courts will extend the holding of a case only as far as the facts require. In first amendment cases, the application of this principle often means that freedom of speech and press issues remain unresolved for years while courts come to widely varying conclusions about how the first amendment is to be interpreted. This Article proposes that courts be allowed to extend the holding of certain cases beyond the facts through "contiguous decision-making." Such additional authority is necessary to preserve the special status of the first amendment and will not greatly enlarge …
Proposed Prior Art Legislation For Computer Program Patent Applications: Creating A Potential For Coexisting Patents, Reed R. Heimbecher
Proposed Prior Art Legislation For Computer Program Patent Applications: Creating A Potential For Coexisting Patents, Reed R. Heimbecher
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Although both copyright and patent law can be used to protect computer programs, this Note suggests that sui generis protection should be established for software. The author provides background information, including a description of various computer related terms, a discussion of the patentability of algorithms, and a discussion of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Diamond v. Diehr. This Note then proposes that pending software patents, even if eventually granted, should not constitute prior art for computer program patents.
What Is Art - Toward A Legal Definition, Leonard D. Duboff
What Is Art - Toward A Legal Definition, Leonard D. Duboff
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
A great number of unresolved issues arise in the relatively new field of art law. The author considers several areas of the law, including copyright, customs, state and federal moral and economic rights statutes, and state consignment statutes in order to develop a legal definition of "art." This Article concludes that this definition depends on who does the defining; however, common threads exist. Some sort of originality on the part of the work is required. Additionally, legislators faced with defining art are consistently concerned with the scope of the definition. The author believes a definition that attempts to include more …
Art Of The State: Congressional Censorship Of The National Endowment For The Arts, Stephen F. Rohde
Art Of The State: Congressional Censorship Of The National Endowment For The Arts, Stephen F. Rohde
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
This Article explores the content restrictions imposed on the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities. It recalls the ambitious goals set for the NEA and NEH in 1965. Next, it traces the 1989-1990 legislative battles to ban federal funding for "obscene" and "indecent" art. Finally, the author concludes that the congressionally-imposed content restrictions are unconstitutional in that they abridge the first amendment, enact a system of prior restraint, violate the prohibition on bills of attainder, and establish vague and uncertain standards imperiling protected speech.
Some Constitutional Implications Of Denying Nea Subsidies To Arts Projects Under The Yates Compromise, Karen Faaborg
Some Constitutional Implications Of Denying Nea Subsidies To Arts Projects Under The Yates Compromise, Karen Faaborg
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
The 1989 funding legislation for the National Endowment for the Arts is constitutiQnally infirm for at least two reasons. First, it politicizes the grant-making process by inserting a government official as censor. Second, it allows subject matter discrimination to occur without the strict scrutiny safeguards designed to avoid illicit prior restraints and the chilling of first amendment rights. Passed as a form of compromise between two warring factions-the Jesse Helms set who would severely restrict NEA funding and the freedom-of-speech set who would impose no restrictions whatsoever-the so-called Yates compromise would nonetheless find a friendly audience at the Supreme Court …